Orthostatic intolerance is a common condition encountered in primary care and encompasses a range of symptoms triggered by standing. This review aims to provide general physicians with a practical framework for understanding terminology, diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, and management of orthostatic intolerance.Current concepts: Hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo is defined by the International Classification of Vestibular Disorders as 5 or more episodes of dizziness, unsteadiness, or vertigo triggered by arising or present during the upright position, which improve with sitting or lying down, in the presence of documented orthostatic hypotension (OH), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), or syncope. Measurement of orthostatic blood pressure and heart rate is essential for screening. The differential diagnosis includes benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, persistent postural-perceptual dizziness, anxiety disorders, bilateral vestibulopathy, primary orthostatic tremor, sensory neuropathy, gait disorders, and cardiac conditions. Evaluation of OH requires a stepwise approach to distinguish neurogenic from non-neurogenic causes. Evaluation of POTS focuses on identifying pathophysiological subtypes, including neuropathic, hyperadrenergic, deconditioning-related, and hypovolemic forms.Discussion and conclusion: Management begins with nonpharmacological strategies, including adequate hydration, increased salt intake, use of compression garments, postural education, and adjustment of contributing medications. When these measures are insufficient, pharmacological treatments for OH include midodrine, droxidopa, fludrocortisone, and pyridostigmine, whereas POTS may be managed with low-dose beta-blockers, ivabradine, or midodrine. A systematic approach incorporating appropriate terminology, standardized diagnostic criteria, and stepwise management is essential for optimizing care in patients with orthostatic intolerance.

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) remains a cornerstone of curative treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. However, dose escalation to improve tumor control is often constrained by the proximity of the rectum, which increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities. Biodegradable rectal spacers inserted between the prostate and rectum have emerged as an effective approach to reduce rectal radiation exposure. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on indications, contraindications, procedural standards, and clinical management for biodegradable rectal spacer insertion during prostate cancer RT. Materials and Methods: This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel through a systematic review of the literature, analysis of international guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Urology, American Society for Radiation Oncology), and expert consensus among radiation oncologists, radiologists, and urologists with clinical experience in spacer insertion. The strength of each recommendation and the level of evidence were classified according to the modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Results: Spacer insertion is conditionally recommended (Grade C, Level I) for patients receiving definitive external-beam RT without rectal invasion. It reduces the high-dose rectal irradiation volume (V70–75) by >50%, decreases acute GI toxicity, and helps maintain bowel-related quality of life. However, the benefit for late severe toxicity (grade 2 or higher) remains debated in recent meta-analyses. Contraindications include rectal invasion, anatomical inaccessibility, infection, and material hypersensitivity. Procedures should be performed under local anesthesia in a sterile environment by trained physicians. Short-course antibiotics and simulator-based training, including completion of multiple supervised cases, are advised. Conclusion Biodegradable rectal spacer insertion is clinically validated and effective in reducing acute rectal toxicity. Although pivotal trials demonstrated a favorable procedural safety profile, real-world postmarket data include reports of rare but severe procedural complications. This guideline provides standardized recommendations tailored to Korean clinical practice while remaining consistent with international standards, emphasizing the importance of operator training and careful patient selection.

Purpose: Radical cystectomy (RC) is associated with substantial postoperative morbidity, and unplanned readmission remains common despite advances in perioperative management. However, the association between postoperative readmission due to complications and oncologic outcomes after RC for bladder cancer has not been clearly defined. We evaluated the impact of postoperative readmission on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after RC for bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 3,972 patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer in a multicenter cohort. Postoperative readmission was defined as unplanned hospitalization within 90 days postsurgery due to surgery-related complications. Survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of OS and CSS. Results: Among the study population, 916 patients (23.1%) experienced postoperative readmission. Baseline and perioperative characteristics were generally comparable between patients with and without readmission. Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated significantly worse OS and CSS among patients who experienced postoperative readmission (both log-rank p<0.001). In multivariable analyses adjusting for clinicopathological factors, postoperative readmission remained independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.654; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.464–1.868; p<0.001) and CSS (HR, 1.761; 95% CI, 1.509–2.055; p<0.001). Conclusion Postoperative readmission within 90 days after RC was independently associated with inferior long-term oncologic outcomes. These findings suggest the importance of strategies aimed at preventing postoperative complications and subsequent readmission.

Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility of radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and level IV venous tumor thrombus, compared with CPB-assisted surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with RCC and level IV venous tumor thrombus who underwent surgery at a single center between 2014 and 2020. Feasibility of non-CPB surgery was assessed by comparing perioperative safety-related outcomes, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between the non-CPB and CPB groups. Perioperative outcomes included operative time, blood loss, severe complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥III), intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis and generalized Wilcoxon tests were used to compare survival outcomes. Results: A total of 16 patients met eligibility criteria: 5 underwent surgery without CPB, and 11 underwent CPB-assisted surgery. Median operative time was similar between the CPB and non-CPB groups (490 minutes vs. 480 minutes, p=0.650). Compared with the CPB group, blood loss was lower in the non-CPB group (4000 mL vs. 1080 mL, p=0.333). Severe complications occurred in 36.4% of CPB patients and 0% of non-CPB patients (p=0.245). ICU stay was comparable between the non-CPB and CPB groups (2 days vs. 3 days, p=0.356). OS did not differ significantly between groups (p=0.180), whereas PFS was longer in the non-CPB group (p=0.041). Conclusions Radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy without CPB appears feasible and may be associated with lower perioperative morbidity and blood loss without compromising oncologic outcomes. Non-CPB surgery should be considered in selected patients with level IV venous tumor thrombus when technically feasible.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a high-pressure spray disinfection system using neutral electrolyzed water to reduce airborne bacterial concentrations in veterinary hospitals and to characterize clinically relevant airborne pathogens and antimicrobial resistance. Methods: Active air sampling was performed before and after disinfection in multiple room types across five small animal hospitals in South Korea. Total airborne bacterial concentrations were quantified as colony-forming units per cubic meter. Representative colonies were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, with confirmatory sequencing for selected isolates. Susceptibility testing was performed for Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species using disk diffusion. Results: Mean airborne bacterial concentrations decreased from 358.2 to 150.6 colony-forming units per cubic meter (58% reduction; p < 0.05). Waiting rooms showed the highest predisinfection concentrations, and operating rooms the lowest. Among 848 isolates, Micrococcus luteus, staphylococci, and Bacillus species were most frequent. Eight isolates were clinically important pathogens; two met multidrug resistance criteria. No targeted pathogens were detected after disinfection. Conclusions and Relevance: High-pressure neutral electrolyzed water spraying significantly reduced airborne bacterial loads in veterinary clinical environments, supporting routine air disinfection and microbial surveillance as components of infection prevention programs.

Objective: To evaluate ruminoreticular temperature and body activity after vaccination, stratified by pregnancy status. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study investigated ruminoreticular temperature and body activity in Hanwoo cows after experimental administration of FMD and LSD vaccines. Sixty-three Hanwoo cows (pregnant n = 23 [100–175 days], nonpregnant n = 40) were monitored using a rumen-insertable biosensor that records ruminoreticular temperature and activity every 10 min. Groups received FMD, LSD, simultaneous FMD/LSD, or saline (control). Outcomes were analyzed using analysis of covariance with age and parity as covariates. Results: In pregnant cows, simultaneous FMD/LSD vaccination increased ruminoreticular temperature at day 1 and returned to baseline by day 3; single-vaccine groups showed more prolonged elevations. In nonpregnant cows, simultaneous vaccination increased temperature at day 1, normalizing by day 3–4. Body activity did not differ among pregnant groups;in nonpregnant cows, the simultaneous group showed lower activity than single-vaccine groups on some days. Conclusions and Relevance: In pregnant Hanwoo cows, post-vaccination temperature increase may enhance the risk of abortion, stillbirth, and premature birth, but this cannot be concluded to be the effect of vaccination. Since vaccination is the sole prevention for infectious diseases, it is unavoidable. Therefore, further research on reproduction related side effects after simultaneous vaccination are needed, and the findings of this study may provide valuable data to support such investigations.

Background: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a critical complication related to worse outcomes in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Herein, we addressed the impact of IDH on mortality and other outcomes in patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring intermittent hemodialysis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1,009 patients who underwent intermittent hemodialysis due to severe AKI. IDH was defined as either dialysis discontinuation due to hemodynamic instability or a decrease in systolic blood pressure (BP) of ≥30 mmHg, with or without a nadir systolic BP of <90 mmHg during the first session. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to unstable status was additionally analyzed. Hazard ratios (HRs) of outcomes were calculated using a Cox regression model after adjusting for multiple variables. Risk factors for IDH were evaluated using a logistic regression model. Results: IDH occurred in 449 patients (44.5%) during the first hemodialysis session. Patients with IDH had a higher mortality rate than those without IDH (40% vs. 23%; HR, 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.65). The rate of ICU transfer was higher in patients experiencing IDH than in those without IDH (17% vs. 11%; HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02–2.02). Factors such as old age, high BP and pulse rate, active malignancy, cirrhosis, and hypoalbuminemia were associated with an increased risk of IDH episodes. Conclusion The occurrence of IDH is associated with worse outcomes in patients with AKI requiring intermittent hemodialysis. Therefore, careful monitoring and early intervention of IDH may be necessary in this patient subset.

Background: With the aging population and advancements in medical care worldwide, the number of older patients with end-stage kidney disease continues to rise. This study aimed to identify factors associated with osteoporosis and osteopenia in older patients undergoing incident hemodialysis and assess their impact on mortality. Methods: We analyzed a large multicenter retrospective cohort of patients aged ≥70 years undergoing incident hemodialysis to identify factors associated with osteoporosis using logistic regression analysis and to assess the association of death with osteoporosis and osteopenia using Cox multivariable analysis. Results: Among 710 patients, 39.0% and 19.6% had osteoporosis and osteopenia, respectively. Osteoporosis was significantly associated with female sex, a history of fractures, and the absence of phosphate binder use. During a median follow-up of 36.8 months, 348 participants (58.8%) died. Mortality rates were the highest in the osteoporosis group (79.8%), followed by the osteopenia (77.2%) and normal bone mineral density (BMD) groups (35.2%). Cox regression analysis revealed that even after adjusting for covariates, the osteoporosis group was significantly associated with a higher mortality risk than the normal BMD group. Osteoporosis at the start of hemodialysis was significantly associated with higher mortality. Conclusion We should consider the importance of bone health in patients undergoing incident hemodialysis and pay attention to the use of phosphate binders and fracture prevention.

Background: Obesity is a well-known risk factor for chronic kidney disease and its progression. However, the impact of obesity on the renal function of the elderly population is uncertain. We investigated the association between obesity and renal outcomes in the elderly. Methods: We analyzed 130,504 participants from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Senior cohort. Obesity was classified according to body mass index (BMI), sex-specific waist circumference (WC), and the presence of metabolic syndrome. The primary outcome was renal function decline, defined as a decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 50% from baseline or new-onset end-stage renal disease. Results: During a follow-up period of 559,531.1 person-years (median, 4.3 years), 2,486 participants (19.0%; incidence rate of 4.44 per 1,000 person-years) showed renal function decline. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that BMI/WC was not associated with renal function decline. However, the group with metabolic syndrome had a significantly increased risk of renal function decline compared to the group without metabolic syndrome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–1.36). Compared with the non-metabolic syndrome group, the adjusted HRs (95% CI) for participants with one through five components were 0.96 (0.84–1.11), 1.10 (0.96–1.27), 1.24 (1.06–1.45), 1.37 (1.12–1.66), and 1.99 (1.42–2.79), respectively (p for trend < 0.001). Conclusion In elderly Korean adults, metabolic syndrome and the number of its components were associated with a higher risk of renal function decline, but BMI or WC was not significant.

Background: The effects of perioperative ketamine and esketamine on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify their impact on PONV and related adverse events. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing ketamine or esketamine with control agents. The primary outcome was a pooled analysis of PONV and nausea-only data. PONV, postoperative nausea (PON), and postoperative vomiting (POV) were also analyzed separately. Subgroup analyses were conducted by comparator type (placebo, opioid, or non-opioid) and dose categories. Meta-regression was used to assess dose-response relationships. Results: Fifty-five studies (n = 6676) were included. Ketamine and esketamine did not significantly reduce the incidence of pooled PONV risk (risk ratio [RR]: 0.95, 95% CI [0.87–1.04], P = 0.274). No benefit was found versus placebo. Compared with opioids, PONV was reduced (RR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.32–0.77], P = 0.002), but not in the pooled analysis (RR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.43–1.08], P = 0.107). Conversely, compared with non-opioid controls, ketamine/esketamine increased the pooled PONV risk (RR = 1.46, 95% CI [1.03–2.05], P = 0.032). No significant dose-response relationship was found. Both agents increased hallucinations (RR = 1.73, 95% CI [1.35–2.20], P = 0.0002) and drowsiness (RR = 2.18, 95% CI [1.13–4.21], P = 0.024). Conclusions Ketamine and esketamine did not significantly reduce PONV overall. While they showed benefits compared with opioid-based regimens, they may be less effective than non-opioid adjuvants. However, their neuropsychiatric and sedative risks warrant cautious use.