Neuropathic pain markedly impairs quality of life and imposes a substantial socioeconomic burden, while available treatments often provide only partial relief and are limited by safety concerns. The Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain (NeuPSIG-IASP) first published pharmacologic recommendations in 2007, followed by a major update in 2015 and a new guideline in 2025. This narrative review specifically compares the 2015 and 2025 NeuPSIG-IASP guidelines, outlining key methodological changes and therapeutic shifts. The 2025 guideline is based on a larger, more rigorous meta-analysis, maintains α2δ-ligands (adds mirogabalin), serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants as first-line drugs, downgrades tramadol into the opioid third-line group. It also introduces high-frequency motor-cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a weakly recommended third-line option and discusses implications for Korean clinical practice.

Purpose: To report a case of oncocytic and inverted Schneiderian papilloma originating from the lacrimal sac.Case summary: A 70-year-old male presented with a 5-year history of bilateral epiphora. Best-corrected visual acuity was 0.9 in the right eye and 1.0 in the left eye, and intraocular pressure was 12 mmHg in the right eye and 14 mmHg in the left eye. The findings of nasolacrimal duct probing, the irrigation test, and dacryoscintigraphy suggested partial obstruction of the right nasolacrimal duct. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a mass measuring approximately 2.5 cm in the right lacrimal sac. Surgical excision of the mass was planned in collaboration with the otolaryngology department, followed by histopathologic examination of the resected specimen. The otorhinolaryngology team removed the lacrimal sac mass endoscopically through the nasal cavity and submitted the specimen for histopathologic analysis. Subsequently, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy was performed. Postoperatively, the patient’s epiphora resolved, and histopathologic evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of oncocytic and inverted Schneiderian papilloma. Conclusions Schneiderian papilloma can originate from the nasolacrimal duct and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with epiphora.

The gut microbiome is not just a bystander of colorectal carcinogenesis but is an active driver of colorectal cancer (CRC). CRC-associated microbiome contributes in the tumorigenesis through chronic inflammation, formation of toxic metabolite and genotoxins, oncogenic signal activation, immune evasion, and barrier disruption—all reinforcing a tumor microenvironment. In contrast, beneficial microbiome supports the barrier-immune-metabolic axis by maintaining mucosal integrity and balanced immune tone. Despite extensive studies of microbiome-based CRC biomarkers, microbiome-based CRC biomarkers have not been yet ready for routine clinical use due to variation across populations and lack of standardization of key steps such as sampling, analysis, cutoffs, and interpretation. Microbiome-based therapies aim to change the overall intestinal ecosystem rather than simply adding or removing single strains. At present, dietary modulation and prebiotics are considered supportive measures, while probiotics or synbiotics are in preclinical stage. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) still faces important challenges in effectiveness, standardization and safety. By its role in reshaping the tumor–host immune environment, FMT is viewed as a potential option for cancer therapy after further development through well-controlled clinical trials with careful safety monitoring.

Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background: Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have accelerated their integration into clinical domains, including laboratory medicine. The performance of LLMs in answering board-level laboratory medicine questions has not been comprehensively evaluated. Given the importance of diagnostic accuracy in this field, rigorous and objective evaluations of LLM capabilities are essential. Methods: We assessed 12 LLMs from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google using 320 Korean Residency Examination questions (2021–2024) spanning six laboratory medicine subspecialties. Standardized prompts were provided via their application programming interfaces under deterministic settings (temperature = 0). Questions were administered thrice to assess response reproducibility. Outputs were compared with validated answers and analyzed for accuracy, reasoning quality, and error typology. Results: Google’s Gemini 2.0 Pro achieved the highest accuracy (80.0%), followed by OpenAI’s GPT-4.5 (77.2%) and Anthropic’s Claude 3.7 Sonnet (74.1%). Accuracy decreased as the difficulty of questions increased (78.0% for easy vs. 45.1% for challenging). Subspecialty performance varied. Al models underperformed on questions on transfusion medicine (mean accuracy: 38.8%), primarily because of limitations in domain-specific and regional knowledge representations. Incorrect answers primarily resulted from reasoning errors. Reproducibility exceeded 95% for most models; however, some residual non-determinism appeared even with greedy decoding (temperature = 0). Conclusions LLMs demonstrated substantial potential for integration into laboratory medicine, particularly in clinical chemistry and immunology. Performance inconsistencies (particularly for high-difficulty questions) and knowledge gaps (notably for transfusion medicine) highlight the necessity for further development—potentially including domain-specific fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation integration—and robust expert oversight before clinical application.

Background: Fusion genes are major drivers of acute leukemia. Conventional diagnostics are limited in detecting the diverse fusions included in recently updated acute leukemia classifications. We evaluated the fusion detection performance of RNA sequencing (RNAseq) compared with that of conventional diagnostics in patients with acute leukemia. Methods: We retrospectively obtained the data of 101 patients with acute leukemia who underwent conventional diagnostics (i.e., karyotyping, FISH, or multiplex reverse transcription PCR) at diagnosis at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between September 2022 and September 2023. Whole RNA-seq was performed using the Illumina Stranded mRNA Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The concordance, sensitivity, and specificity of RNA-seq for fusion gene detection were compared with those of conventional diagnostics. Results: RNA-seq helped identify 52 fusion genes in 51 (50.5%) of 101 patients, with detection rates of 40.7%, 70.3%, 37.5%, and 50% in acute myeloid leukemia, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and mixed-phenotype acute leukemia, respectively. RNA-seq showed 83.3% sensitivity and 80.8% concordance with conventional diagnostics; it missed eight fusions, likely because of low transcript abundance or enhancer hijacking. RNA-seq also helped clarify three previously unspecified rearrangements and detected 12 fusions (21.4%) in 56 cases that tested negative with conventional diagnostics, including four novel (KMT2A::THAP12 , RUNX1::PRPF19 , MLLT10::UBE2L6, and FUS::ZNF362) and three rare (HNRNPH1::ERG, RUNX1::USP42, and ETV6::NCOA2) fusions. Conclusions This was the first study to evaluate the performance of whole RNA-seq in fusion detection in patients with acute leukemia in Korea. Incorporating RNA-seq into diagnostic workflows may facilitate earlier and more precise therapeutic decisions and improve prognostic assessment in patients with acute leukemia.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of the Trauma-nursing Education and Skill Support (TESS) program based on the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation model). The program was designed to enhance trauma nurses’ clinical competencies, including trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability, through the integration of theoretical education and simulation-based practice. Methods: A quasi-experimental study using a non-equivalent control group pretest–posttest design was conducted. Participants included 108 trauma nurses from regional trauma centers, military trauma centers, and emergency care facilities, who were assigned to an experimental group (n=52) or a control group (n=56). The TESS program consisted of a 2-day, 14-hour blended-learning course that included eight lecture sessions and four simulation-based practice stations. Data were collected at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 6 months using validated instruments measuring trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for data analysis. Results: The experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability compared with baseline (all p<.001). These improvements were sustained at 6 months, although trauma-related knowledge scores showed a slight decline compared with immediate posttest levels. Between-group analyses confirmed significant group-by-time interaction effects for all outcomes: trauma-related knowledge (η2=0.12, p<.001), self-efficacy (η2=0.09, p=.002), and problem-solving ability (η2=0.08, p=.003). Conclusion The TESS program effectively enhanced trauma nurses’ trauma-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and problem-solving ability, with effects sustained for up to 6 months. Incorporating blended learning and simulation-based training into standardized trauma nursing education may strengthen clinical competencies and ultimately contribute to improved patient outcomes.

Background/Aims: Nocturnal acid reflux disrupts sleep and impairs quality of life. Proton pump inhibitors provide insufficient suppression of nocturnal acid secretion, whereas fexuprazan offers prolonged acid suppression. We compared the efficacy of fexuprazan and esomeprazole in controlling nocturnal reflux. Methods: In a randomized and crossover study, patients received fexuprazan or esomeprazole daily for 4 weeks, followed by a washout and crossover to the alternate medication for another 4 weeks, with a final washout completing the sequence. Severity (scores 0-10), frequency, sleep disturbance, and medication preferences were evaluated. Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and randomized to receive either fexuprazan (n = 20) or esomeprazole (n = 19) first. After the first treatment, fexuprazan reduced severity from 7.5 ± 1.7 to 1.4 ± 1.7 (81.3% decrease), versus 7.8 ± 1.5 to 2.8 ± 1.9 (64.1% decrease) with esomeprazole (P = 0.012). In patients with severe symptoms (scores ≥ 7), fexuprazan led to significantly greater improvement than esomeprazole (P = 0.008). Following the first washout, the second crossover treatment resulted in greater improvement in symptom severity with fexuprazan (P = 0.001). During the second washout, nocturnal symptoms severity and frequencies were better controlled with fexuprazan than with esomeprazole (P = 0.005 and 0.019). Patients who switched from esomeprazole to fexuprazan preferred fexuprazan (P = 0.018). Conclusions Fexuprazan was more effective than esomeprazole in controlling nocturnal reflux symptom, particularly in patients with severe symptoms. Fexuprazan may offer a therapeutic advantage for patients with severe and persistent nocturnal reflux despite proton pump inhibitor therapy.