INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adjunct systemic corticosteroid therapy in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHOD: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from the databases' inception to February 2024. All RCTs evaluating the effect of systemic corticosteroids on mortality, compared to standard of care among adult bacterial CAP patients admitted to ICU were included. Bayesian meta-analysis was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Independent authors reviewed each study for eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias in duplicate, with discrepancies referred to senior reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 6 RCTs comprising 1585 patients were included for analysis. In ICU patients with severe CAP who were treated with corticosteroids, there was no significant reduction in hospital mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-1.14, certainty of evidence: ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low) or all-cause mortality (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.34-1.22, ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low) compared with placebo. The use of corticosteroids showed a significant reduction in mechanical ventilation post-intervention (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.86, ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high) compared with placebo. In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with hydrocortisone, hospital mortality was significantly reduced (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.88, ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low) compared with placebo. There was no significant increase in gastrointestinal bleeding, secondary infections or hyperglycaemia in patients treated with corticosteroids. CONCLUSION Corticosteroids significantly reduced mechanical ventilation requirements, and hydrocor-tisone significantly reduced hospital mortality. Further work is required to determine whether other corticosteroids reduce mortality among ICU patients with CAP.
Humans ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use* ; Bayes Theorem ; Community-Acquired Infections/mortality* ; Critical Illness ; Hospital Mortality ; Intensive Care Units ; Pneumonia, Bacterial/mortality* ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Respiration, Artificial

Humans ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects*

INTRODUCTION: Hospital-at-home programmes are well described in the literature but not in Asia. We describe a home-based inpatient substitutive care programme in Singapore, with clinical and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a hospital-at-home programme from September 2020 to September 2021. Suitable patients, who otherwise required hospitalisation, were admitted to the programme. They were from inpatient wards, emergency department and community nursing teams in the western part of Singapore, where a multidisciplinary team provided hospital-level care at home. Electronic health record data were extracted from all patients admitted to the programme. Patient satisfaction surveys were conducted post-discharge. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients enrolled. Mean age was 67.9 (standard deviation 16.7) years, and 46% were male. The main diagnoses were skin and soft tissue infections (35%), urinary tract infections (29%) and fluid overload (18%). Median length of stay was 4 (interquartile range 3-7) days. Seven patients were escalated back to the hospital, of whom 2 died after escalation. One patient died at home. There was 1 case of adverse drug reaction and 1 fall at home, and no cases of hospital-acquired infections. Patient satisfaction rates were high and 94% of contactable patients would choose to participate again. CONCLUSION Hospital-at-home programmes appear to be safe and feasible alternatives to inpatient care in Singapore. Further studies are warranted to compare clinical outcomes and cost to conventional inpatient care.
Aftercare ; Aged ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Patient Discharge ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore