Background: Currently, little is known about the relationship between the temporal radiographic latent trajectories, which are based on the extent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to elucidate the differences in the temporal trends of critical laboratory biomarkers, utilization of critical care support, and clinical outcomes according to temporal radiographic latent trajectories. Methods: We enrolled 2,385 patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19 and underwent serial chest radiographs from December 2019 to March 2022. The extent of radiographic pneumonia was quantified as a percentage using a previously developed deep-learning algorithm. A latent class growth model was used to identify the trajectories of the longitudinal changes of COVID-19 pneumonia extents during hospitalization. We investigated the differences in the temporal trends of critical laboratory biomarkers among the temporal radiographic trajectory groups. Cox regression analyses were conducted to investigate differences in the utilization of critical care supports and clinical outcomes among the temporal radiographic trajectory groups. Results: The mean age of the enrolled patients was 58.0 ± 16.9 years old, with 1,149 (48.2%) being male. Radiographic pneumonia trajectories were classified into three groups: The steady group (n = 1,925, 80.7%) exhibited stable minimal pneumonia, the downhill group (n = 135, 5.7%) exhibited initial worsening followed by improving pneumonia, and the uphill group (n = 325, 13.6%) exhibited progressive deterioration of pneumonia. There were distinct differences in the patterns of temporal blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between the uphill group and the other two groups. Cox regression analyses revealed that the hazard ratios (HRs) for the need for critical care support and the risk of intensive care unit admission were significantly higher in both the downhill and uphill groups compared to the steady group. However, regarding in-hospital mortality, only the uphill group demonstrated a significantly higher risk than the steady group (HR, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.08–21.98). Conclusion Stratified pneumonia trajectories, identified through serial chest radiographs, are linked to different patterns of temporal changes in BUN and CRP levels. These changes can predict the need for critical care support and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia.Appropriate therapeutic strategies should be tailored based on these disease trajectories.

Although many wearable devices are used to assess sleep, their accuracy remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of the Actiwatch, a research-grade device, and the Fitbit, a consumer-grade device, against sleep diaries to assess sleep patterns. Methods: Twenty participants wore Fitbit and Actiwatch for two weeks and tracked their sleep patterns using sleep diaries. Total sleep time (TST), time-in-bed (TIB), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) from the two devices and sleep diaries were analyzed using analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The TIB measured by the sleep log, Fitbit, and Actiwatch were 420.9 minutes, 417.3 minutes, and 567.4 minutes, respectively. Compared to the sleep log, the Fitbit underestimated TST, TIB, and SE, with significant differences observed for TST (p<0.001) and SE (p<0.001), but not for TIB. The Actiwatch overestimated TIB (p<0.001) and TST (p=0.02) and underestimated SE (p<0.001) compared to the sleep log. The difference between the Fitbit and Actiwatch was significant for TST, TIB, and SE (all p<0.001). Conclusions: The Fitbit showed a smaller difference than the Actiwatch when compared with the sleep logs. The Fitbit could be used as a tool to assess sleep patterns in the clinic as well as in daily life.

Background: Currently, little is known about the relationship between the temporal radiographic latent trajectories, which are based on the extent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to elucidate the differences in the temporal trends of critical laboratory biomarkers, utilization of critical care support, and clinical outcomes according to temporal radiographic latent trajectories. Methods: We enrolled 2,385 patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19 and underwent serial chest radiographs from December 2019 to March 2022. The extent of radiographic pneumonia was quantified as a percentage using a previously developed deep-learning algorithm. A latent class growth model was used to identify the trajectories of the longitudinal changes of COVID-19 pneumonia extents during hospitalization. We investigated the differences in the temporal trends of critical laboratory biomarkers among the temporal radiographic trajectory groups. Cox regression analyses were conducted to investigate differences in the utilization of critical care supports and clinical outcomes among the temporal radiographic trajectory groups. Results: The mean age of the enrolled patients was 58.0 ± 16.9 years old, with 1,149 (48.2%) being male. Radiographic pneumonia trajectories were classified into three groups: The steady group (n = 1,925, 80.7%) exhibited stable minimal pneumonia, the downhill group (n = 135, 5.7%) exhibited initial worsening followed by improving pneumonia, and the uphill group (n = 325, 13.6%) exhibited progressive deterioration of pneumonia. There were distinct differences in the patterns of temporal blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between the uphill group and the other two groups. Cox regression analyses revealed that the hazard ratios (HRs) for the need for critical care support and the risk of intensive care unit admission were significantly higher in both the downhill and uphill groups compared to the steady group. However, regarding in-hospital mortality, only the uphill group demonstrated a significantly higher risk than the steady group (HR, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.08–21.98). Conclusion Stratified pneumonia trajectories, identified through serial chest radiographs, are linked to different patterns of temporal changes in BUN and CRP levels. These changes can predict the need for critical care support and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia.Appropriate therapeutic strategies should be tailored based on these disease trajectories.

Although many wearable devices are used to assess sleep, their accuracy remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of the Actiwatch, a research-grade device, and the Fitbit, a consumer-grade device, against sleep diaries to assess sleep patterns. Methods: Twenty participants wore Fitbit and Actiwatch for two weeks and tracked their sleep patterns using sleep diaries. Total sleep time (TST), time-in-bed (TIB), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) from the two devices and sleep diaries were analyzed using analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The TIB measured by the sleep log, Fitbit, and Actiwatch were 420.9 minutes, 417.3 minutes, and 567.4 minutes, respectively. Compared to the sleep log, the Fitbit underestimated TST, TIB, and SE, with significant differences observed for TST (p<0.001) and SE (p<0.001), but not for TIB. The Actiwatch overestimated TIB (p<0.001) and TST (p=0.02) and underestimated SE (p<0.001) compared to the sleep log. The difference between the Fitbit and Actiwatch was significant for TST, TIB, and SE (all p<0.001). Conclusions: The Fitbit showed a smaller difference than the Actiwatch when compared with the sleep logs. The Fitbit could be used as a tool to assess sleep patterns in the clinic as well as in daily life.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Although many wearable devices are used to assess sleep, their accuracy remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of the Actiwatch, a research-grade device, and the Fitbit, a consumer-grade device, against sleep diaries to assess sleep patterns. Methods: Twenty participants wore Fitbit and Actiwatch for two weeks and tracked their sleep patterns using sleep diaries. Total sleep time (TST), time-in-bed (TIB), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) from the two devices and sleep diaries were analyzed using analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The TIB measured by the sleep log, Fitbit, and Actiwatch were 420.9 minutes, 417.3 minutes, and 567.4 minutes, respectively. Compared to the sleep log, the Fitbit underestimated TST, TIB, and SE, with significant differences observed for TST (p<0.001) and SE (p<0.001), but not for TIB. The Actiwatch overestimated TIB (p<0.001) and TST (p=0.02) and underestimated SE (p<0.001) compared to the sleep log. The difference between the Fitbit and Actiwatch was significant for TST, TIB, and SE (all p<0.001). Conclusions: The Fitbit showed a smaller difference than the Actiwatch when compared with the sleep logs. The Fitbit could be used as a tool to assess sleep patterns in the clinic as well as in daily life.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.