Purpose: Technological advancements have enabled reduced-port robotic systems, enhancing the benefits of robotic surgery. This study compared the surgical outcomes of conventional multiport (5 ports), single-site (2 ports), and singleport (2 ports) robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: A prospectively collected database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy between January 2010 and August 2022 at Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System. The initial 20 cases from each group (multiport, single-site, and SP) were analyzed, focusing on demographics, surgical procedures, pathological results, and postoperative outcomes. The “textbook outcome” metric was employed to assess surgical quality. Results: The SP group showed lower visual analog pain scale compared to the multiport and single-site groups (3.5, 4.4, and 4.3, respectively, P = 0.017), faster time to first flatus (2.0, 2.7, and 2.8 days, respectively; P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stays (3.5, 6.2, and 5.5 days, respectively; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in major complications, unplanned intensive care unit care, readmission, or mortality between the groups. The rate of patients achieving textbook outcomes were 85.0% for the multiport group, 100% for the single-site group, and 95.0% for the SP group (P = 0.310). Conclusion Reduced-port robotic gastrectomy, including single-site and SP, has shown surgical safety with a high proportion of patients meeting textbook outcomes. The SP system demonstrated less pain and faster recovery, aligning with minimally invasive surgical goals. Therefore, the SP system could be a reliable and safe option for robotic gastrectomy, offering enhanced recovery without compromising surgical quality.

Purpose: Although laparoscopic distal gastrectomy has rapidly replaced open distal gastrectomy, laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is less frequently performed owing to technical difficulties. Robotic surgery could be an appropriate minimally invasive alternative to LTG because it alleviates the technical challenges posed by laparoscopic procedures.However, few studies have compared the oncological safety of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) with that of LTG, especially for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Herein, we aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of RTG for AGC and compare them with those of LTG. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 147 and 204 patients who underwent RTG and LTG for AGC, respectively, between 2007 and 2020. Long-term outcomes were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: After IPTW, the 2 groups exhibited similar clinicopathological features. The 5-year overall survival was comparable between the 2 groups (88.5% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 79.4%–93.7%] after RTG and 87.3% [95% CI, 80.1%–92.0%]) after LTG; log-rank P=0.544).The hazard ratio (HR) for death after RTG compared with that after LTG was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.40–1.33; P=0.304). The 5-year relapse-free survival was also similar between the 2 groups (75.7% [95% CI, 65.2%–83.4%] after RTG and 76.4% [95% CI, 67.9%–83.0%] after LTG; logrank P=0.850). The HR for recurrence after RTG compared with that after LTG was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.60–1.46; P=0.753). Conclusions Our findings revealed that RTG and LTG for AGC had similar long-term outcomes. RTG is an oncologically safe alternative to LTG and has technical advantages.