Background: The tibiofibular syndesmosis is essential for preserving the stability of the ankle. Acute syndesmotic injuries with evident or latent instability usually warrant surgical interventions. This cadaveric study examines and compares biomechanical characteristics between the following treatments for syndesmosis injuries: suture-button fixation plus syndesmotic repair and screw fixation. Methods: The lower extremities of 10 cadavers disarticulated at the knee joints were used, yielding 20 feet. Ten feet underwent surgery using the suture-button fixation with syndesmotic repair, while the remaining 10 feet underwent surgery using screw fixation. Before surgical treatment of syndesmosis injuries, each cadaveric lower limb underwent preliminary physiological cyclic loading, which was followed by a series of postfixation cyclic loading tests after the surgical procedure. Results: Our principal finding is that suture-button fixation with syndesmotic repair provided torsional strength comparable to that of screw fixation. The mean failure torque did not differ between the 2 groups, but the rotational stiffness was significantly lower in the suture-button fixation/augmentation group. Conclusions Suture-button fixation/augmentation facilitates flexible (physiological) syndesmosis movement and may be a useful alternative treatment for ankle syndesmosis injury.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to confirm the effect of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injections (TRIAM) to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma.Subjects and Method We reviewed and documented the medical charts of 20 patients who were administered with TRIAM to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma from January 2018 to June 2019 were. The surface area of the granulomatous tissue was measured using Image J. The differences between the area of the granulomatous tissue after conventional treatment and after TRIAM on the same patient were compared. Results: A total of 20 patients consisting of 12 males and 8 females were included, with the patients’ average age being 60.0±14.3 years. The initial surface area of granulation tissue was 1.266±0.449 cm2, and 1.243±0.432 cm2 after conventional treatment, showing no statistically significant difference in the tissue area (p=0.143). The pre-injection surface area of granulation tissue was 1.243±0.432 cm2, and the area on the 7th day after the third injection was 0.477±0.217 cm2, showing a significant difference (p<0.001). Conclusion Compared to the conventional treatment, the surface area of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma significantly decreased after being treating with TRIAM. This finding suggests the effectiveness of TRIAM as a treatment of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma without complications such as bleeding.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to confirm the effect of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injections (TRIAM) to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma.Subjects and Method We reviewed and documented the medical charts of 20 patients who were administered with TRIAM to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma from January 2018 to June 2019 were. The surface area of the granulomatous tissue was measured using Image J. The differences between the area of the granulomatous tissue after conventional treatment and after TRIAM on the same patient were compared. Results: A total of 20 patients consisting of 12 males and 8 females were included, with the patients’ average age being 60.0±14.3 years. The initial surface area of granulation tissue was 1.266±0.449 cm2, and 1.243±0.432 cm2 after conventional treatment, showing no statistically significant difference in the tissue area (p=0.143). The pre-injection surface area of granulation tissue was 1.243±0.432 cm2, and the area on the 7th day after the third injection was 0.477±0.217 cm2, showing a significant difference (p<0.001). Conclusion Compared to the conventional treatment, the surface area of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma significantly decreased after being treating with TRIAM. This finding suggests the effectiveness of TRIAM as a treatment of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma without complications such as bleeding.

Purpose: Finasteride and dutasteride are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and reduce the risk of developing prostate cancer. Finasteride blocks only the type 2 form of 5-alpha-reductase, whereas dutasteride blocks both type 1 and 2 forms of the enzyme. Previous studies suggest the possibility that dutasteride may be superior to finasteride in preventing prostate cancer. We directly compared the effects of finasteride and dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer in patients with BPH using a pooled analysis of 15 real-world databases. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cohort study of new-users of finasteride and dutasteride. We include patients who were prescribed 5 mg finasteride or dutasteride for the first time to treat BPH and had at least 180 days of prescription. We excluded patients with a history of prostate cancer or a prostate-specific antigen level ≥ 4 ng/mL before the study drug prescription. Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the hazard ratio (HR) for prostate cancer after propensity score (PS) matching. Results: A total of 8,284 patients of new-users of finasteride and 8,670 patients of new-users of dutasteride were included across the 15 databases. In the overall population, compared to dutasteride, finasteride was associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer in both on-treatment and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods. After 1:1 PS matching, 4,897 patients using finasteride and 4,897 patients using dutasteride were enrolled in the present study. No significant differences were observed for risk of prostate cancer between finasteride and dutasteride both on-treatment (HR=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–1.00; p=0.051) and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods (HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.67–1.14; p=0.310). Conclusions Using real-world databases, the present study demonstrated that dutasteride was not associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer than finasteride in patients with BPH.

Background: The development of frailty at hospital discharge affects the clinical outcomes in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors who had no frailty before hospitalization. We aimed to describe the prevalence of new frailty using the clinical frailty scale (CFS) and evaluate its associated factors in patients with severe COVID-19 without pre-existing frailty before hospitalization. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of clinical data from a nationwide retrospective cohort collected from 22 hospitals between January 1, 2020 and August 31, 2021. The patients were at least 19 years old and survived until discharge after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) because of severe COVID-19. Development of new frailty was defined as a CFS score ≥5 at hospital discharge. Results: Among 669 severe COVID-19 survivors without pre-existing frailty admitted to the ICU, the mean age was 65.2±12.8 years, 62.5% were male, and 50.2% received mechanical ventilation (MV). The mean CFS score at admission was 2.4±0.9, and new frailty developed in 27.8% (186/483). In multivariate analysis, older age, cardiovascular disease, CFS score of 3–4 before hospitalization, increased C-reactive protein level, longer duration of corticosteroid treatment, and use of MV and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were identified as factors associated with new-onset frailty. Conclusion Our study suggests that new frailty is not uncommon and is associated with diverse factors in survivors of severe COVID-19 without pre-existing frailty.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to confirm the effect of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injections (TRIAM) to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma.Subjects and Method We reviewed and documented the medical charts of 20 patients who were administered with TRIAM to treat granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma from January 2018 to June 2019 were. The surface area of the granulomatous tissue was measured using Image J. The differences between the area of the granulomatous tissue after conventional treatment and after TRIAM on the same patient were compared. Results: A total of 20 patients consisting of 12 males and 8 females were included, with the patients’ average age being 60.0±14.3 years. The initial surface area of granulation tissue was 1.266±0.449 cm2, and 1.243±0.432 cm2 after conventional treatment, showing no statistically significant difference in the tissue area (p=0.143). The pre-injection surface area of granulation tissue was 1.243±0.432 cm2, and the area on the 7th day after the third injection was 0.477±0.217 cm2, showing a significant difference (p<0.001). Conclusion Compared to the conventional treatment, the surface area of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma significantly decreased after being treating with TRIAM. This finding suggests the effectiveness of TRIAM as a treatment of granulomatous tissue surrounding the tracheostomy stoma without complications such as bleeding.

Purpose: Finasteride and dutasteride are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and reduce the risk of developing prostate cancer. Finasteride blocks only the type 2 form of 5-alpha-reductase, whereas dutasteride blocks both type 1 and 2 forms of the enzyme. Previous studies suggest the possibility that dutasteride may be superior to finasteride in preventing prostate cancer. We directly compared the effects of finasteride and dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer in patients with BPH using a pooled analysis of 15 real-world databases. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cohort study of new-users of finasteride and dutasteride. We include patients who were prescribed 5 mg finasteride or dutasteride for the first time to treat BPH and had at least 180 days of prescription. We excluded patients with a history of prostate cancer or a prostate-specific antigen level ≥ 4 ng/mL before the study drug prescription. Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the hazard ratio (HR) for prostate cancer after propensity score (PS) matching. Results: A total of 8,284 patients of new-users of finasteride and 8,670 patients of new-users of dutasteride were included across the 15 databases. In the overall population, compared to dutasteride, finasteride was associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer in both on-treatment and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods. After 1:1 PS matching, 4,897 patients using finasteride and 4,897 patients using dutasteride were enrolled in the present study. No significant differences were observed for risk of prostate cancer between finasteride and dutasteride both on-treatment (HR=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–1.00; p=0.051) and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods (HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.67–1.14; p=0.310). Conclusions Using real-world databases, the present study demonstrated that dutasteride was not associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer than finasteride in patients with BPH.