OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in geriatric patients following gastrointestinal perforation surgery, and constructed a model to validate its predictive value. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted. The clinical data of geriatric patients (aged ≥ 60 years) after gastrointestinal perforation surgery admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Hebei General Hospital from October 2017 to October 2024 were enrolled. Two groups were divided according to whether ARDS occurred postoperatively, and the differences in each index between the groups were compared. Lasso regression and multifactorial Logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for the development of ARDS, and a prediction model was constructed based on these, which was presented using a nomogram. The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were plotted to evaluate the discrimination, accuracy, and clinical practicability of the model. RESULTS: A total of 155 geriatric patients following gastrointestinal perforation surgery were ultimately included in the analysis, among whom 43 developed ARDS, with an incidence rate of 27.7%. There were significantly differences in age, body mass index (BMI), acute kidney injury comorbidity, heart rate, onset time, the duration of surgery, the site of perforation, seroperitoneum, amount of bleeding, shock comorbidity, central venous pressure (CVP), C-reactive protein, and albumin between ARDS and non-ARDS groups. Lasso regression identified nine significant predictors: age, BMI, acute kidney injury comorbidity, onset time, seroperitoneum, shock comorbidity, CVP, hemoglobin, and albumin. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis identified BMI [odds ratio (OR) = 1.310, P < 0.001], hemoglobin (OR = 1.019, P = 0.045), seroperitoneum (OR = 1.001, P = 0.017), and albumin (OR = 0.871, P < 0.001) as independent risk factors for the occurrence of ARDS. A prediction model was constructed based on the above four independent risk factors, and the ROC curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the model for predicting the occurrence of ARDS was 0.885 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.824-0.946], and internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling (Bootstrap 500 times), which showed that the AUC value of the model was 0.886 (95%CI was 0.883-0.889). Calibration curves revealed excellent concordance between observed outcomes and model predictions. DCA indicated a high net benefit value for the model, which has good clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS BMI, hemoglobin, seroperitoneum, and albumin were identified as independent risk factors for ARDS in geriatric patients following gastrointestinal perforation surgery. The prediction model constructed using these four indicators facilitates early identification of high-risk individuals by clinicians.
Humans ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Aged ; Risk Factors ; Logistic Models ; Postoperative Complications ; Intestinal Perforation/surgery* ; Male ; ROC Curve ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Intensive Care Units ; Nomograms

OBJECTIVETo summarize the diagnosis and treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforation (ICP).

METHODSClinical data, treatment course and outcome of 17 patients who developed ICP following colonoscopic examination or operation at Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital from January 2000 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTSDuring above 13 years, a total of 127 106 patients underwent colonoscopic examination or operation, of whom 17 cases (0.013%) had ICP. There were 8 males and 9 females with an average age of 65.2 (32-85) years. The interval between the onset of ICP and clinically diagnosed ICP was 0 to 6 days after performance. ICP occurred in 8 patients following colonoscopy operations, including simple colonic polyp excision, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), while in 9 patients following simple colonoscopy examination. Except for one patient who was immediately diagnosed with ICP through the finding of "yellow adipose tissue visible in the vision field" during operation,7 early cases (41.2%) were diagnosed by abdominal X-ray examination, and 9 later cases were confirmed by abdominal CT examination. The perforation sites included sigmoid colon in 5 cases, caecum in 3 cases, descending colon in 3 cases, descending and sigmoid junction in 2 cases, ileum in 1 case, splenic flexure in 1 case, sigmoid and rectum junction in 1 case, retum in 1 case. One case with ICP following ESD after resection of polyp in caecum was cured successfully with conservative treatment, including fasting, gastrointestinal decompression, fluid infusion, anti-infection and nutritional support. One case with ICP, which was found during colonoscopic operation and the perforation was immediately closed with titanium clip, received conservative treatment, including anti-infection and then was cured. Fifteen patients underwent surgery, including 8 patients with primary intention intestinal perforation repair, 4 patients with primary intention resection of associated intestine and anastomosis, 2 patients with primary intention resection of associated intestine and ostomy, 1 patient with primary intention intestinal perforation repair and ostomy. Postoperative abdominal incision infection occurred in 4 cases, pulmonary infection in 1 case, incision infection with cardiovascular event or urinary tract infection in 1 case each. All the patients were cured and discharged. Average hospital stay was 18.6(3-45) days.

CONCLUSIONSICP should be diagnosed by physical examination and imaging examination as soon as possible. For perforation during colonoscopic performance, colonoscopic titanium clip can be used for closure. Perforation repair is still the main procedure for ICP. If necessary, partial intestinal resection and anastomosis or ostomy can be selected.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colonic Polyps ; Colonoscopy ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Iatrogenic Disease ; Intestinal Perforation ; diagnosis ; etiology ; therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Colon, Ascending ; injuries ; Foreign Bodies ; complications ; Humans ; Intestinal Perforation ; diagnosis ; etiology ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Seafood

No abstract available.
Aged ; Colonoscopy ; Enema/*adverse effects ; Humans ; Intestinal Perforation/*diagnosis/etiology ; Male ; Rectal Diseases/*diagnosis/diagnostic imaging/etiology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

OBJECTIVETo analyze the clinical characteristics of neonatal intestinal perforation and to provide a theoretical basis for improving the prognosis of this disease.

METHODSThe clinical data of 101 patients with neonatal intestinal perforation who were hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between January 2000 and June 2014 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTSThe main causes of neonatal intestinal perforation were neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC, 41 cases, 40.6%), idiopathic intestinal perforation (17 cases, 16.8%), and congenital megacolon (10 cases, 9.9%). The average birth weight and average gestational age of the idiopathic intestinal perforation group were significantly higher than those of the NEC group (P<0.05). The main pathogen of the NEC group was enterococci, which accounted for 57% (13/23), while in the idiopathic intestinal perforation group Gram-negative bacteria became the major pathogen; the distribution of pathogens were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis found that acidosis, multi-site intestinal perforation, and prolonged perforation-operation interval were independent risk factors for death due to neonatal intestinal perforation.

CONCLUSIONSMultiple causes contribute to neonatal intestinal perforation, and NEC is the major one. Neonatal intestinal perforation caused by NEC has different pathogens compared with idiopathic intestinal perforation, and the two diseases may be mutually independent. Early diagnosis and timely operation is the main measure to rescue the lives of patients with neonatal intestinal perforation.

Enterocolitis, Necrotizing ; complications ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal ; Intestinal Perforation ; etiology ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Retrospective Studies

No abstract available.
Colon/pathology/surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Intestinal Perforation/*etiology ; Plastics ; Stents/*adverse effects

Duodenal diverticula are common, but perforated duodenal diverticulum is rare. Because of the disease rarity, there is no standard management protocol for perforated duodenal diverticulum. To properly manage this rare complication, a clear preoperative diagnosis and clinical disease severity assessment are important. An abdomino-pelvic CT is an unquestionably crucial diagnostic tool. Perforation is considered a surgical emergency, although conservative treatment based on fasting and broad-spectrum antibiotics may be offered in some selected cases. Herein, we report two cases of perforated duodenal diverticulum, one case managed with surgical treatment and one with conservative treatment.
Aged ; Diverticulum/complications/*diagnosis/surgery ; Duodenal Diseases/complications/*diagnosis/surgery ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Humans ; Intestinal Perforation/*diagnosis/etiology/surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Advanced cancer patients with refractory ascites often do not respond to conventional treatments including dietary sodium restriction, diuretics, and repeated large volume paracentesis. In these patients, continuous peritoneal drainage by an indwelling catheter may be an effective option for managing refractory ascites with a relative low complication rate. Peritoneal catheter-induced complications include hypotension, hematoma, leakage, cellulitis, peritonitis, and bowel perforation. Although bowel perforation is a very rare complication, it can become disastrous and necessitates emergency surgical treatment. Herein, we report a case of a 57-year-old male with refractory ascites due to advanced liver cancer who experienced iatrogenic colonic perforation after peritoneal drainage catheter insertion and was treated successfully with endoscopic clipping.
*Catheters, Indwelling ; Colon/*injuries ; Colonoscopy ; Humans ; Intestinal Perforation/*etiology/surgery ; Male ; Medical Errors ; Middle Aged ; Paracentesis/*adverse effects ; Peritoneum ; Rupture ; Surgical Instruments ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is useful for the pathological diagnosis of pancreatic masses, but patients are susceptible to severe bleeding and perforation. Because the incidence and severity of these complications have not been fully evaluated. METHODS: We aimed to evaluate severe bleeding and perforation after EUS-FNA for pancreatic masses using large-scale data derived from a Japanese nationwide administrative database. RESULTS: In total, 3,090 consecutive patients from 212 low- to high-volume hospitals were analyzed. Severe bleeding requiring transfusion or endoscopic treatment occurred in seven patients (0.23%), and no perforation was observed. No patient mortality was recorded within 30 days of EUS-FNA. The rate of severe bleeding in low-volume hospitals was significantly higher than that in medium- and high-volume hospitals (0.48% vs 0.10%, p=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Severe bleeding and perforation following EUS-FNA for pancreatic masses are rare, and the procedure is safe.
Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/*adverse effects ; Female ; Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*etiology ; Humans ; Intestinal Perforation/*etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/*pathology

Sunitinib as a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor is one of the anti-tumor agents, approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to use treat gastrointestinal stromal tumor and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The agent is known to commonly induce adverse reactions such as fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, stomatitis, esophagitis, hypertension, skin toxicity, reduciton in cardiac output of left ventricle, and hypothyroidism. However, it has been reported to rarely induce adverse reactions such as nephrotic syndrome and irreversible reduction in renal functions, and cases of intestinal perforation or pneumatosis interstinalis as such reactions have been consistently reported. In this report, a 66-year old man showing abdominal pain had renal cell carcinoma and history of sunitinib at a dosage of 50 mg/day on a 4-weeks-on, 2-weeks-off schedule. Seven days after the third cycle he was referred to the hospital because of abdominal pain. Computed tomography showed pneumoperitoneum with linear pneumatosis intestinalis in his small bowel. The patient underwent surgical exploration that confirmed the pneumatosis intestinalis at 100 cm distal to Treitz's ligament. We report a rare case of intestinal perforation with pneumatosis intestinalis after administration of sunitinib to a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell/*drug therapy ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Humans ; Indoles/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Intestinal Perforation/*diagnosis/etiology/surgery ; Kidney Neoplasms/*drug therapy ; Lung/radiography ; Male ; Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis/*diagnosis/etiology ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Pyrroles/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed