Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background: Warm ischemia is a major contributor to ischemic cholangiopathy and non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) after liver transplantation, particularly in donation-after-circulatory-death grafts. However, the isolated impact of warm ischemia on peribiliary fibrosis is difficult to delineate because clinical settings involve overlapping effects of cold ischemia, reperfusion injury, and alloimmunity. This study aimed to establish a non-transplant rat model that isolates warm ischemic biliary injury and to compare the antifibrotic effects of rapamycin and tacrolimus. Methods: Warm ischemia was induced in Sprague–Dawley rats by ligating both ends of the peribiliary vascular plexus and the hepatic artery, followed by 30 minutes of portal vein clamping. Rats were randomly assigned to control, tacrolimus (1 mg/kg/day), or rapamycin (1 mg/kg/day) groups (n=15 per group). Serum alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and total bilirubin were measured serially. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Sirius red staining were performed at 1, 3, and 6 weeks. Peribiliary fibrosis was quantified using digital image analysis of collagen area fraction. Results: Warm ischemia induced acute hepatobiliary injury with transient enzyme elevations, but no significant intergroup differences were observed. Histologically, biliary epithelial proliferation and collagen deposition increased progressively and became prominent at 6 weeks. At this time point, fibrosis ratios differed significantly (overall p=0.002): controls showed the highest fibrosis (4.8%), followed by tacrolimus (2.4%) and rapamycin (1.7%). Both immunosuppressants significantly reduced fibrosis compared with controls (p<0.05), whereas the difference between tacrolimus and rapamycin was not significant. Conclusion This warm ischemia model demonstrates that isolated ischemic injury alone can induce progressive peribiliary fibrosis. Rapamycin and tacrolimus attenuated fibrosis, with rapamycin producing the lowest collagen deposition. These findings provide mechanistic insight into ischemic cholangiopathy after liver transplantation—particularly in donation after circulatory death grafts—and underscore the need for further studies using models that incorporate cold ischemia, reperfusion, and alloimmune factors.

Purpose: Weight reduction (WR) can reduce liver volume, affecting the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR). This study aimed to evaluate the decrease in liver volume after WR and analyze risk factors affecting liver volume reduction in potential liver donors with steatosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 147 potential liver donors with steatosis who participated in a WR program prior to liver transplantation between January 2016 and December 2021. Total liver volume (TLV) was measured using CT and MRI. Risk factors for large liver volume reduction (≥10%) were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Ninety-seven donors (66.0%) underwent donor hepatectomy after WR. Liver volumes showed a statistically significant decrease (from 1,399.6 ± 315.4 mL to 1,283.6 ± 271.2 mL, P < 0.05). Thirty-eight donors (42.7%) showed large liver volume reduction. There was a more significant reduction in weight, AST, and ALT in the large liver volume reduction group than in the small liver volume reduction group (all P < 0.05). WR percentage and ALT abnormalities were independent risk factors for large liver volume reduction (odds ratio, 1.184 [95% confidence interval, 1.054–1.329] and odds ratio, 5.502 [95% confidence interval, 1.660–18.229], respectively; all P < 0.05). Conclusion Potential liver donors with 7% or more WR or ALT abnormality require liver volume/GRWR remeasurement after WR to ensure adequate graft size and prevent small-for-size syndrome.

Purpose: Right lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with dual portal veins (PVs) remains technically challenging.This study aimed to identify independent risk factors for PV complications. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 111 recipients of dual PV LDLT between 2011 and 2020. Recipient characteristics, anatomical geometry, and surgical factors were evaluated. Outcomes were overall PV complications and major PV complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III). Logistic regression was performed. Results: PV complications developed in 41 patients (36.9%), including 16 major events (14.4%). Univariate analysis revealed associations with right posterior PV (RPPV) diameter, axial angle, and coronal angle. On multivariate analysis, larger RPPV diameter (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; P = 0.041) and wider axial angle (OR, 1.08; P = 0.015) were independent predictors of major PV complications. Reconstruction method was not significant. Patients with overall major Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIcomplications had inferior 100-month survival (80% vs. 100%; P = 0.014, log-rank test). Conclusion In dual PV LDLT, anatomical geometry—specifically RPPV diameter and axial angle—independently predicts major PV complications, whereas surgical technique does not. Preoperative 3-dimensional imaging and anatomical risk stratification should inform donor selection and surgical planning.

Background: Although the presence of both obesity and reduced muscle mass presents a dual metabolic burden and additively has a negative effect on a variety of cardiometabolic parameters, data regarding the associations between their combined effects and left ventricular diastolic function are limited. This study investigated the association between the ratio of skeletal muscle mass to visceral fat area (SVR) and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in patients with preserved ejection fraction using random forest machine learning. Methods: In total, 1,070 participants with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction who underwent comprehensive health examinations, including transthoracic echocardiography and bioimpedance body composition analysis, were enrolled. SVR was calculated as an index of sarcopenic obesity by dividing the appendicular skeletal muscle mass by the visceral fat area. Results: In the random forest model, age and SVR were the most powerful predictors of LVDD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that older age (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07 to 1.15) and lower SVR (adjusted OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.57) were independent risk factors for LVDD.SVR showed a significant improvement in predictive performance and fair predictability for LVDD, with the highest area under the curve noted in both men and women, with statistical significance. In non-obese and metabolically healthy individuals, the lowest SVR tertile was associated with a greater risk of LVDD compared to the highest SVR tertile. Conclusion Decreased muscle mass and increased visceral fat were significantly associated with LVDD compared to obesity, body fat composition, and body muscle composition indices.

Purpose: Finasteride and dutasteride are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and reduce the risk of developing prostate cancer. Finasteride blocks only the type 2 form of 5-alpha-reductase, whereas dutasteride blocks both type 1 and 2 forms of the enzyme. Previous studies suggest the possibility that dutasteride may be superior to finasteride in preventing prostate cancer. We directly compared the effects of finasteride and dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer in patients with BPH using a pooled analysis of 15 real-world databases. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cohort study of new-users of finasteride and dutasteride. We include patients who were prescribed 5 mg finasteride or dutasteride for the first time to treat BPH and had at least 180 days of prescription. We excluded patients with a history of prostate cancer or a prostate-specific antigen level ≥ 4 ng/mL before the study drug prescription. Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the hazard ratio (HR) for prostate cancer after propensity score (PS) matching. Results: A total of 8,284 patients of new-users of finasteride and 8,670 patients of new-users of dutasteride were included across the 15 databases. In the overall population, compared to dutasteride, finasteride was associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer in both on-treatment and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods. After 1:1 PS matching, 4,897 patients using finasteride and 4,897 patients using dutasteride were enrolled in the present study. No significant differences were observed for risk of prostate cancer between finasteride and dutasteride both on-treatment (HR=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–1.00; p=0.051) and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods (HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.67–1.14; p=0.310). Conclusions Using real-world databases, the present study demonstrated that dutasteride was not associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer than finasteride in patients with BPH.

Purpose: This study elucidates the mechanism of the physiological effect of cannabidiol (CBD) by assessing its impact on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation in RWPE-1 cells and prostatitis-induced by 17β-estradiol and dihydrotestosterone in a rat model, focusing on its therapeutic potential for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Materials and Methods: RWPE-1 cells were stratified in vitro into three groups: (1) controls, (2) cells with LPS-induced inflammation, and (3) cells with LPS-induced inflammation and treated with CBD. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and western blots were performed on cellular components and supernatants after administration of CBD. Five groups of six Sprague–Dawley male rats were assigned: (1) control, (2) CP/CPPS, (3) CP/CPPS and treated with 50 mg/kg CBD, (4) CP/CPPS and treated with 100 mg/kg CBD, and (5) CP/CPPS and treated with 150 mg/kg CBD. Prostatitis was induced through administration of 17β-estradiol and dihydrotestosterone. After four weeks of CBD treatment, a pain index was evaluated, and prostate tissue was collected for subsequent histologic examination and western blot analysis. Results: CBD demonstrated efficacy in vivo for CP/CPPS and in vitro for inflammation. It inhibited the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)uclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) pathway by activating the CB2 receptor, reducing expression of interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) (p<0.01). CBD exhibited analgesic effects by activating and desensitizing the TRPV1 receptor. Conclusions CBD inhibits the TLR4/NF-κB pathway by activating the CB2 receptor, desensitizes the TRPV1 receptor, and decreases the release of COX2. This results in relief of inflammation and pain in patients with CP/CPPS, indicating CBD as a potential treatment for CP/CPPS.

Background: s/Aims: Liver transplantation (LT) is now a critical, life-saving treatment for patients with liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite its significant benefits, biliary complications (BCs) continue to be a major cause of postoperative morbidity.This study evaluates the fluorescence intensity (FI) of the common bile duct (CBD) utilizing near-infrared indocyanine green (ICG) imaging, and examines its association with the incidence of BCs within three months post-LT. Methods: This investigation analyzed data from nine living donor LT (LDLT) recipients who were administered 0.05 mg/kg of ICG prior to bile duct anastomosis. Real-time perfusion of the CBD was recorded for three minutes using an ICG camera, and FI was quantified using Image J (National Institutes of Health). Key parameters assessed included F max, F1/2 max, T1/2 max, and the slope (F max/ T max) to evaluate the fluorescence response. Results: BCs occurred in two out of nine patients. These two patients exhibited the longest T1/2 max values, which were linked with lower slope values, implicating a potential relationship between extended T1/2 max, reduced slope, and the occurrence of postoperative BCs. Conclusions The study indicates that ICG fluorescence imaging may serve as an effective tool for assessing bile duct perfusion in LDLT patients. While the data suggest that an extended T1/2 max and lower slope may correlate with an increased risk of BCs, further validation through larger studies is required to confirm the predictive value of ICG fluorescence imaging in this setting.

Background: s/Aims: Liver transplantation (LT) is now a critical, life-saving treatment for patients with liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite its significant benefits, biliary complications (BCs) continue to be a major cause of postoperative morbidity.This study evaluates the fluorescence intensity (FI) of the common bile duct (CBD) utilizing near-infrared indocyanine green (ICG) imaging, and examines its association with the incidence of BCs within three months post-LT. Methods: This investigation analyzed data from nine living donor LT (LDLT) recipients who were administered 0.05 mg/kg of ICG prior to bile duct anastomosis. Real-time perfusion of the CBD was recorded for three minutes using an ICG camera, and FI was quantified using Image J (National Institutes of Health). Key parameters assessed included F max, F1/2 max, T1/2 max, and the slope (F max/ T max) to evaluate the fluorescence response. Results: BCs occurred in two out of nine patients. These two patients exhibited the longest T1/2 max values, which were linked with lower slope values, implicating a potential relationship between extended T1/2 max, reduced slope, and the occurrence of postoperative BCs. Conclusions The study indicates that ICG fluorescence imaging may serve as an effective tool for assessing bile duct perfusion in LDLT patients. While the data suggest that an extended T1/2 max and lower slope may correlate with an increased risk of BCs, further validation through larger studies is required to confirm the predictive value of ICG fluorescence imaging in this setting.

Purpose: Finasteride and dutasteride are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and reduce the risk of developing prostate cancer. Finasteride blocks only the type 2 form of 5-alpha-reductase, whereas dutasteride blocks both type 1 and 2 forms of the enzyme. Previous studies suggest the possibility that dutasteride may be superior to finasteride in preventing prostate cancer. We directly compared the effects of finasteride and dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer in patients with BPH using a pooled analysis of 15 real-world databases. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cohort study of new-users of finasteride and dutasteride. We include patients who were prescribed 5 mg finasteride or dutasteride for the first time to treat BPH and had at least 180 days of prescription. We excluded patients with a history of prostate cancer or a prostate-specific antigen level ≥ 4 ng/mL before the study drug prescription. Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the hazard ratio (HR) for prostate cancer after propensity score (PS) matching. Results: A total of 8,284 patients of new-users of finasteride and 8,670 patients of new-users of dutasteride were included across the 15 databases. In the overall population, compared to dutasteride, finasteride was associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer in both on-treatment and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods. After 1:1 PS matching, 4,897 patients using finasteride and 4,897 patients using dutasteride were enrolled in the present study. No significant differences were observed for risk of prostate cancer between finasteride and dutasteride both on-treatment (HR=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–1.00; p=0.051) and intent-to-treat time-at-risk periods (HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.67–1.14; p=0.310). Conclusions Using real-world databases, the present study demonstrated that dutasteride was not associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer than finasteride in patients with BPH.