Objective:To investigate the application of blended team-based learning (BTBL) in improving the clinical reasoning ability of general practitioners from different sources.Methods:From September to December in 2021, 52 postgraduates of general practice in Tongji University School of Medicine were selected as subjects, and according to their study background and practice experience, they were divided into residency training group, community group, and specialist group. BTBL was adopted for all students in the course of clinical reasoning in general practice, and a 4-station objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) test was conducted before and after the course to evaluate teaching effectiveness from the aspects of medical history collection, physical examination, doctor-patient communication, and medical record writing. SPSS 22.0 was used to perform a statistical analysis of data. Continuous data were expressed as mean±standard deviation, and an analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison between groups; the paired samples t-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used for comparison of normally distributed or non-normally distributed data within each group. Categorical data were expressed as frequency and percentage. Results:There was a significant change in the score of physical examination after the course in the community group (44.88±9.17 vs. 78.06±12.11, t=-12.49, P<0.001), the specialist group (45.85±8.18 vs. 68.65±13.10, t=-6.43, P<0.001), and the residency training group (42.38±15.30 vs. 76.44±16.46, t=-5.98, P<0.001). There was a significant change in the score of doctor-patient communication after the course in the community group (63.00±13.84 vs. 78.69±7.10, t/Z=-4.33, P<0.05) and the residency training group (60.00±15.50 vs. 70.88±6.44, t/Z=-2.12, P<0.05). There was also a significant change in the score of medical record writing after the course in the community group (60.19±17.96 vs. 79.69±14.25, t=-2.96, P<0.05), the specialist group (47.77±12.59 vs. 80.31±12.93, t=-6.26, P<0.05), and the residency training group (37.00±15.50 vs. 75.88±15.88, t=-7.25, P<0.05). The score of medical record writing before the course was 60.19±17.96 in the community group, 47.77±12.59 in the specialist group, and 37.00±15.50 in the residency training group, with a significant difference between the three groups ( χ2=13.04, P=0.001); after the course, the score of medical record writing was 78.69±7.10 in the community group, 63.46±19.40 in the specialist group, and 70.88±6.44 in the residency training group, with a significant difference between the three groups ( χ2=10.13, P=0.006). Conclusions:In the course of clinical reasoning in general practice, BTBL can improve teaching efficiency, save teaching resources, and play the role of promoting strengths and avoiding weaknesses.

Objective:To investigate the application of blended team-based learning (BTBL) in improving the clinical reasoning ability of general practitioners from different sources.Methods:From September to December in 2021, 52 postgraduates of general practice in Tongji University School of Medicine were selected as subjects, and according to their study background and practice experience, they were divided into residency training group, community group, and specialist group. BTBL was adopted for all students in the course of clinical reasoning in general practice, and a 4-station objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) test was conducted before and after the course to evaluate teaching effectiveness from the aspects of medical history collection, physical examination, doctor-patient communication, and medical record writing. SPSS 22.0 was used to perform a statistical analysis of data. Continuous data were expressed as mean±standard deviation, and an analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison between groups; the paired samples t-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used for comparison of normally distributed or non-normally distributed data within each group. Categorical data were expressed as frequency and percentage. Results:There was a significant change in the score of physical examination after the course in the community group (44.88±9.17 vs. 78.06±12.11, t=-12.49, P<0.001), the specialist group (45.85±8.18 vs. 68.65±13.10, t=-6.43, P<0.001), and the residency training group (42.38±15.30 vs. 76.44±16.46, t=-5.98, P<0.001). There was a significant change in the score of doctor-patient communication after the course in the community group (63.00±13.84 vs. 78.69±7.10, t/Z=-4.33, P<0.05) and the residency training group (60.00±15.50 vs. 70.88±6.44, t/Z=-2.12, P<0.05). There was also a significant change in the score of medical record writing after the course in the community group (60.19±17.96 vs. 79.69±14.25, t=-2.96, P<0.05), the specialist group (47.77±12.59 vs. 80.31±12.93, t=-6.26, P<0.05), and the residency training group (37.00±15.50 vs. 75.88±15.88, t=-7.25, P<0.05). The score of medical record writing before the course was 60.19±17.96 in the community group, 47.77±12.59 in the specialist group, and 37.00±15.50 in the residency training group, with a significant difference between the three groups ( χ2=13.04, P=0.001); after the course, the score of medical record writing was 78.69±7.10 in the community group, 63.46±19.40 in the specialist group, and 70.88±6.44 in the residency training group, with a significant difference between the three groups ( χ2=10.13, P=0.006). Conclusions:In the course of clinical reasoning in general practice, BTBL can improve teaching efficiency, save teaching resources, and play the role of promoting strengths and avoiding weaknesses.

Objective To evaluate the value of intrathecal synthetic related markers in patients with mild cognitive impairment(MCI),Alzheimer's disease(AD),and other types of dementia.Methods Retrospec-tively collect the clinical data of 577 patients diagnosed with MCI(MCI group,178 cases),AD(AD group,131 cases),and other types of dementia(other types group,268 cases)from June 2019 to July 2023 in Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University.Oligoclonal zone electrophoresis(OCB)and 24 h intrathecal pro-tein synthesis rate(ISR)of each group were investigated,and the difference of different indexes among the groups was compared to evaluate the value of related indexes in the differential diagnosis of different diseases.Results Compared with AD group and other groups,AD group had a higher proportion of females,more patients were＞50-70 years old,and the incidence of abnormal lipid metabolism was higher,with statistical significance(P＜0.05).There were significant differences in OB(S),cerebrospinal fluid albumin,serum albumin and cerebrospinal flu-id IgG in different disease groups(P＜0.05).IgG index and ISR in patients with positive SOB(CSF)were higher than those in negative and weakly positive patients,and the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.001).IgG index was positively correlated with ISR(r=0.878,P＜0.001).Conclusion Intrathecal synthetic mark-ers such as IgG index,SOB(CSF)and 24 h ISR have synergistic effects in the diagnosis of cognitive dysfunction and various dementias,which can be collectively utilized in the diagnosis of diseases.

Objective: To investigate the activities of daily living and the use of assistive devices among disabled people demanding assistive devices in Jiading Township, Jiading District, Shanghai Municipality, so as to provide the evidence for the implementation of rehabilitation interventions and the selection of assistive devices for the disabled people living in the community. Methods: The disabled people demanding assistive devices were sampled from 17 communities in Jiading Township in January 2020. A face-to-face questionnaire survey was conducted to collect participants'age, gender, type of disability, provision and use of assistive devices. The activities of daily living were evaluated using the Activities of Daily Living Scale, and the difference in the frequency of assistive device use was compared among the disabled people with different activities of daily living. Results: A total of 377 questionnaires were allocated, and 328 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 87.00%. The respondents included 187 men ( 57.01% ) and 141 women (42.99%), and had a mean age of ( 71.78±13.86 ) years. Among all respondents, limb disability was predominant (248 people, 75.61%), and 84.45% (277 people) were provided with assistive devices. Assessment of activities of daily living showed complete self-care in 85 respondents ( 25.91% ), functional decline in 39 respondents ( 11.89% ) and functional dysfunction in 204 respondents ( 62.20% ). The proportion of functional dysfunction was predominantly detected among disabled people at ages of 80 years and older ( 79.63% ) ( P<0.05 ). Of the disabled people with assistive devices, 139 people used the devices daily ( 50.18% ), and the proportion of daily use of assistive devices was significantly higher in people with functional dysfunctions than in those with complete self-care ( 59.33% vs. 29.41%; P<0.05 ). In addition, no need was identified as the predominant cause of non-provision of assistive devices ( 29 people, 56.86% ). Conclusions Functional dysfunction of daily living is highly prevalent among the disabled people demanding assistive devices in Jiading Township, in whom the elderly are predominant, and the proportion of assistive device use is high among people with functional dysfunctions. The provision of assistive devices recommends to be improved based on assessment of activities of daily living.