1.Prognostic Significance of Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters in Patients With ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With CDK4/6 Inhibitors Plus Endocrine Therapy
Minseung SUH ; Jeongryul RYU ; Hojin SONG ; Jae Ho JEONG ; Sangwon HAN ; Hyehyun JEONG ; Jeong Eun KIM ; Yeokyeong SHIN ; Byung-Kwan JEONG ; Hee Jin LEE ; Gyungyub GONG ; Jin-Hee AHN ; Kyung Hae JUNG ; Sung-Bae KIM ; Dae Hyuk MOON
Korean Journal of Radiology 2026;27(4):363-374
Objective:
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy (ET) constitute the standard systemic treatment for estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, treatment responses remain heterogeneous, highlighting the need for reliable prognostic markers. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT findings in this setting.
Materials and Methods:
This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients with ER+/HER2- MBC who underwent18F-FDG PET/CT before initiating CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET between 2018 and 2023. Maximum standardized uptake value(SUVmax), whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated as the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively, using multivariable Cox models. PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, and TLG) were analyzed as both continuous and dichotomized variables based on median values, adjusting for relevant clinical covariates.
Results:
Among the 374 patients, 82 (21.9%) presented with de novo metastatic disease, and 357 (95.5%) received CDK4/6 inhibitors as first-line therapy. In multivariable Cox analysis, all continuous PET parameters were independently associated with PFS (adjusted hazard ratio for SUVmax 1.05 [95% confidence interval 1.02–1.08]; log-transformed MTV 1.16 [1.08–1.25]; and log-transformed TLG 1.14 [1.07–1.23]) and OS (SUVmax 1.08 [1.04–1.11]; log-transformed MTV 1.24 [1.12–1.38]; and log-transformed TLG 1.22 [1.11–1.34]) with all P < 0.001. Results based on dichotomized PET parameters were similar to those obtained with continuous values: PFS (adjusted hazard ratio for SUVmax ≥ 7.6, 1.41 [1.08–1.85]; MTV ≥ 21.2 cm 3 , 1.41 [1.08–1.86]; and TLG ≥ 78.9, 1.51 [1.14–1.99]) with P ≤ 0.013 and OS (1.43 [1.01–2.04]; 1.84 [1.28– 2.66]; and 1.73 [1.20–2.50], respectively) with P ≤ 0.046.
Conclusion
Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters are independent prognostic markers in patients with ER+/HER2- MBC receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors with ET, supporting their potential utility in risk stratification.
2.Comparison of SUVA/V and SUVA‑V for Evaluating AtheroscleroticInflammation in 18F‑FDG PET/CT
Jeongryul RYU ; Shin Ae HAN ; Sangwon HAN ; Sunju CHOI ; Dae Hyuk MOON ; Minyoung OH
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2024;58(1):25-31
Purpose:
This study aimed to compare the clinical significance of two parameters, division of standardized uptake value (SUV) of target arterial activity by background venous blood pool activity ( SUVA/V ) and subtraction of background venous blood pool activity from SUV of target arterial activity (SUVA‑V ) of carotid arteries with atherosclerotic plaques using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT).
Methods:
Patients aged 50 years or more who were diagnosed with carotid artery stenosis of 50% or more with carotid Doppler ultrasonography and had torso 18F-FDG PET/CT were enrolled retrospectively and classified patients who developed cerebrovascular events (CVEs) within 5 years after 18F-FDG PET/CT scan as the active group and patients who did not experience the CVE within 5 years as an inactive group. We calculated SUVA/V and SUVA‑V using measurements of SUVmax
Results:
SUVA‑V SUVA‑V_high , and SUVA‑V_low were significantly higher in the active group than in the inactive group, but neithe SUVA/V SUVA‑V_high , nor SUVA‑V_low showed significant differences between the active and inactive groups. Thedifference in rank between groups of SUVA‑V_high and SUVA‑V_low was greater than the difference in rank between groups of SUVA‑V_high and SUVA‑V_low . The CVE incidence differed between SUVA‑V_high and SUVA‑V_low of high carotid FDG uptake, but the CVE incidence did not differ between SUVA‑V_high and SUVA‑V_low of high carotid FDG uptake.
Conclusion
SUVA‑V may be a more rational solution than SUVA/V for evaluating atherosclerotic plaque inflammation on 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail