Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background: Laser procedures are integral to dermatologic practice, yet safety measures- particularly regarding ocular protection and plume control- are poorly studied in real-world settings. Objective: To evaluate current practices in eye protection, infection control, and occupational risk awareness among Korean dermatologists performing laser treatments. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among board-certified dermatologists at the 2024 Korean Society for Dermatologic Laser Surgery meeting. The questionnaire covered demographics, laser frequency, use of goggles and masks, infection control strategies, ophthalmologic monitoring, and history of warts or cancer. Results: Seventy-nine respondents completed the survey. All reported using protective goggles, but only 26.6% and 22.8% did so for CO 2 and erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet lasers, respectively. Only 24.1% underwent regular eye exams, and 13.9% reported eye conditions after starting laser practice. While 89.9% used masks, 40.8% used dental masks, which are inadequate for plume protection. Suction devices were used by 94.9%, though performance specifications were unclear. Warts were reported by 46.8% of respondents; two reported cancer diagnoses after initiating laser work. Conclusion Despite high overall adherence to basic safety practices, critical gaps remain. Our findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and long-term occupational health monitoring to ensure safe laser practice.

Background: A novel botulinum toxin type A (Protoxin; Protox Inc.) has been developed. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the newly developed Protoxin compared to the approved drug onabotulinumtoxinA (OBoNT) in moderate to severe glabellar lines. Methods: Adults with a glabellar line Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) score of 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) were enrolled in the study. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Protoxin or OBoNT. A total of 20 units of botulinum toxin was injected at five sites in the glabellar region (4 units at each site). FWS scores were assessed at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 post-injection. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects at week 4 who had a reduction of 2 or more points in FWS and a final score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild). Results: A total of 274 subjects were randomized, of whom 78.1% were female. At week 4 post-treatment, the improvement rate of glabellar lines was 62.22% in the Protoxin group and 62.96% in the OBoNT group. The lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (−12.24%) exceeded the −15% margin, confirming the non-inferiority of the new drug. Safety profiles were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion Protoxin demonstrated efficacy and safety profiles comparable to those of OBoNT in the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines.

Background: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by erythema, papules, ocular symptoms, and heightened sensitivity. Patients with neurogenic symptoms such as burning or stinging remain particularly difficult to manage. Current guidelines often underrepresent energy-based devices (EBDs), pigmentary sequelae, psychosocial burden, and ocular comorbidities. Objective: To examine Korean dermatologists’ expert perspectives on rosacea management, focusing on skin sensitivity, neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary changes, psychosocial impact, ocular involvement, and EBD use. Methods: A web-based, 29-item survey was administered to 25 board-certified Korean dermatologists (May–June 2025). Quantitative and qualitative responses were analyzed. Results: Erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular phenotypes with sensitivity skin predominated. EBDs (pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light) were frequently used but limited by cost and sensitivity issues. Neurogenic symptoms were recognized but rarely treated with neuromodulators. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was infrequent, yet monitoring was inconsistent.Psychosocial and ocular aspects were acknowledged but seldomly systematically addressed.Respondents expressed interest in emerging adjunctive treatments such as cold plasma, skin boosters, and holistic care approaches. Conclusion Korean dermatologists adopt individualized strategies for rosacea, yet practice gaps remain regarding neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary complications, and psychosocial and ocular comorbidities. Findings support the need for updated multidisciplinary, phenotype-driven guidelines aligned with real-world practice.

In patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), the risk of incidental durotomy (ID) during anterior cervical spine surgery is relatively high. However, the anterior surgical approach is technically demanding because of limited visualization and restricted operative space, which makes direct dural repair difficult. As a result, indirect repair techniques are typically employed, but these approaches can pose significant postoperative management challenges, particularly in cases of symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. A 68-year-old male patient presented with right-sided symptoms involving both the upper and lower extremities. Radiological evaluation revealed C3–4–5 anterolisthesis, OPLL at the C4–5 level, and bilateral foraminal stenosis at C3–4 and C4–5. During anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), an ID occurred at the anterior aspect of the C4–5 segment and was managed with primary indirect repair. Approximately 2 weeks postoperatively, the patient developed symptomatic CSF leakage. Under fluoroscopic guidance, a needle was precisely positioned adjacent to the interbody cage at the anterior aspect of the C4–5 segment—the site of the durotomy—to administer a targeted anterior epidural blood patch (EBP). The procedure was completed successfully without complications and resulted in effective resolution of the CSF leak. ID at the anterior aspect of the spinal canal during ACDF may lead to persistent symptoms due to CSF leakage. In such cases, a minimally invasive strategy, such as a targeted anterior EBP performed under fluoroscopic guidance, may represent an effective alternative to surgical re-exploration for symptom resolution.

Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is widely performed as a full-endoscopic surgical procedure for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis. The technique involves the use of a small-caliber endoscopic system introduced through Kambin triangle to accomplish the primary surgical steps. However, anatomical barriers are frequently encountered in the lower lumbar segments, particularly at L4–5 and L5–S1, which may limit the feasibility of the transforaminal approach. Although various advanced transforaminal techniques have been developed to overcome these anatomical barriers, these techniques often make the procedure more technically demanding and may prolong operative time. In this video presentation, we report 2 cases in which a full-endoscopic paraspinal lumbar foraminotomy was performed to achieve adequate decompression of the exiting nerve root (ENR) without being constrained by these anatomical limitations. We also outline the procedural details and technical characteristics of this approach. Both patients presented with lumbar foraminal stenosis at the L5–S1 level, where anatomical barriers such as a high iliac crest, large transverse process, and sacral ala were present. A full-endoscopic paraspinal foraminotomy was performed at this level using a large-caliber endoscopic system, allowing sufficient decompression of the ENR and resulting in marked relief of radicular leg pain. We report a surgical procedure for full-endoscopic paraspinal lumbar foraminotomy using a large-caliber endoscopic system that permits the use of instruments of various sizes and configurations. When applied in appropriate clinical scenarios, this technique may facilitate more convenient and expedited decompression of the ENR.

Objective: Partial resection of the superior articular process (SAP) is commonly performed during transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS). The present study evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of total SAP resection using the selective superior articular process resection (SSAPR) technique, in comparison with conventional TELF. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 79 patients with symptomatic LFS who were treated using TELF (52 segments) or SSAPR (34 segments) between March 2018 and September 2022. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and MacNab criteria. Vertebral slippage was measured to assess segmental stability, and postoperative complications were systematically analyzed. Results: The study cohort consisted of 79 patients (39 men and 40 women; mean age, 61.9±14.2 years) who were followed for a mean duration of 14.5±2.2 months. At the final follow-up, no significant differences were identified between the TELF and SSAPR groups in VAS or ODI scores (p=0.603 and p=0.776, respectively). Vertebral slippage increased significantly in the TELF group, from 5.49±3.64 mm to 8.75±6.78 mm (p=0.019), whereas only minimal changes were observed in the SSAPR group, from 3.67±3.57 mm to 3.86±3.17 mm (p=0.858). Grade 2 dysesthesia occurred in 12.8% of TELF cases but was not observed in the SSAPR group (p=0.07). Conclusion The SSAPR technique provides effective foraminal decompression with improved surgical efficiency and a lower risk of postoperative nerve irritation, while maintaining segmental stability. These findings support the clinical utility of total SAP resection as a safe and viable alternative to conventional partial SAP resection for the treatment of LFS.

Background: A systematic evaluation of potential living liver donors is essential to ensure donor safety and optimize recipient outcomes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study aimed to assess donor acceptance rates and reasons for disqualification among individuals evaluated for LDLT at a high-volume transplant center over a one-year period. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1,087 potential living liver donors who presented for LDLT evaluation in 2023. Of these, 991 candidates advanced beyond the initial screening (Stage 1) and underwent comprehensive clinical, imaging, and pathological assessments (Stages 2 and 3). Candidates who discontinued after Stage 1 were excluded due to the absence of documented reasons for non-progression. Results: Among the 991 candidates who proceeded beyond initial screening, 473 (47.7%) completed the full donor evaluation, of whom 466 were judged to be suitable donors. Among suitable donors, 384 (82.4%) proceeded to donor hepatectomy, whereas 82 did not, primarily due to recipient-related factors such as clinical deterioration or withdrawal of consent. Donor ineligibility was determined in 422 candidates (42.6%), most commonly due to inadequate remnant liver volume (52.8%), hepatic steatosis (20.6%), and insufficient graft size (10.2%). Among candidates undergoing Stage 2 evaluation, 162 (16.3%) failed to meet steatosis criteria; 126 were excluded solely for steatosis and advised weight reduction, and 39 subsequently became eligible and successfully donated. Conclusion In this high-volume LDLT center, donor disqualification was primarily driven by remnant liver volume and hepatic steatosis. Targeted interventions such as weight reduction enabled successful donation in a subset of initially ineligible candidates, underscoring the importance of individualized donor evaluation and pre-donation optimization.

Objectives: This study investigated whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected quality of life (QOL) and whether its impact differed between individuals with and without suicidal ideation. Methods: A secondary analysis was performed using community-based cross-sectional survey data collected in Daegu, Republic of Korea, in 2018 (pre-pandemic phase), 2020 (pandemic phase), and 2022 (post-peak phase). Participants aged 18 years or older were recruited through stratified random sampling. Suicidal ideation over the past year was assessed using a single “yeso” question. QOL was measured using the Korean version of the abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment, comprising physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains. A multivariate analysis of covariance was conducted to examine the main and interaction effects of suicidal ideation and the COVID-19 phase, adjusting for age, education, marital status, and income. Results: Suicidal ideation was significantly associated with lower QOL in all domains (p<0.001). QOL declined significantly during the pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic phase, especially in the physical, psychological, and social domains. A significant interaction between suicidal ideation and the COVID-19 phase was observed for physical health (p=0.03), driven by a decline in physical QOL among those without suicidal ideation during the pandemic. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted multiple domains of QOL, with differing patterns depending on suicidal ideation status. Continuous and adaptive mental health strategies developed according to individuals’ suicidality are needed during and beyond public health crises to mitigate pandemic-related declines in QOL.