Background: s/Aims: While large-for-size syndrome is uncommon in liver transplantation (LT), it can result in fatal outcome. To prevent such fatality, we manufactured 3D-printed intra-abdominal cavity replicas to provide intuitive understanding of the sizes of the graft and the patient’s abdomen in patients with small body size between July 2020 and February 2022. Methods: Clinical outcomes were compared between patients using our 3D model during LT, and patients who underwent LT without 3D model by using 1 : 5 ratio propensity score-matched analysis. Results: After matching, a total of 20 patients using 3D-printed abdominal cavity model and 100 patients of the control group were included in this study. There were no significant differences in 30-day postoperative complication (50.0% vs. 64.0%, p = 0.356) and the incidence of large-for-size syndrome (0% vs. 7%, p = 0.599). Overall survival of the 3D-printed group was similar to that of the control group (p = 0.665), but graft survival was significantly superior in the 3D-printed group, compared to the control group (p = 0.034). Conclusions Since it showed better graft survival, as well as low cost and short production time, our 3D-printing protocol can be a feasible option for patients with small abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome after LT.

Background: s/Aims: While large-for-size syndrome is uncommon in liver transplantation (LT), it can result in fatal outcome. To prevent such fatality, we manufactured 3D-printed intra-abdominal cavity replicas to provide intuitive understanding of the sizes of the graft and the patient’s abdomen in patients with small body size between July 2020 and February 2022. Methods: Clinical outcomes were compared between patients using our 3D model during LT, and patients who underwent LT without 3D model by using 1 : 5 ratio propensity score-matched analysis. Results: After matching, a total of 20 patients using 3D-printed abdominal cavity model and 100 patients of the control group were included in this study. There were no significant differences in 30-day postoperative complication (50.0% vs. 64.0%, p = 0.356) and the incidence of large-for-size syndrome (0% vs. 7%, p = 0.599). Overall survival of the 3D-printed group was similar to that of the control group (p = 0.665), but graft survival was significantly superior in the 3D-printed group, compared to the control group (p = 0.034). Conclusions Since it showed better graft survival, as well as low cost and short production time, our 3D-printing protocol can be a feasible option for patients with small abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome after LT.

Background: s/Aims: While large-for-size syndrome is uncommon in liver transplantation (LT), it can result in fatal outcome. To prevent such fatality, we manufactured 3D-printed intra-abdominal cavity replicas to provide intuitive understanding of the sizes of the graft and the patient’s abdomen in patients with small body size between July 2020 and February 2022. Methods: Clinical outcomes were compared between patients using our 3D model during LT, and patients who underwent LT without 3D model by using 1 : 5 ratio propensity score-matched analysis. Results: After matching, a total of 20 patients using 3D-printed abdominal cavity model and 100 patients of the control group were included in this study. There were no significant differences in 30-day postoperative complication (50.0% vs. 64.0%, p = 0.356) and the incidence of large-for-size syndrome (0% vs. 7%, p = 0.599). Overall survival of the 3D-printed group was similar to that of the control group (p = 0.665), but graft survival was significantly superior in the 3D-printed group, compared to the control group (p = 0.034). Conclusions Since it showed better graft survival, as well as low cost and short production time, our 3D-printing protocol can be a feasible option for patients with small abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome after LT.

Background: Tacrolimus is a key immunosuppressant after liver transplantation.Although guideline-recommended trough levels are 4–10 ng/mL, concerns about nephrotoxicity, metabolic complications, and malignancies have led to interest in minimizing tacrolimus use. However, the effects of lower tacrolimus levels on graft rejection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of adult patients (≥19 years) who underwent living donor liver transplantation between January 2000 and December 2021. Patients were divided into low tacrolimus (FK) (<6 ng/mL) and high FK (≥6 ng/mL) groups based on tacrolimus levels measured 1–2 years post-transplantation. We analyzed overall survival, biopsy-proven rejection-free survival, and HCC recurrence-free survival in relevant subgroups. Cox proportional hazards regression identified predictors of mortality, rejection, and HCC recurrence. Results: Among 1,117 recipients, 941 were in the low FK group and 176 in the high FK group. Landmark analysis showed significantly better 10-year overall survival in the low FK group (82.8% vs. 68.8%, p=0.016), while rejection-free survival did not differ significantly beyond 2 years (p=0.098), despite early separation favoring the low FK group (p<0.001). Higher tacrolimus levels independently predicted increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR]=1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35–2.89; p<0.001) and rejection (HR=2.20, 95% CI 1.48–3.27; p<0.001). Among 614 HCC patients, landmark analysis revealed no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (77.7% vs. 81.2%, p=0.288) or overall survival (77.3% vs. 65.8%, p=0.215), and FK levels were not independently associated with either outcome. Conclusion Maintaining tacrolimus levels below 6 ng/mL was associated with better survival and rejection outcomes without increasing HCC recurrence, suggesting dose minimization may be feasible in selected patients.

In liver transplantation, the primary concern is to ensure an adequate future liver remnant (FLR) volume for the donor, while selecting a graft of sufficient size for the recipient. The living donor–resection and partial liver segment 2−3 transplantation with delayed total hepatectomy (LD−RAPID) procedure offers a potential solution to expand the donor pool for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).We report the first case involving a cirrhotic patient with autoimmune hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma, who underwent left lobe LDLT using the LD−RAPID procedure. The living liver donor (LLD) underwent a laparoscopic left hepatectomy, including middle hepatic vein. The resection on the recipient side was an extended left hepatectomy, including the middle hepatic vein orifice and caudate lobe. At postoperative day 7, a computed tomography scan showed hypertrophy of the left graft from 320 g to 465 mL (i.e., a 45.3% increase in graft volume body weight ratio from 0.60% to 0.77%). After a 7-day interval, the diseased right lobe was removed in the second stage surgery. The LD−RAPID procedure using left lobe graft allows for the use of a small liver graft or small FLR volume in LLD in LDLT, which expands the donor pool to minimize the risk to LLD by enabling the donation of a smaller liver portion.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to build a prediction model for estimating graft weight about different graft volumetry methods combined with other variables. Methods: Donors who underwent living-donor right hepatectomy from March 2021 to March 2023 were included. Estimated graft volume measured by conventional method and 3-dimensional (3D) software were collected as well as the actual graft weight. Linear regression was used to build a prediction model. Donor groups were divided according to the 3D volumetry of <700 cm3 , 700–899 cm3 , and ≥900 cm3 to compare the performance of different models. Results: A total of 119 donors were included. Conventional volumetry showed R2 of 0.656 (P < 0.001) while 3D software showed R2 of 0.776 (P < 0.001). The R2 of the multivariable model was 0.842 (P < 0.001) including for 3D volume (β = 0.623, P < 0.001), body mass index (β = 7.648, P < 0.001), and amount of weight loss (β = –7.252, P < 0.001). The median errors between different models and actual graft weight did not differ in donor groups (<700 and 700–899 cm3 ), while the median error of univariable linear model using 3D software (122.5; interquartile range [IQR], 61.5–179.8) was significantly higher than multivariable-adjusted linear model (41.5; IQR, 24.8–69.8; P = 0.003) in donors with estimated graft weight ≥900 cm3 . Conclusion The univariable 3D volumetry model showed an acceptable outcome for donors with an estimated graft volume <900 cm3 . For donors with an estimated graft volume ≥900 cm3 , the multivariable-adjusted linear model showed higher accuracy.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether micro-flow imaging (MFI) offers diagnostic performance comparable to that of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in detecting segmental congestion among patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods: Data from 63 patients who underwent LDLT between May and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. MFI and CEUS data collected on the first postoperative day were quantified. Segmental congestion was assessed based on imaging findings and laboratory data, including liver enzymes and total bilirubin levels. The reference standard was a postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan performed within 2 weeks of surgery. Additionally, a subgroup analysis examined patients who underwent reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein territory. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of MFI were 73.9% and 67.5%, respectively. In comparison, CEUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 75.0%. These findings suggest comparable diagnostic performance, with no significant differences in sensitivity (P=0.655) or specificity (P=0.257) between the two modalities. Additionally, early postoperative laboratory values did not show significant differences between patients with and without congestion. The subgroup analysis also indicated similar diagnostic performance between MFI and CEUS. Conclusion MFI without contrast enhancement yielded results comparable to those of CEUS in detecting segmental congestion after LDLT. Therefore, MFI may be considered a viable alternative to CEUS.

Purpose: Right-sided tumors have been reported to have a poorer survival rate than left-sided tumors; however, there remains debate regarding whether sidedness is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). This study aimed to assess the impact of sidedness on prognosis in resectable CRLM and to identify prognostic factors. Methods: Patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM at Samsung Medical Center from January 2008 to December 2021 were included in the investigation. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed, and prognostic factors were identified. Results: A total of 497 patients were included in the study, with 106 on the right side and 391 on the left side. The rightsided group had a higher percentage of synchronous tumors (90.6% vs. 80.3%, P = 0.020). In survival analysis, the right side showed lower 5-year OS (49.7% vs. 54.2, P = 0.305) and 5-year PFS (57.1% vs. 60.2%, P = 0.271), but the differences were not statistically significant. In the analysis of prognostic factors, synchronous tumor (odds ratio [OR], 5.01; P < 0.001), CEA (OR, 1.46; P = 0.016), and maximum tumor size of hepatic metastasis (OR, 1.09; P = 0.026) were associated with OS. Conclusion In resectable CRLM, there was no difference in prognosis based on sidedness. CEA level, synchronous tumor, and maximum tumor size of hepatic metastasis were identified as prognostic factors.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether micro-flow imaging (MFI) offers diagnostic performance comparable to that of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in detecting segmental congestion among patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods: Data from 63 patients who underwent LDLT between May and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. MFI and CEUS data collected on the first postoperative day were quantified. Segmental congestion was assessed based on imaging findings and laboratory data, including liver enzymes and total bilirubin levels. The reference standard was a postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan performed within 2 weeks of surgery. Additionally, a subgroup analysis examined patients who underwent reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein territory. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of MFI were 73.9% and 67.5%, respectively. In comparison, CEUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 75.0%. These findings suggest comparable diagnostic performance, with no significant differences in sensitivity (P=0.655) or specificity (P=0.257) between the two modalities. Additionally, early postoperative laboratory values did not show significant differences between patients with and without congestion. The subgroup analysis also indicated similar diagnostic performance between MFI and CEUS. Conclusion MFI without contrast enhancement yielded results comparable to those of CEUS in detecting segmental congestion after LDLT. Therefore, MFI may be considered a viable alternative to CEUS.

Purpose: Right-sided tumors have been reported to have a poorer survival rate than left-sided tumors; however, there remains debate regarding whether sidedness is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). This study aimed to assess the impact of sidedness on prognosis in resectable CRLM and to identify prognostic factors. Methods: Patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM at Samsung Medical Center from January 2008 to December 2021 were included in the investigation. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed, and prognostic factors were identified. Results: A total of 497 patients were included in the study, with 106 on the right side and 391 on the left side. The rightsided group had a higher percentage of synchronous tumors (90.6% vs. 80.3%, P = 0.020). In survival analysis, the right side showed lower 5-year OS (49.7% vs. 54.2, P = 0.305) and 5-year PFS (57.1% vs. 60.2%, P = 0.271), but the differences were not statistically significant. In the analysis of prognostic factors, synchronous tumor (odds ratio [OR], 5.01; P < 0.001), CEA (OR, 1.46; P = 0.016), and maximum tumor size of hepatic metastasis (OR, 1.09; P = 0.026) were associated with OS. Conclusion In resectable CRLM, there was no difference in prognosis based on sidedness. CEA level, synchronous tumor, and maximum tumor size of hepatic metastasis were identified as prognostic factors.