Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Objective:To explore the risk assessment and intervention effect of WeChat platform-based health management in high-risk populations for cardiovascular diseases (CVD).Methods:It was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 480 individuals at high risk of CVD who underwent physical examinations at the Health Management Center of Sichuan Provincial People′s Hospital from February to April in 2023 were selected using a simple random sampling method. The participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group (240 cases each) using a random number table. The control group received routine follow-up and health assessments, while the intervention group received an additional 12-month WeChat-based health management intervention. During the study, 28 participants were lost to follow-up, resulting in 227 participants in the intervention group and 225 in the control group being included in the final analysis. The 10-year CVD risk was assessed using the prediction for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in China (China-PAR) model, and psychological status was evaluated using the self-rating anxiety Scale (SAS) and the self-rating depression scale (SDS). Changes in health behaviors, adherence, life style, blood pressure, metabolic indicators, psychological status, and CVD risk were compared before and after the intervention in both groups to evaluate the intervention′s effectiveness.Results:Among the 452 high-risk participants analyzed, the intervention group included 227 individuals [mean age: (53.16±10.81) years; 117 males and 110 females], and the control group included 225 individuals [mean age: (52.60±10.25) years; 118 males and 107 females]. There was no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (all P>0.05). After 12 months of intervention, the intervention group showed significant improvements in medication adherence, intake of vegetables and fruits, exercise duration, sleep time, proportion of regular lifestyle, and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, all of which were all higher than both the baseline values and those in the control group (all P<0.05). Conversely, the intervention group showed reductions in medical visit rate, smoking and drinking rates, high-salt diet, meat intake, body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides, SAS and SDS scores when compared to the baseline values and those in the control group (all P<0.05). The proportions of participants with 10-year CVD risk levels of 10%-<20%, 20%-<30%, 30%-<40%, and ≥40% significantly decreased in the intervention group after intervention (18.94% vs 36.12%, 12.78% vs 26.43%, 7.93% vs 19.82%, 3.96% vs 17.63%), and were also significantly lower than those in the control group (18.94% vs 40.45%, 12.78% vs 30.67%, 7.93% vs 22.67%, 3.96% vs 16.89%) (all P<0.001). After 12 months, the intervention group showed significantly higher improvement rates in both medication adherence and non-medication-related compliance behaviors, including smoking, alcohol consumption, meat and salt intake, fruit and vegetable intake, exercise duration, sleep duration, and lifestyle regularity, when compared to those in the control group (16.74% vs -3.11%, 14.54% vs -0.89%, 16.74% vs -0.44%, 57.71% vs 8.44%, 21.15% vs -0.44%, 56.83% vs -6.67%, 51.54% vs -3.56%, 60.79% vs -7.11%, 26.87% vs -13.78%, 22.91% vs -1.78%) (all P<0.001). Conclusion:The WeChat platform-based health management intervention can effectively improve the behavioral patterns, compliance, control of CVD risk factors and psychological status of high-risk populations for CVD, and help reduce their 10-year risk of CVD.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Chronic stress triggers the imbalance of the homeostasis of the tumor immune microenvironment(TIME),which is a key factor driving the development of lung cancer.Based on the mapping relationship between the concept of"spirit"in traditional Chinese medicine and chronic stress,and between"qi"and"immunity",it is believed that the cross-linking mechanism of"chronic stress-TIME-lung cancer"aligns with the understanding of traditional Chinese medicine of disease as involving the interplay between the"body,qi and spirit".The disorganization of"spirit"and"qi"is not only the root of the change of the"form",but also the key to prevent and control it.The treatment principle of synergizing to improve the chronic stress of"regulating the spirit"and remodeling the TIME of"invigorating the qi"is further proposed,which emphasizes on grasping the core pathogenesis of lung cancer at each stage of its evolution in order to administer medicines,drawing on the clinical experience and pharmacological research results in order to accurately hit the target,and combining special therapies like acupuncture,Chinese kungfu,sound therapy to treat the change of"shape"by modulating neuro-endocrine-immune network homeostasis,so as to provide new ideas and accessible solutions for the comprehensive prevention and treatment system of lung cancer.

Chronic stress triggers the imbalance of the homeostasis of the tumor immune microenvironment(TIME),which is a key factor driving the development of lung cancer.Based on the mapping relationship between the concept of"spirit"in traditional Chinese medicine and chronic stress,and between"qi"and"immunity",it is believed that the cross-linking mechanism of"chronic stress-TIME-lung cancer"aligns with the understanding of traditional Chinese medicine of disease as involving the interplay between the"body,qi and spirit".The disorganization of"spirit"and"qi"is not only the root of the change of the"form",but also the key to prevent and control it.The treatment principle of synergizing to improve the chronic stress of"regulating the spirit"and remodeling the TIME of"invigorating the qi"is further proposed,which emphasizes on grasping the core pathogenesis of lung cancer at each stage of its evolution in order to administer medicines,drawing on the clinical experience and pharmacological research results in order to accurately hit the target,and combining special therapies like acupuncture,Chinese kungfu,sound therapy to treat the change of"shape"by modulating neuro-endocrine-immune network homeostasis,so as to provide new ideas and accessible solutions for the comprehensive prevention and treatment system of lung cancer.

Objective:To explore the risk assessment and intervention effect of WeChat platform-based health management in high-risk populations for cardiovascular diseases (CVD).Methods:It was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 480 individuals at high risk of CVD who underwent physical examinations at the Health Management Center of Sichuan Provincial People′s Hospital from February to April in 2023 were selected using a simple random sampling method. The participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group (240 cases each) using a random number table. The control group received routine follow-up and health assessments, while the intervention group received an additional 12-month WeChat-based health management intervention. During the study, 28 participants were lost to follow-up, resulting in 227 participants in the intervention group and 225 in the control group being included in the final analysis. The 10-year CVD risk was assessed using the prediction for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in China (China-PAR) model, and psychological status was evaluated using the self-rating anxiety Scale (SAS) and the self-rating depression scale (SDS). Changes in health behaviors, adherence, life style, blood pressure, metabolic indicators, psychological status, and CVD risk were compared before and after the intervention in both groups to evaluate the intervention′s effectiveness.Results:Among the 452 high-risk participants analyzed, the intervention group included 227 individuals [mean age: (53.16±10.81) years; 117 males and 110 females], and the control group included 225 individuals [mean age: (52.60±10.25) years; 118 males and 107 females]. There was no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (all P>0.05). After 12 months of intervention, the intervention group showed significant improvements in medication adherence, intake of vegetables and fruits, exercise duration, sleep time, proportion of regular lifestyle, and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, all of which were all higher than both the baseline values and those in the control group (all P<0.05). Conversely, the intervention group showed reductions in medical visit rate, smoking and drinking rates, high-salt diet, meat intake, body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides, SAS and SDS scores when compared to the baseline values and those in the control group (all P<0.05). The proportions of participants with 10-year CVD risk levels of 10%-<20%, 20%-<30%, 30%-<40%, and ≥40% significantly decreased in the intervention group after intervention (18.94% vs 36.12%, 12.78% vs 26.43%, 7.93% vs 19.82%, 3.96% vs 17.63%), and were also significantly lower than those in the control group (18.94% vs 40.45%, 12.78% vs 30.67%, 7.93% vs 22.67%, 3.96% vs 16.89%) (all P<0.001). After 12 months, the intervention group showed significantly higher improvement rates in both medication adherence and non-medication-related compliance behaviors, including smoking, alcohol consumption, meat and salt intake, fruit and vegetable intake, exercise duration, sleep duration, and lifestyle regularity, when compared to those in the control group (16.74% vs -3.11%, 14.54% vs -0.89%, 16.74% vs -0.44%, 57.71% vs 8.44%, 21.15% vs -0.44%, 56.83% vs -6.67%, 51.54% vs -3.56%, 60.79% vs -7.11%, 26.87% vs -13.78%, 22.91% vs -1.78%) (all P<0.001). Conclusion:The WeChat platform-based health management intervention can effectively improve the behavioral patterns, compliance, control of CVD risk factors and psychological status of high-risk populations for CVD, and help reduce their 10-year risk of CVD.

Background and Objectives: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. Results: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCAFFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479).Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). Conclusions The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months.

Background and Objectives: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. Results: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCAFFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479).Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). Conclusions The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months.