Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a surgical procedure for patients who want to lose weight. An acute porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis is an infrequent but not rare complication in patients who undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. In this article, we present a 40-year-old male patient with body mass index of 47 kg/m² was admitted for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The surgery took about 130 minutes without any hemorrhage. Full enoxaparin prophylaxis, early and full mobilization, and intermittent pneumatic compression stockings were all applied to prevent venous thrombosis. Unfortunately, he applied to our emergency department and diagnosed to have porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis. There was an approximately 60 cm necrotic jejunal segment between 10th and 70th cm after Treitz ligament and was resected. He was discharged on sixth post operative day with prescription of oral warfarin.
Adult ; Bariatric Surgery ; Body Mass Index ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Enoxaparin ; Gastrectomy ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices ; Ligaments ; Male ; Obesity ; Prescriptions ; Thrombosis ; Veins ; Venous Thrombosis ; Warfarin

Surgical operation in treating obesity and type 2 diabetes is popularizing rapidly in China. Correct prevention and recognition of perioperation-related operative complications is the premise of ensuring surgical safety. Familiar complications of the operation include deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary artery embolism, anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic fistula and marginal ulcer. The prevention of deep venous thrombosis is better than treatment. The concrete measures contain physical prophylaxis (graduated compression stocking and intermittent pneumatic compression leg sleeves) and drug prophylaxis (unfractionated heparin and low molecular heparin), and the treatment is mainly thrombolysis or operative thrombectomy. The treatment of pulmonary artery embolism includes remittance of pulmonary arterial hypertension, anticoagulation, thrombolysis, operative thrombectomy, interventional therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Hemorrhage is a rarely occurred but relatively serious complication after bariatric surgery. The primary cause of anastomotic bleeding after laparoscopic gastric bypass is incomplete hemostasis or weak laparoscopic repair. The common bleeding site in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is gastric stump and close to partes pylorica, and the bleeding may be induced by malformation and weak repair technique. Patients with hemodynamic instability caused by active bleeding or excessive bleeding should timely received surgical treatment. Anastomotic fistula in gastric bypass can be divided into gastrointestinal anastomotic fistula and jejunum-jejunum anastomotic fistula. The treatment of postoperative anastomotic fistula should vary with each individual, and conservative treatment or operative treatment should be adopted. Anastomotic stenosis is mainly related to the operative techniques. Stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy often occurs in gastric angle, and the treatment methods include balloon dilatation and stent implantation, and surgical treatment should be performed when necessary. Marginal ulcer after gastric bypass is a kind of peptic ulcer occurring close to small intestine mucosa in the junction point of stomach and jejunum. Ulcer will also occur in the vestige stomach after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and the occurrence site locates mostly in the gastric antrum incisal margin. Preoperative anti-HP (helicobacter pylorus) therapy and postoperative continuous administration of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for six months is the main means to prevent and treat marginal ulcer. For patients on whom conservative treatment is invalid, endoscopic repair or surgical repair should be considered. Different surgical procedures will generate different related operative complications. Fully understanding and effectively dealing with the complications of various surgical procedures through multidisciplinary cooperation is a guarantee for successful operation.
Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; Anticoagulants ; therapeutic use ; Bariatric Surgery ; adverse effects ; Catheterization ; China ; Conservative Treatment ; Constriction, Pathologic ; etiology ; therapy ; Digestive System Fistula ; etiology ; therapy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; methods ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; Gastric Bypass ; adverse effects ; Gastric Mucosa ; pathology ; Gastric Stump ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; etiology ; prevention & control ; surgery ; Hemostasis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; methods ; Hemostatic Techniques ; Heparin ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices ; Intestine, Small ; pathology ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; Margins of Excision ; Peptic Ulcer ; etiology ; therapy ; Postoperative Complications ; diagnosis ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Pulmonary Embolism ; etiology ; therapy ; Stents ; Stockings, Compression ; Thrombectomy ; Thrombolytic Therapy ; Venous Thrombosis ; etiology ; prevention & control ; therapy

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to adapt the standardized evidence-based nursing protocol using the IPC (intermittent pneumatic compression) intervention to prevent venous thromboembolism in surgical patients. Further, an investigation was done to measure knowledge on prevention of venous thromboembolism, surrogate incidence of venous thromboembolism and to assess IPC compliance in the study patients compared with those in surgical patients who underwent IPC intervention due to previous clinical experience. METHODS: An analysis was done of the nine modules suggested by National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA) in the adaptation manual of the clinical practice guideline for protocol adaptation. A nonequivalent control group post test design as a quasi-experiment was used to verify the effect of the IPC protocol. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in knowledge of prevention of venous thromboembolism, IPC application time after intervention and the number of IPC applications between the experimental group (n=50) using the IPC nursing protocol and the control group (n=49). However, the symptoms of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism were not observed in either the experimental group or the control group after the intervention. CONCLUSION: Results confirm that the standardized IPC nursing protocol provides effective intervention to prevent venous thromboembolism in surgical patients.
Compliance ; Evidence-Based Nursing ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices ; Nursing Assessment* ; Nursing* ; Pulmonary Embolism ; Venous Thromboembolism* ; Venous Thrombosis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially fatal complication that is relatively common after hip surgery. Since patients with a hip fracture have a higher risk of preoperative VTE due to an inability to ambulate after injury and aggravation of underlying age-related conditions, it may be difficult to effectively prevent VTE using only conventional approaches. Very few studies have been published reporting on the prevalence and prevention of VTE in patients with a hip fracture compared to those with hip arthroplasty. For this reason, we aimed to share recent updates on the diagnosis and prevention of VTE in patients with a hip fracture. Preoperative screening tests to diagnose VTE need to be performed more actively following hip fracture and indirect multidetector computed tomography venography is considered the most effective test for this purpose. As the risk of VTE appears to increase with time following a hip fracture, preventive measures should be taken as soon as possible in patients with a hip fracture. A wide variety of mechanical and pharmacological options are available for prophylaxis. When considering patient compliance and preventive impact, intermittent pneumatic compression devices and foot pumps are recommended as mechanical modalities. Of the available preventive medications for patients with a hip fracture, low molecular weight heparin seems to be the most appropriate option because of its short half-life and fast onset of action. Surgery should be performed as soon as possible in patients with hip fractures, and we recommend mechanical and pharmacological methods as active interventions immediately after injury to prevent VTE.
Arthroplasty ; Diagnosis* ; Foot ; Half-Life ; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight ; Hip Fractures ; Hip* ; Humans ; Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices ; Mass Screening ; Multidetector Computed Tomography ; Patient Compliance ; Phlebography ; Prevalence ; Venous Thromboembolism*

Pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality, developed in the antenatal and postpartum periods of pregnancy. The incidence of VTE during normal pregnancy is four- to six-fold higher than in the general reproductive aged female population. Physiologic changes such as hypercoagulable state, decreased venous capacitance, and reduced venous blood flow due to mechanical obstruction from gravid uterus compromise this condition. The prominent risk factors for VTE are thrombophilia, history of circulatory disease and previous VTE, preeclampsia and related disorders, and Cesarean section. In case of suspicion of VTE, prompt diagnosis and management are needed with the caution of potential adverse effects on the fetus. Low molecular weight heparin treatment is preferred due to better safety, more consistent bioavailability, ease of administration, lower risk of drug-related osteoporosis and thrombocytopenia and easier monitoring. For pregnant women with acute VTE, adjusted-dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin should be administrated antenatally and continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum. For prevention of VTE, mechanical prophylaxis such as physiotherapy, exercise, compression stockings, and intermittent pneumatic compression devices could be used. Thromboprophylaxis should also be considered for pregnant subjects with certain risks such as carriers of molecular thrombophilia or previously experienced VTE.
Biological Availability ; Cesarean Section ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Fetus ; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices ; Mortality ; Osteoporosis ; Postpartum Period ; Pre-Eclampsia ; Pregnancy* ; Pregnant Women ; Risk Factors ; Stockings, Compression ; Thrombocytopenia ; Thromboembolism* ; Thrombophilia ; Uterus ; Venous Thromboembolism

Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) device has been used to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study investigated the effectiveness of IPC device. We evaluated incidences of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients after use of IPC device, and compared with historical incidences from our institution. We applied IPC device in 741 patients who underwent 870 elective primary THAs from January 2010 to December 2013, DVT was detected in 3 patients (0.3%) by sonography, and one (0.1%) of them was symptomatic. Symptomatic PE occurred in 1 patient (0.1%) and there were no cases of fatal PE. The incidence of symptomatic DVT was significantly lower than the historical control (P = 0.042). The IPC is a safe and effective prophylaxis of VTE after primary THA in Korea.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/*adverse effects ; Humans ; Incidence ; *Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging/epidemiology/*prevention & control ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Risk Factors ; Ultrasonography ; Venous Thromboembolism/diagnostic imaging/epidemiology/*prevention & control ; Young Adult

Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) device has been used to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study investigated the effectiveness of IPC device. We evaluated incidences of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients after use of IPC device, and compared with historical incidences from our institution. We applied IPC device in 741 patients who underwent 870 elective primary THAs from January 2010 to December 2013, DVT was detected in 3 patients (0.3%) by sonography, and one (0.1%) of them was symptomatic. Symptomatic PE occurred in 1 patient (0.1%) and there were no cases of fatal PE. The incidence of symptomatic DVT was significantly lower than the historical control (P = 0.042). The IPC is a safe and effective prophylaxis of VTE after primary THA in Korea.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/*adverse effects ; Humans ; Incidence ; *Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging/epidemiology/*prevention & control ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Risk Factors ; Ultrasonography ; Venous Thromboembolism/diagnostic imaging/epidemiology/*prevention & control ; Young Adult

PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the effects of mechanical interventions for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients. METHODS: The participants were assigned to the intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and graduated compression stocking (GCS) intervention. Patients who met the criteria were selected for comparison from our previous study. Data for 140 patients were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: The mean age was 57.5 (+/-15.7) and 61.4% were men. About forty-seven percent of the participants were 61 years or over. In the second duplex scan, 3, 2 and 1 critically ill patients developed deep vein thrombosis in the control, GCS, and IPC groups, respectively. Incidences of DVT were 6.0%, 5.0%, and 2.0% for the control, GCS, and IPC groups, respectively. This difference was not significant. Relative risks of no intervention were 3.0 and 1.2 compared with IPC and GCS application. There were no significantly different variables among the three groups before the intervention except for diagnosis on admission. CONCLUSION: Although it may difficult to conclude that mechanical prophylaxis effectively prevents DVT among SICU patients because there was no statistical significance in this study, but incidence rates among the three groups differed greatly. The findings reveal that further study should be conducted with larger samples and randomized controlled trial for SICU patients.
Critical Care ; Critical Illness ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Incidence ; Critical Care ; Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices ; Male ; Pilot Projects* ; Stockings, Compression* ; Venous Thrombosis*

BACKGROUND: There are few comparative studies about the optimal method of pneumatic compression to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare venous hemodynamic changes and their clinical influences between two graded sequential compression groups (an alternate sequential compression device [ASCD] vs. a simultaneous sequential compression device [SSCD]). METHODS: In total, 34 patients (68 limbs) undergoing knee and spine operations were prospectively randomized into two device groups (ASCD vs. SSCD groups). Duplex ultrasonography examinations were performed on the 4th and 7th postoperative days for the detection of DVT and the evaluation of venous hemodynamics. Continuous data for the two groups were analyzed using a two-tailed, unpaired t-test. Relative frequencies of unpaired samples were compared using Fisher exact test. Mixed effects models that might be viewed as ANCOVA models were also considered. RESULTS: DVT developed in 7 patients (20.6%), all of whom were asymptomatic for isolated calf DVTs. Two of these patients were from the ASCD group (11.8%) and the other five were from the SSCD group (29.4%), but there was no significant difference (p = 0.331). Baseline peak velocity, mean velocity, peak volume flow, and total volume flow were enhanced significantly in both device groups (p < 0.001). However, the degrees of flow and velocity enhancement did not differ significantly between the groups. The accumulated expelled volumes for an hour were in favor of the ASCD group. CONCLUSIONS: Both graded sequential compression devices showed similar results both in clinical and physiological efficacies. Further studies are required to investigate the optimal intermittent pneumatic compression method for enhanced hemodynamic efficacy and better thromboprophylaxis.
Aged ; *Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects ; *Fracture Fixation/adverse effects ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; *Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices ; Knee/surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; *Spinal Fusion/adverse effects ; Spine/surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Venous Thrombosis/etiology/physiopathology/*prevention & control/ultrasonography

Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) device is an effective method to prevent deep vein thrombosis. This method has been known to be safe with very low rate of complications compared to medical thromboprophylaxis. Therefore, this modality has been used widely in patients who underwent a hip fracture surgery. We report a patient who developed extensive bullae, a potentially serious skin complication, beneath the leg sleeves during the use of IPC device after hip fracture surgery.
Aged, 80 and over ; Blister/*etiology/pathology ; Female ; Hip Fractures/*surgery ; Humans ; Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices/*adverse effects ; *Postoperative Complications ; Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control