This study explored the differences in academic achievement and psychological/emotional well-being between criterion-referenced evaluation (CRE) and norm-referenced evaluation (NRE) at a medical school. The objective was to address concerns about declining academic performance and to propose evaluation methods that promote a more supportive learning environment for students. In total, 90 first-year medical students who completed the basic medical curriculum in 2022 and 2023 were surveyed and analyzed. The sample consisted of 45 students assessed by NRE in 2022 and 45 students assessed by CRE in 2023. Academic performance was measured using school grades in basic medical subjects and scores from the Basic Medical Education Evaluation. Psychological and emotional well-being were assessed through scales measuring academic burnout, academic motivation, coping efficacy, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. The results indicated that students assessed by CRE achieved significantly higher academic scores in certain subjects than those assessed by NRE. Additionally, the CRE group exhibited more positive psychological and emotional states, including lower levels of academic burnout, anxiety, and depression. These findings suggest that CRE may have a beneficial impact on students’ emotional well-being and overall academic experience. The study concludes that CRE plays a critical role in improving both academic performance and emotional health among medical students, and that transitioning to CRE may alleviate concerns about declining grades while promoting a more supportive learning environment.

This study explored the differences in academic achievement and psychological/emotional well-being between criterion-referenced evaluation (CRE) and norm-referenced evaluation (NRE) at a medical school. The objective was to address concerns about declining academic performance and to propose evaluation methods that promote a more supportive learning environment for students. In total, 90 first-year medical students who completed the basic medical curriculum in 2022 and 2023 were surveyed and analyzed. The sample consisted of 45 students assessed by NRE in 2022 and 45 students assessed by CRE in 2023. Academic performance was measured using school grades in basic medical subjects and scores from the Basic Medical Education Evaluation. Psychological and emotional well-being were assessed through scales measuring academic burnout, academic motivation, coping efficacy, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. The results indicated that students assessed by CRE achieved significantly higher academic scores in certain subjects than those assessed by NRE. Additionally, the CRE group exhibited more positive psychological and emotional states, including lower levels of academic burnout, anxiety, and depression. These findings suggest that CRE may have a beneficial impact on students’ emotional well-being and overall academic experience. The study concludes that CRE plays a critical role in improving both academic performance and emotional health among medical students, and that transitioning to CRE may alleviate concerns about declining grades while promoting a more supportive learning environment.

This study explored the differences in academic achievement and psychological/emotional well-being between criterion-referenced evaluation (CRE) and norm-referenced evaluation (NRE) at a medical school. The objective was to address concerns about declining academic performance and to propose evaluation methods that promote a more supportive learning environment for students. In total, 90 first-year medical students who completed the basic medical curriculum in 2022 and 2023 were surveyed and analyzed. The sample consisted of 45 students assessed by NRE in 2022 and 45 students assessed by CRE in 2023. Academic performance was measured using school grades in basic medical subjects and scores from the Basic Medical Education Evaluation. Psychological and emotional well-being were assessed through scales measuring academic burnout, academic motivation, coping efficacy, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. The results indicated that students assessed by CRE achieved significantly higher academic scores in certain subjects than those assessed by NRE. Additionally, the CRE group exhibited more positive psychological and emotional states, including lower levels of academic burnout, anxiety, and depression. These findings suggest that CRE may have a beneficial impact on students’ emotional well-being and overall academic experience. The study concludes that CRE plays a critical role in improving both academic performance and emotional health among medical students, and that transitioning to CRE may alleviate concerns about declining grades while promoting a more supportive learning environment.

This study explored the differences in academic achievement and psychological/emotional well-being between criterion-referenced evaluation (CRE) and norm-referenced evaluation (NRE) at a medical school. The objective was to address concerns about declining academic performance and to propose evaluation methods that promote a more supportive learning environment for students. In total, 90 first-year medical students who completed the basic medical curriculum in 2022 and 2023 were surveyed and analyzed. The sample consisted of 45 students assessed by NRE in 2022 and 45 students assessed by CRE in 2023. Academic performance was measured using school grades in basic medical subjects and scores from the Basic Medical Education Evaluation. Psychological and emotional well-being were assessed through scales measuring academic burnout, academic motivation, coping efficacy, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. The results indicated that students assessed by CRE achieved significantly higher academic scores in certain subjects than those assessed by NRE. Additionally, the CRE group exhibited more positive psychological and emotional states, including lower levels of academic burnout, anxiety, and depression. These findings suggest that CRE may have a beneficial impact on students’ emotional well-being and overall academic experience. The study concludes that CRE plays a critical role in improving both academic performance and emotional health among medical students, and that transitioning to CRE may alleviate concerns about declining grades while promoting a more supportive learning environment.

This study explored the differences in academic achievement and psychological/emotional well-being between criterion-referenced evaluation (CRE) and norm-referenced evaluation (NRE) at a medical school. The objective was to address concerns about declining academic performance and to propose evaluation methods that promote a more supportive learning environment for students. In total, 90 first-year medical students who completed the basic medical curriculum in 2022 and 2023 were surveyed and analyzed. The sample consisted of 45 students assessed by NRE in 2022 and 45 students assessed by CRE in 2023. Academic performance was measured using school grades in basic medical subjects and scores from the Basic Medical Education Evaluation. Psychological and emotional well-being were assessed through scales measuring academic burnout, academic motivation, coping efficacy, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. The results indicated that students assessed by CRE achieved significantly higher academic scores in certain subjects than those assessed by NRE. Additionally, the CRE group exhibited more positive psychological and emotional states, including lower levels of academic burnout, anxiety, and depression. These findings suggest that CRE may have a beneficial impact on students’ emotional well-being and overall academic experience. The study concludes that CRE plays a critical role in improving both academic performance and emotional health among medical students, and that transitioning to CRE may alleviate concerns about declining grades while promoting a more supportive learning environment.

Background: In Korea, the actual distribution of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) to the clinical field is insufficient due to the many barriers for cardiovascular patients to participate in CR. Community-based CR is a useful alternative to overcome these obstacles. Through a nationwide survey, we investigated the possibility of regional medical and public health management institutes which can be in charge of community-based CR in Korea. Methods: The questionnaires on recognition of CR and current available resources in health-related institutions were developed with reference to the CR evaluation tools of York University and the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation.The questionnaires were sent to regional public and private medical institutions and public health management institutions. Results: In total, 2,267 questionnaires were sent to 1,186 institutions. There were 241 and 242 responses from 173 and 179 regional private and public medical institutions, respectively. And a total of 244 responses were gathered from 180 public health management institutions. Although many institutions were equipped with the necessary facilities for exercise training, there were few patient-monitoring systems during exercise. Most institutions were aware of the need for CR, but were burdened with the cost of establishing personnel and facilities to operate CR. Conclusion Most regional medical, and public health management institutions in Korea are unprepared for the implementation of community-based CR programs. To encourage the utilization of such, there should be efforts to establish a national consensus.

No abstract available.
Lipoproteins ; Wind

The purpose of this study was to examine professors’ and students’ perceptions of curriculum that fosters character in medical school. ‘Character’ can be defined as a desirable personality and the ability to be a good person. A total of 264 subjects (professors=131, students=133) participated in the study. Survey questions were divided into the three parts (education needs, factors of character, and curriculum management strategy). Data were analyzed by using t-test and one-way analysis of variance. Both professors and students recognized the need for character education. Professors were more aware of the need for education than students (t=4.35, p<0.01), and clinical professors were more aware of the need for education than basic medical science professors (t=3.48, p<0.01). Premedical students were more aware of the need for character-centered education than medical students in the later stages of their education (t=3.41, p<0.01). Professors and students commonly referred to ‘consideration and communication’ as the most important factor in building character. Professors considered ‘self-regulation’ more important than the students recognized, while students perceived ‘wisdom’ as more important than the professors did. There was a difference in preference for curriculum development (creating new subjects vs. revising existing subjects) between the two groups. However, both groups agreed on the teaching and evaluation methods. In conclusion, both groups acknowledged the need for character education. However, there were differences in perception on the major factors of character and preference for curriculum development. The results of this study may assist in designing character education in medical education.