Background/Aims: Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is a rare but important cause of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The clinical course of GAVE is not well-known, and recurrent bleeding from GAVE is a therapeutic challenge. Therefore, we investigated the clinical course of GAVE and identified the risk factors for bleeding from it. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with GAVE using upper GI endoscopy at Asan Medical Center between January 2004 and December 2019 and evaluated the clinical course and risk factors for bleeding from GAVE. Results: Of the 348 patients (mean age, 62.3 ± 10.7 years; male, 62%), bleeding from GAVE occurred in 123 (35%) patients during follow-up (median, 17.3 months; interquartile range [IQR], 4.2–46.6). GI bleeding from GAVE was significantly associated with Child–Pugh class B or C liver cirrhosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57–4.16), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.52–5.07), use of antithrombotic agents (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.13–4.82), and involvement of the duodenal bulb (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.76–5.86). Rebleeding occurred in 39 of 123 patients (32%), in whom CKD (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.12–5.81) was significantly associated with rebleeding. Endoscopic hemostasis was most commonly performed using argon plasma coagulation, and the median number of endoscopic hemostasis performed was 2 (IQR, 1–3). Conclusions A careful follow-up for bleeding is needed in GAVE patients with liver cirrhosis, CKD, use of antithrombotic agents, and duodenal bulb involvement.

Background: Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), which detect glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B, are widely used to screen for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI); however, their sensitivity is lower than that of molecular assays. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of two EIAs, C. Diff Quik Chek Complete (QCC) and RIDASCREEN (RIDA), and investigate the cycle threshold (Ct) values from two real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays (Allplex GI–Bacteria(I) and Xpert C. difficile) in EIA-discordant samples. Methods: A total of 180 clinical stool samples were tested using QCC, RIDA, and Allplex GI– Bacteria(I) PCR assays. The Xpert C. difficile assay was used to analyze discordant results. Results: QCC and RIDA showed high sensitivities for GDH detection, 100.0% and 94.4%, respectively. QCC was significantly more sensitive than RIDA for toxin detection (51.4% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.007). In 25 EIA-discordant, Xpert positive samples, the Ct values of the toxin B gene ranged from 31.5 to 44.8 (mean, 38.1) for Allplex PCR and from 23.7 to 36.3 (mean, 30.4) for Xpert PCR. The Ct values of the two PCR assays were not significantly correlated (r = 0.201, p = 0.324). Conclusion QCC is a suitable initial immunological test for diagnosing CDI. The lack of correlation in the Ct values between the two real-time PCR assays suggests that assay-specific validation is necessary for cutoff level interpretation.

Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background: s/Aims: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard treatment for periampullary tumors, but it is technically challenging. Evidence directly comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic, and hybrid approaches is limited. This study conducts a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of open PD (OPD), laparoscopic PD (LPD), robotic PD (RPD), and hybrid PD. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 1994 and August 2024.We included randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies that evaluated at least two PD approaches. Perioperative outcomes were the primary endpoints, while oncologic safety served as a secondary endpoint. A random-effects NMA was performed, establishing treatment hierarchies through ranking probabilities (PROSPERO ID: CRD420250365864). Results: A total of 78 studies were included (5 randomized and 73 retrospective). RPD was associated with lower blood loss compared to OPD (mean difference [MD], –163.85 mL) and LPD (MD, –84.14 mL). Hospital stays were also shorter for RPD compared to OPD (MD, –2.50 days) and LPD (MD, –1.88 days). In contrast, OPD was the most time-efficient approach compared to LPD (MD, –77.61 minutes) and RPD (MD, –73.30 minutes). Mortality rates, severe complications, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rates, and reoperation rates were comparable across all surgical approaches. In terms of oncologic safety, lymph node yield and R0 resection rates were similar for all modalities. Conclusions While OPD is the most time-efficient approach, RPD provides significant advantages in reducing intraoperative blood loss and shortening hospital stays compared to both LPD and OPD.

Monoclonal protein (M-protein) is a crucial biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring monoclonal gammopathies, including multiple myeloma (MM). Traditionally, electrophoresis (EP)-based methods, such as protein EP and immunofixation EP, have been widely used for M-protein detection. However, these methods can show low sensitivity and inadequate quantification of small amounts of M-protein. To overcome these challenges, EP-based methods are often combined with the quantification of serum free light chains in automated immunoassays. Advances in mass spectrometry (MS) have introduced three main approaches for sample preparation: top-down, middle-down, and bottom-up. Middle-down approaches are commonly used with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-offlight MS and liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization (LC–ESI) quadrupole time-offlight MS, whereas the bottom-up approach is typically applied with LC–ESI Orbitrap MS. A review of studies, conducted from 2014 to 2024, on plasma cell disorders that utilized MS-based methods demonstrate improvements in the sensitivity and accuracy of M-protein identification and quantification. MM remains the most frequently studied disease, with significant therapeutic advancements leading to improved outcomes. Minimal residual disease has gained attention because of its correlation with better prognoses. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and amyloid light-chain amyloidosis are occasionally addressed, while studies on other rare diseases remain limited. This review highlights the clinical applications and advancements in MS-based methods, particularly in assessing M-protein levels for treatment responses, risk factors, and prognostic monitoring. Given their advantages—high sensitivity and specificity, automation, cost-effectiveness, and time efficiency—MS-based methods may eventually replace EP-based methods in clinical laboratories.

Purpose: We aimed to compare the final adult height (FAH) of male patients with central precocious puberty (CPP) after treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa). Specifically, we compared FAH with the target height (TH) and the predicted adult height (PAH) before and after GnRHa treatment to quantify height gain and identify predictive factors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 92 male patients with CPP and known FAH after GnRHa treatment at the Department of Pediatrics of Severance Children’s Hospital between January 2000 and June 2024. Results: The mean duration of GnRHa treatment was 2.7±1.3 years. A significant 1.1±0.9 years narrowing was observed in the difference between bone age (BA) and chronological age (CA) during treatment (P<0.001). TH was 172.4±3.4 cm. FAH was 173.6±6.4 cm. FAH was greater than TH by 1.2±5.9 cm (P=0.047). PAH before and after treatment was 179.9±8.1 and 181.2±7.4 cm, respectively. PAH was increased by 1.3±4.9 cm (P=0.012) after treatment. As the PAH standard deviation score (SDS) before GnRHa treatment increased, FAH tended to exceed TH. In contrast, higher testosterone levels before treatment are associated with FAH falling below TH. A longer duration of treatment and taller TH are associated with an FAH SDS greater than height SDS before treatment. Conversely, a greater weight SDS, BA–CA difference, and testis size before treatment are associated with FAH SDS being less than height SDS before GnRHa treatment. Conclusion GnRHa treatment improved FAH and inhibited bone maturation in male patients with CPP.

Purpose: Although gastric cancer (GC) exhibits significant genomic heterogeneity, the clinical implications of its immune microenvironment remain poorly understood. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with GC who underwent gastrectomies between 2011 and 2014. The tumors were analyzed for Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD3), tumor-associated macrophages (CD68 and CD163), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Tumors were classified using the modified The Cancer Genome Atlas scheme, and their clinical characteristics were compared. Results: A total of 567 patients were classified into EBV (6%), MSI-H (10%), chromosomal instability-like (36%), and genomically stable-like (48%) subtypes. EBV tumors exhibited the highest PD-L1 expression (85%) and immune infiltration by CD3+ T cells (86%), CD68+ macrophages (58%), and CD163+ macrophages (40%). High CD68+ macrophage tumors were associated with advanced stages and worse 5-year disease-free survival (83% vs. 95%; P<0.001);however, this association was not independently significant after adjusting for the tumor-nodemetastasis stage. PD-L1 expression did not significantly affect the survival outcomes. Conclusions GC subtypes have distinct immune microenvironments that influence prognosis. Our findings highlight the prognostic and therapeutic potential of immune profiling in GC.

Purpose: This study aimed to address the shift toward competency-based education and the planned 2028 “Integrated Nursing” National Licensing Examination (NLE), this study aimed to establish structural alignment among NLE domains, the seven integrated nursing competencies (INCs), and curriculum goals, with a particular focus on implementing symptom-based clinical reasoning (SBCR). Methods: This Delphi-based methodological study included seven content experts for content validity index (CVI) assessment and 24 nursing education experts who participated in a consensus workshop. The item-level CVI and the scale-level CVI/average were calculated to confirm the linkage between INCs and NLE domains. In addition, qualitative analysis of workshop materials and meeting records was conducted to derive 10 integrated learning topics and to develop an SBCR educational model for the key symptom of headache, grounded in Miller’s Clinical Competence Pyramid (levels 2–4). Results: The analysis confirmed the validity of integrating the INCs within the overall curriculum structure. The resulting framework delineates staged learning objectives and core clinical questions designed to systematically enhance clinical reasoning, promote safe nursing practice, and support professional reflection within a unified curriculum. Conclusion This study provides a practical foundation for nursing curriculum redesign by facilitating a transition from fragmented, subject-based instruction to a holistic, patient-centered SBCR model. This approach aligns with the requirements of the integrated NLE and is expected to contribute to meaningful improvements in actual clinical competency.

Purpose: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify variables associated with standard precautions compliance among hospital nurses and to comprehensively examine their effect sizes. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were reported in accordance with the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Studies published in English or Korean were retrieved from KMbase, KoreaMed, KISS, ScienceON, RISS, Nanet, DBpia, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL. Data collection was conducted from July 6 to July 16, 2024. To ensure a comprehensive search, no restrictions were placed on the publication period, and studies published up to June 2024 were included in the literature search. Analyses were performed using R ver. 4.4.1. Results: Of the 2,321 studies screened, 50 were included in the systematic review and 41 were included in the meta-analysis. Variables were categorized according to the ecological model. Among individual-level factors, variables with medium correlation effect sizes (ESr ≥.30) included self-efficacy (ESr=.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.56), perceived barriers (ESr=−.35; 95% CI, −0.59 to −0.05), cues to action (ESr=.34; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.57), and perceived benefits (ESr=.30; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.46). Among organizational factors, organizational culture for infection control (ESr=.47; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.54) and patient safety culture (ESr=.44; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.53) demonstrated medium effect sizes. Other statistically significant variables with small effect sizes were also identified. No variables were identified within the interpersonal, community, or public policy domains. Conclusion This study identified self-efficacy and organizational culture for infection control as key determinants of compliance with standard precautions. Strengthening these factors may reduce healthcare-associated infections and promote safer nursing care (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024566518).

Purpose: This study systematically reviewed and synthesized the evidence on the effectiveness of mobile health (mHealth) interventions in improving medication adherence among patients with cardiovascular disease. Methods: This systematic review included randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of mHealth interventions on medication adherence among patients with cardiovascular disease. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Embase were searched for peer-reviewed studies and grey literature published in English between January 1, 2013, and July 31, 2025. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. R software ver. 4.5.2 was used to perform the meta-analysis. Results: Fifty-two studies were included in the systematic review, of which 20 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in medication adherence among patients with cardiovascular disease receiving mHealth interventions, with a moderate to large effect size (Hedges’ g=0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.20–1.25; p<.001), despite substantial heterogeneity (I2=97%). However, a considerable proportion of the included studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias, which may limit the internal validity of the findings. Subgroup analyses indicated that the effects of mHealth interventions on medication adherence did not differ significantly according to intervention type, duration, or outcome measurement tools. Conclusion mHealth interventions appear to be effective in improving medication adherence among patients with cardiovascular disease. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution because of the high risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity among the included studies. Future research should explore the use of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and virtual reality, to address medication non-adherence (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023450502).