This case describes a male with a history of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) who had a concomitant branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm under long-term surveillance. During follow-up, new high-risk radiologic features developed within the pancreatic cyst, raising concern for malignant transformation and ultimately leading to surgical resection. However, final histopathologic examination revealed recurrent type 1 AIP rather than malignant progression of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, a finding that represents an uncommon and diagnostically challenging manifestation. This case suggests that when new imaging changes are observed during surveillance of pancreatic cystic lesions, clinicians should consider not only malignant transformation but also the possibility of recurrence or coexistence of underlying diseases such as AIP.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes, identify complications, and analyze recurrence in patients undergoing surgery for primary retroperitoneal tumors (RPTs), which pose significant therapeutic challenges. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 59 patients who underwent surgery for primary RPTs at Ajou University Hospital between January 2015 and December 2024. Patients were divided into a multivisceral resection (MVR) group (n = 25) and a non-MVR group (n = 34) to compare demographics, clinical characteristics, pathological findings, and postoperative outcomes. Results: Compared to the non-MVR group, the MVR group had a significantly higher rate of open surgery (96.0% vs.73.5%, P = 0.034), longer operative times (237.6 minutes vs. 188.8 minutes, P = 0.032), more frequent R2 resections (32.0% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.018), and longer hospital stays (13.1 days vs. 7.0 days, P = 0.007). Malignant tumors comprised 67.7% of cases, with sarcoma being the most common. Recurrence rates were highest in well-differentiated liposarcoma (50.0%) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (22.2%). While univariate analysis showed MVR was associated with severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III; odds ratio, 6.200; P = 0.029), this was not sustained as an independent predictor in multivariable analysis. Conclusion Although MVR was associated with severe complications in univariate analysis, it was not an independent predictor in multivariable analysis. This suggests the increased risk reflects overall surgical complexity. Therefore, MVR should be pursued when oncologically necessary, as it presents an acceptable morbidity profile.

Purpose: Finasteride and dutasteride are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and reduce the risk of developing prostate cancer. Finasteride blocks only the type 2 form of 5-alpha-reductase, whereas dutasteride blocks both type 1 and 2 forms of the enzyme. Previous studies suggest the possibility that dutasteride may be superior to finasteride in preventing prostate cancer. We directly compared the effects of finasteride and dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer in patients with BPH using a pooled analysis of 15 real-world databases. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cohort study of new-users of finasteride and dutasteride. We include patients who were prescribed 5 mg finasteride or dutasteride for the first time to treat BPH and had at least 180 days of prescription. We excluded patients with a history of prostate cancer or a prostate-specific antigen level ≥ 4 ng/mL before the study drug prescription. Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the hazard ratio (HR) for prostate cancer after propensity score (PS) matching. Results: A total of 8,284 patients of new-users of finasteride and 8,670 patients of new-users of dutasteride were included across the 15 databases. In the overall population, compared to dutasteride, finasteride was associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer in both on-treatment and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods. After 1:1 PS matching, 4,897 patients using finasteride and 4,897 patients using dutasteride were enrolled in the present study. No significant differences were observed for risk of prostate cancer between finasteride and dutasteride both on-treatment (HR=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–1.00; p=0.051) and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods (HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.67–1.14; p=0.310). Conclusions Using real-world databases, the present study demonstrated that dutasteride was not associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer than finasteride in patients with BPH.

Purpose: Finasteride and dutasteride are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and reduce the risk of developing prostate cancer. Finasteride blocks only the type 2 form of 5-alpha-reductase, whereas dutasteride blocks both type 1 and 2 forms of the enzyme. Previous studies suggest the possibility that dutasteride may be superior to finasteride in preventing prostate cancer. We directly compared the effects of finasteride and dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer in patients with BPH using a pooled analysis of 15 real-world databases. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cohort study of new-users of finasteride and dutasteride. We include patients who were prescribed 5 mg finasteride or dutasteride for the first time to treat BPH and had at least 180 days of prescription. We excluded patients with a history of prostate cancer or a prostate-specific antigen level ≥ 4 ng/mL before the study drug prescription. Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the hazard ratio (HR) for prostate cancer after propensity score (PS) matching. Results: A total of 8,284 patients of new-users of finasteride and 8,670 patients of new-users of dutasteride were included across the 15 databases. In the overall population, compared to dutasteride, finasteride was associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer in both on-treatment and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods. After 1:1 PS matching, 4,897 patients using finasteride and 4,897 patients using dutasteride were enrolled in the present study. No significant differences were observed for risk of prostate cancer between finasteride and dutasteride both on-treatment (HR=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–1.00; p=0.051) and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods (HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.67–1.14; p=0.310). Conclusions Using real-world databases, the present study demonstrated that dutasteride was not associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer than finasteride in patients with BPH.

There is no established treatment for severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS). However, the potential role of tocilizumab (TCZ) in cytokine storm modulation warrants further investigation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic potential of TCZ in adult patients with SFTS and provide valuable insights into the development of effective treatment strategies for this challenging infectious disease by assessing the impact of TCZ on cytokine dynamics and patient outcomes. This prospective longitudinal observational study included adult patients with SFTS at a teaching hospital in Korea between April 2013 and December 2023. Patients with SFTS and interleukin (IL)-6 levels ≥30 ng/mL received TCZ. The 14- and 28-day mortality rates were compared between the TCZ and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) groups during the study period. Among the total of 97 patients, the clinical characteristics showed no significant differences between the TCZ (n=10) and TPE groups (n=30). Compared with TPE, TCZ treatment showed a trend towards lower mortality rate (14-day mortality rate: 10.0% vs. 16.7%, p=0.608; 28-day mortality rate:10.0% vs. 20.0%, p=0.480). Both treatments showed the potential to reduce the viral load and IL-6 levels, indicating their efficacy in managing the disease course. TCZ is a potential therapeutic option for SFTS as it modulates IL-6 levels and improves clinical outcomes.

Purpose: Finasteride and dutasteride are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and reduce the risk of developing prostate cancer. Finasteride blocks only the type 2 form of 5-alpha-reductase, whereas dutasteride blocks both type 1 and 2 forms of the enzyme. Previous studies suggest the possibility that dutasteride may be superior to finasteride in preventing prostate cancer. We directly compared the effects of finasteride and dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer in patients with BPH using a pooled analysis of 15 real-world databases. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cohort study of new-users of finasteride and dutasteride. We include patients who were prescribed 5 mg finasteride or dutasteride for the first time to treat BPH and had at least 180 days of prescription. We excluded patients with a history of prostate cancer or a prostate-specific antigen level ≥ 4 ng/mL before the study drug prescription. Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the hazard ratio (HR) for prostate cancer after propensity score (PS) matching. Results: A total of 8,284 patients of new-users of finasteride and 8,670 patients of new-users of dutasteride were included across the 15 databases. In the overall population, compared to dutasteride, finasteride was associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer in both on-treatment and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods. After 1:1 PS matching, 4,897 patients using finasteride and 4,897 patients using dutasteride were enrolled in the present study. No significant differences were observed for risk of prostate cancer between finasteride and dutasteride both on-treatment (HR=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–1.00; p=0.051) and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods (HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.67–1.14; p=0.310). Conclusions Using real-world databases, the present study demonstrated that dutasteride was not associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer than finasteride in patients with BPH.

There is no established treatment for severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS). However, the potential role of tocilizumab (TCZ) in cytokine storm modulation warrants further investigation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic potential of TCZ in adult patients with SFTS and provide valuable insights into the development of effective treatment strategies for this challenging infectious disease by assessing the impact of TCZ on cytokine dynamics and patient outcomes. This prospective longitudinal observational study included adult patients with SFTS at a teaching hospital in Korea between April 2013 and December 2023. Patients with SFTS and interleukin (IL)-6 levels ≥30 ng/mL received TCZ. The 14- and 28-day mortality rates were compared between the TCZ and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) groups during the study period. Among the total of 97 patients, the clinical characteristics showed no significant differences between the TCZ (n=10) and TPE groups (n=30). Compared with TPE, TCZ treatment showed a trend towards lower mortality rate (14-day mortality rate: 10.0% vs. 16.7%, p=0.608; 28-day mortality rate:10.0% vs. 20.0%, p=0.480). Both treatments showed the potential to reduce the viral load and IL-6 levels, indicating their efficacy in managing the disease course. TCZ is a potential therapeutic option for SFTS as it modulates IL-6 levels and improves clinical outcomes.

There is no established treatment for severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS). However, the potential role of tocilizumab (TCZ) in cytokine storm modulation warrants further investigation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic potential of TCZ in adult patients with SFTS and provide valuable insights into the development of effective treatment strategies for this challenging infectious disease by assessing the impact of TCZ on cytokine dynamics and patient outcomes. This prospective longitudinal observational study included adult patients with SFTS at a teaching hospital in Korea between April 2013 and December 2023. Patients with SFTS and interleukin (IL)-6 levels ≥30 ng/mL received TCZ. The 14- and 28-day mortality rates were compared between the TCZ and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) groups during the study period. Among the total of 97 patients, the clinical characteristics showed no significant differences between the TCZ (n=10) and TPE groups (n=30). Compared with TPE, TCZ treatment showed a trend towards lower mortality rate (14-day mortality rate: 10.0% vs. 16.7%, p=0.608; 28-day mortality rate:10.0% vs. 20.0%, p=0.480). Both treatments showed the potential to reduce the viral load and IL-6 levels, indicating their efficacy in managing the disease course. TCZ is a potential therapeutic option for SFTS as it modulates IL-6 levels and improves clinical outcomes.

Purpose: Finasteride and dutasteride are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and reduce the risk of developing prostate cancer. Finasteride blocks only the type 2 form of 5-alpha-reductase, whereas dutasteride blocks both type 1 and 2 forms of the enzyme. Previous studies suggest the possibility that dutasteride may be superior to finasteride in preventing prostate cancer. We directly compared the effects of finasteride and dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer in patients with BPH using a pooled analysis of 15 real-world databases. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cohort study of new-users of finasteride and dutasteride. We include patients who were prescribed 5 mg finasteride or dutasteride for the first time to treat BPH and had at least 180 days of prescription. We excluded patients with a history of prostate cancer or a prostate-specific antigen level ≥ 4 ng/mL before the study drug prescription. Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the hazard ratio (HR) for prostate cancer after propensity score (PS) matching. Results: A total of 8,284 patients of new-users of finasteride and 8,670 patients of new-users of dutasteride were included across the 15 databases. In the overall population, compared to dutasteride, finasteride was associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer in both on-treatment and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods. After 1:1 PS matching, 4,897 patients using finasteride and 4,897 patients using dutasteride were enrolled in the present study. No significant differences were observed for risk of prostate cancer between finasteride and dutasteride both on-treatment (HR=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–1.00; p=0.051) and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods (HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.67–1.14; p=0.310). Conclusions Using real-world databases, the present study demonstrated that dutasteride was not associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer than finasteride in patients with BPH.

There is no established treatment for severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS). However, the potential role of tocilizumab (TCZ) in cytokine storm modulation warrants further investigation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic potential of TCZ in adult patients with SFTS and provide valuable insights into the development of effective treatment strategies for this challenging infectious disease by assessing the impact of TCZ on cytokine dynamics and patient outcomes. This prospective longitudinal observational study included adult patients with SFTS at a teaching hospital in Korea between April 2013 and December 2023. Patients with SFTS and interleukin (IL)-6 levels ≥30 ng/mL received TCZ. The 14- and 28-day mortality rates were compared between the TCZ and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) groups during the study period. Among the total of 97 patients, the clinical characteristics showed no significant differences between the TCZ (n=10) and TPE groups (n=30). Compared with TPE, TCZ treatment showed a trend towards lower mortality rate (14-day mortality rate: 10.0% vs. 16.7%, p=0.608; 28-day mortality rate:10.0% vs. 20.0%, p=0.480). Both treatments showed the potential to reduce the viral load and IL-6 levels, indicating their efficacy in managing the disease course. TCZ is a potential therapeutic option for SFTS as it modulates IL-6 levels and improves clinical outcomes.