Objective:To analyze the differences in pediatric CT radiation dose and scanning parameter Settings between children's specialized hospitals and general hospitals, and to provide reference for the optimization strategy of pediatric CT radiation dose.Methods:From July to August 2022, a stratified sampling method was used to select 7 comprehensive hospitals and 2 children's hospitals in Tianjin, and on-site survey was conducted to collect the dose data of children's head, chest, and abdomen and pelvic CT examinations in these hospitals. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to analyze the differences in CTDI vol and DLP of the same age group and examination site among different types of hospitals, and the stepwise regression analysis method was used to analyze the effects of age, examination site, and scanning parameters on radiation dose CTDI vol and DLP. Results:The CTDI vol and DLP of head (1-<5, 5-<10, 10-<15 years old group), chest (5-<10, 10-<15 years old group) and abdomen (1-<5, 5-<10, 10-<15 years old group) in children's specialized hospitals were lower than those in general hospitals (head, 1-<5, 5-<10, 10-<15 years old group, CTDI vol: Z=-9.32, -6.17, -9.86, P<0.001, DLP, Z=-4.41, -4.14, -5.76, P<0.001; chest, 5-<10, 10-<15 years old group, CTDI vol: Z=-3.84, -5.35, P<0.001, DLP, Z=-3.59, -4.63, P<0.001; abdomen, 1-<5、5-<10 and 10-<15 years old group, CTDI vol: Z=-7.88, -7.78, -8.53, P<0.001, DLP, Z=-7.24, -5.92, -3.44, P<0.001). The CT radiation dose in children was positively correlated with age, tube voltage, tube current time product and scan length, and negatively correlated with pitch and hospital type (general hospital and children's hospital) . Conclusion:There are some differences in the CT radiation dose and scanning parameters between children's hospitals and general hospitals. The results indicate that there is still much room for improvement in the optimization of radiation dose in pediatric CT examination.

Objective:To analyze the differences in pediatric CT radiation dose and scanning parameter Settings between children's specialized hospitals and general hospitals, and to provide reference for the optimization strategy of pediatric CT radiation dose.Methods:From July to August 2022, a stratified sampling method was used to select 7 comprehensive hospitals and 2 children's hospitals in Tianjin, and on-site survey was conducted to collect the dose data of children's head, chest, and abdomen and pelvic CT examinations in these hospitals. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to analyze the differences in CTDI vol and DLP of the same age group and examination site among different types of hospitals, and the stepwise regression analysis method was used to analyze the effects of age, examination site, and scanning parameters on radiation dose CTDI vol and DLP. Results:The CTDI vol and DLP of head (1-<5, 5-<10, 10-<15 years old group), chest (5-<10, 10-<15 years old group) and abdomen (1-<5, 5-<10, 10-<15 years old group) in children's specialized hospitals were lower than those in general hospitals (head, 1-<5, 5-<10, 10-<15 years old group, CTDI vol: Z=-9.32, -6.17, -9.86, P<0.001, DLP, Z=-4.41, -4.14, -5.76, P<0.001; chest, 5-<10, 10-<15 years old group, CTDI vol: Z=-3.84, -5.35, P<0.001, DLP, Z=-3.59, -4.63, P<0.001; abdomen, 1-<5、5-<10 and 10-<15 years old group, CTDI vol: Z=-7.88, -7.78, -8.53, P<0.001, DLP, Z=-7.24, -5.92, -3.44, P<0.001). The CT radiation dose in children was positively correlated with age, tube voltage, tube current time product and scan length, and negatively correlated with pitch and hospital type (general hospital and children's hospital) . Conclusion:There are some differences in the CT radiation dose and scanning parameters between children's hospitals and general hospitals. The results indicate that there is still much room for improvement in the optimization of radiation dose in pediatric CT examination.

Objective To investigate the basic conditions of non-medical radiation institutions and their current status of occupational health management of radiation workers and radiation protection in workplaces in Tianjin City, China, and to clarify the key points of occupational health management and radiation protection efforts. Methods A comprehensive survey was conducted to assess the basic conditions of non-medical radiation institutions and their status of occupational health management for radiation workers across 16 districts in Tianjin in 2023. Then, some non-medical radiation institutions were chosen according to their industrial sections as sentinel institutions to investigate radiation protection in workplaces. Results In 2023, there were a total of 431 non-medical radiation institutions in 16 districts of Tianjin, primarily in the industries of nuclear instrument, industrial radiography, and others. In these institutions, there were a total of 5264 radiation workers, with 93.8%, 93.0%, and 93.7% participating in the training of radiation protection, the occupational health examination, and the personal dose monitoring, respectively. Eighty-six non-medical radiation institutions were chosen as the sentinel institutions for investigation of radiation protection conditions in workplaces. The resulting data met the stipulated limits according to relevant standards. Conclusion The current status of occupational health management and radiation protection in non-medical radiation institutions in Tianjin is satisfactory. However, there is a need for further management enhancements, particularly in key industries such as nuclear instrumentation and industrial radiography.

Objective To investigate the basic conditions of non-medical radiation institutions and their current status of occupational health management of radiation workers and radiation protection in workplaces in Tianjin City, China, and to clarify the key points of occupational health management and radiation protection efforts. Methods A comprehensive survey was conducted to assess the basic conditions of non-medical radiation institutions and their status of occupational health management for radiation workers across 16 districts in Tianjin in 2023. Then, some non-medical radiation institutions were chosen according to their industrial sections as sentinel institutions to investigate radiation protection in workplaces. Results In 2023, there were a total of 431 non-medical radiation institutions in 16 districts of Tianjin, primarily in the industries of nuclear instrument, industrial radiography, and others. In these institutions, there were a total of 5264 radiation workers, with 93.8%, 93.0%, and 93.7% participating in the training of radiation protection, the occupational health examination, and the personal dose monitoring, respectively. Eighty-six non-medical radiation institutions were chosen as the sentinel institutions for investigation of radiation protection conditions in workplaces. The resulting data met the stipulated limits according to relevant standards. Conclusion The current status of occupational health management and radiation protection in non-medical radiation institutions in Tianjin is satisfactory. However, there is a need for further management enhancements, particularly in key industries such as nuclear instrumentation and industrial radiography.

Objective:To understand the level of radiation doses from digital mammography in Tianjin and the associated influencing factors.Methods:The stratified quota sampling method was used for analysis of 374 digital mammography-examined individuals by using 12 digital mammography devices in 12 selected medical institutions. The examinations were carried out in terms of exposure positions[(craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO)], compressed breast thickness, tube voltage, time product of tube current (mAs) and target/filter.Results:The median age of the examined individuals in this survey was 43 years, the median tube voltage (kV) was 29 kV, the median tube current time product was 60.3 mAs, the median compressed breast thickness was 48 mm, and the median average glandular dose (AGD) was 1.32 mGy. The mean dose to the analyzed glandular tissue in the conditions of different target/filters varies in the descent order of Mo/Mo > Mo/Rh > Rh/Rh > W/Rh > W/Al, with the difference being statistically significant difference ( χ2=885.90, P<0.05). The mean dose to the glandular tissue increased with the increase in compressed breast thickness, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=31.58, 8.56, 76.13, 118.47, 24.09, P<0.05). Conclusions:The median average glandular dose in Tianjin was 1.32 mGy. This level is lower than in Guangxi province and Fuzhou city, similar to that in Beijing and Guangdong province, and lower than the national survey result of average breast dose. The efforts should be dedicated to further strengthening the research on the related factors of the average glandular dose in order to protect the health and safety of the examined individuals.

Objective:To study the level of CT dose to paediatric patients in Tianjin, and to provide basic data for establishing the diagnostic reference levels for paediatric patients from CT examinations in Tianjin.Methods:In 2022, a general survey was carried out of the CT doses to the head, chest, abdomen and pelvis of the scanned paediatric patients in two tertiary pediatric hospitals and seven tertiary general hospitals in Tianjin. The scanned pediatric patients were divided into four age groups in terms of the age of -1, -5, -10 and -15 years, and 20 patients were investigated in each age group in each hospital. The basic information were collected on the scanned patients, CT scanning parameters, volume CT dose index (CTDI vol), dose length product (DLP), and the differences in CTDI vol and DLP on the same site among different age groups and different types of hospitals were analyzed. Results:There were significant differences in CTDI vol and DLP between different age groups at the same site (head, chest, abdominal and pelvic, CTDI vol:χ2=296.51, 193.82, 291.72, P<0.001; DLP: χ2=291.22, 263.63, 344.97, P<0.001). There were significant differences in CTDI vol and DLP among different types of hospitals on the same site (head, chest, abdominal and pelvic, CTDI vol:Z=-13.13, -7.57, -15.27, P<0.001; DLP: Z=-9.07, -6.15, -11.57, P < 0.001). Conclusions:The 75 th percentile values of CTDI vol and DLP for pediatric head, chest, abdomen and pelvis CT scanning in tertiary hospitals in Tianjin are at a good level, and the dose on some examination sites are relatively high. Further optimization of pediatric CT scanning procedures is necessary.

Objective To investigate the actual situation and problems faced by radiological professionals in implementing The Specification of Radiological Protection Assessment for Occupational Hazard in Construction Project Part 2: Radiotherapy Facility (GBZ/T 220.2—2009). Methods A questionnaire survey was performed on radiological professionals who were selected, using the multi-stage stratified sampling method, from those who had participated in the assessment for occupational hazard in the construction project of radiotherapy facility from seven provinces and cities in China. A descriptive statistical analysis was used to analyze the general information and the awareness, promotion, and implementation of the standard of the participants. The chi-squared test was used to compare the data of different regions. Results A total of 173 radiological professionals from seven provinces and cities were investigated. They had a relatively high awareness rate (98.8%) of the standard, but a relatively low training and promotion rate (65.3%) of the standard. There were no significant differences in the awareness rate and the training and promotion rate between different regions (χ² = 2.743, P = 0.602; χ² = 5.584, P = 0.061). The use frequency of the standard was relatively low among the radiological professionals, and 64.9% of them thought that it was necessary to revise the standard, especially to further refine the scope of application, key technical indicators such as assessment methods, and radiological protection management regulations. Conclusion The training and promotion of the standard should be strengthened among radiological professionals. Some key technical indicators in the standard should be clarified and refined.

Objective:To investigate the application of GBZ/T 220.2-2009 "The Specification of Radiological Protection Assessment for Occupational Hazard in Construction Project-Part 2: Radiotherapy Facility" in health management institutions, and to understand the scientificity, practicability and problems existing in the implementation of the standard.Methods:The method of multistage stratified sampling and questionnaire survey were used to collect the standard application status among 96 radiological health managers who had participated in the evaluation of radiotherapy facility construction projects in 6 provinces and cities from November 2020 to April 2021. A descriptive statistical analysis method was used to analyze the basic information of the survey object, the knowledge of the standard, the publicity and implementation of the standard.Results:The radiological health management personnel mainly came from health supervision agencies (62.5%, 60/96) , and 86.5% (83/96) were engaged in the pre-evaluation of radiotherapy device construction project and the approval and supervision of control effect evaluation. The awareness rate and training rate of radiological health managers on GBZ/T 220.2-2009 were 88.5% (85/96) and 31.3% (30/96) , respectively. 89.6% (86/96) managers thought it could meet the needs of radiotherapy facility construction project approval or supervision. 49.0% (47/96) of managers believed that the standard needed to be revised.Conclusion:The content of GBZ/T 220.2-2009 is basically scientific and reasonable, but the publicity, implementation and training of radiological health administrator still need to be strengthened. It is suggested to revise some clauses in the standard that do not meet the requirements.

Objective:To verify radiation shielding effect of the maze of the CyberKnife room, so as to identify and correct the deficiencies in the shielding designs in certain circumstances.Methods:In line with the radiation protection shielding design scheme of the CyberKnife room provided by the producer, the consideradtions are focused on the useful beam that could mainly pass through the image center, but not the outer wall of the maze. However, during the inspection and acceptance of radiological protection in the built room, it was found that in a certain situations useful wire did not pass through the imaging center. Therefore, the additional shielding and protection facilities were built and verified.Results:After verification and acceptance on the scene, in the case where the useful beam was passing through the image center, the highest ambient dose equivalent rate at the concerned points 30 cm away from the outer wall of the maze was 0.31 μSv/h, less than the control level 10 μSv/h. In the opposite case, the highest ambient dose equivalent rate at the same points as above was 301.67 μSv/h, ablut 30 times as much as the control level. After the thickness in maze outer wall was enhanced, the highest ambient dose equivalent rate at the same as above was 2.14 μSv/h. This testing result met the concerned national standard.Conclusions:It is desirable that in designing the outer wall shielding in the maze in a CyberKnife room, attention should be paid to whether or not the useful beam could pass through the image center, or otherwise directly irradiate on the maze on the basis of the movement range of the accelerator. Shielding wall thickness should be calculated on the basis of the irradiation ragne and the distance between source location and the concerned points to ensure being in compliance with the requirements of the concerned national standard. Meanwhile, it should protect the workers occupying at the concerned locations from receiving higher radiation doses.

Objective:To investigate the application of GBZ/T 220.2-2009 "The Specification of Radiological Protection Assessment for Occupational Hazard in Construction Project-Part 2: Radiotherapy Facility" in health management institutions, and to understand the scientificity, practicability and problems existing in the implementation of the standard.Methods:The method of multistage stratified sampling and questionnaire survey were used to collect the standard application status among 96 radiological health managers who had participated in the evaluation of radiotherapy facility construction projects in 6 provinces and cities from November 2020 to April 2021. A descriptive statistical analysis method was used to analyze the basic information of the survey object, the knowledge of the standard, the publicity and implementation of the standard.Results:The radiological health management personnel mainly came from health supervision agencies (62.5%, 60/96) , and 86.5% (83/96) were engaged in the pre-evaluation of radiotherapy device construction project and the approval and supervision of control effect evaluation. The awareness rate and training rate of radiological health managers on GBZ/T 220.2-2009 were 88.5% (85/96) and 31.3% (30/96) , respectively. 89.6% (86/96) managers thought it could meet the needs of radiotherapy facility construction project approval or supervision. 49.0% (47/96) of managers believed that the standard needed to be revised.Conclusion:The content of GBZ/T 220.2-2009 is basically scientific and reasonable, but the publicity, implementation and training of radiological health administrator still need to be strengthened. It is suggested to revise some clauses in the standard that do not meet the requirements.