Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of steatotic liver disease severity on the cumulative incidence of lung cancer utilizing data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). Methods: This study examined the risk of lung cancer in the general population in conjunction with the incidence of steatotic liver disease. The study population consisted of 3,261,438 individuals aged 20 years or older who underwent a general health examination in 2009. Results: Individuals with fatty liver index (FLI) of 30–59 exhibited a 1.08-fold increased risk of lung cancer (95% CI: 1.04–1.11), while FLI ≥ 60 was associated with a 1.22-fold elevated risk of lung cancer (95% CI: 1.17–1.28) compared to those with FLI < 30. The risk varied with smoking status; in current smokers, the adjusted HR for the FLI 30–59 group was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.00–1.10), while that in the FLI ≥ 60 group was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.04–1.18). In never- or past-smokers, the adjusted HR for the FLI 30–59 group was 1.10, and that for the FLI ≥ 60 group was 1.31. Subgroup analysis revealed an incidence rate of 1.06 per 1,000 person-years in the consistently high FLI group compared to 1.15 in those with improved FLI. Improving FLI over time was associated with a 0.93-fold decrease in lung cancer risk. Conclusions Our study demonstrated a correlational relationship between lung cancer incidence and the severity of steatotic liver disease as measured by FLI.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of steatotic liver disease severity on the cumulative incidence of lung cancer utilizing data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). Methods: This study examined the risk of lung cancer in the general population in conjunction with the incidence of steatotic liver disease. The study population consisted of 3,261,438 individuals aged 20 years or older who underwent a general health examination in 2009. Results: Individuals with fatty liver index (FLI) of 30–59 exhibited a 1.08-fold increased risk of lung cancer (95% CI: 1.04–1.11), while FLI ≥ 60 was associated with a 1.22-fold elevated risk of lung cancer (95% CI: 1.17–1.28) compared to those with FLI < 30. The risk varied with smoking status; in current smokers, the adjusted HR for the FLI 30–59 group was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.00–1.10), while that in the FLI ≥ 60 group was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.04–1.18). In never- or past-smokers, the adjusted HR for the FLI 30–59 group was 1.10, and that for the FLI ≥ 60 group was 1.31. Subgroup analysis revealed an incidence rate of 1.06 per 1,000 person-years in the consistently high FLI group compared to 1.15 in those with improved FLI. Improving FLI over time was associated with a 0.93-fold decrease in lung cancer risk. Conclusions Our study demonstrated a correlational relationship between lung cancer incidence and the severity of steatotic liver disease as measured by FLI.

Purpose: This study aims to develop and implement an economic evaluation using a micro-costing approach to provide a precise and transparent analysis of the direct costs of cystoscopic procedures in Korean hospitals. The study seeks to identify key cost components and evaluate whether current reimbursement rates accurately reflect these direct costs. Materials and Methods: Significant variations in cost items were identified across different studies. An economic evaluation was conducted using a micro-costing methodology for the cost analysis of cystoscopic procedures, developed through literature review, data collection from studies, and expert consultations. Results: Gangnam Severance Hospital (GSH) performed 2,188 cystoscopic procedures, including 1,847 cystoscopies and 341 JJ stent removals, with average costs of $100.8 and $110.6, respectively. At National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital (NHIMC), 1,463 procedures were performed, including 1,167 cystoscopies and 296 JJ stent removals, with average costs of $119.2 and $125.3. Cystoscopy costs at GSH were driven by reprocessing ($45.8, 45.4%) and equipment ($33.1, 32.9%), while NHIMC’s were $52.5 (44.0%) for equipment and $48.7 (40.8%) for reprocessing. Both hospitals incurred financial losses, with NHIS (National Health Insurance Service) covering only about 71.7% and 60.6% of costs for cystoscopy, and 71.0% and 62.7% for JJ stent removal. Conclusions The significant discrepancy between HIRA (Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service)’s estimated costs and those identified here suggests that current fees for cystoscopic procedures may be underestimated and require reassessment.Given the results, reevaluating these rates is essential to ensure fair compensation for healthcare providers and to deliver optimal patient care.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of steatotic liver disease severity on the cumulative incidence of lung cancer utilizing data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). Methods: This study examined the risk of lung cancer in the general population in conjunction with the incidence of steatotic liver disease. The study population consisted of 3,261,438 individuals aged 20 years or older who underwent a general health examination in 2009. Results: Individuals with fatty liver index (FLI) of 30–59 exhibited a 1.08-fold increased risk of lung cancer (95% CI: 1.04–1.11), while FLI ≥ 60 was associated with a 1.22-fold elevated risk of lung cancer (95% CI: 1.17–1.28) compared to those with FLI < 30. The risk varied with smoking status; in current smokers, the adjusted HR for the FLI 30–59 group was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.00–1.10), while that in the FLI ≥ 60 group was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.04–1.18). In never- or past-smokers, the adjusted HR for the FLI 30–59 group was 1.10, and that for the FLI ≥ 60 group was 1.31. Subgroup analysis revealed an incidence rate of 1.06 per 1,000 person-years in the consistently high FLI group compared to 1.15 in those with improved FLI. Improving FLI over time was associated with a 0.93-fold decrease in lung cancer risk. Conclusions Our study demonstrated a correlational relationship between lung cancer incidence and the severity of steatotic liver disease as measured by FLI.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of steatotic liver disease severity on the cumulative incidence of lung cancer utilizing data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). Methods: This study examined the risk of lung cancer in the general population in conjunction with the incidence of steatotic liver disease. The study population consisted of 3,261,438 individuals aged 20 years or older who underwent a general health examination in 2009. Results: Individuals with fatty liver index (FLI) of 30–59 exhibited a 1.08-fold increased risk of lung cancer (95% CI: 1.04–1.11), while FLI ≥ 60 was associated with a 1.22-fold elevated risk of lung cancer (95% CI: 1.17–1.28) compared to those with FLI < 30. The risk varied with smoking status; in current smokers, the adjusted HR for the FLI 30–59 group was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.00–1.10), while that in the FLI ≥ 60 group was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.04–1.18). In never- or past-smokers, the adjusted HR for the FLI 30–59 group was 1.10, and that for the FLI ≥ 60 group was 1.31. Subgroup analysis revealed an incidence rate of 1.06 per 1,000 person-years in the consistently high FLI group compared to 1.15 in those with improved FLI. Improving FLI over time was associated with a 0.93-fold decrease in lung cancer risk. Conclusions Our study demonstrated a correlational relationship between lung cancer incidence and the severity of steatotic liver disease as measured by FLI.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of steatotic liver disease severity on the cumulative incidence of lung cancer utilizing data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). Methods: This study examined the risk of lung cancer in the general population in conjunction with the incidence of steatotic liver disease. The study population consisted of 3,261,438 individuals aged 20 years or older who underwent a general health examination in 2009. Results: Individuals with fatty liver index (FLI) of 30–59 exhibited a 1.08-fold increased risk of lung cancer (95% CI: 1.04–1.11), while FLI ≥ 60 was associated with a 1.22-fold elevated risk of lung cancer (95% CI: 1.17–1.28) compared to those with FLI < 30. The risk varied with smoking status; in current smokers, the adjusted HR for the FLI 30–59 group was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.00–1.10), while that in the FLI ≥ 60 group was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.04–1.18). In never- or past-smokers, the adjusted HR for the FLI 30–59 group was 1.10, and that for the FLI ≥ 60 group was 1.31. Subgroup analysis revealed an incidence rate of 1.06 per 1,000 person-years in the consistently high FLI group compared to 1.15 in those with improved FLI. Improving FLI over time was associated with a 0.93-fold decrease in lung cancer risk. Conclusions Our study demonstrated a correlational relationship between lung cancer incidence and the severity of steatotic liver disease as measured by FLI.

Purpose: The usability of a new surgical navigation system that provides patient-specific vascular information for robotic gastrectomy in gastric cancer remains unexplored for laparoscopic gastrectomy owing to differences in surgical environments. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability and safety of this navigation system in laparoscopic gastrectomy and to compare the post-operative outcomes between procedures with and without its use. Materials and Methods: Between June 2022 and July 2023, 38 patients across 2 institutions underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy using a navigation system (navigation group). The technical feasibility, safety, and accuracy of detecting variations in vascular anatomy were measured. The perioperative outcomes were compared with 114 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy without a navigation system (non-navigation group) using 1:3 propensity score matching during the same study period. Results: In all patients in the navigation group, no adverse events associated with the navigation system occurred during surgery in any patient in the navigation group. No accidental vessel injuries necessitate auxiliary procedures. All vessels encountered during the gastrectomy were successfully reconstructed and visualized. Patient demographics and operative data were comparable between the 2 groups. The navigation group exhibited a significantly lower overall complication rate (10.5%) than the non-navigation group (26.3%, P=0.043). Notably, pancreas-related complications were absent in the navigation group but occurred in eight cases in the non-navigation group (7.0%, P=0.093), although the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions The patient-specific surgical navigation system demonstrated clinical feasibility and safety for laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer, potentially reducing complication rates compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy without its use.