Objective:To explore the effect of nursing scheme based on self-regulation theory (SRT) on self-efficacy and quality of life of patients with chronic pancreatitis, and to provide basis for better promoting patients′ rehabilitation.Methods:Using a non-random historical control study, 55 patients with chronic pancreatitis admitted to The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University from November 2021 to October 2022 were classified as the control group, and 55 patients with chronic pancreatitis admitted from November 2022 to October 2023 were classified as the research group. The control group received routine nursing intervention, while the research group received SRT-based nursing intervention. Both groups received a 3-month intervention. The General Self-Efficacy Scale, Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale, Self Rated Abilities for Health Practices Scale, and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index were used to evaluate the self-efficacy, self-care ability, health behavior, and quality of life of two groups before and after the intervention, and statistical comparisons were made.Results:Both groups of patients completed the study. There were 28 males and 27 females in the control group. The age was (45.33 ± 12.26) years old. There were 30 males and 25 females in the research group. The age was (45.48 ± 12.61) years old. After the intervention, the score of the self-efficacy in the research group was (29.32 ± 2.88) points, which was higher than that in the control group (19.28 ± 1.95) points, the difference was significant ( t=21.41, P<0.05). The scores of self-care skills, self-responsibility, self-concept, health knowledge and the total score of the self-care ability in the research group were (35.32 ± 2.31), (22.85 ± 1.42), (25.88 ± 1.93), (64.32 ± 5.22), (148.34 ± 8.33) points respectively. They were all higher than those of the control group (28.66 ± 1.77), (17.22 ± 1.23), (18.67 ± 1.86), (60.08 ± 4.52), (124.56 ± 8.92) points. The differences were significant ( t values were 4.55-22.23, all P<0.05). The scores of exercise, nutrition, health responsibility, psychological comfort and the total score of the health behavior in the research group were (25.58 ± 1.41), (25.02 ± 2.03), (24.31 ± 2.34), (25.16 ± 1.63), (100.05 ± 7.36) points respectively. They were all higher than those of the control group (22.31 ± 2.03), (20.15 ± 2.82), (20.16 ± 2.89), (21.15 ± 2.17), (83.79 ± 7.84) points. The differences were significant ( t values were 8.28-11.21, all P<0.05). The scores of social activity, psychological state, physiological function, self-conscious symptoms and the total score of the quality of life in the research group were (16.78 ± 1.26), (17.03 ± 1.85), (22.43 ± 1.96), (17.09 ± 0.88), (73.41 ± 4.22) points respectively. They were all higher than those of the control group (15.32 ± 1.15), (15.34 ± 1.76), (20.86 ± 1.59), (16.03 ± 0.75), (67.52 ± 4.18) points. The differences were significant ( t values were 4.61-7.35, all P<0.05). Conclusions:SRT-based nursing scheme can effectively improve the self-efficacy and self-care ability of patients with chronic pancreatitis, and improve their health behavior and quality of life.

Objective:To explore the effect of nursing scheme based on self-regulation theory (SRT) on self-efficacy and quality of life of patients with chronic pancreatitis, and to provide basis for better promoting patients′ rehabilitation.Methods:Using a non-random historical control study, 55 patients with chronic pancreatitis admitted to The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University from November 2021 to October 2022 were classified as the control group, and 55 patients with chronic pancreatitis admitted from November 2022 to October 2023 were classified as the research group. The control group received routine nursing intervention, while the research group received SRT-based nursing intervention. Both groups received a 3-month intervention. The General Self-Efficacy Scale, Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale, Self Rated Abilities for Health Practices Scale, and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index were used to evaluate the self-efficacy, self-care ability, health behavior, and quality of life of two groups before and after the intervention, and statistical comparisons were made.Results:Both groups of patients completed the study. There were 28 males and 27 females in the control group. The age was (45.33 ± 12.26) years old. There were 30 males and 25 females in the research group. The age was (45.48 ± 12.61) years old. After the intervention, the score of the self-efficacy in the research group was (29.32 ± 2.88) points, which was higher than that in the control group (19.28 ± 1.95) points, the difference was significant ( t=21.41, P<0.05). The scores of self-care skills, self-responsibility, self-concept, health knowledge and the total score of the self-care ability in the research group were (35.32 ± 2.31), (22.85 ± 1.42), (25.88 ± 1.93), (64.32 ± 5.22), (148.34 ± 8.33) points respectively. They were all higher than those of the control group (28.66 ± 1.77), (17.22 ± 1.23), (18.67 ± 1.86), (60.08 ± 4.52), (124.56 ± 8.92) points. The differences were significant ( t values were 4.55-22.23, all P<0.05). The scores of exercise, nutrition, health responsibility, psychological comfort and the total score of the health behavior in the research group were (25.58 ± 1.41), (25.02 ± 2.03), (24.31 ± 2.34), (25.16 ± 1.63), (100.05 ± 7.36) points respectively. They were all higher than those of the control group (22.31 ± 2.03), (20.15 ± 2.82), (20.16 ± 2.89), (21.15 ± 2.17), (83.79 ± 7.84) points. The differences were significant ( t values were 8.28-11.21, all P<0.05). The scores of social activity, psychological state, physiological function, self-conscious symptoms and the total score of the quality of life in the research group were (16.78 ± 1.26), (17.03 ± 1.85), (22.43 ± 1.96), (17.09 ± 0.88), (73.41 ± 4.22) points respectively. They were all higher than those of the control group (15.32 ± 1.15), (15.34 ± 1.76), (20.86 ± 1.59), (16.03 ± 0.75), (67.52 ± 4.18) points. The differences were significant ( t values were 4.61-7.35, all P<0.05). Conclusions:SRT-based nursing scheme can effectively improve the self-efficacy and self-care ability of patients with chronic pancreatitis, and improve their health behavior and quality of life.

Objective To discuss the clinical features and therapeutic effects of adrenogenital syndrome in children. Methods Clinical and follow up data were summarized for 42 children with adrenogenital syndrome, including 30 cases of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) and 12 cases of adrenal cortex tumor. Results Endocrine function examination in 15 cases of CAH showed that 24h urine 17 KS was elevated in 10 cases and normal in 5.There was obvious clitorism in all 30 CAH children and urogenital sinus malformation in 28.Of the 12 cases of adrenal cortex tumor 7 had sexual abnormality and hypercortisolism simultaneously.Clitoris shortening or clitoridectomy was performed in CAH cases plus vaginal vestibule plasty simultaneously.Of the 12 cases of adrenal cortex tumor 10 underwent complete tumor resection;1 partial tumor resection and the remaining 1 declined treatment.During the follow up 8 case of cortex tumor,4 cases of adenoma survived tumor free with an average survival time of 7.5 years;2 cases of cortex carcinoma survived tumor free for 3 and 4 years;while the other 2 cases died soon after discharge. Conclusions The diagnosis can be established based on clitorism,labium confluence or male sexual precocity,increase in urine 24h 17 KS and blood testrone.Cortex hormone should be taken early,properly,life long in CAH patients,and appropriate perineoplasty should be performed.Early detection and resection of tumor is the key point for treating adrenogenital syndrome caused by cortex tumor.