OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

Purpose: In chronic inflammatory diseases, neutrophils release NETs (neutrophil extracellular traps), web-like structures composedof DNA and citrullinated histones, to eliminate bacteria and regulate the inflammatory response. In periodontitis, NETosis acts asa crucial defense mechanism, characterized by the expression of citrullinated histones. This study aims to evaluate the impact ofage and smoking on the expression of citrullinated histones in patients with periodontitis and the feasibility of using saliva for their detection. Materials and Methods: A total of 19 patients participated in the experiment. Among them, 15 were grouped accord-ing to smoking status and age, with 5 patients assigned to each group. After clinical and radiographic examinations, blood sampleswere collected from the subjects, and serum was separated. For 4 subjects, both blood and saliva samples were collected. Thelevels of citrullinated histones in the samples were quantified using an ELISA kit, and the results were compared and statisticallyanalyzed. Results: The concentration of citrullinated histones was significantly higher in younger individuals (P < 0.05). Although the expression of citrullinated histones was higher in the smoking group compared to the non-smoking group, the difference was not statistically significant. In patients with periodontitis, the levels of citrullinated histones detected in saliva were comparable to those found in serum. Conclusion Age may be potential risk factors influencing the expression of citrullinated histones in patients with periodontitis. Additionally, saliva, which is easier to collect, could be used as a viable sample for detecting citrullinated histones in periodontitis patients.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

Purpose: In chronic inflammatory diseases, neutrophils release NETs (neutrophil extracellular traps), web-like structures composedof DNA and citrullinated histones, to eliminate bacteria and regulate the inflammatory response. In periodontitis, NETosis acts asa crucial defense mechanism, characterized by the expression of citrullinated histones. This study aims to evaluate the impact ofage and smoking on the expression of citrullinated histones in patients with periodontitis and the feasibility of using saliva for their detection. Materials and Methods: A total of 19 patients participated in the experiment. Among them, 15 were grouped accord-ing to smoking status and age, with 5 patients assigned to each group. After clinical and radiographic examinations, blood sampleswere collected from the subjects, and serum was separated. For 4 subjects, both blood and saliva samples were collected. Thelevels of citrullinated histones in the samples were quantified using an ELISA kit, and the results were compared and statisticallyanalyzed. Results: The concentration of citrullinated histones was significantly higher in younger individuals (P < 0.05). Although the expression of citrullinated histones was higher in the smoking group compared to the non-smoking group, the difference was not statistically significant. In patients with periodontitis, the levels of citrullinated histones detected in saliva were comparable to those found in serum. Conclusion Age may be potential risk factors influencing the expression of citrullinated histones in patients with periodontitis. Additionally, saliva, which is easier to collect, could be used as a viable sample for detecting citrullinated histones in periodontitis patients.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

Purpose: In chronic inflammatory diseases, neutrophils release NETs (neutrophil extracellular traps), web-like structures composedof DNA and citrullinated histones, to eliminate bacteria and regulate the inflammatory response. In periodontitis, NETosis acts asa crucial defense mechanism, characterized by the expression of citrullinated histones. This study aims to evaluate the impact ofage and smoking on the expression of citrullinated histones in patients with periodontitis and the feasibility of using saliva for their detection. Materials and Methods: A total of 19 patients participated in the experiment. Among them, 15 were grouped accord-ing to smoking status and age, with 5 patients assigned to each group. After clinical and radiographic examinations, blood sampleswere collected from the subjects, and serum was separated. For 4 subjects, both blood and saliva samples were collected. Thelevels of citrullinated histones in the samples were quantified using an ELISA kit, and the results were compared and statisticallyanalyzed. Results: The concentration of citrullinated histones was significantly higher in younger individuals (P < 0.05). Although the expression of citrullinated histones was higher in the smoking group compared to the non-smoking group, the difference was not statistically significant. In patients with periodontitis, the levels of citrullinated histones detected in saliva were comparable to those found in serum. Conclusion Age may be potential risk factors influencing the expression of citrullinated histones in patients with periodontitis. Additionally, saliva, which is easier to collect, could be used as a viable sample for detecting citrullinated histones in periodontitis patients.

Objective: The Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease–Cognition (SCOPA-Cog) was developed to assess cognition in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the SCOPACog (K-SCOPA-Cog). Methods: We enrolled 129 PD patients with movement disorders from 31 clinics in South Korea. The original version of the SCOPA-Cog was translated into Korean using the translation-retranslation method. The test–retest method with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were used to assess reliability. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Korean version (MOCA-K) and the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) were used to assess concurrent validity. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.797, and the ICC was 0.887. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation with the K-MMSE and MOCA-K scores (r = 0.546 and r = 0.683, respectively). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that the K-SCOPA-Cog has good reliability and validity.

Background: Hand hygiene is considered the simplest and most cost-effective method of infection prevention. Regular observation and feedback on hand hygiene compliance are key strategies for its enhancement. This study evaluated the effectiveness of hand hygiene surveillance, including direct observation and feedback, by comprehensively analyzing the reported hand hygiene compliance within the Korean National Healthcare-Associated Infections Surveillance System from 2019 to 2022. Methods: Participating medical institutions included general hospitals and hospitals with infection control departments that consented to participate. Hand hygiene surveillance was conducted using direct observation. Collected data, including healthcare workers, clinical areas, hand hygiene moments, and hand hygiene compliance, were recorded to calculate hand hygiene compliance rates. Additionally, the volume of alcohol-based hand sanitizers used per patient per day was investigated as an indirect indicator of hand hygiene compliance. The study was conducted from July 2019 to December 2022. Results: Hand hygiene compliance increased from 87.2% in Q3 2019 to 89.9% in 2022. Nurses and medical technologists showed the highest compliance rates, whereas doctors showed the lowest compliance rates. Intensive care units excelled in compliance, whereas emergency de partments lagged. Compliance was highest after patient contact and lowest when the patient’s surroundings were touched. Larger hospitals consumed more alcohol-based hand sanitizers than smaller hospitals did. Conclusion This study confirmed an improvement in hand hygiene compliance through sustained surveillance, indicating its contribution not only to preventing infection transfer within healthcare facilities but also to fostering a culture of hand hygiene in the country.