Purpose: This study aimed to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of single-port laparoscopic articulated instrument-assisted versus da Vinci SP-assisted totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair using a propensity score-matched multi-institutional cohort. Methods: Between April 2022 and July 2025, 221 patients underwent TEP unilateral inguinal hernia repair at four institutions. Among them, 33 patients underwent da Vinci SP-assisted repair (Intuitive Surgical) and 188 underwent single-port laparoscopy using the articulated instrument, ArtiSential (LivsMed). Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio based on demographic and clinical variables, resulting in 30 matched patients in each group. Perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: After matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced between the groups.Operative time was significantly longer in the da Vinci SP group than in the ArtiSential group (median [interquartile range], 82.0 [67.5–105.0] vs. 35.0 [28.5–47.5] minutes; p < 0.001). No open conversions occurred, and conversions to transabdominal preperitoneal repair were rare and comparable. Mesh size selection differed significantly, with smaller meshes more frequently used in the da Vinci SP group (p < 0.001). Postoperative outcomes, including length of hospital stay, overall complication rates, chronic pain, and recurrence, were similar between the groups. No major complications, readmissions, or reoperations were observed. Conclusion Articulated instrument-assisted TEP inguinal hernia repair demonstrated a significantly shorter operative time than da Vinci SP-assisted repair, while perioperative safety and postoperative outcomes were comparable.

Background: A systematic evaluation of potential living liver donors is essential to ensure donor safety and optimize recipient outcomes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study aimed to assess donor acceptance rates and reasons for disqualification among individuals evaluated for LDLT at a high-volume transplant center over a one-year period. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1,087 potential living liver donors who presented for LDLT evaluation in 2023. Of these, 991 candidates advanced beyond the initial screening (Stage 1) and underwent comprehensive clinical, imaging, and pathological assessments (Stages 2 and 3). Candidates who discontinued after Stage 1 were excluded due to the absence of documented reasons for non-progression. Results: Among the 991 candidates who proceeded beyond initial screening, 473 (47.7%) completed the full donor evaluation, of whom 466 were judged to be suitable donors. Among suitable donors, 384 (82.4%) proceeded to donor hepatectomy, whereas 82 did not, primarily due to recipient-related factors such as clinical deterioration or withdrawal of consent. Donor ineligibility was determined in 422 candidates (42.6%), most commonly due to inadequate remnant liver volume (52.8%), hepatic steatosis (20.6%), and insufficient graft size (10.2%). Among candidates undergoing Stage 2 evaluation, 162 (16.3%) failed to meet steatosis criteria; 126 were excluded solely for steatosis and advised weight reduction, and 39 subsequently became eligible and successfully donated. Conclusion In this high-volume LDLT center, donor disqualification was primarily driven by remnant liver volume and hepatic steatosis. Targeted interventions such as weight reduction enabled successful donation in a subset of initially ineligible candidates, underscoring the importance of individualized donor evaluation and pre-donation optimization.

Background: We developed a simplified variant of the ADV score, the AFP-PIVKAII (AP) score for post-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis, which considers only AFP and PIVKA-II levels excluding morphometric tumor size information from the ADV score. This study investigated the prognostic performance of the AP score in predicting HCC recurrence and overall survival (OS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods: We analyzed 843 patients with HCC who underwent LDLT between 2006 and 2015, assessing HCC recurrence and OS in relation to AP score. Results: The median pretransplant AFP and PIVKA-II levels were 12.8 ng/mL and 27 mAU/mL, respectively. The median and mean AP scores were 2.6 log (range: 0.6–9.2 log) and 2.9±1.1 log, respectively. The 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the AP score in predicting post-transplant HCC recurrence was 0.672 (p<0.001). HCC recurrence and OS curves along AP score intervals of 1.0 log showed statistical differences in accordance with the AP scores (both p<0.001). Using a Youden index J-derived AP score cutoff of 4.0 log, two-tiered groups (ADV <4.0 log vs. ADV ≥4.0 log) showed statistically significant differences in HCC recurrence and OS (both p<0.001). Harrell’s c-indices for AP score with cutoff of 4.0 log and ADV scores with cutoff of 5.0 log regarding HCC recurrence and OS were similar. Conclusion The AP score functions as an integrated surrogate marker for predicting post-transplant outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing LDLT. It may serve as a simplified alternative to the ADV score, particularly in patients with small HCCs.

Purpose: Postoperative complications following gastric cancer surgery significantly impact patient outcomes, yet standardized definitions for these events have not been consistently applied across institutions in Korea. This study aimed to develop a consensus-based, standardized complication classification system specific to gastrectomy for gastric cancer as part of the Korean Quality Improvement Platform in Surgery (K-QIPS) initiative. Methods: As part of K-QIPS, a dedicated task force team (TFT) was formed with surgical experts from fourteen high-volume hospitals across Korea. The TFT conducted ten formal meetings to review existing literature and international guidelines, and incorporated findings from randomized controlled trials. The final complication list was developed through expert consensus and structured into a standardized framework. A Data Entry Manual was created to support consistent data collection by surgical clinical reviewers. Results: The TFT defined specific postoperative complications following gastrectomy for gastric cancer, including anastomotic leakage, duodenal stump leakage, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal and luminal bleeding, delayed gastric emptying, and internal hernia. Notably, internal hernia was described in standardized form for the first time. General complications were developed first and overlapped in part with the gastric cancer-specific list. The task force also produced a Data Entry Manual that provides practical instructions to ensure consistency and accuracy in complication reporting. Conclusion This nationwide consensus initiative established the first standardized complication classification system for gastric cancer surgery in Korea. The proposed definitions and data entry system are expected to improve complication reporting, enable multicenter research, support surgical quality benchmarking, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the detection ability of quality of life (QoL) changes and responsiveness of the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS)-40 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ). Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate QoL changes after various gastrectomies between January 2021 and April 2022. Participants were instructed to complete the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. QoL changes over time and QoL responsiveness were assessed for each questionnaire. Results: Data from 491 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 22 institutions were analyzed. The summary scores of the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 showed significant differences between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.044 and p=0.038, respectively), but no difference was observed for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Dysphagia on the KOQUSS-40 was significantly different between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.031); however, dysphagia on the EORTC QLQ-STO22 did not differ. The responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 was similar to that of the EORTC QLQ in patients who experienced ≥ 10% body weight loss, but approximately 10% less in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy than the EORTC QLQ. Conclusion KOQUSS-40 has several advantages over EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 when comparing QoL between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups. The findings provide information for researchers investigating the QoL of patients who have undergone curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between circulating interleukin-17 (IL-17) levels and systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods: We conducted a comprehensive systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant studies. The meta-analysis compared serum/plasma IL-17, IL-17A, IL-17B, IL-17E, and IL-17F levels in SSc patients with those in control subjects, incorporating subgroup analyses based on ethnicity and disease subtype. Results: This analysis included 16 studies, comprising 1,229 patients diagnosed with SSc and 839 control participants. The metaanalysis did not identify a significant difference in circulating IL-17 levels between SSc patients and controls in overall group (standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.260; 95% confidence interval [CI]=–1.805 to 2.336; p=0.825). However, recent studies supported this finding, demonstrating a stronger association (SMD=2.040; 95% CI=1.049 to 3.030; p<0.001). IL-17A levels were significantly higher in SSc patients (SMD=2.046; 95% CI=0.724 to 3.369; p=0.002), along with notable increases in IL-17B (SMD=0.764; 95% CI=0.230 to 1.298; p=0.005), IL-17E (SMD=0.672; 95% CI=0.282 to 1.062; p=0.001), and IL-17F (SMD=0.402;95% CI=0.019 to 0.784; p=0.039). However, no significant difference in IL-17A levels was observed between diffuse and limited SSc groups. Conclusion IL-17A, IL-17B, IL-17E, and IL-17F were significantly elevated in SSc, with IL-17A demonstrating the most pronounced association. These findings suggest that specific IL-17 subtypes, particularly IL-17A, play a role in SSc pathogenesis.

Background: and Purpose The relationship between thrombus histology and long-term stroke patient outcomes remains unexplored. We aimed to determine whether the histological characteristics of thrombi are associated with long-term outcomes in stroke patients and to identify the thrombus features linked to these outcomes. Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 512 patients with ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular thrombectomy between July 2017 and July 2023. Patients were followed up for long-term major adverse cardiovascular events occurrence. Thrombus histology was assessed using immunohistochemistry, including the proportion of fibrin, red blood cells, and platelets, as well as the distribution patterns categorized as layered, erythrocytic, diffuse platelet, and mixed. Results: During a median follow-up of 38.1 months, 164 patients experienced major adverse cardiovascular events, with an incidence rate of 3.02 per 100 person-years. Major adverse cardiovascular events occurrence was associated with the diffuse platelet pattern and proportion of platelets and red blood cells within the thrombus. After adjusting for confounders, the diffuse platelet pattern independently predicted major adverse cardiovascular events, including mortality and stroke recurrence. Subgroup analysis also demonstrated that the association between the diffuse platelet pattern and major adverse cardiovascular events was consistent across key clinical subgroups based on age (≥65 vs. <65 yr), atrial fibrillation, cancer status, and discharge medications. Conclusions Thrombus histology could provide predictive value for long-term prognosis. In particular, histological distribution patterns may be more important than simple composition in thrombus research, including in the prediction of prognosis.

Shared decision-making (SDM), which has become a core principle of patient-clinician communication, emphasizes respect for autonomy, partnership, and transparency. In neonatal practice—where decisions often carry profound ethical and emotional weight—SDM helps align medical recommendations with the family's values, fosters trust, and may reduce moral distress for both parents and clinicians. However, in Korea, the systematic recognition and formalization of SDM remains limited, underscoring the need for practical guidance and institutional support in neonatal and pediatric care. This review discusses key principles of SDM and illustrates their application in real clinical communication through hypothetical neonatal case vignettes. SDM is best understood not as a single model but as a continuum shaped by the balance between medical judgment and parental values. Drawing on Opel’s stepwise framework, SDM is most appropriate when more than one medically reasonable option exists and value considerations meaningfully influence the choice. Physicians must also remain aware of personal biases that can shape how options are framed and discussed. Building on this conceptual foundation, this paper describes how meaningful SDM can be practiced using the 4 conversational phases outlined by Madrigal and Kelly: (1) acknowledging the need for a decision and inviting participation; (2) sharing information while listening; (3) uncovering values, hopes, and fears; and (4) reaching a balanced and ethically grounded decision. Through clinical examples, these phases demonstrate how empathy, pacing, and reflective dialogue can transform information exchange into shared moral reasoning. Finally, structural and cultural barriers continue to hinder the implementation of SDM in Korea, including time constraints, limited training, and restrictive legal frameworks. Policy reform, education, and team-based strategies are essential to support its broader adoption. SDM ultimately offers an ethically robust and relational framework for navigating complex, value-laden decisions in neonatal and pediatric care that is grounded in communication that recognizes bias and engages families as true partners.

Background: Studies on whether donor-to-recipient sex match status affects long-term survival after liver transplantation (LT) have yielded contradictory results. This study evaluated whether donor-to-recipient sex match status influenced long-term survival after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) or deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) at a high-volume center. Methods: The study included 6,664 patients who underwent primary LT between January 2000 and December 2022 at our institution. Patients were divided into four groups according to donor-to-recipient sex match status: male-to-male (n=3,427 [51.4%]), male-to-female (n=1,152 [17.3%]), female-to-male (n=1,385 [20.8%]), and female-to-female (n=700 [10.5%]). Results: Regarding clinical characteristics, the four groups differed significantly regarding background liver disease (P<0.001), model for end-stage liver disease score (P<0.001), serum protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II level (P=0.003), presence of concurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; P<0.001), and type of LT (P=0.003). Overall survival (OS) of all LT recipients did not differ significantly among the groups (P=0.377). Donor-to-recipient sex match status did not affect long-term OS in either LDLT (P=0.176) or DDLT (P=0.220) groups. In addition, sex match status did not significantly influence posttransplant OS among patients who underwent LDLT without HCC (P=0.464), LDLT with HCC (P=0.236), DDLT without HCC (P=0.338), or DDLT with HCC (P=0.818). Conclusions Donor-to-recipient sex match status does not significantly affect posttransplant patient survival or HCC prognosis after LDLT or DDLT.