Background: A systematic evaluation of potential living liver donors is essential to ensure donor safety and optimize recipient outcomes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study aimed to assess donor acceptance rates and reasons for disqualification among individuals evaluated for LDLT at a high-volume transplant center over a one-year period. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1,087 potential living liver donors who presented for LDLT evaluation in 2023. Of these, 991 candidates advanced beyond the initial screening (Stage 1) and underwent comprehensive clinical, imaging, and pathological assessments (Stages 2 and 3). Candidates who discontinued after Stage 1 were excluded due to the absence of documented reasons for non-progression. Results: Among the 991 candidates who proceeded beyond initial screening, 473 (47.7%) completed the full donor evaluation, of whom 466 were judged to be suitable donors. Among suitable donors, 384 (82.4%) proceeded to donor hepatectomy, whereas 82 did not, primarily due to recipient-related factors such as clinical deterioration or withdrawal of consent. Donor ineligibility was determined in 422 candidates (42.6%), most commonly due to inadequate remnant liver volume (52.8%), hepatic steatosis (20.6%), and insufficient graft size (10.2%). Among candidates undergoing Stage 2 evaluation, 162 (16.3%) failed to meet steatosis criteria; 126 were excluded solely for steatosis and advised weight reduction, and 39 subsequently became eligible and successfully donated. Conclusion In this high-volume LDLT center, donor disqualification was primarily driven by remnant liver volume and hepatic steatosis. Targeted interventions such as weight reduction enabled successful donation in a subset of initially ineligible candidates, underscoring the importance of individualized donor evaluation and pre-donation optimization.

Background: We developed a simplified variant of the ADV score, the AFP-PIVKAII (AP) score for post-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis, which considers only AFP and PIVKA-II levels excluding morphometric tumor size information from the ADV score. This study investigated the prognostic performance of the AP score in predicting HCC recurrence and overall survival (OS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods: We analyzed 843 patients with HCC who underwent LDLT between 2006 and 2015, assessing HCC recurrence and OS in relation to AP score. Results: The median pretransplant AFP and PIVKA-II levels were 12.8 ng/mL and 27 mAU/mL, respectively. The median and mean AP scores were 2.6 log (range: 0.6–9.2 log) and 2.9±1.1 log, respectively. The 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the AP score in predicting post-transplant HCC recurrence was 0.672 (p<0.001). HCC recurrence and OS curves along AP score intervals of 1.0 log showed statistical differences in accordance with the AP scores (both p<0.001). Using a Youden index J-derived AP score cutoff of 4.0 log, two-tiered groups (ADV <4.0 log vs. ADV ≥4.0 log) showed statistically significant differences in HCC recurrence and OS (both p<0.001). Harrell’s c-indices for AP score with cutoff of 4.0 log and ADV scores with cutoff of 5.0 log regarding HCC recurrence and OS were similar. Conclusion The AP score functions as an integrated surrogate marker for predicting post-transplant outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing LDLT. It may serve as a simplified alternative to the ADV score, particularly in patients with small HCCs.

Purpose: Due to its rarity, treatment guidelines for appendiceal cancer have traditionally followed those established for colorectal cancer, despite showing distinct histologic and clinical features. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term oncologic outcomes of appendiceal cancer with those of right-sided colon cancers. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with stage I–III appendiceal, cecal, or ascending colon cancer who underwent curative resection between 2010 and 2020 at our center. A 1:3:3 exact matching for age, sex, TNM stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy was performed. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Results: Overall, 245 patients with appendiceal cancer (n = 35), ascending colon cancer (n = 105), and cecal cancer (n = 105) were analyzed. Appendiceal cancer exhibited a higher proportion of T4 tumors and fewer harvested lymph nodes compared with ascending or cecal cancers. The mean follow-up duration was 9.5 years. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were lower in appendiceal cancer (66.2% and 52.9%) than in ascending (91.2% and 78.4%) or cecal cancer (88.5% and 78.3%). Similarly, the 10-year disease-free survival rate was lower in appendiceal cancer (59.2%) compared with ascending (83.1%) and cecal cancers (78.4%). Cox regression analysis identified age (≥65 years), perforation, nodal metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion as independent predictors of poor prognosis. Conclusion Appendiceal cancer exhibited significantly worse long-term survival compared to cecal or ascending colon cancer. Tumor perforation, nodal metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion were adverse prognostic factors for overall and disease-free survival.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes, identify complications, and analyze recurrence in patients undergoing surgery for primary retroperitoneal tumors (RPTs), which pose significant therapeutic challenges. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 59 patients who underwent surgery for primary RPTs at Ajou University Hospital between January 2015 and December 2024. Patients were divided into a multivisceral resection (MVR) group (n = 25) and a non-MVR group (n = 34) to compare demographics, clinical characteristics, pathological findings, and postoperative outcomes. Results: Compared to the non-MVR group, the MVR group had a significantly higher rate of open surgery (96.0% vs.73.5%, P = 0.034), longer operative times (237.6 minutes vs. 188.8 minutes, P = 0.032), more frequent R2 resections (32.0% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.018), and longer hospital stays (13.1 days vs. 7.0 days, P = 0.007). Malignant tumors comprised 67.7% of cases, with sarcoma being the most common. Recurrence rates were highest in well-differentiated liposarcoma (50.0%) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (22.2%). While univariate analysis showed MVR was associated with severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III; odds ratio, 6.200; P = 0.029), this was not sustained as an independent predictor in multivariable analysis. Conclusion Although MVR was associated with severe complications in univariate analysis, it was not an independent predictor in multivariable analysis. This suggests the increased risk reflects overall surgical complexity. Therefore, MVR should be pursued when oncologically necessary, as it presents an acceptable morbidity profile.

Purpose: While progesterone receptor (PR) negativity in luminal-type breast cancer is generally associated with worse oncologic outcomes, its prognostic role in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of PR expression in ER-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with ER-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer who underwent primary surgery at Korea University Guro Hospital between January 2009 and December 2019. Patients were grouped by PR expression as negative/low (Allred score, 0–6) or strongly positive (Allred score,7 or 8). Prognostic outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed. Results: A total of 223 patients were included. Patients in the negative/low PR group were older compared to the strongly positive PR group. The negative/low PR group showed significantly worse DFS (P = 0.005) and DRFS (P = 0.014) but showed no significant difference in BCSS (P = 0.153). On multivariate analysis, negative or low PR expressions were linked to inferior DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34–7.16; P = 0.008) and DRFS (HR, 9.55; 95% CI, 1.22– 74.77; P = 0.032). Conclusion In ER-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer, negative or weak PR expression was associated with inferior DFS and DRFS compared to strong PR expression. These findings highlight the potential prognostic value of PR status in this group, underscoring its relevance in guiding treatment and follow-up strategies for more individualized patient care.

Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility of detecting peripheral arterial lesions in plane-reconstructed lower extremity CT angiograms using object detection algorithms. Methods: We retrospectively collected 1,241 contrast-enhanced lower extremity CT images from patients with peripheral arterial disease. One-stage (YOLOv5: v5s, v5m, v5l, v5x) and 2-stage (Faster R-CNN) detectors were used to classify stent, stenosis, and occlusion. A one-by-one comparison between manual test image annotations and algorithmic detection results was conducted to evaluate model performance and errors. Performance was evaluated by mean average precision (mAP@.5) and precision-recall curves. Results: Among YOLOv5 models, v5l showed the highest overall accuracy (77% mAP@.5). While stent classification was excellent (≥ 96.9% mAP@.5 in YOLOv5 and 99.8% in Faster R-CNN), classification accuracies for stenosis (53.8%–58.7% in YOLOv5 vs. 37.2% in Faster R-CNN) and occlusion (69%–80.9% in YOLOv5 vs. 67.7% in Faster R-CNN) were moderate.Stenosis was frequently missed, resulting in high false-negative rates. Occlusions at arterial bifurcations were often not detected, and stent edges were misclassified as occlusions. Overfitting emerged in some YOLOv5 models beyond 75 epochs. Conclusion This pilot study supports the feasibility of applying object detection algorithms as a preliminary step toward developing clinical decision support tools for peripheral arterial disease. Further refinements, including additional training data and more granular lesion annotation, are essential for improved classification of stenosis and occlusion.

Purpose: Postoperative complications following gastric cancer surgery significantly impact patient outcomes, yet standardized definitions for these events have not been consistently applied across institutions in Korea. This study aimed to develop a consensus-based, standardized complication classification system specific to gastrectomy for gastric cancer as part of the Korean Quality Improvement Platform in Surgery (K-QIPS) initiative. Methods: As part of K-QIPS, a dedicated task force team (TFT) was formed with surgical experts from fourteen high-volume hospitals across Korea. The TFT conducted ten formal meetings to review existing literature and international guidelines, and incorporated findings from randomized controlled trials. The final complication list was developed through expert consensus and structured into a standardized framework. A Data Entry Manual was created to support consistent data collection by surgical clinical reviewers. Results: The TFT defined specific postoperative complications following gastrectomy for gastric cancer, including anastomotic leakage, duodenal stump leakage, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal and luminal bleeding, delayed gastric emptying, and internal hernia. Notably, internal hernia was described in standardized form for the first time. General complications were developed first and overlapped in part with the gastric cancer-specific list. The task force also produced a Data Entry Manual that provides practical instructions to ensure consistency and accuracy in complication reporting. Conclusion This nationwide consensus initiative established the first standardized complication classification system for gastric cancer surgery in Korea. The proposed definitions and data entry system are expected to improve complication reporting, enable multicenter research, support surgical quality benchmarking, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Purpose: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) efficacy and safety is established for older patients, but East Asian data are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MBS by comparing older (≥55 years) and younger (<55 years) East Asian patients with obesity. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective review included 410 patients undergoing MBS from January to December 2019.Patients were stratified into the older group (OG, age ≥55 years; n = 39) and the younger group (YG, age <55 years; n = 371). We compared surgical safety, weight parameters, and comorbidity resolution rates. Results: The OG had lower mean body weight (97.9 ± 16.4 kg vs. 113.2 ± 23.1 kg, P < 0.001) but more comorbidities and lower average ABCD score for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission. Postoperative complication rate (12.8% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.400) and postoperative hospital stay (4.1 ± 1.8 days vs. 4.0 ± 8.9 days, P = 0.773) showed no significant differences.At 12 months, the percentage of total weight loss was significantly lower in the OG (23.7 ± 6.9% vs. 27.8 ± 8.4%, P = 0.014).Remission rates for T2DM (47.6% vs. 80.5%, P < 0.001), hypertension (34.6% vs. 57.5%, P = 0.073), and dyslipidemia (12.5% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.012) were also lower in the OG, yet still demonstrated clinically meaningful metabolic improvement. Conclusion MBS is a safe and effective treatment for older East Asians with obesity, offering substantial comorbidity resolution despite achieving a lower weight loss compared to the younger patients.

Background: Inferior orbital blowout fractures (BOF) cause ocular symptoms like diplopia and extraocular muscle limitation, influenced by inferior rectus muscle (IRM) status. This study evaluated the relationship between preoperative IRM status on computed tomography (CT) and ocular symptom recovery time. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 127 patients with inferior BOF and ocular symptoms (2012–2024). Inclusion criteria included age 18–80 years and preoperative CT availability. IRM status was assessed for bone interruption, herniation extent, and swelling (short/ long axis ratio < 0.54 or ≥ 0.54). Recovery times were analyzed using t-tests and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p< 0.05). Results: Of 127 patients (mean age, 35 years; 67.7% male), 66 (52.0%) recovered from ocular symptoms within 7 days, 53 (41.7%) within 30–90 days, and eight (6.3%) had diplopia that remained as a permanent sequela at the last follow-up. Diplopia recovery time was longer in IRM–bone contact (16.9± 5.5 days, n= 35) and bone-pierced IRM (29.4± 10.3 days, n= 15) groups versus no-contact (5.1± 4.2 days, n= 77; p= 0.02, t-test). Herniation and swelling showed no significant correlation (p> 0.05). Conclusion Preoperative CT-based assessment of the IRM–bone interface predicts diplopia recovery time, with bone-pierced IRM linked to prolonged recovery. Patients with bone-pierced IRM may require closer follow-up and careful consideration of timely surgical management.

The Hippo-YAP/TEAD pathway plays a central role in melanoma progression by regulating tumor cell proliferation, survival, and migration. Using a NanoLuc Binary Technology (NanoBiT) protein-protein interaction assay, we screened honokiol-based small molecules and identified several analogues that disrupt the YAP-TEAD interaction. HK03 was the most effective analogue, leading to a pronounced reduction in Cyr61 levels and diminished Erk and Akt phosphorylation in B16-F10 melanoma cells. HK03 also blocked epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and impaired melanoma cell migration in wound-healing assays. In vivo, HK03 treatment markedly reduced metastatic burden in a B16-F10 lung metastasis model. These findings suggest that honokiol derivatives, particularly HK03, represent potential lead compounds for targeting the YAP-TEAD axis in melanoma therapy.