1.Analysis of the Capacities of Health Facilities in the Eastern Visayas Region based on Health Care Provider Network Service Delivery Guidelines.
Leizel P. Lagrada ; Romulo F. Nieva ; Alvin Duke R. Sy ; Kim Leonard G. Dela Luna ; Darrlyn Normaine P. Bernabe ; Fernando B. Garcia ; He Yeon Ji ; Romil Jeffrey R. Juson ; Jasper M. Maglinab ; Jihwan Jeon
Acta Medica Philippina 2026;60(3):13-26
OBJECTIVES
Timely access to appropriate levels of care is essential for improving maternal, newborn,
and child health outcomes. To address persistent service delivery fragmentation and strengthen referral systems, the Philippine Department of Health issued Administrative Order 2020-0019 to guide the design of Health Care Provider Networks (HCPNs) under the Universal Health Care Act of 2019. This study assessed the extent to which sixteen municipalities across four provinces in Eastern Visayas comply with the HCPN service delivery guidelines in the context of maternal and newborn care.
The study employed a descriptive cross-sectional mixed-methods design, utilizing structured facility checklists to assess compliance with HCPN standards. Qualitative data were gathered through key informant interviews and focus group discussions with purposively selected stakeholders—decision makers, health personnel, and mothers—to contextualize findings. A three-lever framework for integrated care (policy, operational, and cross- cutting) guided the analysis
RESULTSThe findings revealed significant gaps between the current capacities of study health facilities and the requirements outlined in the HCPN guidelines. Major gaps included (1) weak cooperative governance mechanisms to support network-wide coordination; (2) limited systematic linkages between facilities, including fragmented referral protocols and non-interoperable health information systems; (3) inadequate investments in infrastructure, health human resources, and medical commodities; and (4) absence of performance monitoring systems across HCPNs.
CONCLUSION
Human ; Information Systems ; Occupational Groups ; Referral And Consultation ; Universal Health Care ; Delivery Of Health Care
2.Genomic variant surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 positive specimens using a direct PCR product sequencing surveillance (DPPSS) method.
Nicole Ann L. Tuberon ; Francisco M. Heralde III ; Catherine C. Reportoso ; Arturo L. Gaitano III ; Wilmar Jun O. Elopre ; Kim Claudette J. Fernandez
Acta Medica Philippina 2026;60(1):57-68
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as the causative agent of COVID-19 has significantly challenged the public health landscape in late 2019. After almost 3 years of the first ever SARS-CoV-2 case, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the end of this global health emergency in May 2023. Although, despite the subsequent drop of COVID-19 cases, the SARS-CoV-2 infection still exhibited multiple waves of infection, primarily attributed to the appearance of new variants. Five of these variants have been classified as Variants of Concern (VOC): Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and the most recent, Omicron. Therefore, the development of methods for the timely and accurate detection of viral variants remains fundamental, ensuring an ongoing and effective response to the disease. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the application of an in-house approach in genomic surveillance for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants using in silico designed primers.
METHODSThe primers used for the study were particularly designed based on conserved regions of certain genes in the virus, targeting distinct mutations found in known variants of SARS-CoV-2. Viral RNA extracts from nasopharyngeal samples (n=14) were subjected to quantitative and qualitative tests (Nanodrop and AGE). Selected samples were then analyzed by RT-PCR and amplicons were submitted for sequencing. Sequence alignment analysis was carried out to identify the prevailing COVID-19 variant present in the sample population.
RESULTSThe study findings demonstrated that the in-house method was able to successfully amplify conserved sequences (spike, envelope, membrane, ORF1ab) and enabled identification of the circulating SARS-CoV-2 variant among the samples. Majority of the samples were identified as Omicron variant. Three out of four designed primers effectively bound into the conserved sequence of target genes present in the sample, revealing the specific SARSCoV-2 variant. The detected mutations characterized for Omicron found in the identified lineages included K417N, S477N, and P681H which were also identified as mutations of interest. Furthermore, identification of the B.1.448 lineage which was not classified in any known variant also provided the potential of the developed in-house method in detecting unknown variants of COVID-19.
CONCLUSIONAmong the five VOCs, Omicron is the most prevalent and dominant variant. The in-house direct PCR product sequencing surveillance (DPPSS) method provided an alternative platform for SAR-CoV-2 variant analysis which is accessible and affordable than the conventional diagnostic surveillance methods and the whole genome sequencing. Further evaluation and improvements on the oligonucleotide primers may offer significant contribution to the development of a specific and direct PCRbased detection of new emerging COVID-19 variants.
Sars-cov-2 ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Dna Primers ; Oligonucleotide Primers ; Computer Simulation ; Conserved Sequence ; Coronavirus ; Covid-19 ; Disease ; Emergencies ; Evaluation Studies As Topic ; Genes ; Genome ; Global Health ; Health ; Identification (psychology) ; Infection ; Infections ; Membranes ; Methods ; Mutation ; Oligonucleotides ; Organizations ; Population ; Public Health ; Rna ; Rna, Viral ; Sars Virus ; Sequence Alignment ; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ; Syndrome ; Viruses ; Whole Genome Sequencing ; World Health Organization
4.Differences in perceptions of medical artificial intelligence between medical and non-medical professionals in Korea: a qualitative study
Jeonghoon HA ; Hakyoung PARK ; Jiwon SHINN ; Hun-Sung KIM
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2026;69(3):281-293
Purpose: Medical artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being integrated into clinical practice and healthcare systems, raising concerns regarding safety, accountability, and governance. Despite its increasing importance, empirical comparative studies examining differences in perceptions of medical AI among key expert groups remain limited. This study aimed to compare and analyze perceptions of medical AI among medical and non-medical professionals and to systematically identify commonalities and differences across policy- and governance-relevant domains. Methods: Focus group interviews using open-ended questions were conducted with 30 experts (15 medical and 15 non-medical professionals) who had direct experience with medical AI. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis combined with qualitative comparative analysis. Analytical rigor was strengthened through independent coding and consensus-based discussions. Results: Both groups recognized the potential of medical AI to bring meaningful changes to healthcare systems. However, medical professionals primarily evaluated medical AI in terms of clinical applicability, patient safety, explainability, and accountability. In contrast, non-medical professionals emphasized technological maturity, scalability, data infrastructure, standardization, and system-integration potential. Group-specific patterns also emerged regarding perceived limitations, autonomy, educational priorities, and classification frameworks, particularly in relation to clinical risk management versus system-level design and governance considerations. Conclusion: Differences in perceptions of medical AI are systematically associated with distinct interpretive frames shaped by professional roles and responsibility structures. Effective implementation and policy design for medical AI therefore require an integrated approach that accounts for these structural differences. This study provides empirical evidence and a conceptual foundation for future quantitative and mixed-methods research on medical AI governance.
5.Korean colorectal cancer screening guidelines for asymptomatic, average-risk adults: the 2025 revision
EunKyo KANG ; Jae Myung CHA ; Seo Young KANG ; Kiheon LEE ; Su Young KIM ; Younghoon KIM ; An Na SEO ; Hyo-Jin KANG ; Jong Keon JANG ; Kwang-Pil KO ; Aesun SHIN ; Dae Kyung SOHN ; Youngki HONG ; Eun-Jung CHO ; Minje HAN ; Soo Young KIM ; Hyeon Ji LEE ; Chang Kyun CHOI ; Mina SUH
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2026;69(3):268-280
Purpose:
To develop the 2025 update to the Korean colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines by systematically evaluating recent evidence, integrating domestic data, and addressing changes since the 2015 guideline revision, thereby providing an evidence-based standard for clinicians and policymakers.
Methods:
A multidisciplinary committee developed the guidelines using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The process included formulation of three key questions addressing screening efficacy, diagnostic accuracy, and optimal screening age and interval. A systematic review of international guidelines and primary literature was conducted, yielding 327 eligible studies. In addition, a utility-based analysis using a Markov model was performed to determine optimal screening ages and intervals.
Results:
The evidence synthesis identified high-certainty evidence supporting the use of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for reducing CRC mortality and moderate-certainty evidence for colonoscopy. Evidence for computed tomographic colonography (CTC) and stool DNA testing was rated as very low certainty. Based on the evidence review and cost-utility analysis, the committee conditionally recommends CRC screening for asymptomatic, average-risk adults aged 45–74 years using either colonoscopy every 10 years or FIT every 1–2 years. CTC and stool DNA testing were not recommended owing to insufficient evidence.
Conclusion
The 2025 Korean Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening present updated, evidence-based recommendations tailored to the domestic healthcare context. By conditionally endorsing both colonoscopy and FIT for individuals aged 45–74 years, these guidelines aim to improve population-level screening effectiveness and reduce the burden of CRC in South Korea.
7.Autonomic dysfunction in systemic diseases: a narrative review
Eunhee SOHN ; Sooyoung KIM ; Eun Kyoung LEE
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2026;69(5):401-410
Autonomic dysfunction is a common but frequently overlooked manifestation of systemic diseases. Because early manifestations are often nonspecific, including dizziness, fatigue, palpitations, exercise intolerance, and gastrointestinal dysmotility, clinicians need a structured approach to support timely recognition and risk stratification.Current concepts: Systemic disorders affect autonomic regulation through overlapping mechanisms, including metabolic injury, microvascular dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and impaired cardiovascular reflex control. In diabetes, autonomic nerve injury accumulates over time, and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy is associated with increased cardiovascular events and mortality. In chronic kidney disease, persistent sympathetic activation, reduced vagal modulation, and baroreflex impairment contribute to hypertension, intradialytic hypotension, and arrhythmic risk. In heart failure and ischemic heart disease, sympathetic predominance and vagal withdrawal accelerate disease progression and are associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Systemic autoimmune disorders are also associated with impaired cardiovascular reflex control and small-fiber neuropathy.Discussion and conclusion: A practical evaluation begins with symptom screening and review of medications and comorbidities, followed by standardized autonomic testing. Cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests, together with scoring tools such as the composite autonomic scoring scale, help quantify the distribution and severity of autonomic involvement and support longitudinal monitoring. Management should integrate optimal control of the underlying systemic disease, non-pharmacological measures for orthostatic intolerance, and symptom-directed treatment for orthostatic hypotension.
8.Differential diagnosis and treatment of orthostatic intolerance: a narrative review
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2026;69(5):381-391
Orthostatic intolerance is a common condition encountered in primary care and encompasses a range of symptoms triggered by standing. This review aims to provide general physicians with a practical framework for understanding terminology, diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, and management of orthostatic intolerance.Current concepts: Hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo is defined by the International Classification of Vestibular Disorders as 5 or more episodes of dizziness, unsteadiness, or vertigo triggered by arising or present during the upright position, which improve with sitting or lying down, in the presence of documented orthostatic hypotension (OH), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), or syncope. Measurement of orthostatic blood pressure and heart rate is essential for screening. The differential diagnosis includes benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, persistent postural-perceptual dizziness, anxiety disorders, bilateral vestibulopathy, primary orthostatic tremor, sensory neuropathy, gait disorders, and cardiac conditions. Evaluation of OH requires a stepwise approach to distinguish neurogenic from non-neurogenic causes. Evaluation of POTS focuses on identifying pathophysiological subtypes, including neuropathic, hyperadrenergic, deconditioning-related, and hypovolemic forms.Discussion and conclusion: Management begins with nonpharmacological strategies, including adequate hydration, increased salt intake, use of compression garments, postural education, and adjustment of contributing medications. When these measures are insufficient, pharmacological treatments for OH include midodrine, droxidopa, fludrocortisone, and pyridostigmine, whereas POTS may be managed with low-dose beta-blockers, ivabradine, or midodrine. A systematic approach incorporating appropriate terminology, standardized diagnostic criteria, and stepwise management is essential for optimizing care in patients with orthostatic intolerance.
9.Unusual Dislocation of a Hip Tumor Endoprosthesis following Limb Salvage Surgery for Osteosarcoma of the Proximal Femur
Tae Yung HUH ; Jae Young LEE ; Hyung Lae CHO ; Do Hyeng KIM
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association 2026;61(1):88-93
Limb salvage surgery using a tumor prosthesis for the treatment of malignant bone tumors in the proximal femur is an effective method for preserving hip joint function. On the other hand, maintaining hip joint stability can be challenging because of the extensive resection of the bone and surrounding soft tissue. This paper reports an unusual case of hip dislocation in a patient with a proximal femoral osteosarcoma who underwent limb salvage surgery. Over six years, the tumor prosthesis gradually migrated posterosuperiorly above the iliac crest, resulting in 14 cm of lower limb shortening. The acetabular reconstruction was performed using an allograft, and the middle segment of the tumor prosthesis was removed to allow for hip reduction. Concurrent reconstruction of the hip abductor muscles was also carried out. No recurrence of the dislocation was observed during follow-up, and the patient could walk independently with the aid of an orthopedic brace, despite an 8 cm leg length discrepancy.
10.Comparison of the Short-Term Patient Reported Outcome Measurement of the Skin Crease “Bikini” Incision Anterolateral Supine Approach versus the Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: 1:1 Matching Analysis
Eic Ju LIM ; Jin Yeob PARK ; Chul-Ho KIM
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association 2026;61(1):72-81
Purpose:
This study compared the clinical utility and safety of the muscle-sparing anterolateral supine (ALS) approach using a skin-crease bikini incision with the conventional direct lateral (DL) approach in terms of the short-term patient reported outcome measurement (PROM) and the postoperative complication rates.
Materials and Methods:
Between March 2023 and February 2024, patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. Ninety patients were identified in the ALS group, and 264 were identified in the DL group. After 1:1 matching for age, sex, and body mass index, 87 patients in each group were analyzed. The primary outcomes were the PROM, including the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), evaluated preoperatively and at six weeks, three months, six months, and one year postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included postoperative complications such as transient sensory changes, permanent nerve injury, dislocation, superficial and deep infections, intraoperative fracture, and iliopsoas tendinitis.
Results:
All three PROM (mHHS, OHS, and HOOS) showed statistically and clinically superior results in the ALS group compared to the DL group within the first six months postoperatively. No significant differences in the incidence of any recorded complications were observed between the two groups.
Conclusion
At three and six months postoperatively, the ALS approach with a bikini incision showed superior PROM compared to the DL, suggesting better early functional recovery and patient satisfaction. Although the PROM differences diminished at one year, the early postoperative advantage highlights the clinical benefits of the muscle-sparing ALS approach.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail