Purpose: Timely surgical intervention is crucial in trauma care, particularly in patients with hypotensive abdominal injuries.In South Korea, the regional trauma center system has adopted a quality metric mandating initiation of emergency surgery within 1 hour of emergency department (ED) arrival for such patients. We evaluated the impact of ED-to-surgery time on clinical outcomes in hypotensive abdominal trauma and assessed the appropriateness of the 1-hour threshold. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 425 trauma patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery at 2 regional trauma centers between 2019 and 2022. Patients with an initial or lowest recorded systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included complications, intensive care unit stay, and total hospital stay. Patients were categorized into early (≤1 hour) and delayed (>1 hour) surgery groups. Statistical analyses included logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM), receiver operating characteristic curve, and complication analysis by 30-minute intervals. Results: We found that 243 patients (57.2%) underwent surgery within 1 hour. In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between early and delayed groups. Age, Glasgow Coma Scale, lowest SBP, 4-hour RBC transfusion volume, and abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale were independent mortality predictors. PSM confirmed no mortality difference by surgical timing. However, complication rates increased with surgical delays. Conclusion While surgical delay was not associated with mortality, it was linked to increased complications. Future trauma quality metrics should incorporate refined patient stratification and evaluate the entire process aimed at restoring physiological instability, rather than relying on a strict 1-hour threshold.

Objectives: . Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) has a favorable prognosis. However, indeterminate lymph nodes (LNs) are common, making it challenging to distinguish recurrent from persistent DTC. Previous studies have not specifically compared the prognosis between recurrent and persistent DTC. Therefore, we aimed to compare prognosis and oncologic characteristics between these two groups. Methods: . This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary care institution and included 265 patients with DTC (recurrent, 109; persistent, 156) who underwent reoperation between November 1, 1999, and August 31, 2018, for structural disease. Patients with distant metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis were excluded. Clinical and oncological characteristics, patterns of LN metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. For DFS, time zero was defined as the date of the second operation. Results: . Recurrent DTC had a higher incidence of central LN metastasis (P=0.003), infield recurrence (P<0.001), and distant metastasis (P<0.001). In contrast, persistent DTC more frequently exhibited lateral LN metastasis (P=0.003) and outfield recurrence (P<0.001). The most common site of neck LN metastasis was ipsilateral level VI/VII (51.4%) in recurrent DTC and ipsilateral level IV (43.0%) in persistent DTC. Ten-year DFS was significantly lower in recurrent DTC than in persistent DTC (41.0% vs. 67.9%; P<0.001). Recurrent DTC, older age, a higher number of metastatic LNs at the second operation (first reoperation), and R1/R2 resection at the second operation were associated with decreased DFS. OS did not significantly differ between recurrent and persistent DTC (P=0.160). Conclusion . Recurrent DTC is associated with poorer DFS than persistent DTC, although OS does not significantly differ between the two groups.

Background: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by erythema, papules, ocular symptoms, and heightened sensitivity. Patients with neurogenic symptoms such as burning or stinging remain particularly difficult to manage. Current guidelines often underrepresent energy-based devices (EBDs), pigmentary sequelae, psychosocial burden, and ocular comorbidities. Objective: To examine Korean dermatologists’ expert perspectives on rosacea management, focusing on skin sensitivity, neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary changes, psychosocial impact, ocular involvement, and EBD use. Methods: A web-based, 29-item survey was administered to 25 board-certified Korean dermatologists (May–June 2025). Quantitative and qualitative responses were analyzed. Results: Erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular phenotypes with sensitivity skin predominated. EBDs (pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light) were frequently used but limited by cost and sensitivity issues. Neurogenic symptoms were recognized but rarely treated with neuromodulators. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was infrequent, yet monitoring was inconsistent.Psychosocial and ocular aspects were acknowledged but seldomly systematically addressed.Respondents expressed interest in emerging adjunctive treatments such as cold plasma, skin boosters, and holistic care approaches. Conclusion Korean dermatologists adopt individualized strategies for rosacea, yet practice gaps remain regarding neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary complications, and psychosocial and ocular comorbidities. Findings support the need for updated multidisciplinary, phenotype-driven guidelines aligned with real-world practice.

Background: Handgrip strength (HGS) is an indicator of late-life health, associated with disability, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. While exercise helps maintain HGS, diabetes may reduce its benefits. This study investigated the association between exercise and low HGS (LHGS) stratified by diabetes status and sex. Methods: Data from 16,443 participants in the 2017–2019 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed. HGS was measured using a digital dynamometer. Exercise type and frequency were assessed by questionnaire. Three-way and twoway interaction terms were analyzed for exercise, sex and diabetes. Results: Aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, and diabetes were significantly associated with LHGS (P<0.05). A significant interaction between diabetes and aerobic exercise was observed in females (odds ratio [OR] of LHGS=1.704, 95% confidence interval= 1.073–2.707). Among males, both exercise types were associated with lower odds of LHGS regardless of diabetes status, except for aerobic exercise in non-diabetic males. Among males, the ORs of LHGS for aerobic and resistance exercise were 0.479 (0.278– 0.827) and 0.317 (0.165–0.611) with diabetes, 0.757 (0.554–1.035) and 0.536 (0.360–0.798) without diabetes. Among females, the ORs of LHGS for aerobic exercise and resistance exercise were 1.109 (0.716–1.719) and 0.529 (0.224–1.249) with diabetes, 0.676 (0.539–0.848) and 0.795 (0.564–1.121) without diabetes. Conclusions The modifying effect of diabetes on the relationship between exercise and grip strength was observed in females but not in males. Females with diabetes may require tailored exercise guideline to prevent LHGS.

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) remains a cornerstone of curative treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. However, dose escalation to improve tumor control is often constrained by the proximity of the rectum, which increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities. Biodegradable rectal spacers inserted between the prostate and rectum have emerged as an effective approach to reduce rectal radiation exposure. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on indications, contraindications, procedural standards, and clinical management for biodegradable rectal spacer insertion during prostate cancer RT. Materials and Methods: This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel through a systematic review of the literature, analysis of international guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Urology, American Society for Radiation Oncology), and expert consensus among radiation oncologists, radiologists, and urologists with clinical experience in spacer insertion. The strength of each recommendation and the level of evidence were classified according to the modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Results: Spacer insertion is conditionally recommended (Grade C, Level I) for patients receiving definitive external-beam RT without rectal invasion. It reduces the high-dose rectal irradiation volume (V70–75) by >50%, decreases acute GI toxicity, and helps maintain bowel-related quality of life. However, the benefit for late severe toxicity (grade 2 or higher) remains debated in recent meta-analyses. Contraindications include rectal invasion, anatomical inaccessibility, infection, and material hypersensitivity. Procedures should be performed under local anesthesia in a sterile environment by trained physicians. Short-course antibiotics and simulator-based training, including completion of multiple supervised cases, are advised. Conclusion Biodegradable rectal spacer insertion is clinically validated and effective in reducing acute rectal toxicity. Although pivotal trials demonstrated a favorable procedural safety profile, real-world postmarket data include reports of rare but severe procedural complications. This guideline provides standardized recommendations tailored to Korean clinical practice while remaining consistent with international standards, emphasizing the importance of operator training and careful patient selection.

Background: Clopidogrel requires several hours to achieve adequate platelet inhibition. We investigated the association of clopidogrel preloading time with 30-day clinical outcomes and post-procedural troponin elevation in patients with stable angina undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 1,020 patients with stable angina (clopidogrel-naive) who received 300 mg clopidogrel preloading within 24 hours before elective PCI between 2012 and 2020. Patients were categorized according to clopidogrel preloading-to-balloon time ≤6 hours or >6 hours. The primary endpoint was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and any revascularization. Secondary endpoints included serial troponin T changes and troponin T elevation ≥5×, ≥25×, and ≥70× the upper reference limit. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used. Results: Thirty-day MACE occurred in five patients (0.49%) and did not differ between the ≤6-hour and >6-hour groups after IPTW (0.5% vs. 0.4%, p=0.754). Post-procedural troponin T levels at 6, 24, and 48 hours were higher in the ≤6-hour group. Patients with shorter preloading-to-balloon times showed higher peak troponin T levels, with the greatest difference at the ≤1-hour cutoff (geometric mean ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.53–2.95; p<0.001) and progressive attenuation at longer cutoffs. Troponin T elevation ≥5× and ≥25× was more frequent in the ≤6-hour group, whereas ≥70× elevation did not differ. Conclusion Clopidogrel preloading ≤6 hours before elective PCI was not associated with increased 30-day MACE but was associated with lower-threshold post-procedural troponin T elevation.

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is standard after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, bleeding risk remains a major concern. Early discontinuation of aspirin due to potent P2Y12 inhibition may mitigate bleeding without increasing thrombotic events. Methods: The ASpirin-FREE therapy after successful percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome (ASFREE) study was an investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective, open-label, single-arm pilot study enrolling patients with ACS who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents. All patients received a single loading dose of aspirin on the day of the PCI, followed by ticagrelor or prasugrel monotherapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was definite stent thrombosis. Event rates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: In total, 228 patients were enrolled. TVF occurred in 10 patients (4.4%; 95% CI, 2.1%–7.9%). Definite stent thrombosis was observed in one patient (0.4%; 95% CI, 0.01%–2.4%), with no acute or subacute events. Major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5) occurred in two patients (0.9%; 95% CI, 0.1%–3.1%). Conclusion An aspirin-free strategy following a single loading dose with continuation of potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was feasible in patients with ACS undergoing PCI and was associated with low rates of thrombotic and major bleeding events. These findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and supporting further evaluations in adequately powered randomized controlled trials (CRIS registration: KCT0008182).

Background/Aims: Although gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) is a major contributor to the carbon footprint of national healthcare, the amount of medical waste generated by GIE procedures is not reported in South Korea. This study aimed to measure the amount of medical waste generated from GIE procedures in South Korea. Methods: We conducted a 5-day audit of medical waste generated during GIEs at seven hospitals. During the study period, medical waste in the endoscopy examination rooms was measured twice daily and documented as mass (kg). To calculate the mean mass of disposable waste generated during one esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and one colonoscopy, the mean mass of medical waste generated from seven examinations was calculated. The mean mass of medical waste generated during GIEs was calculated by dividing the total mass of medical waste generated by the number of GIE procedures. Results: Overall, 3,922 endoscopies were performed and 4,558 kg of waste was generated. The mean weight of medical waste generated per endoscopy was 1.34 kg. Each EGD and colonoscopy generated a mean of 0.24 kg and 0.43 kg of disposable waste, respectively. Applying the mean waste estimates from this study to annual GIE procedures performed in South Korea in 2022 showed that the total medical waste produced from GIE was 13,704,453 kg. In addition, the total masses of medical waste produced during EGD and colonoscopy procedures were 819,766 kg and 2,889,478 kg, respectively. Conclusions Our quantitative measurement showed that a large amount of medical waste is generated from GIE procedures. However, further research is warranted to reduce medical waste generated during GIE, which is an urgent unmet need.

Background/Aims: The Korean guidelines for Helicobacter pylori treatment were revised in 2020, however, the extent of adherence to these guidelines in clinical practice remains unclear. Herein, we initiated a prospective, nationwide, multicenter registry study in 2021 to evaluate the current management of H.pylori infection in Korea. Methods: This interim report describes the adherence to the revised guidelines and their impact on firstline eradication rates. Data on patient demographics, diagnoses, treatments, and eradication outcomes were collected using a web-based electronic case report form. Results: A total of 7,261 patients from 66 hospitals who received first-line treatment were analyzed.The modified intention-to-treat eradication rate for first-line treatment was 81.0%, with 80.4% of the prescriptions adhering to the revised guidelines. The most commonly prescribed regimen was the 14-day clarithromycin-based triple therapy (CTT; 42.0%), followed by tailored therapy (TT; 21.2%), 7-day CTT (14.1%), and 10-day concomitant therapy (CT; 10.1%). Time-trend analysis demonstrated significant increases in guideline adherence and the use of 10-day CT and TT, along with a decrease in the use of 7-day CTT (all p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that guideline adherence was significantly associated with first-line eradication success (odds ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.61 to 2.56; p<0.001). Conclusions The revised guidelines for the treatment of H. pylori infection have been increasingly adopted in routine clinical practice in Korea, which may have contributed to improved first-line eradication rates. Notably, the 14-day CTT, 10-day CT, and TT regimens are emerging as the preferred first-line treatment options among Korean physicians.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.