Objective To investigate the significance of modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity score (S-ReSC), renal stone complexity score (R.I.R.S.), and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Nephrolithometric Nomogram (CROES) score in predicting the stone-clearance rate (SFR) after ureteroscopy combined with flexible negative pressure suction sheath in the treatment of kidney stones. Methods A total of 200 patients with kidney stones treated in our hospital during Dec.2022 and Apr.2024 were selected.According to abdominal CT evaluation 1 month after surgery, the patients were divided into the residual group (n=38) and the non-residual group (n=162).The relationship between the scores was assessed with Pearson correlation, the independent risk factors were identified with binary logistic regression, the predictive efficacy was evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the difference in the area under the ROC curves (AUCs) was compared with the Delong test. Results Compared with the non-residual group, the residual group had significantly higher modified S-ReSC and R.I.R.S., but significantly lower CROES score (P＜0.05). Modified S-ReSC was positively correlated with R.I.R.S. (P＜0.05), while CROES score was negatively correlated with S-ReSC and R.I.R.S.Staghorn stones, maximum stone diameter, elevated CT values, increased S-ReSC and R.I.R.S., and decreased CROES score were independent risk factors for postoperative stone residual (P＜0.05).ROC curves showed the optimal AUC of R.I.R.S.was 0.855, and the optimal AUC of combined prediction was 0.950.Conclusion The R.I.R.S.has the best efficacy in predicting postoperative stone residual, especially for complex stones.The combination of stone characteristics and the three scoring systems can improve the prediction efficiency, and provide reference for preoperative evaluation and individualized treatment.

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of paroxetine alone and combined with folic acid in patients complaining of premature ejaculation ,and measured the 5-hydroxyptamine(5-HT ) concentration in two groups before and after treatment and compared the differences .Methods 126 cases of PE were included from department of Urology of 363 Hospital of Chengdu .Subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups ,group A were given paroxetine hydrochloride 20 mg/d ,group B were given paroxetine hydrochloride 20 mg/d and fo-lic acid 0 .4 mg/d ,study duration was 8 weeks .Blood sample got from the candidates both in screening period and after 8 weeks of treatment .The efficiency after treatment was measured by IELT and PEP ,the plasma 5-HT level was measured too .SPSS16 .0 statistical analysis was used .Results After treatment ,IELT of group A and group B was improved from 1 .21 ,1 .18 min to 8 .04 ,9 .42 min .The improvement of average IELT in group B was significantly higher than that in group A ,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0 .05) ;The PEP score and 5-HT level in group B were significantly higher than that in group A ,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0 .05) .Conclusion Paroxetine combined with folic acid in the treatment of primary premature ejaculation has a significant effect ,compared to paroxetine alone .The average plasma level of 5-HT increased significantly ,and folic acid could assist paroxetine in elevating plasma levels of 5-HT and improving primary premature ejaculation symptoms .

Objective To investigate the relationship between concentration change of serum 5‐hydroxy tryptamine and clinical symptoms improvement in primary premature ejaculation with the treatment of paroxitine .Methods 81 cases of lifelong PE and an intra‐vaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT ) ≤60 s were included in this study .Subjects were divided into 2 groups according to the IELT ,group A (IELT≤30 s) and group B (30 s