1.Effect and safety of auricular composite tissue particle injection in treatment of flat nose
Jianmiao FANG ; Xiang YAO ; Yihong GU
Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology 2025;31(3):269-274
Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of auricular composite tissue particle injection in the treatment of nasal collapse.Methods:Patients with flat nose in Yuyao People′s Hospital of Zhejiang Province from June 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively enrolled, and were divided into two groups according to the treatment methods: Observation group, 41 cases were treated with ear complex tissue granule injection, including 16 males and 25 females, aged 19-45 (27.2±1.6) years; Control group, 54 cases underwent silicone prosthesis implantation, including 21 males and 33 females, aged 18-46 (26.4±1.8) years. The satisfaction rates of nasal tip and nasal shape at 1 week, 6 months and 1 year after surgery were compared between the two groups, and the effect maintenance rates of patients at 6 months and 1 year after surgery were compared between the two groups, and the occurrence of adverse reactions in the two groups was recorded.Results:The satisfaction rates of nasal tip at 1 week, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery were 79.6% (43/54), 64.8% (35/54), and 48.2% (26/54) in the control group, and 92.7% (38/41), 78.1% (32/41), and 63.4% (26/41) in the observation group, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The satisfaction rates of nasal shape at 1 week, 6 months and 1 year after surgery were 79.6% (43/54), 55.6% (30/54) and 40.7% (22/54) in the control group and 90.2% (37/41), 75.6% (31/41) and 56.1% (23/41) in the observation group, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the effect maintenance rate between the two groups at 6 months and 1 year after surgery (all P>0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 4.9% (2/41), which was lower than that of 27.8% (15/54) in the control group ( P=0.004). Conclusion:Compared with silicone implantation, there is no significant difference in the nasal tip, nasal shape satisfaction rate and effect maintenance rate of the auricular composite tissue particle injection in the treatment of flat nose , and the incidence of adverse reactions is low.
2.Effect and safety of auricular composite tissue particle injection in treatment of flat nose
Jianmiao FANG ; Xiang YAO ; Yihong GU
Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology 2025;31(3):269-274
Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of auricular composite tissue particle injection in the treatment of nasal collapse.Methods:Patients with flat nose in Yuyao People′s Hospital of Zhejiang Province from June 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively enrolled, and were divided into two groups according to the treatment methods: Observation group, 41 cases were treated with ear complex tissue granule injection, including 16 males and 25 females, aged 19-45 (27.2±1.6) years; Control group, 54 cases underwent silicone prosthesis implantation, including 21 males and 33 females, aged 18-46 (26.4±1.8) years. The satisfaction rates of nasal tip and nasal shape at 1 week, 6 months and 1 year after surgery were compared between the two groups, and the effect maintenance rates of patients at 6 months and 1 year after surgery were compared between the two groups, and the occurrence of adverse reactions in the two groups was recorded.Results:The satisfaction rates of nasal tip at 1 week, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery were 79.6% (43/54), 64.8% (35/54), and 48.2% (26/54) in the control group, and 92.7% (38/41), 78.1% (32/41), and 63.4% (26/41) in the observation group, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The satisfaction rates of nasal shape at 1 week, 6 months and 1 year after surgery were 79.6% (43/54), 55.6% (30/54) and 40.7% (22/54) in the control group and 90.2% (37/41), 75.6% (31/41) and 56.1% (23/41) in the observation group, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the effect maintenance rate between the two groups at 6 months and 1 year after surgery (all P>0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 4.9% (2/41), which was lower than that of 27.8% (15/54) in the control group ( P=0.004). Conclusion:Compared with silicone implantation, there is no significant difference in the nasal tip, nasal shape satisfaction rate and effect maintenance rate of the auricular composite tissue particle injection in the treatment of flat nose , and the incidence of adverse reactions is low.
4.Clinical study of analgesic effect of lornoxicam in nasal packing.
Zhonghua LU ; Qi ZHU ; Jianmiao FANG ; Guanghua PENG ; Suzhen XU
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2013;27(20):1145-1147
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the pain control effect of lornoxicam on patients after nasal packing.
METHOD:
A total of 56 patients undergoing nasal packing between January 2011 and August 2011 were randomly divided into the treatment group and control group. (1) Treatment group: routinely given lornoxicam for injection 8 mg(2 ml), intravenous injection, twice a day; (2) CONTROL GROUP: given saline 2 ml, intravenous injection, twice a day, other treatments are the same with the treatment group. Visual analog scale was used to record the painful severity of nose and head at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h,and record the sleep quality score at 24 and 48 h.
RESULT:
The pain in nose and head and night sleeping in treatment group were all significantly better than that in control group.
CONCLUSION
The analgesic effect of lornoxicam in nasal packing is good, with no evident adverse reactions.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Analgesics
;
therapeutic use
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Nasal Cavity
;
surgery
;
Nasal Surgical Procedures
;
adverse effects
;
Pain, Postoperative
;
drug therapy
;
Piroxicam
;
analogs & derivatives
;
therapeutic use
;
Young Adult

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail