1.Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with MAFLD Compared with Patients with MASLD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Jiwon YANG ; Ye Rim KIM ; Seong Kyun NA ; Seonok KIM ; Jihyun AN ; Ju Hyun SHIM
Gut and Liver 2026;20(1):137-152
Background/Aims:
Although metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) represent the updated nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, studies comparing the prognostic implications of these conditions remain limited. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the associations among MAFLD, MASLD, and long-term clinical outcomes.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify cohort studies that assessed the association of MASLD and MAFLD with all-cause mortality, cause-specific (cardiovascular and cancer-related) mortality, and the incidence of cardiovascular disease in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases from inception through October 31, 2024. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for relevant outcomes.
Results:
We identified 18 cohort studies, comprising 10,653,666 patients with MAFLD from 13 studies and 3,202,447 patients with MASLD from nine studies. MAFLD was significantly associated with an increased risk of overall mortality (pooled HR [95% confidence interval], 1.30 [1.16 to 1.47]) and cardiovascular mortality (1.31 [1.08 to 1.60]; both p<0.01), but not with cancer-related mortality (1.10 [0.97 to 1.24]; p=0.130). Conversely, MASLD was associated with a higher risk for all mortality outcomes: overall mortality (1.34 [1.12 to 1.61]), cardiovascular mortality (1.17 [1.07 to 1.27]), and cancer-related mortality (1.24 [1.19 to 1.29]; all p<0.01). The risk of cardiovascular disease was increased in patients with both MAFLD (1.48 [1.31 to 1.66]) and MASLD (1.33 [1.21 to 1.46]; both p<0.001).
Conclusions
MAFLD and MASLD were both associated with increased risks of mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. Notably, a significant association with cancer-related mortality was observed for MASLD, but not for MAFLD.
2.Network meta-analysis and validation study of expanded liver transplantation criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma: Significant role of alpha-fetoprotein
Dongman YU ; Yeongseok HWANG ; Jin-Sung JU ; Subin HEO ; Seon-Ok KIM ; Sang Hyun CHOI ; Gi-Won SONG ; Jihyun AN ; Ju Hyun SHIM
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2026;32(2):751-771
Background/Aims:
Various expanded criteria (EC) for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been proposed to avoid the narrow nature of the Milan criteria (MC). To investigate which EC predicts more favorable outcomes in terms of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA).
Methods:
A database search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, to identify studies comparing OS and RFS between patients within the MC and those exceeding the MC but within the EC. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using a random-effects NMA and validated in an in-house cohort of 1,008 LT recipients.
Results:
Among 22,466 articles identified, 35 studies with 45 pairwise comparisons were included in the NMA along with 8 different EC. The University of California San Francisco (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19–1.71), Up-to-Seven (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.15–1.97), and Hangzhou criteria (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.11–2.57) showed inferior OS to the MC. The MC ranked highest for both OS and RFS, followed by Metroticket 2.0 for OS and the Asan criteria for RFS. In the validation cohort, both Metroticket 2.0 and AFP model yielded more favorable HCC-specific mortality than other EC.
Conclusions
Several EC, of which those of Metroticket 2.0 were the best, yielded comparable outcomes to the MC. AFP-based EC such as Metroticket 2.0 and AFP model appeared to be useful in both the NMA and the validation cohort, suggesting a potential role in identifying selected low-risk patients beyond the MC.
3.Feasibility of Virtual Reality-Based Auditory Localization Training With Binaurally Recorded Auditory Stimuli for Patients With Single-Sided Deafness
Leeseul SHIM ; Jihyun LEE ; Ji-Hye HAN ; Hanjae JEON ; Sung-Kwang HONG ; Hyo-Jeong LEE
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2023;16(3):217-224
Objectives:
. To train participants to localize sound using virtual reality (VR) technology, appropriate auditory stimuli that contain accurate spatial cues are essential. The generic head-related transfer function that grounds the programmed spatial audio in VR does not reflect individual variation in monaural spatial cues, which is critical for auditory spatial perception in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD). As binaural difference cues are unavailable, auditory spatial perception is a typical problem in the SSD population and warrants intervention. This study assessed the applicability of binaurally recorded auditory stimuli in VR-based training for sound localization in SSD patients.
Methods:
. Sixteen subjects with SSD and 38 normal-hearing (NH) controls underwent VR-based training for sound localization and were assessed 3 weeks after completing training. The VR program incorporated prerecorded auditory stimuli created individually in the SSD group and over an anthropometric model in the NH group.
Results:
. Sound localization performance revealed significant improvements in both groups after training, with retained benefits lasting for an additional 3 weeks. Subjective improvements in spatial hearing were confirmed in the SSD group.
Conclusion
. By examining individuals with SSD and NH, VR-based training for sound localization that used binaurally recorded stimuli, measured individually, was found to be effective and beneficial. Furthermore, VR-based training does not require sophisticated instruments or setups. These results suggest that this technique represents a new therapeutic treatment for impaired sound localization.
4.Loco-regional therapies competing with radiofrequency ablation in potential indications for hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis
Ha Il KIM ; Jihyun AN ; Seungbong HAN ; Ju Hyun SHIM
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2023;29(4):1013-1028
Background/Aims:
There is no clear consensus on the relative ranking of interventional and radiation techniques with indications similar to those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We used a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of non-surgical treatments for early HCC.
Methods:
We searched databases for randomized trials assessing the efficacy of loco-regional treatments for HCCs ≤5 cm with no extrahepatic spread or portal invasion. The primary outcome was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included overall and local progression-free survival (PFS). A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed, and the relative ranking of therapies was assessed with P-scores.
Results:
Nineteen studies comparing 11 different strategies in 2,793 patients were included. Chemoembolization plus RFA improved OS better than RFA alone (HR 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33–0.82; P-score=0.951). Cryoablation, microwave ablation, laser ablation, and proton beam therapy had similar effects on OS compared with RFA. For overall PFS, but not local PFS, only chemoembolization plus RFA performed significantly better than RFA (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42–0.88; P-score=0.964). Injection of percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid was significantly less effective than RFA for all measured outcomes, while no differences in progression outcomes were identified for other therapies included in the network.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that chemoembolization combined with RFA is the best option for local treatment of early HCC. Cases with potential contraindications for RFA may benefit from a tailored approach using thermal or radiation modalities.
6.Validation of the Korean Version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 Profile V2.1 among Cancer Survivors
Danbee KANG ; Youngha KIM ; Jihyun LIM ; Junghee YOON ; Sooyeon KIM ; Eunjee KANG ; Heesu NAM ; Sungkeun SHIM ; Mangyeong LEE ; Haesook BOK ; Sang-Won LEE ; Soo-Yong SHIN ; Jin Seok AHN ; Dongryul OH ; Juhee CHO
Cancer Research and Treatment 2022;54(1):10-19
Purpose:
The purpose of the study was to validate the Korean version of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 Profile v2.1 (K-PROMIS-29 V2.1) among cancer survivors.
Materials and Methods:
Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics of the Comprehensive Cancer Center at the Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, from September to October 2018. Participants completed a survey questionnaire that included the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Pearson’s correlations were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1.
Results:
The mean age of the study participants was 54.4 years, the mean time since diagnosis was 1.2 (±2.4) years, and 349 (87.3%) completed the entire questionnaire. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the seven domains in the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 ranged from 0.81 to 0.96, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. In the CFA, the goodness-of-fit indices for the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 were high (comparative fit index, 0.91 and standardized root-mean-squared residual, 0.06). High to moderate correlations were found between comparable subscales of the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 and subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (r=0.52-0.73).
Conclusion
The K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the health-related quality of life domains in a cancer population, thus supporting their use in studies and oncology trials.
7.Cervicocerebral atherosclerosis and its hepatic and coronary risk factors in patients with liver cirrhosis
Jihyun AN ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Seon-Ok KIM ; Ha Il KIM ; Gi-Won SONG ; Han Chu LEE ; Ju Hyun SHIM
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2022;28(1):67-76
Background/Aims:
We aimed to investigate the silent atherosclerotic burden of cervicocephalic vessels in cirrhotic patients compared with the general population, as well as the relevant risk factors including coronary parameters.
Methods:
This study included 993 stroke-free patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) who underwent magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the head and neck as a pre-liver transplant assessment and 6,099 health checkup participants who underwent MRA examination. The two cohorts were matched for cerebrovascular risk factors, and the prevalence of atherosclerosis in major intracranial and extracranial arteries was compared in 755 matched pairs. Moreover, traditional, hepatic, and coronary variables related to cerebral atherosclerosis were assessed in cirrhotic patients.
Results:
Overall, intracranial atherosclerosis was significantly less prevalent in the LC group than in the matched control group (2.3% vs. 5.4%, P=0.002), whereas the prevalence of extracranial atherosclerosis was similar (4.4% vs. 5.8%, P=0.242). These results were maintained in multivariate analyses of the pooled samples, with corresponding adjusted odds ratios [ORs] of LC of 0.56 and 0.77 (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.36–0.88 and 0.55–1.09). In the LC group, lower platelet count was inversely correlated with intracranial atherosclerosis (adjusted OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13–0.76). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score ≥100 was the only predictive factor for both intracranial and extracranial atherosclerosis (adjusted ORs, 4.06 and 5.43, respectively).
Conclusions
LC confers protection against intracranial atherosclerosis, and thrombocytopenia may be involved in this protective effect. High CAC score could serve as a potential surrogate for cervicocerebral vascular screening in asymptomatic cirrhotic patients.
8.The effects of immune checkpoint modulators on the clinical course of patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Jihyun AN ; Hyo Jeong KANG ; Eunsil YU ; Han Chu LEE ; Ju Hyun SHIM
Journal of Liver Cancer 2022;22(1):40-50
Background:
/Aim: Immune checkpoint proteins regulating T-cell mediated anti-tumor immunity have been reported to affect clinical outcomes in multiple malignancies. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of histological expression of immune checkpoint proteins in patients with resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods:
A total of 221 patients with HCC who underwent curative resection were included. Expression of programmed-cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in tumor cells (tPD-L1) and tumor infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMCs) (iPD-L1), programmed-cell death-1 in TIMCs (iPD-1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 in TIMCs (iCTLA-4) were measured immunohistochemically.
Results:
Histo-positivity for iCTLA-4, iPD-1, iPD-L1, and tPD-L1 was 32.1%, 42.5%, 35.3%, and 14.9%, respectively. Multivariate logistic analyses revealed that male sex and tumor >5 cm were variables related to iCTLA-4 positivity (odds ratio [OR], 0.46 and 1.94, respectively; P<0.05). Poor differentiation was related to PD-L1 expression in both tumor cells and TIMCs (OR, 2.88 and 3.46, respectively; P<0.05). Microvascular invasion was significantly associated only with iPD-L1 (OR, 2.24; P<0.05). In time-dependent outcome analyses, expression of immune checkpoint proteins in TIMCs (i.e., iCTLA-4, iPD-1, and iPD-L1) was significantly related to longer overall survival and non-cancer-related survival (all P<0.05), but not to time-to-recurrence or cancer-specific deaths. Concurrent activation of the PD-1:PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways predicted improved outcomes in terms of overall survival and non-cancer related survival (P=0.06 and P=0.03, respectively).
Conclusions
Immune checkpoint proteins upregulated in TIMCs in HCC tissues have individual and additive effects in prolonging the survival of patients, specifically in terms of survival not related to cancer recurrence.
9.Stereotactic body radiation therapy for small (≤5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to curative treatment: Results of a single-arm, phase II clinical trial
Sang Min YOON ; So Yeon KIM ; Young-Suk LIM ; Kang Mo KIM ; Ju Hyun SHIM ; Danbi LEE ; Jihyun AN ; Jinhong JUNG ; Jong Hoon KIM ; Han Chu LEE
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2020;26(4):506-515
Background/Aims:
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is used as an alternative ablative treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not suitable for curative treatments. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of SBRT for small (≤5 cm) HCCs.
Methods:
A phase II, single-arm clinical trial on SBRT for small HCCs was conducted at an academic tertiary care center. The planned SBRT dose was 45 Gy with a fraction size of 15-Gy over 3 consecutive days. The primary endpoint was 2-year local control rate. Radiologic responses were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1) and the modified RECIST criteria.
Results:
Between 2013 and 2016, 50 patients (53 lesions) were enrolled, with a median follow-up period of 47.8 months (range, 2.9–70.6). Patients’ age ranged from 41 to 74 years, and 80% were male. Median tumor size was 1.3 cm (range, 0.7–3.1). The 2- and 5-year local control rates were 100% and 97.1%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate was 77.6%. Six months after SBRT, radiologic responses were evident in 44 lesions (83%) according to the RECIST criteria and 49 (92.4%) according to the modified RECIST criteria. None of the patients showed grade ≥3 adverse events.
Conclusions
SBRT showed excellent results as an ablative treatment for patients with small HCCs while showing minimal toxicities. SBRT can be a good alternative for both curative and salvage intents in patients with HCCs that are unsuitable for curative treatments.
10.Comparison of surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization with additional radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion.
Danbi LEE ; Han Chu LEE ; Jihyun AN ; Ju Hyun SHIM ; Kang Mo KIM ; Young Suk LIM ; Young Hwa CHUNG ; Yung Sang LEE
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2018;24(2):144-150
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Portal vein invasion (PVI) is a poor prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We intended to compare the effects of surgical resection and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with additional radiation therapy (RT) in HCC patients with PVI. METHODS: The subjects comprised 43 patients who underwent surgical resection for HCC with PVI without previous treatment and another 43 patients who received TACE followed by RT (TACE+RT) as initial treatment who were matched for Child-Pugh class, tumor size, and extent of PVI. Disease progression and death after the treatment were examined, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups. Predisposing factors affecting OS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses in HCC patients with PVI. RESULTS: The subjects (Age [51, 24-74; median, range], Sex [81/13; male/female], Etiology [78/1/15; hepatitis B virus {HBV}/ hepatitis C virus {HCV}/non-HBV and non-HCV]) were followed for a median of 17 (2-68) months. There were no differences in clinical or tumor characteristics between the resection and TACE+RT groups. The cumulative PFS was not significantly different between groups. The median PFS was 5.6 and 4.0 months in the resection and TACE+RT groups, respectively. However, the cumulative OS was significantly longer in patients treated with resection than in those treated with TACE+RT (P=0.04). The median OS was 26.9 and 14.2 months in the resection and TACE+RT groups, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that surgical resection was an independent predictive factor for better survival outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection might be an effective treatment in HCC patients with PVI.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular*
;
Causality
;
Disease Progression
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Hepacivirus
;
Hepatectomy
;
Hepatitis B virus
;
Humans
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Portal Vein*

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail