Abstract Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly recognized as a vital, non-invasive tool for managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) due to its real-time assessment capabilities and patient comfort. However, the lack of standardized training pathways remains a significant barrier to its widespread adoption, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. This editorial evaluates the implementation of a mastery learning-based workshop in Indonesia designed to enhance IUS skills among physicians. The mastery learning framework—incorporating flipped learning, deliberate practice, and real-time feedback led to significant improvements in technical performance with large effect sizes. Despite these gains, only about two-thirds of participants achieved competency in sigmoid colon scanning, and only half met the standard for terminal ileum assessment. This suggests that while short-term intensive workshops are effective for early skill acquisition, they may be insufficient for ensuring consistent proficiency in technically demanding tasks. Mastery learning offers a structured and reproducible approach to gastroenterology procedural training. To translate these initial educational gains into durable clinical expertise, future programs should consider longitudinal curricula that include sustained practice, mentorship, and ongoing assessment.
Intestinal ultrasound ; Mastery learning ; Inflammatory bowel disease ; Medical education ; Competency-based training ; Gastroenterology

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is useful for the pathological diagnosis of pancreatic masses, but patients are susceptible to severe bleeding and perforation. Because the incidence and severity of these complications have not been fully evaluated. METHODS: We aimed to evaluate severe bleeding and perforation after EUS-FNA for pancreatic masses using large-scale data derived from a Japanese nationwide administrative database. RESULTS: In total, 3,090 consecutive patients from 212 low- to high-volume hospitals were analyzed. Severe bleeding requiring transfusion or endoscopic treatment occurred in seven patients (0.23%), and no perforation was observed. No patient mortality was recorded within 30 days of EUS-FNA. The rate of severe bleeding in low-volume hospitals was significantly higher than that in medium- and high-volume hospitals (0.48% vs 0.10%, p=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Severe bleeding and perforation following EUS-FNA for pancreatic masses are rare, and the procedure is safe.
Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/*adverse effects ; Female ; Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*etiology ; Humans ; Intestinal Perforation/*etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/*pathology