Purpose: This study explored the experiences of physicians and nurses providing end-oflife care in Korean acute care hospitals. It aimed to identify the challenges faced in caring for dying patients and to suggest strategies for improving hospital-based end-of-life care. Methods: A qualitative exploratory design was employed using focus group interviews.Eleven healthcare professionals (five physicians and six nurses) working in tertiary or general hospitals participated in the study between July and August 2018. The interviews were conducted using a semi-structured guide covering seven thematic areas. All sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically following Braun and Clarke’s framework. Results: Six major themes emerged: (1) communication with patients and families, (2) physical care for dying patients, (3) psychological and spiritual support, (4) hospital environment and system constraints, (5) moral distress and emotional burden on healthcare providers, and (6) suggestions for improvement. The participants described difficulties in open communication, limited resources for comfort care, emotional strain from invasive treatment at the end of life, and the absence of standardized institutional protocols.They emphasized the need for structured communication training, multidisciplinary collaboration, and integration of palliative care principles into acute care practice. Conclusion Physicians and nurses play a pivotal yet emotionally demanding role in providing end-oflife care in acute hospitals. Institutional reforms, including education, protocol development, and supportive environments, are essential to ensuring dignified, patient-centered care and sustain healthcare providers in their professional roles.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections impose a significant burden on antibiotic usage, healthcare expenditures, and morbidity. Therefore, it is crucial to revise policies to minimize such losses. This nationwide survey aimed to evaluate infection prevention and control (IPC) components in healthcare facilities and encourage improvements in acute care hospitals with inadequate infection prevention settings. This study aims to enhance the infection control capabilities of healthcare facilities. Methods: From December 27, 2021, to May 13, 2022, we conducted a survey of 1,767 acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. A survey was conducted to evaluate the infection control components in 1,767 acute care hospitals. Infection control officers provided direct responses to a systematically developed questionnaire. Subsequently, 10% of the respondents were randomly selected for the site investigation. Results: Overall, 1,197 (67.7%) hospitals responded to the online survey. On-site investigations were conducted at 125 hospitals. Hospitals with ≥ 150 beds are advised to have an IPC team under Article 3 of the Medical Service Act; however, only 87.0% (598/687) of hospitals with ≥ 100 beds had one. Conversely, 22.7% (116/510) of hospitals with < 100 beds had an IPC team. Regulations for hand hygiene, waste management, healthcare worker protection and safety, environmental cleaning, standard precautions, and prevention of the transmission of multidrug-resistant pathogens were present in 84.2%, 80.1%, 77.4%, 76.2%, 75.8%, and 63.5% of the hospitals, respectively. Hospitals with < 100 beds had low availability of all categories of standard operating procedures. Conclusion This study is the first national survey of acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The data presented in the current study will improve the understanding of IPC status and will help establish a survey system. Our survey provides a basis for improving policies related to IPC in healthcare facilities.

Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections impose a significant burden on antibiotic usage, healthcare expenditures, and morbidity. Therefore, it is crucial to revise policies to minimize such losses. This nationwide survey aimed to evaluate infection prevention and control (IPC) components in healthcare facilities and encourage improvements in acute care hospitals with inadequate infection prevention settings. This study aims to enhance the infection control capabilities of healthcare facilities. Methods: From December 27, 2021, to May 13, 2022, we conducted a survey of 1,767 acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. A survey was conducted to evaluate the infection control components in 1,767 acute care hospitals. Infection control officers provided direct responses to a systematically developed questionnaire. Subsequently, 10% of the respondents were randomly selected for the site investigation. Results: Overall, 1,197 (67.7%) hospitals responded to the online survey. On-site investigations were conducted at 125 hospitals. Hospitals with ≥ 150 beds are advised to have an IPC team under Article 3 of the Medical Service Act; however, only 87.0% (598/687) of hospitals with ≥ 100 beds had one. Conversely, 22.7% (116/510) of hospitals with < 100 beds had an IPC team. Regulations for hand hygiene, waste management, healthcare worker protection and safety, environmental cleaning, standard precautions, and prevention of the transmission of multidrug-resistant pathogens were present in 84.2%, 80.1%, 77.4%, 76.2%, 75.8%, and 63.5% of the hospitals, respectively. Hospitals with < 100 beds had low availability of all categories of standard operating procedures. Conclusion This study is the first national survey of acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The data presented in the current study will improve the understanding of IPC status and will help establish a survey system. Our survey provides a basis for improving policies related to IPC in healthcare facilities.

Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections impose a significant burden on antibiotic usage, healthcare expenditures, and morbidity. Therefore, it is crucial to revise policies to minimize such losses. This nationwide survey aimed to evaluate infection prevention and control (IPC) components in healthcare facilities and encourage improvements in acute care hospitals with inadequate infection prevention settings. This study aims to enhance the infection control capabilities of healthcare facilities. Methods: From December 27, 2021, to May 13, 2022, we conducted a survey of 1,767 acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. A survey was conducted to evaluate the infection control components in 1,767 acute care hospitals. Infection control officers provided direct responses to a systematically developed questionnaire. Subsequently, 10% of the respondents were randomly selected for the site investigation. Results: Overall, 1,197 (67.7%) hospitals responded to the online survey. On-site investigations were conducted at 125 hospitals. Hospitals with ≥ 150 beds are advised to have an IPC team under Article 3 of the Medical Service Act; however, only 87.0% (598/687) of hospitals with ≥ 100 beds had one. Conversely, 22.7% (116/510) of hospitals with < 100 beds had an IPC team. Regulations for hand hygiene, waste management, healthcare worker protection and safety, environmental cleaning, standard precautions, and prevention of the transmission of multidrug-resistant pathogens were present in 84.2%, 80.1%, 77.4%, 76.2%, 75.8%, and 63.5% of the hospitals, respectively. Hospitals with < 100 beds had low availability of all categories of standard operating procedures. Conclusion This study is the first national survey of acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The data presented in the current study will improve the understanding of IPC status and will help establish a survey system. Our survey provides a basis for improving policies related to IPC in healthcare facilities.

Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections impose a significant burden on antibiotic usage, healthcare expenditures, and morbidity. Therefore, it is crucial to revise policies to minimize such losses. This nationwide survey aimed to evaluate infection prevention and control (IPC) components in healthcare facilities and encourage improvements in acute care hospitals with inadequate infection prevention settings. This study aims to enhance the infection control capabilities of healthcare facilities. Methods: From December 27, 2021, to May 13, 2022, we conducted a survey of 1,767 acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. A survey was conducted to evaluate the infection control components in 1,767 acute care hospitals. Infection control officers provided direct responses to a systematically developed questionnaire. Subsequently, 10% of the respondents were randomly selected for the site investigation. Results: Overall, 1,197 (67.7%) hospitals responded to the online survey. On-site investigations were conducted at 125 hospitals. Hospitals with ≥ 150 beds are advised to have an IPC team under Article 3 of the Medical Service Act; however, only 87.0% (598/687) of hospitals with ≥ 100 beds had one. Conversely, 22.7% (116/510) of hospitals with < 100 beds had an IPC team. Regulations for hand hygiene, waste management, healthcare worker protection and safety, environmental cleaning, standard precautions, and prevention of the transmission of multidrug-resistant pathogens were present in 84.2%, 80.1%, 77.4%, 76.2%, 75.8%, and 63.5% of the hospitals, respectively. Hospitals with < 100 beds had low availability of all categories of standard operating procedures. Conclusion This study is the first national survey of acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The data presented in the current study will improve the understanding of IPC status and will help establish a survey system. Our survey provides a basis for improving policies related to IPC in healthcare facilities.

Purpose: Biliary atresia (BA) is a rare but progressive cholangiopathy and the leading cause of pediatric liver transplantation worldwide. The Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons (KAPS) has conducted three national surveys (2001, 2011, and 2023) to assess long-term trends in the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of BA. This study provides a comparative analysis of the 2nd and 3rd national surveys, with reference to selected findings from the 1st survey. Methods: This study included 453 patients from the 3rd national survey (2011–2021) and 435 patients from the 2nd survey (2001–2010), all of whom underwent Kasai portoenterostomy. Data were collected via electronic case report forms from pediatric surgical centers nationwide. Comparisons were made regarding demographics, clinical features, diagnostic patterns, operative details, follow-up outcomes, and survival. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to evaluate long-term survival. Results: The mean number of BA patients per year remained stable between surveys (43.5 in the 2nd, 41.18 in the 3rd), though centralization of care increased, with 61.5% of cases managed by two major institutions in the 3rd survey. The median age at surgery decreased, and the use of preoperative imaging (especially magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography) increased. The 10-year native liver survival rate declined from 59.8% to 53.7%, while overall 10-year survival improved slightly (92.9% to 93.2%). Postoperative complications, such as cholangitis and liver failure, persisted but were better categorized. The 3rd survey also reported improved mortality (4.9%) and reduced follow-up loss (11.5%) compared to the 2nd survey. Conclusion While overall survival after Kasai operation has remained high and even improved, native liver survival has slightly declined. The findings reflect earlier diagnosis, more consistent diagnostic imaging, and increasing centralization of care. These trends underscore the importance of long-term nationwide data collection in guiding future strategies for BA management in Korea.