Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) usually exhibits indolent behavior, often misdiagnosed and is associated with a favorable prognosis [1]. Despite the indolent nature of LG-ESS, recurrence is common, the risk is as high as 1 in 3 to 1 in 2 [2]. The behavior of such tumors can lead to invade blood vessels [3]. An intravascular tumor is associated with direct risk of sudden death from pulmonary embolism. There are very few reported cases with clinically obvious intravascular extension. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy are adjuvant treatments that have not been able to demonstrate a definitive benefit in survival [4]. We want to take advantage of the opportunity, so far unpublished, to demonstrate with this case the surgical challenge described step by step, as well as to demonstrate the importance of surgery as the only curative treatment even in extended intravascular disease [5]. Here in, we present the surgical challenge of a LG-ESS in a 59-year old woman with iliac and cava vein tumoral thrombus extension. We performed a tumoral thrombectomy and vascular repair, with a pelvic exenteration and double barrel wet colostomy. After performing pelvic exenteration, the thrombus with intravascular involvement was addressed at 2 points: inferior cava vein and right common iliac vein with the extraction of the entire thrombus. These defects are corrected by angioplasty and venorrhaphy, respectively. The surgery got a complete cytoreduction. It lasted 290 minutes, with 430 mL blood loss. In patients with LG-ESS, cytoreduction is a reliable option even in extended metastatic disease.

Indirect effects of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic are difficult to calculate. Fear of intrahospital infection has led to a decrease in the use of emergency services and the performance of elective procedures. Several low- and middle-income countries have seen the number of institutional deliveries reduced, even in the absence of a follow-up program for home births. We present the case of a patient with adequate prenatal care and an institutional delivery plan who, due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, chose to have a home delivery with unsafe conditions. The lack of supervision by health personnel and the absence of an immediate consultation plan facilitated the presentation of postpartum hemorrhage and poor neonatal results. Little attention has been paid during the pandemic to pregnant women who decide to have their birth at home. A broad discussion is necessary in this regard, to regain the confidence of the population and strengthen institutional births, or to strengthen midwife-assisted home births programs. Patients’ fear to acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection inside hospitals is a factor that must be taken into account in prenatal care programs.

Indirect effects of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic are difficult to calculate. Fear of intrahospital infection has led to a decrease in the use of emergency services and the performance of elective procedures. Several low- and middle-income countries have seen the number of institutional deliveries reduced, even in the absence of a follow-up program for home births. We present the case of a patient with adequate prenatal care and an institutional delivery plan who, due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, chose to have a home delivery with unsafe conditions. The lack of supervision by health personnel and the absence of an immediate consultation plan facilitated the presentation of postpartum hemorrhage and poor neonatal results. Little attention has been paid during the pandemic to pregnant women who decide to have their birth at home. A broad discussion is necessary in this regard, to regain the confidence of the population and strengthen institutional births, or to strengthen midwife-assisted home births programs. Patients’ fear to acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection inside hospitals is a factor that must be taken into account in prenatal care programs.