Episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) is a rare disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of angioedema accompanying peripheral blood eosinophilia. Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are the primary treatment; however, concerns remain regarding potential adverse effects associated with frequent or long-term use of OCS. Although the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying EAE remain unclear, studies have reported an association between T-cell clonality and subsequent elevation of interleukin (IL)-5 levels. A 43-year-old male had experienced facial and hand edema accompanied by eosinophilia since 2020. During episodes of angioedema, he exhibited febrile sensation and rapid weight gain within a few hours, along with dyspnea and severe pruritus. To control symptoms, continuous OCS therapy was required. In 2021, he was treated with anti-IL 5 antibody (reslizumab 200 mg) for 3 months, which was ineffective. Subsequently, he visited Ajou University Hospital in November 2022 for additional disease management. He had been taking deflazacort (8–32 mg/day) and cyclosporine (75–200 mg/day); however, his EAE was not controlled during which higher doses of OCS had been used. Laboratory findings revealed variations in blood eosinophils according to the symptom status and OCS dose, and general reductions in immunoglobulin G2 (IgG2), IgG3, and IgG levels due to long-term use of OCS. Since anti-interleukin (IL)-5 receptor antibody (benralizumab, 30 mg) and intravenous immunoglobulin were regularly administered at 4-week intervals, no further attacks of EAE have been observed with stopping OCS treatment. Severe EAE refractory to anti-IL-5 antibody as well as OCS therapy could be controlled by anti-IL-5 receptor antibody as an effective steroid-sparing agent.

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to iodinated contrast media (ICM) can range from mild cutaneous symptoms to life-threatening anaphylaxis. In patients with a history of ICM hypersensitivity, avoidance of the culprit agent is generally recommended. This case report describes a successful desensitization in a 56-year-old man with recurrent HSRs to multiple agents including ioversol, iohexol, iobitridol, and iopamidol. Intradermal testing was performed to identify potentially safe alternatives; however, all tested agents, including iohexol, ioversol, iobitridol, iopamidol, iodixanol, iomeprol, and iopromide, yielded positive results. Given the clinical necessity of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, a 13-step rapid desensitization protocol with iodixanol was implemented. The procedure was completed without any breakthrough reactions. This case highlights desensitization as a feasible and effective strategy for patients with hypersensitivity to multiple ICM agents.

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a heterogeneous primary immunodeficiency characterized by reduced levels of immunoglobulin (Ig)G, with or without IgA and/or IgM deficiency, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Clinical manifestations are diverse, ranging from recurrent infections to autoimmune and allergic diseases. While CVID has been rarely reported in the Korean population, particularly in adults, we report 2 adult cases of CVID comorbid with asthma and Behcet’s disease. The first case of a 53-year-old with severe allergic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis experienced recurrent respiratory infections, stomatitis, and cystitis requiring frequent antibiotic treatment. Laboratory findings indicated a T2-high asthma phenotype, with elevated serum total IgE specific IgE to dog hair and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. Immunological evaluation revealed decreased serum IgG (including IgG1 and IgG2), along with hypogammaglobulinemia. She had been treated with regular anti-IgE antibody therapy and intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IVIGRT). The second case of a 38-year-old with Behçet’s disease and uveitis had bronchial asthma and rhinitis that were exacerbated by recurrent infections despite standard asthma therapy. Laboratory findings revealed a T2-low phenotype and a marked reduction in serum IgG (including IgG1, IgG2, and IgG4), and hypogammaglobulinemia, consistent with CVID.IVIGRT effectively reduced asthma exacerbations and infection episodes in both cases. These cases highlight the clinical heterogeneity of CVID and its potential overlap with allergic and autoimmune diseases. Immunological evaluation of underlying immunodeficiency should be considered in adult patients with asthma who present with frequent exacerbations and recurrent infections. Early diagnosis and IVIGRT can prevent complications and improve outcomes.

Purpose: Asthma is characterized by chronic type 2/eosinophilic inflammation in the airway mucosa. This study aimed to explore the clinical value of 2 cutoffs of blood eosinophil counts (≥ 300/μL and ≥ 150/μL) in eosinophilic asthma, with relation to eosinophilderived neurotoxin (EDN), a surrogate marker of eosinophilic activity. Methods: To compare clinical features and eosinophil-related mediators according to 2 cutoffs of peripheral blood eosinophil counts (≥ 300/μL and ≥ 150/μL), 137 adult asthmatics who had maintained antiasthmatic medications, including inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta 2 agonist, without biologics, were enrolled. EDN levels in serum, urine and sputum were measured by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay. Results: Patients with asthma and higher blood eosinophil counts ( ≥ 300/μL) had a higher prevalence of severe asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, partly controlled/uncontrolled status, and higher levels of sputum eosinophils and EDN in serum/sputum than those with lower blood eosinophil counts (< 300/μL). When compared between patients with asthma having higher blood eosinophils ( ≥ 150/μL) and those with lower eosinophils ( < 150/μL), there were no differences in symptom severity, control status or lung function parameters. Conclusion These findings suggest that blood eosinophil count ≥ 300/μL may identify asthma patients at higher risk for severity and heightened eosinophil activity, supporting its utility as a biomarker in a real clinical setting.

Primary antibody deficiency (PAD) is the most common form of primary immunodeficiency (PID) in adults, although the overall prevalence remains low. Recent studies have suggested a rising incidence due to changes in environmental factors and increased awareness. PID typically presents with recurrent upper and lower respiratory tract infections but may also be associated with allergic and autoimmune diseases, resulting in various clinical manifestations. This report presents three representative adult cases of PAD— X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA), common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), and IgG3 subclass deficiency (IgG3D) with bronchial asthma—offering insights into their diagnosis and long-term management. These cases emphasize the need to suspect XLA in patients with recurrent pneumonia and bronchiectasis, to recognize chronic severe urticaria as a potential clinical clue for CVID, and to evaluate IgG3D in asthma patients with frequent viral infections despite standard care. Through these examples, this clinical insight underscores the importance of early suspicion of PID, comprehensive immunological evaluation and individualized treatment strategies in improving outcomes for adult PID patients.

Tuberculosis remains one of the leading causes of death from infectious diseases worldwide, and its effective treatment requires prolonged multidrug regimens. Hypersensitivity reactions to antituberculosis drugs (ATDs) can significantly compromise treatment outcomes. These reactions range from mild skin eruptions to severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. The most frequently implicated agents are pyrazinamide, rifampin, isoniazid, and ethambutol, which are often associated with multiple drug hypersensitivity.Diagnostic tools such as patch testing, intradermal testing, and lymphocyte transformation tests may aid in identifying the culprit drug, but their sensitivity and specificity are limited. In cases of SCARs, immediate discontinuation of the offending agent is essential, and systemic corticosteroids may be effective in moderate to severe cases. Reintroduction of ATDs may be attempted through drug rechallenge or desensitization. Although drug reintroduction was traditionally contraindicated in patients with SCARs, recent reports have demonstrated successful desensitization when performed cautiously with informed consent. Breakthrough reactions may occur during desensitization, but they are often manageable with dose or interval adjustments. The development of standardized desensitization protocols for ATD-induced hypersensitivity remains an important future objective. In addition, ATDs can also induce classical immediate-type reactions such as urticaria and angioedema. In rare cases, they may present as atypical non-IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, for which no definitive diagnostic tools are currently available. Severe reactions may occur upon re-administration and cannot be prevented by desensitization. Thus, careful differential diagnosis is essential and any form of re-exposure is strictly contraindicated.

Background: To investigate Korean neurologists' perceptions of the non-standard term ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ and their actual evaluation and management of such patients. Methods: We performed an anonymous web-based cross-sectional survey of board-certified Korean neurologists by Korean Society of Pain and Autonomic Disorders between August 13 and September 10, 2025. A questionnaire sent by e-mail asked about demographics, experience with patients labeled with ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo,’ use and perceived usefulness of autonomic function tests, the impact of coronavirus disease 2019, and opinions on terminology and the role of neurologists. Results: In total, 109 neurologists responded. Most reported that patients presenting for ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ were young or middle-aged adults and that their numbers had increased over the preceding 2 years. Referrals frequently originated from Korean medicine clinics and other non-neurology departments, often after stand-alone heart rate variability testing. Fatigue, orthostatic intolerance, palpitations, sweating abnormalities, gastrointestinal symptoms, and anxiety or insomnia were common, and autonomic testing was generally regarded as helpful. Eighty percent felt that the risks associated with ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ are overstated, and 95% preferred replacing the term with standardized expressions such as autonomic dysfunction. Conclusions Korean neurologists view ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ as an unrecognized and potentially misleading label and support society-led standardization of terminology and guidance to improve autonomic dysfunction care and resource use.