Objective:To evaluate the clinical outcomesof primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and revision procedure with RTSA after treatment failure of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conductedon 24 elderly patients with Neer three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures who underwent RTSA revision after treatment failure (RTSA revision group) from January 2017 to June 2022. There were 7 males and 17 females included, with a mean age of 78.23±5.78 years (range, 67-86 years). Forty-eight patients who underwent primary RTSA (primary RTSA group) during the same time period were selected by propensity score matchingin a 1∶2 ratio as controls, based on age, dominanthand, etiology, Neer typing, glenohumeral joint dislocation, rotator cuff integrity, and osteoporosis T-score. The primary RTSA group included 12 males and 36 females, with a mean age of 76.38±6.15 years (range, 65-87 years). Clinical indicators including demographic characteristics, healing rate of the greater tuberosity, visual analogue score (VAS), Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), shoulder range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction, and complication rate were collected and analyzed.Results:The mean follow-up duration was 40(32, 60) months (range, 25-72 months) in the primary RTSA group and 38(30, 61) months (range, 24-68 months) in RTSA revision group. There was no significant difference (χ 2=5.058, P=0.168) in the healing rate of the greater tuberosity between the primary RTSA group (41/48, 85.4%) and the RTSA revision group (15/24, 62.5%). Compared with preoperative status, the ROM of anterior elevation, abduction supination, external rotation, VAS score, Constant-Murley score, and ASES score were significantly improved at the last follow-up (all P<0.05) in the RTSA revision group. The anterior elevation (123.74°± 16.57°), abduction supination (113.73°±16.42°), and external rotation (36.45°±10.36°) in the primary RTSA group were superior to those in the RTSA revision group (109.43°±18.75°, 98.64°±15.47°, 30.47°±10.64°, respectively), the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). No statistical difference of ROM of internal rotation between the two groups was found (χ 2=4.034, P=0.133). At the last follow-up, the Constant-Murley scores (75.47±11.66) and ASES scores (73.58±15.72) of the primary RTSA group were higher than those in the RTSA revision group (60.43±10.24 and 63.28±18.77, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). In terms of VAS (1.66±0.93 vs. 2.02±1.15) and patient satisfaction [83%(40/48) vs. 88%(21/24)], no statistical difference was identified ( P>0.05). The complication rate were 10.4% (5/48) in the primary RTSA group and 20.8% (5/24) in the RTSA revision group (χ 2=1.452, P=0.285), with no serious complications requiring revision surgery in either group. Conclusions:For elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures after failed operation, RTSA revision might effectively improve the limb function and alleviatepain. However, compared with RTSA revision, primary RTSA demonstrated superiorearly clinical outcomes in shoulder ROM and functional recovery.

Objective:To evaluate the clinical outcomesof primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and revision procedure with RTSA after treatment failure of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conductedon 24 elderly patients with Neer three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures who underwent RTSA revision after treatment failure (RTSA revision group) from January 2017 to June 2022. There were 7 males and 17 females included, with a mean age of 78.23±5.78 years (range, 67-86 years). Forty-eight patients who underwent primary RTSA (primary RTSA group) during the same time period were selected by propensity score matchingin a 1∶2 ratio as controls, based on age, dominanthand, etiology, Neer typing, glenohumeral joint dislocation, rotator cuff integrity, and osteoporosis T-score. The primary RTSA group included 12 males and 36 females, with a mean age of 76.38±6.15 years (range, 65-87 years). Clinical indicators including demographic characteristics, healing rate of the greater tuberosity, visual analogue score (VAS), Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), shoulder range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction, and complication rate were collected and analyzed.Results:The mean follow-up duration was 40(32, 60) months (range, 25-72 months) in the primary RTSA group and 38(30, 61) months (range, 24-68 months) in RTSA revision group. There was no significant difference (χ 2=5.058, P=0.168) in the healing rate of the greater tuberosity between the primary RTSA group (41/48, 85.4%) and the RTSA revision group (15/24, 62.5%). Compared with preoperative status, the ROM of anterior elevation, abduction supination, external rotation, VAS score, Constant-Murley score, and ASES score were significantly improved at the last follow-up (all P<0.05) in the RTSA revision group. The anterior elevation (123.74°± 16.57°), abduction supination (113.73°±16.42°), and external rotation (36.45°±10.36°) in the primary RTSA group were superior to those in the RTSA revision group (109.43°±18.75°, 98.64°±15.47°, 30.47°±10.64°, respectively), the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). No statistical difference of ROM of internal rotation between the two groups was found (χ 2=4.034, P=0.133). At the last follow-up, the Constant-Murley scores (75.47±11.66) and ASES scores (73.58±15.72) of the primary RTSA group were higher than those in the RTSA revision group (60.43±10.24 and 63.28±18.77, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). In terms of VAS (1.66±0.93 vs. 2.02±1.15) and patient satisfaction [83%(40/48) vs. 88%(21/24)], no statistical difference was identified ( P>0.05). The complication rate were 10.4% (5/48) in the primary RTSA group and 20.8% (5/24) in the RTSA revision group (χ 2=1.452, P=0.285), with no serious complications requiring revision surgery in either group. Conclusions:For elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures after failed operation, RTSA revision might effectively improve the limb function and alleviatepain. However, compared with RTSA revision, primary RTSA demonstrated superiorearly clinical outcomes in shoulder ROM and functional recovery.

Objective:To estimate the costs of dementia from a societal perspective in Tongliao City and ex-plore the influencing factors of these costs.Methods:Dementia was diagnosed using the 10/66 Dementia Research Group assessment instruments.Data on healthcare utilization,caregiver's care time or costs,and the distress due to caregiving were collected.The cost-proportion conversion method was used to estimate the per capita cost of health services based on data from the National Statistical Yearbook.The human capital approach was used to estimate the unit value of informal care time,and the willingness-to-pay method was used to measure the intangible costs of car-egivers.The total societal costs of dementia were calculated based on the reference year 2023,and a two-part model was employed to analyze the factors influencing the societal costs.Results:A total of 390 dementia patients were di-agnosed,with an average societal cost per capita of 117 877 Yuan.The largest cost component was informal care provided by unpaid family members,accounting for 73.1％of the total societal cost.The societal costs for female patients were 61 395 Yuan higher than those for male patients.Patients with comorbid stroke had a higher societal cost of 63 008 Yuan compared to patients without stroke,and each additional chronic disease added 5 868 Yuan to societal costs.Additionally,each non-memory dimension impairment in the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale in-creased the societal costs by 53 997 Yuan.Conclusion:Dementia poses a significant socio-economic burden,with informal care being the major component of this burden.

Objective:To investigate the operation efficacy of anterior radius head fracture combined with lateral ligament complex injury.Methods:The patients with radial head fracture admitted from September 2017 to August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, 51 males and 54 females, average age of 38.84±13.63 years (range of 16-70 years). Based on the radial head fractures of Mason classification of type II, the cases involving the anterior radius head fracture were divided into three subtypes according to the number of fracture blocks and the type of displacement: type A (53 cases): one part of the anterior radius head collapse fracture; type B (50 cases): two or more parts of the anterior radial head collapse fracture; type C (2 cases): anterior radius head dissociated and displaced fracture. All fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Among them, the lateral ligament complex of type B were elongated due to the injury but the continuity existed. Therefore, the lateral ligament complex in 21 cases were not repaired in the early period (unrepaired group); in recent years, 29 cases repaired the lateral ligament complex (repair group). The postoperative efficacy was evaluated by elbow range of motion, table-top relocation test, Mayo score, and Broberg Morrey score. the patients were evaluated at final follow-up, except table-top relocation test was recorded according to the actual completion time.Results:All operations were successfully completed. The mean follow-up was 14.08±1.52 months (range of 12-18 months). Type A: the flexion and extension range was 115.70°±6.35°; the completion time of the table-top relocation test was 75.68±11.90 days; the Mayo score was 93.72±2.40 point, and the Broberg Morrey score was 92.89±2.28 point. Type B: lateral ligament repair group (repaired group) 29 cases and unrepaired lateral ligament group (unrepaired group) 21 cases. The flexion and extension range of elbow in repaired group was 112.1°±4.4°, which was better than that in unrepaired group 105.8°±3.7° ( t=5.31, P<0.001). The completion time of table-top relocation test was 77.72±6.51 days in repaired group and 104.29±18.45 days in unrepaired group ( t=6.32, P<0.001). The Mayo score of the repaired group was 90.21±5.88 points and that of the unrepaired group was 87.14±5.26 points ( t=1.90, P=0.063), and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Broberg Morrey score of 90.93±6.43 points in the repaired group was better than 86.95±6.37 points in the unrepaired group ( t=2.17, P=0.035). Type C for 2 patients, the flexion and extension range of elbow were 107°and 106°; the completion time of table-top relocation test were 82 days and 98 days; the Mayo scores were 91 point and 87 point; Broberg Morrey scores were 93 point and 85 point. There was a patient developed myositis ossificans in unrepair group of tybe B. Conclusion:The elbow joint is stable when one part of the anterior radius head collapse fracture; there is a degree of instability in the elbow when two or more parts of the anterior radial head collapse fractures suggest to repair the lateral ligament complex. The elbow joint is extremely unstable when anterior radius head dissociated and displaced fractures, the lateral ligament complex should be repaired in time.

Objective:To investigate the importance of measuring and restoring distal radius tear drop angle in the treatment of distal radius middle column fracture with anterior collapse of lunate fossa joint.Methods:Thirty one cases of distal radius fractures in 29 patients was reported for 2 years from January 2018 to January 2020. Two patients with both distal radius fractures were included in this study. All cases in this group were treated by operation. Among the 29 patients, there were 20 males and 9 females. Their ages were 44.9±15.1 years (ranged from 20 to 78 years). Two patients with both distal radius fractures were included in this study, due to both teardrop angle (TDA) reduced. The time from injury to operation was 4-17 d, with an average of 6.9 d. Except for 2 cases of fracture with simple volar approach, the other cases were treated with combined volar and dorsal approach. All patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with plates and bone grafting. The teardrop angle was measured before and after operation, and the effect of surgical recovery of teardrop angle was compared. The wrist function was evaluated by Gartland-Werley scores.Results:The wounds of all patients healed in one stage without postoperative infection. The follow-up time of 29 patients were 15.1±5.2 months, ranged from 7 to 31 months. The healing time for all fractures was 10.3±2.9 weeks (from 8 to 16 weeks). No fracture nonunion or redisplacement. In 31 cases, the tear drop angle was 33.4°±5.83° (20°-45°) before operation, and 58.9°±9.89° (35°-70°) after operation. At the end of follow-up, Gartland-Werley scores was 4.7±4.6, ranged from 0 to 17. Among them, 10 cases were excellent, 16 were good, 5 cases were fair, and the excellent and good rate was 83.9%. The Gartland-Werley scores of the two subgroups with postoperative tear drop angle recovery ≥50° and <50° were compared, and the results were significantly different (the excellent and good rate for two subgroups were 96.2% and 20.0% respectively ( P=0.001). Conclusion:The distal radius fracture with significantly reduced tear drop angle should be actively treated. The measurement and recovery of tear drop angle is an important factor affecting the functional outcome of distal radius fracture with anterior edge collapse of lunate fossa joint, which should be highly concerned by clinical doctors. The recovery of teardrop angle mostly requires dorsal approach.

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.Methods:The clinical data of 58 elderly patients with three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty or reverse shoulder arthroplasty from June 2014 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 46 cases were from Sichuan Provincial Orthopaedic Hospital (22 cases of hemiarthroplasty and 24 cases of reverse shoulder arthroplasty), and 12 cases were from Tianjin Hospital (5 cases of hemiarthroplasty and 7 cases of reverse shoulder arthroplasty). In the hemiarthroplasty group, there were 27 patients, including 7 males and 20 females, with an average age of 70.29±6.81 years (range, 61-87 years), and there were 10 cases of 3-part fractures and 17 cases of 4-part fractures. In the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group, including 9 males and 22 females, with an average age of 75.06 ±4.25 years (range, 67-86 years), and there were 9 cases of 3-part fractures and 22 cases of 4-part fractures. The postoperative efficacy evaluation indexes included visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), prosthesis upward displacement, healing of greater tuberosity, scapular glenoid notch, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant-Murley score.Results:The average follow-up was 50.63±16.02 months (range, 24-75 months) in the hemiarthroplasty group and 28.32±11.93 months (range, 14-56 months) in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group. The anterior elevation in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group was 118.22°±27.22°, and those in the hemiarthroplasty group was 102.77°±25.88°, which was significant difference ( t=2.21, P=0.032); the results of external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR) in two groups were similar, and no significant difference (ER: t=0.57, P=0.616; IR: χ 2=2.61, P=0.273); the average Constant-Murley and ASES in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group were significantly better than those in the hemiarthroplasty group ( P=0.019 and 0.018); the complication rates of hemiarthroplasty group and reverse shoulder arthroplasty group were 37% (10/27) and 13% (4/31), respectively (χ 2=4.59, P=0.032). In the hemiarthroplasty group, 6 patients had upward movements of the prosthesis and 2 patients had wear of the glenoid side; notching (sirveaux grade 1) was noted in 1 patient in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group. Conclusion:In the treatment of three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly, reverse shoulder arthroplasty achieves significantly better functional results compared to hemiarthroplasty.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy of dual plate fixation in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture with comminuted calcar.Methods:From July 2018 to April 2020, 25 patients (7 males and 18 females) were treated operatively for proximal humeral fractures with calcar comminution using anterior plate and lateral Philos plate. The data of patients who were followed up for more than 12 months was retrospectively analyzed. The mean age was 58.3 years (range 33-79 years). There were 13 right sides (all principal sides) and 12 left sides (all non-principal sides). The causes of injuries included: falling on flat ground (12 cases), traffic accidents (11 cases) and falling from height (2 cases). According to Neer classification, there were 7 cases of two-part fractures, 16 cases of three-part fractures and 2 cases of four-part fractures. A number of parameters including patient demographics, mechanism of injury, operative time, time to union, the range of shoulder motion, visual analogue scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley shoulder joint score, neck-shaft angle and the complications were recorded.Results:All of 25 patients were operated and followed up for 24.7 months (range 14 to 36 months). The operation time was 124.3 min (75-185 min), and the blood loss was 178.4 ml (100-350 ml). All patients had healed fractures at the last follow-up, and the neck-shaft angle was 132.88°±8.11° immediately after surgery, and 132.68°±8.36° at the last follow-up. All 25 patients healed completely in 4.7 months (range 3-5 months). Range of shoulder joint motion were forward flexion 161.20°±13.01° (range 140°-180°), external rotation 37.60°±7.65° (range 20°-45°), and internal rotation T 4-L 4 levels. VAS score was 0.36±0.81 points (range 0-3 points), while ASES score was 87.32±8.78 points (range 57.7-100 points) and Constant-Murley score was 89.40±8.37 points (range 60 to 100 points). Overall satisfaction score (Constant-Murley score) was excellent in 23 cases, and good in 2 cases. No obvious complications occurred. Conclusion:The combination of anterior plate and lateral Philos plate in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures with comminuted calcar can achieve stable fixation and satisfactory postoperative results.

Objective:To establish a new classification of lateral clavicle fractures and to evaluate its clinical value.Methods:The data of 67 patients with lateral clavicle fractures admitted from January 2016 to December 2020 were included. Thirty-seven cases were from Shanghai First People's Hospital, including 22 males and 15 females, with an average age of 49.1 years (22-78 years). Thirty cases were from the Second Upper Limb Ward of Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin, including 20 males and 10 females, with an average age of 47.6 years (19-76 years). The ligament injury was determined by measuring the coracoclavicular space on Zanca view X-ray and the distance between the fracture fragment on the inferior surface of the 3D-CT and the distal end of the clavicle. All patients were classified according to the new classification (based on the measurement on Zanca view X-ray and 3D-CT reconstruction, the relationship between the fracture and the coracoclavicular ligament footprint, coracoclavicular ligament injury, the injury of the acromioclavicular joint and the stability of the fracture), conservative treatment is preferable for stable fractures, and surgical treatment for unstable fractures. Three experienced orthopaedic surgeons and three radiologists independently observed the imaging data of 67 patients with distal clavicle fractures, determined the fracture type according to the new classification, and randomly reclassified after 4 weeks interval. Finally, 15 cases were randomly selected for internal control (2 junior orthopedic physicians), and the ICC value was used to assess the reliability. Results:The lateral clavicle fractures were divided into 5 types according to the Gongji classification. Type 1: isolated conical tubercle avulsion fracture, and the fracture line is located medial to the coracoid process; Type 2: complete involvement of the trapezoid & conical ligament at the clavicle insertion, and the fracture line extends to the middle of the clavicle, mean while the acromioclavicular joint is intact; Type 3: fracture fragments on the inferior surface involving the trapezoidal/conical ligament, respectively; Type 4: rupture of the conical ligament, and avulsion fracture of the trapezoid ligament; Type 5: conical ligament intact, and avulsion fracture of clavicle insertion of the trapezoid ligament. There were 18 cases of type 1, 4 cases of type 2, 8 cases of type 3, 32 cases of type 4, and 5 cases of type 5. The inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of all included cases was good (inter-group: first ICC=0.764, second ICC=0.778; intra-group: shoulder specialist ICC=0.782, radiologist ICC=0.750, internal control ICC=0.793). Types 1 and 2 fractures were fixed with anatomical plate and coracoid anchor. Type 3 and 4 fractures were fixed with clavicle hook plate and coracoid anchor. And type 5 underwent conservative treatment. At the last follow-up, all patients had no obvious shoulder joint instability and pain, and no internal fixation failure or fixation breakage was found. Conclusion:The Gongji classification has moderate reliability between observers and intra-observers, and the Gongji distal clavicle fracture classification has a good significance for evaluating the stability of the fracture and guiding the selection of the treatment.

Objective:To analyze the clinical characters and results of the posteromedial dislocation of elbow.Methods:From January 2014 to March 2016, a retrospective observational study of 15 patients with posteromedial elbow dislocations was performed. There were twelve males and three females, the mean age was 44 years old (23-64 years old). There were fourteen complex dislocations and one simple dislocation. The signs of posteromedial dislocation included changes of carry angle and varus deformity. Dimple signs were found in 8 patients. Conservative treatment was used in two cases (one simple dislocation and one complex disclocation). Operative treatment was performed in the other 13 cases with complex dislocations, in which five were fixed by hinged external fixator due to instability. The ranges of elbow and forearm movement, visual analogue score (VAS) and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) were recorded before treatment and at the last visit after average 18 months (17-21 months) of follow-up.Results:Before treatment, the average arc of extension-flexion was 9.3°±1.3° (5°-15°), the average range of forearm pronation was 6.4°±1.4° (0°-10°), supination was 4.3°±1.7° (0°-10°); VAS averaged 8±0.3 scores (7-9 scores); MEPS averaged 15.7±4.3 scores (5-35 scores). At the last follow up, the average arc of extension-flexion was 105°±5.2° (90°-130°), the average range of forearm pronation was 60°±8.5° (20°-80°), supination was 76°±9.5° (20°-90°); VAS averaged 0.4±0.2 scores (0-1 score); MEPS averaged 95.7±2.3 scores (85-100 scores). Significant different was found in all index by paired t test ( P<0.001). No instability of elbow was found in physical and radiology test in all follow-up visit. Conclusion:Posteromedial dislocation of elbow is rare in clinics, closed reduction can be always successful in simple dislocations; open reduction would be necessary in the majority of complex dislocations. However, relatively satisfied clinical results could be achieved.

Radial head fracture is a common disease in upper limb trauma. The most common cause of injury is longitudinal violence along the forearm, often associated with injuries, such as ulnar coronoid process fracture, elbow ligamentous injury, forearm interosseous membrane injury, distal radioulnar joint injury and so on. The treatment strategy of radial head fractures should be determined according to the specific fracture type of the patient. The vast majority of Mason I fractures can usually be treated conservatively, while Mason II and III fractures often require surgical treatment. The surgical treatment usually includes radial head excision, open reduction and internal fixation, and radial head prosthetic replacement. For simple comminted radial head fractures without longitudinal instability of the elbow or forearm, radial head resection can be used. However, if there is longitudinal instability of the elbow or forearm, radial head resection is contraindicated and internal fixation or radial head replacement is recommended. In view of the gradual standardization of the treatment of radial head fracture, this article will review the epidemiological investigation, anatomy and biomechanics, injury mechanism, clinical diagnosis and treatment of radial head fracture, so as to provide ideas for clinical selection of the best treatment scheme suitable for individual patients.