Background and Objectives: Outcomes of deferring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without invasive physiologic assessment for intermediate coronary lesions is uncertain.We sought to compare long-term outcomes between medical treatment and PCI of intermediate lesions without invasive physiologic assessment. Methods: A total of 899 patients with intermediate coronary lesions between 50% and 70% diameter-stenosis were randomized to the conservative group (n=449) or the aggressive group (n=450). For intermediate lesions, PCI was performed in the aggressive group, but was deferred in the conservative group. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], or ischemia-driven any revascularization) at 3 years. Results: The number of treated lesions per patient was 0.8±0.9 in the conservative group and 1.7±0.9 in the aggressive group (p=0.001). At 3 years, the conservative group had a significantly higher incidence of MACE than the aggressive group (13.8% vs. 9.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–2.21; p=0.049), mainly driven by revascularization of target intermediate lesion (6.5% vs. 1.1%; HR, 5.69; 95% CI, 2.20–14.73;p<0.001). Between 1 and 3 years after the index procedure, compared to the aggressive group, the conservative group had significantly higher incidence of cardiac death or MI (3.2% vs.0.7%; HR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.24–15.22; p=0.022) and ischemia-driven any revascularization. Conclusions For intermediate lesions, medical therapy alone, guided only by angiography, was associated with a higher risk of MACE at 3 years compared with performing PCI, mainly due to increased revascularization.

Background: Bone substitutes such as hydroxyapatite (HA) ceramic and recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) are essential in treating bone defects. However, the challenges of controlled and localized BMP-2 delivery necessitate the development of advanced bone graft substitutes. This study introduces and evaluates an innovative, ready-to-use bone substitute employing 3-dimensional-printed poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds combined with BMP-2 to enhance bone regeneration efficiency. Methods: We conducted a comparative study using C57BL/6 mice to evaluate the efficacy of rhBMP-2-coated PLLA scaffolds against traditional HA-based bone graft materials. The PLLA scaffolds were coated with varying concentrations of BMP-2 using an alginate-catechol method. Bone regeneration was assessed through micro-computed tomography (CT) imaging and histological analysis 4 weeks after implantation. The statistical significance of bone mass and formation differences across groups was determined using Student t-test and analysis of variance. Results: Micro-CT analysis revealed substantial bone formation in the group with PLLA scaffolds containing 0.1% BMP-2, exhibiting a bone volume ratio of 11.1% ± 2.8%, significantly higher than all other groups (p = 0.008). Histological analysis corroborated these findings, showing dense collagen deposition and active osteoblast presence in this group, indicating enhanced bone regeneration. Conclusions The novel PLLA scaffold with alginate-catechol-coated BMP-2 significantly enhances bone regeneration compared to traditional bone graft materials. This innovative approach holds promising potential for clinical applications in orthopedics, particularly for treating bone defects.

Background and Objectives: Outcomes of deferring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without invasive physiologic assessment for intermediate coronary lesions is uncertain.We sought to compare long-term outcomes between medical treatment and PCI of intermediate lesions without invasive physiologic assessment. Methods: A total of 899 patients with intermediate coronary lesions between 50% and 70% diameter-stenosis were randomized to the conservative group (n=449) or the aggressive group (n=450). For intermediate lesions, PCI was performed in the aggressive group, but was deferred in the conservative group. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], or ischemia-driven any revascularization) at 3 years. Results: The number of treated lesions per patient was 0.8±0.9 in the conservative group and 1.7±0.9 in the aggressive group (p=0.001). At 3 years, the conservative group had a significantly higher incidence of MACE than the aggressive group (13.8% vs. 9.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–2.21; p=0.049), mainly driven by revascularization of target intermediate lesion (6.5% vs. 1.1%; HR, 5.69; 95% CI, 2.20–14.73;p<0.001). Between 1 and 3 years after the index procedure, compared to the aggressive group, the conservative group had significantly higher incidence of cardiac death or MI (3.2% vs.0.7%; HR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.24–15.22; p=0.022) and ischemia-driven any revascularization. Conclusions For intermediate lesions, medical therapy alone, guided only by angiography, was associated with a higher risk of MACE at 3 years compared with performing PCI, mainly due to increased revascularization.

Purpose: This study was conducted to update the practice guidelines for intravenous infusion therapy published in 2017, focusing on the most recent evidence for peripheral intravenous infusion therapy. Methods: The guideline update was conducted using the 22-step methodology. Results: The updated guidelines consist of 17 domains and 235 recommendations (including 284 sub-recommendations). The domains are as follows: general instructions (5 items), peripheral catheter selection (7), catheter insertion site selection (11), management during peripheral catheter insertion (10), post-insertion management (30), perfusion and locking (17), blood sampling via peripheral catheters(6), exchange and removal of peripheral catheters (6), infusion set management (14), add-on devices (32), complications (25), chemotherapy infusions (10), PCA infusions (7), parenteral nutrition (20), transfusion therapy (23), education (5), and documentation and reporting (7). The evidence levels for these recommendations are as follows: 27(9.5%) at level I, 3 (1.1%) at level I A/P, 118 (41.5%) at level II, and 136 (47.9%) at level III.Recommendation grades are categorized as follows: 30 (10.6%) at level A, 118 (41.5%) at level B, and 136(47.9%) at level C. Of these, 73 (25.7%) recommendations were newly developed, 49 (17.3%) underwent major revisions, and 147 (51.7%) underwent minor revisions. Conclusion The updated practice guideline, based on the latest evidence, is anticipated to enhance nursing practice related to peripheral intravenous infusion therapy.

Purpose: This study was conducted to update the practice guidelines for intravenous infusion therapy published in 2017, focusing on the most recent evidence for peripheral intravenous infusion therapy. Methods: The guideline update was conducted using the 22-step methodology. Results: The updated guidelines consist of 17 domains and 235 recommendations (including 284 sub-recommendations). The domains are as follows: general instructions (5 items), peripheral catheter selection (7), catheter insertion site selection (11), management during peripheral catheter insertion (10), post-insertion management (30), perfusion and locking (17), blood sampling via peripheral catheters(6), exchange and removal of peripheral catheters (6), infusion set management (14), add-on devices (32), complications (25), chemotherapy infusions (10), PCA infusions (7), parenteral nutrition (20), transfusion therapy (23), education (5), and documentation and reporting (7). The evidence levels for these recommendations are as follows: 27(9.5%) at level I, 3 (1.1%) at level I A/P, 118 (41.5%) at level II, and 136 (47.9%) at level III.Recommendation grades are categorized as follows: 30 (10.6%) at level A, 118 (41.5%) at level B, and 136(47.9%) at level C. Of these, 73 (25.7%) recommendations were newly developed, 49 (17.3%) underwent major revisions, and 147 (51.7%) underwent minor revisions. Conclusion The updated practice guideline, based on the latest evidence, is anticipated to enhance nursing practice related to peripheral intravenous infusion therapy.

Background: Bone substitutes such as hydroxyapatite (HA) ceramic and recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) are essential in treating bone defects. However, the challenges of controlled and localized BMP-2 delivery necessitate the development of advanced bone graft substitutes. This study introduces and evaluates an innovative, ready-to-use bone substitute employing 3-dimensional-printed poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds combined with BMP-2 to enhance bone regeneration efficiency. Methods: We conducted a comparative study using C57BL/6 mice to evaluate the efficacy of rhBMP-2-coated PLLA scaffolds against traditional HA-based bone graft materials. The PLLA scaffolds were coated with varying concentrations of BMP-2 using an alginate-catechol method. Bone regeneration was assessed through micro-computed tomography (CT) imaging and histological analysis 4 weeks after implantation. The statistical significance of bone mass and formation differences across groups was determined using Student t-test and analysis of variance. Results: Micro-CT analysis revealed substantial bone formation in the group with PLLA scaffolds containing 0.1% BMP-2, exhibiting a bone volume ratio of 11.1% ± 2.8%, significantly higher than all other groups (p = 0.008). Histological analysis corroborated these findings, showing dense collagen deposition and active osteoblast presence in this group, indicating enhanced bone regeneration. Conclusions The novel PLLA scaffold with alginate-catechol-coated BMP-2 significantly enhances bone regeneration compared to traditional bone graft materials. This innovative approach holds promising potential for clinical applications in orthopedics, particularly for treating bone defects.

Background: Bone substitutes such as hydroxyapatite (HA) ceramic and recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) are essential in treating bone defects. However, the challenges of controlled and localized BMP-2 delivery necessitate the development of advanced bone graft substitutes. This study introduces and evaluates an innovative, ready-to-use bone substitute employing 3-dimensional-printed poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds combined with BMP-2 to enhance bone regeneration efficiency. Methods: We conducted a comparative study using C57BL/6 mice to evaluate the efficacy of rhBMP-2-coated PLLA scaffolds against traditional HA-based bone graft materials. The PLLA scaffolds were coated with varying concentrations of BMP-2 using an alginate-catechol method. Bone regeneration was assessed through micro-computed tomography (CT) imaging and histological analysis 4 weeks after implantation. The statistical significance of bone mass and formation differences across groups was determined using Student t-test and analysis of variance. Results: Micro-CT analysis revealed substantial bone formation in the group with PLLA scaffolds containing 0.1% BMP-2, exhibiting a bone volume ratio of 11.1% ± 2.8%, significantly higher than all other groups (p = 0.008). Histological analysis corroborated these findings, showing dense collagen deposition and active osteoblast presence in this group, indicating enhanced bone regeneration. Conclusions The novel PLLA scaffold with alginate-catechol-coated BMP-2 significantly enhances bone regeneration compared to traditional bone graft materials. This innovative approach holds promising potential for clinical applications in orthopedics, particularly for treating bone defects.

Purpose: This study was conducted to update the practice guidelines for intravenous infusion therapy published in 2017, focusing on the most recent evidence for peripheral intravenous infusion therapy. Methods: The guideline update was conducted using the 22-step methodology. Results: The updated guidelines consist of 17 domains and 235 recommendations (including 284 sub-recommendations). The domains are as follows: general instructions (5 items), peripheral catheter selection (7), catheter insertion site selection (11), management during peripheral catheter insertion (10), post-insertion management (30), perfusion and locking (17), blood sampling via peripheral catheters(6), exchange and removal of peripheral catheters (6), infusion set management (14), add-on devices (32), complications (25), chemotherapy infusions (10), PCA infusions (7), parenteral nutrition (20), transfusion therapy (23), education (5), and documentation and reporting (7). The evidence levels for these recommendations are as follows: 27(9.5%) at level I, 3 (1.1%) at level I A/P, 118 (41.5%) at level II, and 136 (47.9%) at level III.Recommendation grades are categorized as follows: 30 (10.6%) at level A, 118 (41.5%) at level B, and 136(47.9%) at level C. Of these, 73 (25.7%) recommendations were newly developed, 49 (17.3%) underwent major revisions, and 147 (51.7%) underwent minor revisions. Conclusion The updated practice guideline, based on the latest evidence, is anticipated to enhance nursing practice related to peripheral intravenous infusion therapy.

Background and Objectives: Outcomes of deferring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without invasive physiologic assessment for intermediate coronary lesions is uncertain.We sought to compare long-term outcomes between medical treatment and PCI of intermediate lesions without invasive physiologic assessment. Methods: A total of 899 patients with intermediate coronary lesions between 50% and 70% diameter-stenosis were randomized to the conservative group (n=449) or the aggressive group (n=450). For intermediate lesions, PCI was performed in the aggressive group, but was deferred in the conservative group. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], or ischemia-driven any revascularization) at 3 years. Results: The number of treated lesions per patient was 0.8±0.9 in the conservative group and 1.7±0.9 in the aggressive group (p=0.001). At 3 years, the conservative group had a significantly higher incidence of MACE than the aggressive group (13.8% vs. 9.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–2.21; p=0.049), mainly driven by revascularization of target intermediate lesion (6.5% vs. 1.1%; HR, 5.69; 95% CI, 2.20–14.73;p<0.001). Between 1 and 3 years after the index procedure, compared to the aggressive group, the conservative group had significantly higher incidence of cardiac death or MI (3.2% vs.0.7%; HR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.24–15.22; p=0.022) and ischemia-driven any revascularization. Conclusions For intermediate lesions, medical therapy alone, guided only by angiography, was associated with a higher risk of MACE at 3 years compared with performing PCI, mainly due to increased revascularization.

Background: Bone substitutes such as hydroxyapatite (HA) ceramic and recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) are essential in treating bone defects. However, the challenges of controlled and localized BMP-2 delivery necessitate the development of advanced bone graft substitutes. This study introduces and evaluates an innovative, ready-to-use bone substitute employing 3-dimensional-printed poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds combined with BMP-2 to enhance bone regeneration efficiency. Methods: We conducted a comparative study using C57BL/6 mice to evaluate the efficacy of rhBMP-2-coated PLLA scaffolds against traditional HA-based bone graft materials. The PLLA scaffolds were coated with varying concentrations of BMP-2 using an alginate-catechol method. Bone regeneration was assessed through micro-computed tomography (CT) imaging and histological analysis 4 weeks after implantation. The statistical significance of bone mass and formation differences across groups was determined using Student t-test and analysis of variance. Results: Micro-CT analysis revealed substantial bone formation in the group with PLLA scaffolds containing 0.1% BMP-2, exhibiting a bone volume ratio of 11.1% ± 2.8%, significantly higher than all other groups (p = 0.008). Histological analysis corroborated these findings, showing dense collagen deposition and active osteoblast presence in this group, indicating enhanced bone regeneration. Conclusions The novel PLLA scaffold with alginate-catechol-coated BMP-2 significantly enhances bone regeneration compared to traditional bone graft materials. This innovative approach holds promising potential for clinical applications in orthopedics, particularly for treating bone defects.