Background: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by erythema, papules, ocular symptoms, and heightened sensitivity. Patients with neurogenic symptoms such as burning or stinging remain particularly difficult to manage. Current guidelines often underrepresent energy-based devices (EBDs), pigmentary sequelae, psychosocial burden, and ocular comorbidities. Objective: To examine Korean dermatologists’ expert perspectives on rosacea management, focusing on skin sensitivity, neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary changes, psychosocial impact, ocular involvement, and EBD use. Methods: A web-based, 29-item survey was administered to 25 board-certified Korean dermatologists (May–June 2025). Quantitative and qualitative responses were analyzed. Results: Erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular phenotypes with sensitivity skin predominated. EBDs (pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light) were frequently used but limited by cost and sensitivity issues. Neurogenic symptoms were recognized but rarely treated with neuromodulators. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was infrequent, yet monitoring was inconsistent.Psychosocial and ocular aspects were acknowledged but seldomly systematically addressed.Respondents expressed interest in emerging adjunctive treatments such as cold plasma, skin boosters, and holistic care approaches. Conclusion Korean dermatologists adopt individualized strategies for rosacea, yet practice gaps remain regarding neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary complications, and psychosocial and ocular comorbidities. Findings support the need for updated multidisciplinary, phenotype-driven guidelines aligned with real-world practice.

Korea’s healthcare system is at a critical juncture as rapid population aging, rising chronic disease burdens, and fragmented care expose the limits of a hospital-centered, fee-for-service model. Although policy discussions have long emphasized strengthening primary care and introducing a “family doctor” system, past reforms have focused mainly on expanding services or redefining professional roles, without establishing clear accountability, care continuity, or aligned payment mechanisms. Consequently, primary care remains weak and responsibility for comprehensive patient management is diffuse. This article argues that meaningful reform requires redefining the primary physician as an accountable manager of longitudinal, coordinated care within an integrated delivery and payment framework. Drawing on experiences from the United States, the United Kingdom, and several European countries, it identifies common features of successful primary care–oriented systems, including patient registration, team-based care, risk-adjusted payment, and explicit outcome accountability. Based on these insights, the authors propose a Korean primary physician model tailored to solo and small-group practices while fostering regional collaboration. Core elements include voluntary patient registration, multidisciplinary primary care teams, risk-stratified care management, regional care networks, and a mixed payment model combining per-member-per-month payments, shared savings, and performance-based incentives. The article emphasizes phased pilot testing focused on operational feasibility. Ultimately, transitioning to a primary care–centered system is presented as a strategic necessity for sustainability and improved care continuity.

Meningioma arises from arachnoid cap cells and is a common intracranial neoplasm; however, primary extracranial meningioma is rare, accounting for only 1%–2% of cases and is therefore frequently misdiagnosed. We report a case of primary extracranial meningioma arising in the temporal region without intracranial or dural involvement. A 66-year-old woman presented with a slowly enlarging mass in the left temporal region for approximately 10 years, without pain or limitation of mouth opening. Computed tomography revealed a 2.1× 2.7× 4.6 cm mass between the temporalis muscle and the skull, with no intracranial extension. Fine-needle aspiration suggested a spindle-cell neoplasm, and complete excision was performed via a coronal scalp incision for diagnosis and treatment. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical examination confirmed a World Health Organization grade II extracranial meningioma. The patient recovered without complications. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed no residual tumor, and adjuvant radiotherapy was not administered. Surveillance imaging every 6 months demonstrated no recurrence over 3.5 years. This case highlights the importance of including extracranial meningioma in the differential diagnosis of temporal masses and supports complete excision as effective management. A brief literature review is included.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive condition characterized by declining kidney function principally driven by diabetes mellitus, glomerulonephritis, and hypertension. Although renal biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing CKD, its invasive nature restricts its use for early detection and routine clinical applications. Current noninvasive biomarkers, including the estimated glomerular filtration rate and albumin-to-creatinine ratio, are useful indicators of kidney dysfunction but fall short in specificity and sensitivity required to distinguish between CKD subtypes, including diabetic kidney disease and glomerulonephritis. Recently, urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs), nano-sized lipid bilayer entities ranging from 30 to 1,000 nm in diameter and secreted by renal cells, have emerged as promising biomarkers for CKD. uEVs encapsulate a diverse array of proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids that mirror kidney pathophysiology, presenting a noninvasive means to assess disease progression, inflammation, fibrosis, and oxidative stress within the urinary system. Furthermore, uEVs offer a molecular fingerprint of kidney health, positioning them as potential tools for precision medicine. This review explores the diagnostic potential of uEVs, underscoring the need for standardization in urine collection, normalization techniques, and uEV isolation methodologies. We also highlight uEV-based biomarkers that distinguish various CKD subtypes and mirror pathological changes within the kidneys and urogenital system. As molecular proxies of their cells of origin, uEVs hold significant promise in enhancing CKD diagnostics to enable early detection, disease classification, and the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a stroke subtype with high mortality and poor functional outcomes. Prompt occlusion of a ruptured aneurysm at an early stage is crucial to prevent rebleeding, which can result in even higher mortality and more severe disabilities. The most critical initial decision in SAH management is the choice of treatment method with surgical clipping or endovascular coiling. We aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical guideline to select the optimal initial treatment in patients with SAH. We developed this guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted across four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and KoreaMed) to answer two population, intervention, comparison, outcome questions comparing clipping and coiling. The risk of bias was assessed using ROB 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagrams and meta-analyses were generated for functional outcome and mortality. We included six randomized control trials (RCTs) and 58 observational studies. Meta-analysis of RCTs showed that coiling improved functional outcomes compared to clipping (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86–0.97). No significant mortality difference was observed in RCTs (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.91–2.09), but non-RCTs favored clipping for reduced mortality (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69–0.86). However, it is difficult to generalize these findings to all clinical situations, as patients with SAH have a highly variable clinical course. Final treatment decision should be tailored to the individual patient’s status, including aneurysm location, morphology, and the expertise available at the treatment center. Such decisions are best made by specialists such as a board-certified physician and should be explained to the patient and their caregivers, along with the rationale for selecting the most appropriate treatment at the given hospital. Korea has many certified endovascular neurosurgeons, cerebrovascular surgeons, and certified cerebrovascular centers. Proper selection of the most suitable treatment method by certified physicians and centers would greatly benefit patient outcomes and healthcare professionals.

Accurate and early identification of stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) in emergency settings is essential for improving patient outcomes and ensuring the efficient allocation of medical resources. This clinical practice guideline systematically reviews domestic and international literature and conducts meta-analyses to evaluate the utility and diagnostic accuracy of stroke assessment tools used in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). We developed a guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of diagnostic EMS assessment tools for diagnosing stroke and LVO. Overall, 70 non-randomized control studies were selected for this study. A meta-analysis was conducted with a subgroup analysis to distinguish between patients with stroke and those with LVO. EMS tools demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity for diagnosing stroke. In the prehospital setting, using validated EMS stroke assessment tools is recommended for the early identification of stroke and LVO. Upon hospital arrival, stroke specialists should conduct further evaluation and triage to confirm the diagnosis and guide appropriate management. Delays in diagnosing LVO are frequently unacceptable. While experts advocate for the use of EMS assessment tools to facilitate early identification of LVO, these tools alone lack adequate sensitivity. Therefore, further diagnostic evaluations and consultation with stroke specialists upon hospital arrival are recommended.

The mothership (MS) model, where patients are directly transferred to a thrombectomy-capable center, and the drip-and-ship (DS) model, where thrombolysis is initiated at the nearest primary stroke center before transfer for thrombectomy, are the primary transport modes for patients with stroke. We aimed to establish guidelines for selecting the appropriate transfer strategy based on emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO). We developed this guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted across four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and KoreaMed) to answer three Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions comparing MS and DS models. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagrams and meta-analyses were generated for functional outcomes, mortality, and successful recanalization. Twenty-six non-randomized controlled studies showed that the MS model improved good functional outcomes by approximately 14% compared with the DS model (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–1.30). Fifteen studies reported that mortality in the MS and DS models showed no significant differences (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.84–1.11). Twenty-four studies revealed no significant difference in successful recanalization between the MS and DS models (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.68–1.10). The MS model should be considered first to improve the functional outcome of patients with LVO. However, if thrombectomy cannot be performed immediately after thrombolysis, or if a thrombectomy-enabled hospital is not nearby, the DS model should be considered by stroke specialists depending on transportation time and regional factors. We suggest a mixed approach with the DS model based on specific circumstances or regions to ensure the optimum treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Appropriate transport for patients with LVO improves the prognosis of AIS.

Background: Programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors are effective treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but their use can lead to severe pneumonitis. This study aims to evaluate the utility of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) for predicting and diagnosing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-related pneumonitis in NSCLC patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital in Korea from February 2022 to June 2023. Baseline KL-6 levels were measured immediately before initiating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. In patients who developed pneumonitis, KL-6 levels were monitored every 1–2 weeks from the onset of pneumonitis. For patients without pneumonitis, KL-6 levels were measured every 6 weeks. We compared clinical characteristics and serial KL-6 levels between the pneumonitis and non-pneumonitis groups. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled, with 11 developing pneumonitis. Baseline KL-6 levels did not significantly differ between the two groups (261 U/mL in the pneumonitis group vs. 373 U/mL in the non-pneumonitis group, p=0.375). In the pneumonitis group, KL-6 levels generally showed an upward trend, with a median of 412 U/mL at pneumonitis onset. Conversely, KL-6 levels in the non-pneumonitis group showed no clear overall change. Conclusion In this pilot study, baseline KL-6 was not clearly linked to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-related pneumonitis in NSCLC patients. However, increases in KL-6 levels post-baseline were more frequently observed in patients who developed pneumonitis, including cases of all-cause pneumonitis.

Background/Aims: Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is associated with prognosis in patients with COVID-19. However, there is limited data on the correlation between the prognosis of COVID-19 and varying KL-6 levels at different time points. We investigated the optimal cutoff values of the initial and peak serum KL-6 levels to predict mortality and evaluated their correlation with mortality. Methods: This retrospective cohort study collected data on serially collected serum KL-6 levels in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between October 2020 and January 2022 at a single tertiary hospital in South Korea. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden index were used to determine the cutoff points for the initial and peak KL-6 levels that best predicted 30-day mortality. The association between the initial and peak KL-6 values was assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: A total of 349 patients were included in this study. The mean initial and peak KL-6 levels were significantly higher in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group. The initial and peak KL-6 values that best predicted 30-day mortality were 491.85 U/mL and 660.05 U/mL, respectively. An initial KL-6 level greater than 491.85 U/mL and a peak KL-6 level greater than 660.05 U/mL were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Conclusions The initial and peak levels of KL-6 were significantly associated with 30-day mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. These findings suggest that serially monitoring blood KL-6 levels could be a valuable prognostic indicator for COVID-19.