Spontaneous rupture with internal bleeding of solid tumors has rarely been described at the time of diagnosis or during chemotherapy. This rare event must be regarded as a life threatening condition. In these emergency situations, control of hemorrhage, which is life-saving, can be achieved by transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) and/or surgical resection. This report describes two infants presenting with acute hemorrhagic shock due to spontaneous tumor rupture of hepatoblastoma and neuroblastoma during chemotherapy. TAE successfully arrested the tumor bleeding and a visibly reduced the tumor size in both children. Spontaneous rupture of solid tumors occur infrequently in children, but is a life threatening situation. Careful monitoring for the occurrence of this rare event especially in very young children presenting with a large tumor mass.
Child ; Diagnosis ; Drug Therapy ; Emergencies ; Hemorrhage ; Hepatoblastoma ; Humans ; Infant ; Neuroblastoma ; Rupture ; Rupture, Spontaneous ; Shock, Hemorrhagic

Paclitaxel, a chemotherapeutic drug, induces severe peripheral neuropathy. Gabapentin (GBT) is a first line agent used to treat neuropathic pain, and its effect is mediated by spinal noradrenergic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Electro-acupuncture (EA) is used for treating various types of pain via its action through spinal opioidergic and noradrenergic receptors. Here, we investigated whether combined treatment of these two agents could exert a synergistic effect on paclitaxel-induced cold and mechanical allodynia, which were assessed by the acetone drop test and von Frey filament assay, respectively. Significant signs of allodynia were observed after four paclitaxel injections (a cumulative dose of 8 mg/kg, i.p.). GBT (3, 30, and 100 mg/kg, i.p.) or EA (ST36, Zusanli) alone produced dose-dependent anti-allodynic effects. The medium and highest doses of GBT (30 and 100 mg/kg) provided a strong analgesic effect, but they induced motor dysfunction in Rota-rod tests. On the contrary, the lowest dose of GBT (3 mg/kg) did not induce motor weakness, but it provided a brief analgesic effect. The combination of the lowest dose of GBT and EA resulted in a greater and longer effect, without inducing motor dysfunction. This effect on mechanical allodynia was blocked by spinal opioidergic (naloxone, 20 μg), or noradrenergic (idazoxan, 10 μg) receptor antagonist, whereas on cold allodynia, only opioidergic receptor antagonist blocked the effect. In conclusion, the combination of the lowest dose of GBT and EA has a robust and enduring analgesic action against paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain, and it should be considered as an alternative treatment method.
Acetone ; Hyperalgesia ; Methods ; Neuralgia* ; Paclitaxel ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases ; Receptors, Cholinergic

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the clinical outcomes of 'on-label' and 'off-label' drug-eluting stents (DESs) over a 5-year follow-up period. METHODS: A total of 929 patients that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with DESs were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to on-label (n = 449) and off-label (n = 480) indications. Off-label use was defined as implantation of DESs for acute myocardial infarction (MI), very small vessel, a long stenotic lesion, chronic total occlusion, a bifurcation lesion, an ostial lesion, left main coronary artery disease, multivessel disease, a saphenous vein graft lesion, and a lesion with thrombus. Endpoints were composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), which included all-cause death, ischemic-driven target vessel revascularization (Id-TVR), MI, and stent thrombosis (ST). Clinical outcomes in the two groups were compared for up to 5 years postimplantation. RESULTS: At 1 year postimplantation, the off-label group had higher incidences of total MACEs (8.2% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.005), Id-TVR (5.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.004), and ST (1.7% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.042), and at 5 years postimplantation, the off-label group continued to have higher incidences of total MACEs (17.5% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001), Id-TVR (13.1% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.024), and ST (2.1% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.021). Multivessel disease and diabetes were found to be independent risk factors of MACE in patients with an off-label indication. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with an on-label DES had better long-term clinical outcomes than those treated with an off-label DES.
Coronary Artery Disease ; Drug-Eluting Stents* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Incidence ; Myocardial Infarction ; Off-Label Use* ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Risk Factors ; Saphenous Vein ; Stents ; Thrombosis ; Transplants

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We compared the efficacy and safety of valsartan and rosuvastatin combination therapy with each treatment alone in hypercholesterolemic hypertensive patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients who met inclusion criteria were randomized to receive 1 of the following 2-month drug regimens: valsartan 160 mg plus rosuvastatin 20 mg, valsartan 160 mg plus placebo, or rosuvastatin 20 mg plus placebo. The primary efficacy variables were change in sitting diastolic blood pressure (sitDBP) and sitting systolic blood pressure (sitSBP), and percentage change in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) in the combination, valsartan, and rosuvastatin groups. Adverse events (AEs) during the study were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 354 patients were screened and 123 of them were finally randomized. Changes of sitDBP by least squares mean (LSM) were -11.1, -7.2, and -3.6 mm Hg, respectively, and was greater in the combination, as compared to both valsartan (p=0.02) and rosuvastatin (p<0.001). Changes of sitSBP by LSM were -13.2, -10.8, and -4.9 mm Hg, and was greater in the combination, as compared to rosuvastatin (p=0.006) and not valsartan (p=0.42). Percentage changes of LDL-C by LSM were -52, -4, and -47% in each group, and was greater in the combination, as compared to valsartan (p<0.001), similar to rosuvastatin (p=0.16). Most AEs were mild and resolved by the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Combination treatment with valsartan and rosuvastatin exhibited an additive blood pressure-lowering effect with acceptable tolerability, as compared to valsartan monotherapy. Its lipid lowering effect was similar to rosuvatatin monotherapy.
Blood Pressure ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Least-Squares Analysis ; Rosuvastatin Calcium ; Valsartan

In this article, on page 230, Fig. 2A needs to be corrected.

We aimed comparing two-year clinical outcomes of the Everolimus-Eluting Promus and Paclitaxel-Eluting TAXUS Liberte stents used in routine clinical practice. Patients with objective evidence of ischemia and coronary artery disease eligible for PCI were prospectively randomized to everolimus-eluting stent (EES) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) groups. The primary end-point was ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2 yr after intervention, and the secondary end-point was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), such as death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), TVR or stent thrombosis. A total of 850 patients with 1,039 lesions was randomized to the EES (n=425) and PES (n=425) groups. Ischemic-driven TVR at 2 yr was 3.8% in the PES and 1.2% in the EES group (P for non-inferiority=0.021). MACE rates were significantly different; 5.6% in PES and 2.5% in EES (P = 0.027). Rates of MI (0.8% in PES vs 0.2% in EES, P = 0.308), all deaths (1.5% in PES vs 1.2% in EES, P = 0.739) and stent thrombosis (0.3% in PES vs 0.7% in EES, P = 0.325) were similar. The clinical outcomes of EES are superior to PES, mainly due to a reduction in the rate of ischemia-driven TVR.
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/administration & dosage/therapeutic use ; Coronary Artery Disease/*drug therapy/mortality ; Coronary Restenosis/prevention & control ; *Drug-Eluting Stents ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage/therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Paclitaxel/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/*methods ; Prospective Studies ; Sirolimus/administration & dosage/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use ; Thrombosis ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Taxus Liberte stent (Boston Scientific Co.) evolved from the Taxus Express stent, with enhanced stent deliverability and uniform drug delivery. This study was designed to compare angiographic and clinical outcomes in real-world practice between the Taxus Liberte and Taxus Express stents. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2008, 240 patients receiving the Taxus Liberte stent at three centers were registered and compared to historical control patients who had received the Taxus Express stent (n = 272). After propensity score matching, 173 patients treated with the Taxus Liberte stent and the same number of patients treated with the Taxus Express stent were selected. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemia driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year. An additional angiographic assessment was conducted at 9 to 12 months. RESULTS: The study showed no significant difference between the Taxus Express and Taxus Liberte stents (death, 1.73% vs. 2.31%, p = 1.000; MI, 0% vs. 1.73%, p = 0.2478; TVR, 2.31% vs. 1.16%, p = 0.6848; and ST, 0% vs. 1.16%, p = 0.4986). The total MACE rate at 1 year did not differ between the groups (4.05% in Taxus Express vs. 4.05% in Taxus Liberte, p = 1.000). In addition, the binary restenosis rate did not differ (2.25% in Taxus Express vs. 1.80% in Taxus Liberte, p = 0.6848). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world experience with the two Taxus stent designs, both stents showed similarly good clinical and angiographic outcomes at 1 year. A long-term follow-up study is warranted.
Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects/*instrumentation/mortality ; Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease/mortality/radiography/*therapy ; Coronary Restenosis/etiology/mortality ; Coronary Thrombosis/etiology/mortality ; *Drug-Eluting Stents ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction/etiology/mortality ; Paclitaxel/*administration & dosage ; Propensity Score ; Prosthesis Design ; Registries ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stainless Steel ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Impaired responsiveness to clopidogrel is common in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical application of a point-of-care assay to detect impaired responsiveness to clopidogrel after coronary stent implantation in patients with type 2 DM. METHODS: We measured P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) with the VerifyNow point-of-care assay in 544 consecutive patients undergoing dual or triple (i.e., dual plus cilostazol) anti-platelet therapy after coronary stent implantation. High platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as a PRU value > or = 240. RESULTS: The mean PRU values were 233.5 +/- 83.2 and 190.3 +/- 85.5 in patients undergoing dual or triple anti-platelet therapy, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with DM manifested higher post treatment PRU values (238.3 +/- 82.4 vs. 210.8 +/- 86.8, p = 0.001) and a higher frequency of HPR (44.8% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.003) as compared to patients without DM. We also found that higher PRU values and a higher frequency of HPR were present in patients with DM who were undergoing both triple and dual anti-platelet therapy. However, the higher post-treatment PRU values observed in patients with DM decreased with triple anti-platelet therapy (219.4 +/- 82.5 vs. 247.9 +/- 81.1, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: A point-of-care assay can detect elevated platelet reactivity and impaired responsiveness to clopidogrel in patients with type 2 DM. The addition of cilostazol to dual anti-platelet therapy may decrease post-treatment PRU values in patients with type 2 DM.
Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects/*instrumentation ; Aspirin/administration & dosage ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Coronary Disease/blood/*therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/*blood ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Platelet Activation/*drug effects ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; *Platelet Function Tests ; *Point-of-Care Systems ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Registries ; Republic of Korea ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; *Stents ; Tetrazoles/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Ticlopidine/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives ; Treatment Outcome

Limited data are available on the long-term clinical efficacy of drug-eluting stent (DES) in diffuse long lesions. From May 2006 to May 2007, a total of 335 consecutive patients (374 lesions) were underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of long DES (> or = 30 mm) in real world practice. Eight-month angiographic outcomes and 2-yr clinical outcomes were compared between SES (n = 218) and PES (n = 117). Study endpoints were major adverse cardiac events including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target-lesion revascularization, target-vessel revascularization and stent thrombosis. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups as were mean stent length (44.9 +/- 15.2 mm in SES and 47.4 +/- 15.9 in PES, P = 0.121). Late loss at 8 months follow-up was significantly lower in SES than in PES group (0.4 +/- 0.6 mm in SES vs 0.7 +/- 0.8 mm in PES, P = 0.007). Mean follow-up duration was 849 +/- 256 days, and 2-yr cumulative major adverse cardiac events were significantly lower in the SES than in the PES group (5.5% in SES vs 15.4% in PES, P = 0.003). In conclusion, long-term DES use in diffuse long coronary lesions is associated with favorable results, with SES being more effective and safer than PES in this real-world clinical experience.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease/*therapy ; *Drug-Eluting Stents/adverse effects ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Paclitaxel/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Sirolimus/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Plaque composition rather than degree of luminal narrowing may be predictive of future coronary events in high risk patients. The purpose of this study was to compare degree of plaque burden and composition with multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 452 consecutive MSCT angiography examinations were performed between July 2007 and June 2009. Of these, the patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography were evaluated for the presence and type of atherosclerotic plaque and severity of luminal narrowing. RESULTS: Ninety two (46 in the diabetic group and 46 in the non-diabetic group) patients underwent both MSCT angiography and invasive coronary angiography. Among them, 30 patients (65.2%) in the diabetic group and 26 patients (56.5%) in the non-diabetic group had significant coronary narrowing on MSCT angiography. Sixteen patients (34.8%) in the diabetic group and 15 patients (32.6%) in non-diabetic group underwent coronary angioplasty and stenting. Forty-two patients (93.3%) in the diabetic group and 39 patients (88.6%) in the non-diabetic group had multiple types of coronary plaque (p=0.485). MSCT angiography was similar to conventional coronary angiography in its ability to predict significant coronary artery disease in that the area under the curve was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 0.95). Diabetic patients had more mixed plaque compared with non-diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: Differences in coronary plaque composition between diabetic and non-diabetic patients can be determined noninvasively by MSCT angiography. In patients with diabetes, mixed plaque types contribute to the total plaque burden to a higher degree than in non-diabetic patients.
Angiography ; Angioplasty ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease ; Coronary Vessels ; Humans ; Multidetector Computed Tomography ; Phenobarbital ; Plaque, Atherosclerotic ; Stents