The gut microbiome is not just a bystander of colorectal carcinogenesis but is an active driver of colorectal cancer (CRC). CRC-associated microbiome contributes in the tumorigenesis through chronic inflammation, formation of toxic metabolite and genotoxins, oncogenic signal activation, immune evasion, and barrier disruption—all reinforcing a tumor microenvironment. In contrast, beneficial microbiome supports the barrier-immune-metabolic axis by maintaining mucosal integrity and balanced immune tone. Despite extensive studies of microbiome-based CRC biomarkers, microbiome-based CRC biomarkers have not been yet ready for routine clinical use due to variation across populations and lack of standardization of key steps such as sampling, analysis, cutoffs, and interpretation. Microbiome-based therapies aim to change the overall intestinal ecosystem rather than simply adding or removing single strains. At present, dietary modulation and prebiotics are considered supportive measures, while probiotics or synbiotics are in preclinical stage. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) still faces important challenges in effectiveness, standardization and safety. By its role in reshaping the tumor–host immune environment, FMT is viewed as a potential option for cancer therapy after further development through well-controlled clinical trials with careful safety monitoring.

Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background: Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have accelerated their integration into clinical domains, including laboratory medicine. The performance of LLMs in answering board-level laboratory medicine questions has not been comprehensively evaluated. Given the importance of diagnostic accuracy in this field, rigorous and objective evaluations of LLM capabilities are essential. Methods: We assessed 12 LLMs from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google using 320 Korean Residency Examination questions (2021–2024) spanning six laboratory medicine subspecialties. Standardized prompts were provided via their application programming interfaces under deterministic settings (temperature = 0). Questions were administered thrice to assess response reproducibility. Outputs were compared with validated answers and analyzed for accuracy, reasoning quality, and error typology. Results: Google’s Gemini 2.0 Pro achieved the highest accuracy (80.0%), followed by OpenAI’s GPT-4.5 (77.2%) and Anthropic’s Claude 3.7 Sonnet (74.1%). Accuracy decreased as the difficulty of questions increased (78.0% for easy vs. 45.1% for challenging). Subspecialty performance varied. Al models underperformed on questions on transfusion medicine (mean accuracy: 38.8%), primarily because of limitations in domain-specific and regional knowledge representations. Incorrect answers primarily resulted from reasoning errors. Reproducibility exceeded 95% for most models; however, some residual non-determinism appeared even with greedy decoding (temperature = 0). Conclusions LLMs demonstrated substantial potential for integration into laboratory medicine, particularly in clinical chemistry and immunology. Performance inconsistencies (particularly for high-difficulty questions) and knowledge gaps (notably for transfusion medicine) highlight the necessity for further development—potentially including domain-specific fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation integration—and robust expert oversight before clinical application.

Background: Fusion genes are major drivers of acute leukemia. Conventional diagnostics are limited in detecting the diverse fusions included in recently updated acute leukemia classifications. We evaluated the fusion detection performance of RNA sequencing (RNAseq) compared with that of conventional diagnostics in patients with acute leukemia. Methods: We retrospectively obtained the data of 101 patients with acute leukemia who underwent conventional diagnostics (i.e., karyotyping, FISH, or multiplex reverse transcription PCR) at diagnosis at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between September 2022 and September 2023. Whole RNA-seq was performed using the Illumina Stranded mRNA Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The concordance, sensitivity, and specificity of RNA-seq for fusion gene detection were compared with those of conventional diagnostics. Results: RNA-seq helped identify 52 fusion genes in 51 (50.5%) of 101 patients, with detection rates of 40.7%, 70.3%, 37.5%, and 50% in acute myeloid leukemia, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and mixed-phenotype acute leukemia, respectively. RNA-seq showed 83.3% sensitivity and 80.8% concordance with conventional diagnostics; it missed eight fusions, likely because of low transcript abundance or enhancer hijacking. RNA-seq also helped clarify three previously unspecified rearrangements and detected 12 fusions (21.4%) in 56 cases that tested negative with conventional diagnostics, including four novel (KMT2A::THAP12 , RUNX1::PRPF19 , MLLT10::UBE2L6, and FUS::ZNF362) and three rare (HNRNPH1::ERG, RUNX1::USP42, and ETV6::NCOA2) fusions. Conclusions This was the first study to evaluate the performance of whole RNA-seq in fusion detection in patients with acute leukemia in Korea. Incorporating RNA-seq into diagnostic workflows may facilitate earlier and more precise therapeutic decisions and improve prognostic assessment in patients with acute leukemia.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of the Trauma-nursing Education and Skill Support (TESS) program based on the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation model). The program was designed to enhance trauma nurses’ clinical competencies, including trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability, through the integration of theoretical education and simulation-based practice. Methods: A quasi-experimental study using a non-equivalent control group pretest–posttest design was conducted. Participants included 108 trauma nurses from regional trauma centers, military trauma centers, and emergency care facilities, who were assigned to an experimental group (n=52) or a control group (n=56). The TESS program consisted of a 2-day, 14-hour blended-learning course that included eight lecture sessions and four simulation-based practice stations. Data were collected at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 6 months using validated instruments measuring trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for data analysis. Results: The experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability compared with baseline (all p<.001). These improvements were sustained at 6 months, although trauma-related knowledge scores showed a slight decline compared with immediate posttest levels. Between-group analyses confirmed significant group-by-time interaction effects for all outcomes: trauma-related knowledge (η2=0.12, p<.001), self-efficacy (η2=0.09, p=.002), and problem-solving ability (η2=0.08, p=.003). Conclusion The TESS program effectively enhanced trauma nurses’ trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability, with effects sustained for up to 6 months. Incorporating blended learning and simulation-based training into standardized trauma nursing education may strengthen clinical competencies and ultimately contribute to improved patient outcomes.

Background/Aims: Nocturnal acid reflux disrupts sleep and impairs quality of life. Proton pump inhibitors provide insufficient suppression of nocturnal acid secretion, whereas fexuprazan offers prolonged acid suppression. We compared the efficacy of fexuprazan and esomeprazole in controlling nocturnal reflux. Methods: In a randomized and crossover study, patients received fexuprazan or esomeprazole daily for 4 weeks, followed by a washout and crossover to the alternate medication for another 4 weeks, with a final washout completing the sequence. Severity (scores 0-10), frequency, sleep disturbance, and medication preferences were evaluated. Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and randomized to receive either fexuprazan (n = 20) or esomeprazole (n = 19) first. After the first treatment, fexuprazan reduced severity from 7.5 ± 1.7 to 1.4 ± 1.7 (81.3% decrease), versus 7.8 ± 1.5 to 2.8 ± 1.9 (64.1% decrease) with esomeprazole (P = 0.012). In patients with severe symptoms (scores ≥ 7), fexuprazan led to significantly greater improvement than esomeprazole (P = 0.008). Following the first washout, the second crossover treatment resulted in greater improvement in symptom severity with fexuprazan (P = 0.001). During the second washout, nocturnal symptoms severity and frequencies were better controlled with fexuprazan than with esomeprazole (P = 0.005 and 0.019). Patients who switched from esomeprazole to fexuprazan preferred fexuprazan (P = 0.018). Conclusions Fexuprazan was more effective than esomeprazole in controlling nocturnal reflux symptom, particularly in patients with severe symptoms. Fexuprazan may offer a therapeutic advantage for patients with severe and persistent nocturnal reflux despite proton pump inhibitor therapy.

Objectives: This study investigated changes in toothbrushing in adolescents in response to public health policy changes during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) focusing on behavioral trends before, during, and after policy enforcement according to socio-demographic subgroups. Methods: Data from the Korean Youth Risk Behavior Survey (2018–2024) were divided into 3 periods: before (2018–2019), during (2020–2022), and after (2023–2024) the implementation of COVID-19 school restrictions. A total of 354 943 middle and high school students were included. The primary outcome variable was self-reported toothbrushing after lunch at school. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted, adjusting for confounders such as sex, academic performance, school level, school type, handwashing, and oral health status (toothache and gum bleeding). Results: The compliance rate for toothbrushing declined significantly during the restriction period across all groups. It varied by sex, school type, school level, health-related behaviors (drinking, smoking, handwashing), and oral health status. Female students, middle schoolers, students in single-sex schools, non-smokers, and those practicing hand hygiene showed higher compliance. After restrictions were lifted, toothbrushing rates improved but remained lower than pre-pandemic levels. Recovery of the toothbrushing rate was observed in most groups, particularly among female students, high schoolers, and those with positive health-related behaviors. However, academic performance and oral health status were not significantly associated with recovery rate in adjusted analyses. Conclusions This study highlights that adolescents’ health behaviors are highly sensitive to environmental and policy changes. Variations in compliance and recovery rates underscore the need for adolescent-centered policies that account for both compliance and recovery, especially during crises such as pandemics.

Objectives: This study, part of the ongoing Korean National Burden of Disease (KNBD) updates, assesses disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and disability-adjusted life expectancy (DALE) in Korea, taking into account the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 and emphasizing the importance of analyzing these metrics jointly. Methods: Data were obtained from Statistics Korea, the National Health Insurance Service, and the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. DALYs and DALE were calculated using an incidence-based approach, following disease classification, disability weights, and estimation procedures consistent with prior KNBD research. Results: Compared with earlier estimates, DALYs showed a slight decline in 2020 followed by an increase in 2021, with this pattern observed across all income quintiles. For DALE, both men and women experienced modest gains relative to earlier studies; however, a decrease occurred across all income levels in 2021 compared with 2020. Regional disparities in DALE also narrowed beginning in 2020, with a more marked reduction among women. Conclusions Unlike previous studies, this research presents DALYs and DALE concurrently, offering a more comprehensive perspective on summary measures of population health. The post-2020 rise in DALYs underscores the growing need for effective chronic disease management. Additionally, widening income-based disparities in DALE highlight the urgency of addressing health inequities. Continued monitoring and updates of DALYs and DALE are necessary to understand and respond to these evolving trends.

Purpose: This study examined the current status, perceptions, and educational needs of primary care education in medical and nursing schools to provide foundational data that can inform effective curriculum development. Methods: In total, 40 medical and 64 nursing schools were eligible for this study. Data were collected through an online survey using Google Forms, developed by the research team, from November 2024 to January 2025. Frequency analysis and independent t-tests were performed to compare perceptions on primary care education between the two schools types. Borich Needs Assessment and Locus-for-Focus model were used to identify and prioritize educational needs. Results: Responses from 21 medical and 24 nursing schools were analyzed. All medical schools primarily offered education in primary care clinics (100%), whereas most nursing schools offered it in community healthcare institutions (87.5%). Visits and observations were the most common educational methods (>80%). Reports, presentations, and discussions were the most used assessment methods (>60%). Multidisciplinary team-based practicums were limited in both medical (9.5%) and nursing (25.0%) schools. Both groups rated the need to expand primary care education and multidisciplinary team approach highly (>4.4/5). “Longitudinality” and “generalism” were educational priority needs across both groups, whereas other elements showed variations. Conclusion This study identified the shared and distinct aspects of primary care education across schools. The findings highlight the importance of enhancing and tailoring primary care education to each school’s specific context and needs, while fostering interprofessional collaboration to strengthen community-based healthcare.