Objective: Lumbar foraminal stenosis can lead radiculopathy in a subset of patients. Imaging findings have a high false-positive rate. The Kemp test is a provocative maneuver that has traditionally been used for diagnosing facet joint disease. However, it has shown an increased likelihood of concomitant foraminal stenosis. Thus we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a modified version of Kemp test (the Singh-Hartl foraminal compression test) in the diagnosis of symptomatic foraminal stenosis. Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with radiculopathy were enrolled. Participants were asked to perform the Singh-Hartl foraminal compression test, with a positive result if there was reproduction of radicular symptoms. Selective nerve root block (SNRB) was then performed at the suspected level. Visual analogue scores (VAS) were collected before and 15-minutes postprocedure. VAS improvement was calculated as a percentage. Various statistical analyses were conducted considering 2 different threshold (75% or 80% improvement in VAS). Results: Twenty-eight participants (56%) were women, with an average age of 47.3 years. L4 was most commonly involved (n=20). Using 75% improvement as the VAS threshold, the test had a sensitivity of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53–0.87), specificity of 0.57 (95% CI, 0.34–0.78), PPV of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56–0.79), and NPV of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.43–0.75). When using 80% improvement as the VAS threshold, the test had a sensitivity of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.41–0.83), specificity of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.24–0.63), PPV of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.36–0.58), and NPV of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.43–0.75). Conclusion The Singh-Hartl maneuver exhibited moderate to strong ability to rule-in the diagnosis and a moderate ability to rule out the diagnosis of foraminal stenosis when using a threshold of 75% improvement in radicular symptoms post-SNRB. Further studies evaluating the result of this physical examination test in conjunction with severity of imaging findings are warranted.

Several surgical procedures have been proposed to address anterior glenohumeral instability, which is one of the most common complaints in the general population. The remplissage, first described in early 2000s, is a procedure performed simultaneously with the arthroscopic Bankart repair to correct large, engaging Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs). This procedure stabilizes the joint by tenodesing the infraspinatus tendon into the HSL to fill and disengage the defect. This procedure gained popularity because it has relatively low risk and is able to improve shoulder stability while being less invasive than other bone-blocking procedures. The remplissage has become a valuable add-on technique that can substantially improve outcomes in unstable patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair. Nevertheless, several studies in the literature have raised concerns regarding its efficacy in critically unstable patients and the potential range of motion limitations that can arise postoperatively. Additional comparative studies and trials should be conducted to appropriately establish the role of remplissage in treating anterior instability, especially in patients with critical bone loss.

While shoulder hemiarthroplasty is still used to treat young patients with shoulder pathology, the use of this procedure has substantially declined in recent years due to its significant complication profile. Glenoid wear with arthrosis is one of the major postoperative complications following shoulder hemiarthroplasty, and efforts to prevent this complication led many scientists to explore alternative weight-bearing surfaces on arthroplasty implants to decrease joint wear and improve patient outcomes. Pyrolytic carbon, or pyrocarbon, is a material that has better biocompatibility, survivorship, strength, and wear resistance compared to the materials used in traditional shoulder hemiarthroplasty. Pyrocarbon implants have been used in orthopedics for over 50 years; recently, their utility in shoulder hemiarthroplasty has garnered much interest. The purpose behind the use of pyrocarbon in shoulder hemiarthroplasty is to decrease the risk of progressive glenoid wear, especially in young active patients in whom joint preservation is important. Promising survivorship and outcomes have been demonstrated by recent studies, including limited glenoid wear following pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty. Nevertheless, these clinical studies have been limited to relatively small case series with limited long-term follow-up. Accordingly, additional research and comparative studies need to be conducted in order to properly assess the therapeutic efficacy and value of pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty.