Objective:To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of full-time full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FELIF) using a bladed retractor fusion channel (BRFC) system with reversed-mounting designed instruments compared to a tubular fusion channel (TFC).Methods:This retrospective study analyzed 101 cases of uniportal coaxial endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion performed between June 2018 and April 2023. Based on the type of fusion channel utilized, patients were divided into the TFC group (59 cases) and the BRFC group (42 cases). The BRFC technique involved neurological decompression, endplate preparation, and interbody fusion performed under full-time endoscopic monitoring with reversed-mounting designed instruments. Key parameters, including surgery duration, intraoperative estimated blood loss (IEBL), complication incidence, and interbody fusion rate (assessed by Bridwell criteria), were compared between the two groups. Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were recorded preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Additionally, disc height at the fusion level was measured at one week postoperatively.Results:The mean follow-up duration was 42.9±12.1 months in the TFC group and 20.9±4.9 months in the BRFC group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of surgery duration, IEBL, complication incidence, or interbody fusion rate (Grade 1 or 2 by Bridwell criteria) ( P>0.05). For single-level cases, the TFC group showed significantly better short-term clinical outcomes than the BRFC group at one week postoperatively, with JOA scores of 23(20, 25) versus 20(18, 23) ( Z=3.020, P=0.003) and ODI scores of 16%(11%, 21%) versus 28%(21%, 41%) ( Z=4.740, P<0.001). For double-level cases, the JOA score in the TFC group [23(20, 25)] was also significantly better than that in the BRFC group [20(18, 21)] ( Z=2.054, P=0.040) at one week postoperatively. However, at the final follow-up, all clinical indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups ( P>0.05). The disc height at the fusion level significantly increased at one week postoperatively compared to preoperative measurements in both groups ( P<0.05). However, the BRFC group demonstrated a significantly more recovery of disc height at one week postoperatively [(1.46±0.28) cm] compared to the TFC group [(1.17±0.20) cm] ( t=5.947, P<0.001). Conclusion:Full-time FELIF using the BRFC system and reversed-mounting designed instruments is a feasible, safe, and effective approach. However, its short-term clinical outcomes appear inferior to traditional FELIF using the TFC system.

Objective:To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of full-time full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FELIF) using a bladed retractor fusion channel (BRFC) system with reversed-mounting designed instruments compared to a tubular fusion channel (TFC).Methods:This retrospective study analyzed 101 cases of uniportal coaxial endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion performed between June 2018 and April 2023. Based on the type of fusion channel utilized, patients were divided into the TFC group (59 cases) and the BRFC group (42 cases). The BRFC technique involved neurological decompression, endplate preparation, and interbody fusion performed under full-time endoscopic monitoring with reversed-mounting designed instruments. Key parameters, including surgery duration, intraoperative estimated blood loss (IEBL), complication incidence, and interbody fusion rate (assessed by Bridwell criteria), were compared between the two groups. Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were recorded preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Additionally, disc height at the fusion level was measured at one week postoperatively.Results:The mean follow-up duration was 42.9±12.1 months in the TFC group and 20.9±4.9 months in the BRFC group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of surgery duration, IEBL, complication incidence, or interbody fusion rate (Grade 1 or 2 by Bridwell criteria) ( P>0.05). For single-level cases, the TFC group showed significantly better short-term clinical outcomes than the BRFC group at one week postoperatively, with JOA scores of 23(20, 25) versus 20(18, 23) ( Z=3.020, P=0.003) and ODI scores of 16%(11%, 21%) versus 28%(21%, 41%) ( Z=4.740, P<0.001). For double-level cases, the JOA score in the TFC group [23(20, 25)] was also significantly better than that in the BRFC group [20(18, 21)] ( Z=2.054, P=0.040) at one week postoperatively. However, at the final follow-up, all clinical indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups ( P>0.05). The disc height at the fusion level significantly increased at one week postoperatively compared to preoperative measurements in both groups ( P<0.05). However, the BRFC group demonstrated a significantly more recovery of disc height at one week postoperatively [(1.46±0.28) cm] compared to the TFC group [(1.17±0.20) cm] ( t=5.947, P<0.001). Conclusion:Full-time FELIF using the BRFC system and reversed-mounting designed instruments is a feasible, safe, and effective approach. However, its short-term clinical outcomes appear inferior to traditional FELIF using the TFC system.

In this study, products of psoralen pyrolysis were detected using a solid pyrolysis apparatus and synchrotron radiation vacuum ultraviolet photoionization mass spectrum (SVUV-PIMS). The pyrolytic kinetics of psoralen was also studied by calculating its initial pyrolytic route in quantum chemistry. According to the findings with SVUV-PIMS, three pyrolytic products were observed, CO, C9H6O and C10H6O2. Theoretically, three fragment pathways were calculated for psoralen, in which the major primary decomposition route was de-CO, and the major secondary decomposition reaction was de-CO reaction of de-CO products.
Carbon Monoxide ; chemistry ; Ficusin ; chemistry ; Hot Temperature ; Kinetics ; Mass Spectrometry ; instrumentation ; methods ; Models, Chemical ; Molecular Structure ; Organic Chemicals ; chemistry ; Synchrotrons ; Ultraviolet Rays ; Vacuum