Ground-glass nodules (GGNs) are common imaging manifestation in the early screening of lung adenocarcinoma. With the widespread use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in lung cancer screening, the detection rate of GGNs has significantly increased. According to the presence or absence of a solid component, GGNs are mainly classified into pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) and mixed ground-glassnodules (mGGNs), which differ in their natural course and biological behavior. In general, pGGNs tend to progress more slowly, whereas mGGNs are more likely to develop invasive features. The vast majority of pGGNs remain stable for years, but some pGGNs and mGGNs may show an increase in size or in the solid component. The "indolence" observed on the surface of GGNs hides complex genomic, metabolic, and immune changes, which are difficult to capture with traditional image-based data. In recent years, multi-omics analysis, radiomics, and artificial intelligence models have provided new tools for identifying high-risk GGNs. However, there is still controversy over the clinical generalizability, interpretability, and standardization of these models. Furthermore, there is no consensus on whether surgical resection is required. This article reviews the molecular mechanisms, metabolic, and immune microenvironment changes involved in the progression of GGNs, discusses the advantages and limitations of imaging prediction models, and combines domestic and international guidelines and survival studies to explore the controversial points in follow-up and surgical strategies, aiming to provide references for the personalized management of GGNs.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to reveal the insomnia burden and relevant influencing factors among informal caregivers (ICs) of hospitalized patients with lung cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional study on ICs of hospitalized patients with lung cancer was conducted from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021. ICs' burden was assessed using the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Linear and logistic regression models were used to identify the influencing factors. RESULTS: Among 289 ICs of hospitalized patients with lung cancer, 83 (28.72%), 53 (18.34%), and 14 (4.84%) ICs experienced mild, moderate, and severe insomnia, respectively. The scores concerning self-esteem, lack of family support, financial problems, disturbed schedule, and health problems were 4.32 ± 0.53, 2.24 ± 0.79, 2.84 ± 1.14, 3.63 ± 0.77, and 2.44 ± 0.95, respectively. ICs with higher Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLS) scores were associated with a lower risk of insomnia, with an odd ratio ( OR) and 95% confidence interval ( CI) of 0.940 (0.898-0.983). Among the ICs, female gender ( OR = 2.597), alcohol consumption ( OR = 3.745), underlying medical conditions ( OR = 11.765), long-term caregiving experience ( OR = 37.037), and higher monthly expenses ( OR = 5.714) were associated with a high risk of insomnia. CONCLUSION Of the hospitalized patients with lung cancer, 51.9% experienced insomnia. Patients' ADL, ICs gender, alcohol consumption, underlying medical conditions, caregiving duration, and monthly expenses were influencing factors. Therefore, prompt screening and early intervention for ICs of patients with lung cancer is necessary.
Humans ; Female ; Caregivers ; Activities of Daily Living ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology* ; Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology*