Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a viable management strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), following pioneering trials at Kuma Hospital and the Cancer Institute Hospital in Japan. Numerous prospective cohort studies have since validated AS as a management option for low-risk PTMC, leading to its inclusion in thyroid cancer guidelines across various countries. From 2016 to 2020, the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Active Surveillance on Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma (MAeSTro) enrolled 1,177 patients, providing comprehensive data on PTMC progression, sonographic predictors of progression, quality of life, surgical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness when comparing AS to immediate surgery. The second phase of MAeSTro (MAeSTro-EXP) expands AS to low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) tumors larger than 1 cm, driven by the hypothesis that overall risk assessment outweighs absolute tumor size in surgical decision-making. Methods: This protocol aims to address whether limiting AS to tumors smaller than 1 cm may result in unnecessary surgeries for low-risk PTCs detected during their rapid initial growth phase. By expanding the AS criteria to include tumors up to 1.5 cm, while simultaneously refining and standardizing the criteria for risk assessment and disease progression, we aim to minimize overtreatment and maintain rigorous monitoring to improve patient outcomes. Conclusion This study will contribute to optimizing AS guidelines and enhance our understanding of the natural course and appropriate management of low-risk PTCs. Additionally, MAeSTro-EXP involves a multinational collaboration between South Korea and Australia. This cross-country study aims to identify cultural and racial differences in the management of low-risk PTC, thereby enriching the global understanding of AS practices and their applicability across diverse populations.

Background/Aims: Although the urea breath test (UBT) is widely used as a representative monitoring test after Helicobacter pylori eradication, false-negative results can occur because of the gray zone related to its cutoff value. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of the rapid urease test (RUT), the RUT with sweeping method, and the UBT, and to investigate the role of the sweeping method in the gray zone of UBT values. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 216 patients who received standard first-line H. pylori eradication treatments (n=216). All participants underwent to testing using the sweeping method and UBT on the same day. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were analyzed to compare the two methods. Results: The sensitivity (0.537 vs 0.806, p=0.002) and accuracy (0.843 vs 0.870, p=0.026) of the UBT were inferior to those of the sweeping method. A total of 31 individuals tested positive for H. pylori according to the UBT, whereas 54 individuals tested positive according to the sweeping method. In the group for which the gold standard definition indicated H. pylori positivity but UBT results were negative (n=31), all individuals had a UBT value under 2.5‰. In the multivariate logistic regression model, a UBT value of 1.4‰ to 2.5‰ increased the risk of false-negative results by 6.5 times (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.077 to 20.288; p=0.001). Conclusions After H. pylori eradication, false-negative results can occur for individuals undergoing the UBT, primarily for values below the UBT cutoff. The RUT with the sweeping method can potentially help detect H. pylori in the gray zone of the UBT, improving diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a comprehensive practical guide for enteral nutrition (EN) designed to enhance patient safety and reduce complications in Korea. Under the leadership of the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN), the initiative sought to standardize EN procedures, improve decision-making, and promote effective multidisciplinary communication. Methods: The KSPEN EN committee identified key questions related to EN practices and organized them into seven sections such as prescribing, delivery route selection, formula preparation, administration, and quality management. Twenty-one experts, selected based on their expertise, conducted a thorough literature review to formulate evidence-based recommendations. Drafts underwent peer review both within and across disciplines, with final revisions completed by the KSPEN Guideline Committee. The guide, which will be published in three installments, addresses critical elements of EN therapy and safety protocols. Results: The practical guide recommends that EN orders include detailed elements and advocates the use of electronic medical records for communication. Standardized prescription forms and supplementary safety measures are outlined. Review frequency is adjusted according to patient condition—daily for critically ill or unstable patients and as dictated by institutional protocols for stable patients. Evidence indicates that adherence to these protocols reduces mortality, complications, and prescription errors. Conclusion The KSPEN practical guide offers a robust framework for the safe delivery of EN tailored to Korea’s healthcare context. It emphasizes standardized protocols and interdisciplinary collaboration to improve nutritional outcomes, patient safety, and operational efficiency. Rigorous implementation and monitoring of adherence are critical for its success.

Genetic kidney diseases are caused by mutations in specific genes that significantly affect kidney development and function. Although the underlying pathogenic genes of many kidney diseases have been identified, an understanding of their mechanisms and effective treatments remains limited. Gene editing, particularly using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR), has recently become a promising approach for studying genetic diseases and the CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) method has become a prominent research method. It has been shown that CRISPR-Cas9 can be targeted to knock out specific genomic sites, which enables researchers to correct gene mutations, prevent inheritance, and better understand the function of genes and the effectiveness of drugs. However, the application of CRISPR-Cas9 technology in the development of therapeutic agents against genetic kidney disease has been overlooked compared with other genetic diseases. In this paper, we provide an overview of the current research advancements in genetic kidney diseases using CRISPR technology, as well as the diverse preclinical research methods implemented, with particular emphasis on autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Objectives: . Allergic rhinitis (AR) significantly impacts quality of life and incurs socioeconomic costs. The influence of smoking habits, including the use of conventional cigarettes (CCs) and electronic cigarettes (ECs), on the prevalence and management of AR remains a subject of debate. This study aims to explore the association between smoking status (CC and EC use) and the prevalence and management of AR among Koreans by analyzing data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) VII (2018) and VIII (2019–2021). Methods: . This cross-sectional study involved 22,290 participants aged 19 years and older from the KNHANES. Participants self-reported their smoking status, and urinary cotinine levels were measured to assess nicotine exposure. We employed statistical analyses, including logistic regression, to examine the relationships between smoking status, cotinine levels, and the prevalence and management of AR. Results: . In univariable logistic regression analysis, EC users exhibited a 35.8% increased risk of AR compared to non-smokers, whereas CC users experienced a 27.7% reduced risk. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed a 20.3% lower risk of AR among CC users; however, no significant association was observed for EC users. Higher cotinine levels (>500 ng/mL) were associated with a lower prevalence of AR. Specifically, heavy CC users with high cotinine levels demonstrated a 35% reduced risk of AR. Nonetheless, after adjusting for confounders, this association was no longer significant, indicating that other variables might influence this relationship. Conclusion . Smoking status is associated with the prevalence of AR in Koreans. Notably, heavy use of CCs is negatively correlated with the prevalence of AR.

Objective: The long-term efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy, emphasizing single-session RFA, and identify the factors associated with cases requiring additional RFA sessions to achieve a comparable volume reduction rates (VRR). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated benign thyroid nodules treated with RFA between 2008 and 2018.Treatment efficacy at the 5- and 10-year follow-ups was analyzed. Additionally, subgroup analysis comparing technique efficacy, such as the final VRR, between the single- and multi-session RFA groups was performed. Continuous variables were analyzed using the two-sample t-test or Mann–Whitney U test, and categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Results: A total of 267 nodules from 237 patients (age: 46.3 ± 15.0 years; female: 210/237 [88.6%]) were included. Of these, 60 were analyzed for the 5-year follow-up (mean follow-up duration ± standard deviation: 5.8 ± 0.4 years) and 29 for the 10-year follow-up (10.9 ± 0.9 years). Single-session RFA showed a median VRR of 95.7% (5th year) and 98.8% (10th year), while multi-session RFA showed comparable median VRRs of 97.4% (5th year) and 96.9% (10th year). The vascularity type, demographic factors, nodular components, and locations did not significantly differ between the single-session and multisession RFA groups. However, nodules with pre-RFA volume <10 mL were more prevalent in the single-session RFA group than in the multi-session RFA group (5th year: 64.3% [18/28] vs. 34.4% [11/32], P = 0.040; 10th year: 75.0% [12/16] vs. 23.1% [3/13], P = 0.016). Conclusion Single-session RFA may be sufficient for achieving adequate volume reduction during long-term follow-up for small-volume benign thyroid nodules. A high VRR was maintained regardless of the nodular component, location, demographic factors, or vascularity type. However, large-volume nodules may require multiple RFA sessions to achieve a comparable VRR.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Objective: The long-term efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy, emphasizing single-session RFA, and identify the factors associated with cases requiring additional RFA sessions to achieve a comparable volume reduction rates (VRR). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated benign thyroid nodules treated with RFA between 2008 and 2018.Treatment efficacy at the 5- and 10-year follow-ups was analyzed. Additionally, subgroup analysis comparing technique efficacy, such as the final VRR, between the single- and multi-session RFA groups was performed. Continuous variables were analyzed using the two-sample t-test or Mann–Whitney U test, and categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Results: A total of 267 nodules from 237 patients (age: 46.3 ± 15.0 years; female: 210/237 [88.6%]) were included. Of these, 60 were analyzed for the 5-year follow-up (mean follow-up duration ± standard deviation: 5.8 ± 0.4 years) and 29 for the 10-year follow-up (10.9 ± 0.9 years). Single-session RFA showed a median VRR of 95.7% (5th year) and 98.8% (10th year), while multi-session RFA showed comparable median VRRs of 97.4% (5th year) and 96.9% (10th year). The vascularity type, demographic factors, nodular components, and locations did not significantly differ between the single-session and multisession RFA groups. However, nodules with pre-RFA volume <10 mL were more prevalent in the single-session RFA group than in the multi-session RFA group (5th year: 64.3% [18/28] vs. 34.4% [11/32], P = 0.040; 10th year: 75.0% [12/16] vs. 23.1% [3/13], P = 0.016). Conclusion Single-session RFA may be sufficient for achieving adequate volume reduction during long-term follow-up for small-volume benign thyroid nodules. A high VRR was maintained regardless of the nodular component, location, demographic factors, or vascularity type. However, large-volume nodules may require multiple RFA sessions to achieve a comparable VRR.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.