OBJECTIVE: To explore the specific mechanism of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) mediated histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac) modification in promoting the proliferation and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. METHODS: Samples of 40 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and paracancerous tissues resected from January 2021 to January 2023 were collected. The expressions of HDAC2 and H3K27ac in hepatocellular carcinoma, paracancerous tissues and cell lines were detected by immunohistochemistry and Western blotting. The correlation between the expression levels of HDAC2 and H3K27ac and the relationship between HDAC2 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzed. The proliferation, migration and invasion of Hep3B and HepG2 cells were determined by MTS, clone formation, scratch and Transwell experiments. The acetylation of H3K27 mediated by HDAC2 was verified by Western blotting, real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) and chromatin immunoprecipitation high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq). In vivo xenotransplantation experiment, the tumorigenicity of cells in each group was measured, and the expression of proteins related to phosphoinositide 3-kinases/phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR) signal pathway was detected. RESULTS: High expression of HDAC2 and low expression of H3K27ac were found in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and cell lines (P < 0.05), and there was a negative correlation between them (r=-0.477, P=0.002). The expression of HDAC2 was related to tumor size, hepatitis B virus infection, TNM stage and portal vein tumor thrombus (P < 0.05). Compared with the sh-NC group of Hep3B and HepG2 cells, the proliferation, clone formation, migration and invasion ability of sh-HDAC2 group were decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with the Empty group, the HDAC2 group exhibited increased expression levels and activity of HDAC2, as well as enhanced cell proliferation, clone formation, migration, invasion ability, tumor volume and mass in vivo, and elevated expression levels of p-PI3K, p-AKT, and p-mTOR (P < 0.05). Conversely, the enrichment and expression levels of H3K27ac, along with the expression level of PTEN, were decreased (P < 0.05). In the iHDAC2 group, the expression levels and activity of HDAC2, as well as the proliferation, clone formation, migration, invasion ability, tumor volume and mass in vivo, and expression levels of p-PI3K, p-AKT, and p-mTOR were reduced (P < 0.05). Additionally, the expression levels of H3K27ac and PTEN were increased (P < 0.05). To validate the involvement of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in HDAC2-mediated regulation of malignant behaviors in liver cancer cells through H3K27ac, the PI3K activator 740Y-P was introduced. Compared with the iHDAC2 group, the iHDAC2+740Y-P group exhibited increased proliferation, clone formation, migration, invasion ability, tumor volume and mass in vivo, and elevated expression levels of p-PI3K, p-AKT, and p-mTOR (P < 0.05). Conversely, the expression level of PTEN was decreased (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION HDAC2 initiates PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR signal pathway by mediating H3K27 acetylation, which promotes the occurrence and development of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/metabolism* ; Liver Neoplasms/metabolism* ; Histone Deacetylase 2/physiology* ; Cell Proliferation ; Acetylation ; Cell Movement ; Histones/metabolism* ; Animals ; Hep G2 Cells ; Male ; Female ; Mice ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Signal Transduction ; Mice, Nude ; PTEN Phosphohydrolase/metabolism* ; Lysine/metabolism* ; Middle Aged

Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) is a common and lethal manifestation of advanced gastric cancer, with a median survival of only 5-11 months. This consensus was developed by 30 experts from Asia (China, Japan, Korea, and Singapore) using the Delphi method and the GRADE evidence grading system. A total of 29 statements were formulated, covering the diagnosis and assessment of GCPM, indications for laparoscopic exploration and NIPS (normothermic intraperitoneal and systemic treatment), treatment regimens, prevention and management of complications, criteria for conversion surgery, and postoperative intraperitoneal therapy. The consensus aims to standardize clinical practice and improve the prognosis of patients with GCPM.

Due to the unique nature of its anatomical location, the adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been a subject of controversy and disagreement including its definition, staging, and treatment strategies. Chinse expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2018 Edition) had been released in September 2018 and had played a pioneering role in unifying thoracic and general surgeons in China on surgical treatment strategies for AEG. Over the past five years, the emergence of several clinical research results on AEG has provided new clinical evidence for the selection of key surgical treatment strategies. Therefore, to further standardize the surgical treatment of AEG in China, Chinese Expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2024 Edition) was released in 2024 by Chinese expert panel including 25 gastrointestinal surgeons and 24 thoracic surgeons. Based on the highest-level clinical research evidence in recent 5 years, this consensus ultimately formulates 29 recommendations on hotspots and key points on surgical treatment of AEG and summary 5 issues that are still awaiting further exploration. This review will provide a summary and detailed interpretation of the recommendations outlined in this consensus.

Objective:To analyze the safety of paclitaxel-based, hyperthermic, intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (HIPEC) after radical resection of locally advanced gastric cancer.Methods:This was a retrospective cohort study of clinicopathological data of 467 patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who had been admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between July 2019 and April 2021. Among these patients, 151 had undergone radical resection combined with post-operative paclitaxel-based HIPEC (surgery+HIPEC group) and 316 radical resection alone (surgery group). The adverse perioperative events in study patients were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 5.0) published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients in the surgery+HIPEC group according to the number of times HIPEC was administered and the incidence of adverse events was compared between subgroups using the χ 2 test. Independent risk factors for paclitaxel-based HIPEC-associated adverse events were identified by applying a logistic model. Results:In the surgery+HIPEC group, there were 113 (74.8%) male and 38 (25.2%) female patients of median age 64 (55, 68) years, 18 (11.9%), 79 (52.3%), and 54 (35.8%) of whom had undergone one, two, and three paclitaxel-based HIPEC treatments, respectively, after surgery. The median maximum tumor diameter was 5.0 (3.6, 6.5) cm. In the surgery group, there were 244 (77.2%) male and 72 (22.8%) female patients of median age 63 (54, 68) and the median maximum tumor diameter was 4.0 (3.0, 5.5) cm. In the surgery+HIPEC group, 112 patients (74.2%) had 198 Grade 2 or higher adverse perioperative events, postoperative hypoalbuminemia being the commonest (85 cases, 56.3%), followed by postoperative anemia (50 cases, 33.1%). Compared with the surgery group, the incidences of postoperative hypoalbuminemia (56.3% [85/151] vs. 37.7% [119/316], χ 2=14.420, P<0.001), anemia (33.1% [50/151] vs. 22.5% [71/316], χ 2=6.030, P=0.014), abdominal pain [7.3% [11/151] vs. 1.6% [5/316], χ 2=10.042, P=0.002) and abdominal distension (5.3% [8/151] vs. 1.3% [4/316], χ 2=5.123, P=0.024) were all significantly higher in the surgery+HIPEC group. Analysis of the three HIPEC subgroups revealed significant differences in the incidences of postoperative hypoalbuminemia (13/18 vs. 67.1% [53/79] vs. 35.2% [19/54], χ 2=12.955, P<0.001) and pulmonary infection (6/18 vs. 6.3% [5/79] vs. 1.9% [1/54], χ 2=13.232, P<0.001) between them. Univariate analysis identified body mass index, Borrmann's type and number of HIPEC treatments as associated with perioperative adverse events in the surgery+HIPEC group ( P<0.05). However, according to multifactorial logistic analysis, the above factors were not independent risk factors for perioperative adverse events in the surgery+HIPEC group ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Paclitaxel-based HIPEC after radical resection significantly increases the risk of postoperative hypoalbuminemia, anemia, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension in patients who have undergone excision of locally advanced gastric cancer. However, increasing the frequency of HIPEC treatments did not significantly increase the risk of paclitaxel-based HIPEC-related adverse events. Moreover, univariate and multivariate analysis did not identify any independent risk factors for paclitaxel HIPEC-related adverse events.

Due to the unique nature of its anatomical location, the adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been a subject of controversy and disagreement including its definition, staging, and treatment strategies. Chinse expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2018 Edition) had been released in September 2018 and had played a pioneering role in unifying thoracic and general surgeons in China on surgical treatment strategies for AEG. Over the past five years, the emergence of several clinical research results on AEG has provided new clinical evidence for the selection of key surgical treatment strategies. Therefore, to further standardize the surgical treatment of AEG in China, Chinese Expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2024 Edition) was released in 2024 by Chinese expert panel including 25 gastrointestinal surgeons and 24 thoracic surgeons. Based on the highest-level clinical research evidence in recent 5 years, this consensus ultimately formulates 29 recommendations on hotspots and key points on surgical treatment of AEG and summary 5 issues that are still awaiting further exploration. This review will provide a summary and detailed interpretation of the recommendations outlined in this consensus.

Objective:To analyze the safety of paclitaxel-based, hyperthermic, intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (HIPEC) after radical resection of locally advanced gastric cancer.Methods:This was a retrospective cohort study of clinicopathological data of 467 patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who had been admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between July 2019 and April 2021. Among these patients, 151 had undergone radical resection combined with post-operative paclitaxel-based HIPEC (surgery+HIPEC group) and 316 radical resection alone (surgery group). The adverse perioperative events in study patients were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 5.0) published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients in the surgery+HIPEC group according to the number of times HIPEC was administered and the incidence of adverse events was compared between subgroups using the χ 2 test. Independent risk factors for paclitaxel-based HIPEC-associated adverse events were identified by applying a logistic model. Results:In the surgery+HIPEC group, there were 113 (74.8%) male and 38 (25.2%) female patients of median age 64 (55, 68) years, 18 (11.9%), 79 (52.3%), and 54 (35.8%) of whom had undergone one, two, and three paclitaxel-based HIPEC treatments, respectively, after surgery. The median maximum tumor diameter was 5.0 (3.6, 6.5) cm. In the surgery group, there were 244 (77.2%) male and 72 (22.8%) female patients of median age 63 (54, 68) and the median maximum tumor diameter was 4.0 (3.0, 5.5) cm. In the surgery+HIPEC group, 112 patients (74.2%) had 198 Grade 2 or higher adverse perioperative events, postoperative hypoalbuminemia being the commonest (85 cases, 56.3%), followed by postoperative anemia (50 cases, 33.1%). Compared with the surgery group, the incidences of postoperative hypoalbuminemia (56.3% [85/151] vs. 37.7% [119/316], χ 2=14.420, P<0.001), anemia (33.1% [50/151] vs. 22.5% [71/316], χ 2=6.030, P=0.014), abdominal pain [7.3% [11/151] vs. 1.6% [5/316], χ 2=10.042, P=0.002) and abdominal distension (5.3% [8/151] vs. 1.3% [4/316], χ 2=5.123, P=0.024) were all significantly higher in the surgery+HIPEC group. Analysis of the three HIPEC subgroups revealed significant differences in the incidences of postoperative hypoalbuminemia (13/18 vs. 67.1% [53/79] vs. 35.2% [19/54], χ 2=12.955, P<0.001) and pulmonary infection (6/18 vs. 6.3% [5/79] vs. 1.9% [1/54], χ 2=13.232, P<0.001) between them. Univariate analysis identified body mass index, Borrmann's type and number of HIPEC treatments as associated with perioperative adverse events in the surgery+HIPEC group ( P<0.05). However, according to multifactorial logistic analysis, the above factors were not independent risk factors for perioperative adverse events in the surgery+HIPEC group ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Paclitaxel-based HIPEC after radical resection significantly increases the risk of postoperative hypoalbuminemia, anemia, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension in patients who have undergone excision of locally advanced gastric cancer. However, increasing the frequency of HIPEC treatments did not significantly increase the risk of paclitaxel-based HIPEC-related adverse events. Moreover, univariate and multivariate analysis did not identify any independent risk factors for paclitaxel HIPEC-related adverse events.

Objective To retrospectively analyse the use of TCM injections in Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Capital Medical University from 2019 to 2023;To evaluate the reasonableness of its clinical use of medication;To provide theoretical guidance for clinical work in the new situation.Methods Relevant data on the use of TCM injections in a hospital from 2019 to 2023 were collected,and the research method of retrospective analysis was used to analyse their use and medication law.Results From 2019 to 2023,the overall amount of use of TCM injections and the ratio of the amount of use of Western patent medicines showed a downward trend year by year;the amount of anti-neoplastic drugs TCM injections ranked in the first place although it decreased year by year,and the amount of use of enucleating agents and oncological auxiliary drugs TCM injections showed a downward trend;the changes in the consumption of TCM injections,the defined daily doses,and the defined daily cost fluctuated greatly,which was relevant to the medical insurance policy and the inclusion of the nationally negotiated medicines;both the infection of COVID-19 and medical policy played a great influence on the application of TCM injections.Conclusion The use of TCM injections is subject to changes in policy and the influence of social environment,and the supervision of the use of TCM injections should be strengthened to ensure the rational use of medication and medication safety for patients.

Objective To analyze the use of Chinese patent medicines containing toxic TCM decoction pieces in Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Capital Medical University(hereinafter referred to as"our hospital")from 2021 to 2023;To provide references for reasonable management of Chinese patent medicines containing toxic TCM decoction pieces in medical institutions.Methods The Chinese patent medicines containing toxic TCM decoction pieces from 2021 to 2023 were collected in our hospital.Statistics on the number of varieties,efficacy and sales amount of Chinese patent medicines containing toxic TCM decoction pieces were performed.Results From 2021 to 2023,there were 110 kinds of Chinese patent medicines containing toxic TCM decoction pieces and 10 kinds of Chinese patent medicines containing TCM decoction pieces with heavy toxicity,among which the ones of promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis ranked first.The top 3 TCM decoction pieces with heavy toxicity were raw Aconiti Kusnezoffii Radix,raw Aconiti Radix,Strychni Semen;the top 5 TCM decoction pieces with toxicity were Cinnabaris,Realgar,processed Aconiti Kusnezoffii Radix,Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata,Scorpio;the top 3 TCM decoction pieces with light toxicity were Armeniacae Semen Amarum,Hirudo,Eupolyphaga Steleophaga.The top 15 Chinese patent medicines containing toxic TCM decoction pieces in our hospital was relatively stable,especially the Guanjie Kebi Pills in the first place.Conclusion Based on the analysis of the use of Chinese patent medicines containing toxic TCM decoction pieces from 2021 to 2023,this article discuss measures to ensure the safe use of Chinese patent medicines containing toxic TCM decoction pieces,with certain feasibility and necessity.

BACKGROUND: The results of studies comparing Billroth-I (B-I) with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction on the quality of life (QoL) are still inconsistent. The aim of this trial was to compare the long-term QoL of B-I with R-Y anastomosis after curative distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 140 patients undergoing curative distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in West China Hospital, Sichuan University from May 2011 to May 2014 were randomly assigned to the B-I group ( N  = 70) and R-Y group ( N  = 70). The follow-up time points were 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after the operation. The final follow-up time was May 2019. The clinicopathological features, operative safety, postoperative recovery, long-term survival as well as QoL were compared, among which QoL score was the primary outcome. An intention-to-treat analysis was applied. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, and postoperative recovery between the two groups. Less estimated blood loss and shorter surgical duration were found in the B-I group. There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year overall survival (79% [55/70] of the B-I group vs. 80% [56/70] of the R-Y group, P  = 0.966) and recurrence-free survival rates (79% [55/70] of the B-I group vs. 78% [55/70] of the R-Y group, P  = 0.979) between the two groups. The scores of the global health status of the R-Y group were higher than those of the B-I group with statistically significant differences (postoperative 1 year: 85.4 ± 13.1 vs . 88.8 ± 16.1, P  = 0.033; postoperative 3 year: 87.3 ± 15.2 vs . 92.8 ± 11.3, P  = 0.028; postoperative 5 year: 90.9 ± 13.7 vs . 96.4 ± 5.6, P  = 0.010), and the reflux (postoperative 3 year: 8.8 ± 12.9 vs . 2.8 ± 5.3, P  = 0.001; postoperative 5 year: 5.1 ± 9.8 vs . 1.8 ± 4.7, P  = 0.033) and epigastric pain (postoperative 1 year: 11.8 ± 12.7 vs. 6.1 ± 8.8, P  = 0.008; postoperative 3 year: 9.4 ± 10.6 vs. 4.6 ± 7.9, P  = 0.006; postoperative 5 year: 6.0 ± 8.9 vs . 2.7 ± 4.6, P  = 0.022) were milder in the R-Y group than those of the B-I group at the postoperative 1, 3, and 5-year time points. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with B-I group, R-Y reconstruction was associated with better long-term QoL by reducing reflux and epigastric pain, without changing survival outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR.org.cn, ChiCTR-TRC-10001434.
Humans ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology* ; Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y/methods* ; Quality of Life ; Treatment Outcome ; Gastrectomy/methods* ; Postoperative Complications ; Gastroenterostomy/methods* ; Pain

Objective:To explore the preventive value of "integrated prevention strategy" for nipple and areola ischemia after single-port endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy.Methods:The clinical data of 72 patients with breast cancer who received single-port endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from July 2019 to July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, they were all female. The follow-up period was up to July 2022. According to the perioperative treatment methods, the patients were divided into observation group ( n=40) and control group ( n=32). The patients in the observation group who adopted the "integrated prevention strategy" scheme, and patients in the control group who adopted the conventional treatment scheme. The incidence of postoperative nipple and areola ischemic was compared between the two groups, and the postoperative cosmetic effect, quality of life and satisfaction of patients were evaluated. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation ( ± s), and t-test was used for comparison between groups; the Chi-square test was used to compare the data groups. Results:The postoperative drainage volume in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [(632.40±226.37) mL vs (774.91±239.85) mL], and the difference was statistically significant ( P=0.013). Two weeks after operation, there was 1 case of nipple and areola ischemia in the observation group, and 7 cases in the control group, the difference was statistically significant between the two groups ( P=0.019). Twelve months after operation, the score of breast satisfaction (83.93±11.64 vs 67.28±11.52), chest satisfaction (89.63±8.06 vs 83.03±9.49) and psychosocial well-being (89.43±12.42 vs 78.88±10.40) in the observation group were better than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusion:"Integrated prevention strategy" can effectively prevent the occurrence of nipple and areola ischemic after single-port endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy and improve patient satisfaction, which has certain promotion value.