As a high-performance polymer, Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) has good biocompatibility and excellent physical properties and is used in several areas, including dentistry. Many successful cases of implant-supported fixed prostheses with a PEKK framework have been reported; however, a long-term observation of the reported cases and discussion of complications are not available. In this case report, we present three cases of implant-supported fixed prostheses with a PEKK framework veneered with composite resin, lithium disilicate crown, and high-impact polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and discuss their 6-year follow-up results.

Purpose: External ear reconstruction has been a challenging subject for plastic surgeons for decades. Popular methods using autologous costal cartilage or polyethylene still have their drawbacks. With the advance of three-dimensional (3D) printing technique, bioscaffold engineering using synthetic polymer draws attention as an alternative. This is a clinical trial of ear reconstruction using 3D printed scaffold, presented with clinical results after 1 year. Materials and Methods: From 2021 to 2022, five adult patients with unilateral microtia underwent two-staged total ear reconstruction using 3D printed implants. For each patient, a patient-specific 3D printed scaffold was designed and produced with polycaprolactone (PCL) based on computed tomography images, using fused deposition modeling. Computed tomography scan was obtained preoperatively, within 2 weeks following the surgery and after 1 year, to compare the volume of the normal side and the reconstructed ear. At 1-year visit, clinical photo was taken for scoring by two surgeons and patients themselves. Results: All five patients had completely healed reconstructed ear at 1-year follow-up. On average, the volume of reconstructed ear was 161.54% of that of the normal side ear. In a range of 0 to 10, objective assessors gave scores 3 to 6, whereas patients gave scores 8 to 10. Conclusion External ear reconstruction using 3D printed PCL implant showed durable, safe results reflected by excellent volume restoration and patient satisfaction at 1 year postoperatively. Further clinical follow-up with more cases and refinement of scaffold with advancing bioprinting technique is anticipated. The study’s plan and results have been registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS No. 3-2019-0306) and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS No.1182).

An implant-supported hybrid prosthesis is a fixed restoration composed of a metal framework and acrylic resin, offering advantages such as aesthetics, function, phonetics, and lip support, while providing retention and support through the splinting of implants with the metal framework. However, poor oral hygiene can lead to peri-implantitis, and long-term use may result in wear or fracture of the artificial teeth, causing reduced masticatory function and loss of vertical dimension. Traditionally, a new metal framework is cast for remanufacturing, but if the existing framework is intact, it can be reused for a more rapid and simplified protocol. This case involves a 58-year-old male patient with peri-implantitis, where some implants were removed and treated, and the superstructure was remanufactured using the existing metal framework. By preserving the existing metal framework during the remanufacturing of the implant-supported hybrid prosthesis, the treatment time and number of visits were reduced, minimizing patient discomfort.

Although the proportion of edentulous patients is declining, the aging population has resulted in an increase in their absolute numbers. Conventional complete dentures can partially restore oral function but have significant limitations such as low retention and relatively poor masticatory ability. Therefore, implant overdentures have been proposed as an alternative, offering enhanced functionality, higher patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness compared to fixed implants. In this case, a 74-year-old female patient presented with complaints about her existing implant overdenture, fabricated in 2010, which frequently dislodged and was aesthetically unpleasing. Clinical examination revealed worn attachments and artificial teeth, as well as insufficient upper lip support. It was decided to remake the implant overdentures utilizing the existing implants. During the fabrication, the patient continued to use her previous denture. After evaluating the occlusal relationships, facial form, and vertical dimension, the new overdentures were fabricated. The newly created implant overdentures showed satisfactory aesthetic and functional results, and the patient was satisfied.

An implant-supported hybrid prosthesis is a fixed restoration composed of a metal framework and acrylic resin, offering advantages such as aesthetics, function, phonetics, and lip support, while providing retention and support through the splinting of implants with the metal framework. However, poor oral hygiene can lead to peri-implantitis, and long-term use may result in wear or fracture of the artificial teeth, causing reduced masticatory function and loss of vertical dimension. Traditionally, a new metal framework is cast for remanufacturing, but if the existing framework is intact, it can be reused for a more rapid and simplified protocol. This case involves a 58-year-old male patient with peri-implantitis, where some implants were removed and treated, and the superstructure was remanufactured using the existing metal framework. By preserving the existing metal framework during the remanufacturing of the implant-supported hybrid prosthesis, the treatment time and number of visits were reduced, minimizing patient discomfort.

Although the proportion of edentulous patients is declining, the aging population has resulted in an increase in their absolute numbers. Conventional complete dentures can partially restore oral function but have significant limitations such as low retention and relatively poor masticatory ability. Therefore, implant overdentures have been proposed as an alternative, offering enhanced functionality, higher patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness compared to fixed implants. In this case, a 74-year-old female patient presented with complaints about her existing implant overdenture, fabricated in 2010, which frequently dislodged and was aesthetically unpleasing. Clinical examination revealed worn attachments and artificial teeth, as well as insufficient upper lip support. It was decided to remake the implant overdentures utilizing the existing implants. During the fabrication, the patient continued to use her previous denture. After evaluating the occlusal relationships, facial form, and vertical dimension, the new overdentures were fabricated. The newly created implant overdentures showed satisfactory aesthetic and functional results, and the patient was satisfied.

An implant-supported hybrid prosthesis is a fixed restoration composed of a metal framework and acrylic resin, offering advantages such as aesthetics, function, phonetics, and lip support, while providing retention and support through the splinting of implants with the metal framework. However, poor oral hygiene can lead to peri-implantitis, and long-term use may result in wear or fracture of the artificial teeth, causing reduced masticatory function and loss of vertical dimension. Traditionally, a new metal framework is cast for remanufacturing, but if the existing framework is intact, it can be reused for a more rapid and simplified protocol. This case involves a 58-year-old male patient with peri-implantitis, where some implants were removed and treated, and the superstructure was remanufactured using the existing metal framework. By preserving the existing metal framework during the remanufacturing of the implant-supported hybrid prosthesis, the treatment time and number of visits were reduced, minimizing patient discomfort.

Although the proportion of edentulous patients is declining, the aging population has resulted in an increase in their absolute numbers. Conventional complete dentures can partially restore oral function but have significant limitations such as low retention and relatively poor masticatory ability. Therefore, implant overdentures have been proposed as an alternative, offering enhanced functionality, higher patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness compared to fixed implants. In this case, a 74-year-old female patient presented with complaints about her existing implant overdenture, fabricated in 2010, which frequently dislodged and was aesthetically unpleasing. Clinical examination revealed worn attachments and artificial teeth, as well as insufficient upper lip support. It was decided to remake the implant overdentures utilizing the existing implants. During the fabrication, the patient continued to use her previous denture. After evaluating the occlusal relationships, facial form, and vertical dimension, the new overdentures were fabricated. The newly created implant overdentures showed satisfactory aesthetic and functional results, and the patient was satisfied.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with clinically earlystage EOC based on preoperative abdominal-pelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging findings between 2007 and 2021. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative complications were compared between the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Independent prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analysis.Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were the secondary outcomes. Results: In total, 586 patients (lymphadenectomy group, n=453 [77.3%]; nonlymphadenectomy groups, n=133 [22.7%]) were eligible. After surgical staging, upstaging was identified based on the presence of lymph node metastasis in 14 (3.1%) of 453 patients.No significant difference was found in the 5-year DFS (88.9% vs. 83.4%, p=0.203) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.895) between the two groups. Using multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy was not significantly associated with DFS or OS. However, using subgroup analysis, the lymphadenectomy group with serous histology had higher 5-year DFS rates than did the non-lymphadenectomy group (86.5% vs. 74.4%, p=0.048; adjusted hazard ratio=0.281; 95% confidence interval=0.107–0.735; p=0.010). The lymphadenectomy group had longer operating time (p<0.001), higher estimated blood loss (p<0.001), and higher perioperative complication rate (p=0.004) than did the non-lymphadenectomy group. Conclusion In patients with clinically early-stage EOC with serous histology, lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefits. Considering its potential harm,