1.G2A Attenuates Propionibacterium acnes Induction of Inflammatory Cytokines in Human Monocytes.
Andrew J PARK ; George W AGAK ; Min QIN ; Lisa D HISAW ; Aslan PIROUZ ; Stephanie KAO ; Laura J MARINELLI ; Hermes J GARBÁN ; Diane THIBOUTOT ; Philip T LIU ; Jenny KIM
Annals of Dermatology 2017;29(6):688-698
BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a disease of the pilosebaceous unit characterized by increased sebum production, hyperkeratinization, and immune responses to Propionibacterium acnes (PA). Here, we explore a possible mechanism by which a lipid receptor, G2A, regulates immune responses to a commensal bacterium. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the inflammatory properties of G2A in monocytes in response to PA stimulation. Furthermore, our study sought to investigate pathways by which lipids modulate immune responses in response to PA. METHODS: Our studies focused on monocytes collected from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, the monocytic cell line THP-1, and a lab strain of PA. Our studies involved the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent, Western blot, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, small interfering RNA (siRNA), and microarray analysis of human acne lesions in the measurements of inflammatory markers. RESULTS: G2A gene expression is higher in acne lesions compared to normal skin and is inducible by the acne therapeutic, 13-cis-retinoic acid. In vitro, PA induces both the Toll-like receptor 2-dependent expression of G2A as well as the production of the G2A ligand, 9-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid, from human monocytes. G2A gene knockdown through siRNA enhances PA stimulation of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and IL-1β possibly through increased activation of the ERK1/2 MAP kinase and nuclear factor kappa B p65 pathways. CONCLUSION: G2A may play a role in quelling inflammatory cytokine response to PA, revealing G2A as a potential attenuator of inflammatory response in a disease associated with a commensal bacterium.
Acne Vulgaris
;
Blotting, Western
;
Cell Line
;
Cytokines*
;
Gene Expression
;
Gene Knockdown Techniques
;
Humans*
;
In Vitro Techniques
;
Interleukin-8
;
Interleukins
;
Isotretinoin
;
Microarray Analysis
;
Monocytes*
;
NF-kappa B
;
Phosphotransferases
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Propionibacterium acnes*
;
Propionibacterium*
;
Reverse Transcription
;
RNA, Small Interfering
;
Sebum
;
Skin
;
Toll-Like Receptors
2.Is there a "Trial Effect" on Outcome of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Sunitinib?.
Daniel KEIZMAN ; Keren ROUVINOV ; Avishay SELLA ; Maya GOTTFRIED ; Natalie MAIMON ; Jenny J KIM ; Mario A EISENBERGER ; Victoria SINIBALDI ; Avivit PEER ; Michael A CARDUCCI ; Wilmosh MERMERSHTAIN ; Raya LEIBOWITZ-AMIT ; Rony WEITZEN ; Raanan BERGER
Cancer Research and Treatment 2016;48(1):281-287
PURPOSE: Studies suggested the existence of a 'trial effect', in which for a given treatment, participation in a clinical trial is associated with a better outcome. Sunitinib is a standard treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to study the effect of clinical trial participation on the outcome of mRCC patients treated with sunitinib, which at present, is poorly defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of mRCC patients treated with sunitinib between 2004-2013 in 7 centers across 2 countries were reviewed. We compared the response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), between clinical trial participants (n=49) and a matched cohort of non-participants (n=49) who received standard therapy. Each clinical trial participant was individually matched with a non-participant by clinicopathologic factors. PFS and OS were determined by Cox regression. RESULTS: The groups were matched by age (median 64), gender (male 67%), Heng risk (favorable 25%, intermediate 59%, poor 16%), prior nephrectomy (92%), RCC histology (clear cell 86%), pre-treatment NLR (>3 in 55%, n=27), sunitinib induced hypertension (45%), and sunitinib dose reduction/treatment interruption (41%). In clinical trial participants versus non-participants, RR was partial response/stable disease 80% (n=39) versus 74% (n=36), and progressive disease 20% (n=10) versus 26% (n=13) (p=0.63, OR 1.2). The median PFS was 10 versus 11 months (HR=0.96, p=0.84), and the median OS 23 versus 24 months (HR=0.97, p=0.89). CONCLUSION: In mRCC patients treated with sunitinib, the outcome of clinical trial participants was similar to that of non-participants who received standard therapy.
Carcinoma, Renal Cell*
;
Cohort Studies
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Humans
;
Hypertension
;
Nephrectomy

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail