INTRODUCTION: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has revolutionised treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). While effective, its high cost and toxicities, such as fatigue and nausea, pose challenges. METHOD: Medical records from the Joint Breast Cancer Registry in Singapore were used to study MBC patients treated with T-DXd (February 2021-June 2024). This study was conducted to address whether reducing dose intensity and density may have an adverse effect on treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-seven MBC patients were treated with T-DXd, with a median age of 59 years. At the time of data cutoff, 32.1% of patients were still receiving T-DXd. Over half (54%) of the patients received treatment with an initial relative dose intensity (RDI) of <;85%. Overall median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was 8.1 months. rwPFS was similar between RDI groups (<85%: 8.7 months, <85%: 8.1 months, P=0.62). However, human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients showed significantly better rwPFS outcomes compared to HER2-low patients (8.8 versus 2.5 months, P<0.001). Only 16% with central nervous system (CNS) involvement had CNS progressive disease on treatment. No significant progression-free survival (PFS) differences were found between patients with or without CNS disease, regardless of RDI groups. Five patients (5.7%) developed interstitial lung disease (ILD), with 3 (3.4%) having grade 3 events. Two required high-dose steroids and none were rechallenged after ILD. There were no fatalities. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that reduced dose intensity and density had no significant impact on rwPFS or treatment-related toxicities. Furthermore, only 5.7% of patients developed ILD. T-Dxd provided good control of CNS disease, with 82% of patients achieving CNS disease control.
Humans ; Female ; Breast Neoplasms/mortality* ; Middle Aged ; Trastuzumab/adverse effects* ; Aged ; Adult ; Singapore/epidemiology* ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects* ; Camptothecin/adverse effects* ; Immunoconjugates/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Progression-Free Survival ; Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism* ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Treatment Outcome ; Registries

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a promising class of targeted cancer therapeutics that combine the specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the potency of cytotoxic payloads. Despite their therapeutic potential, the use of ADCs faces significant challenges, including off/on-target toxicity and resistance development. This review examines the current landscape of ADC development, focusing on the critical aspects of target selection and antibody engineering. We discuss strategies to increase ADC efficacy and safety, including multitarget approaches, pH-dependent antibodies, and masked peptide technologies. The importance of comprehensive antigen expression profiling in both tumor and normal tissues is emphasized, highlighting the role of advanced technologies, such as single-cell sequencing and artificial intelligence, in optimizing target selection. Furthermore, we explore combination therapies and innovations in linker‒payload chemistry, which may provide approaches for expanding the therapeutic window of ADCs. These advances pave the way for the development of more precise and effective cancer treatments, potentially extending ADC applications beyond oncology.
Humans ; Immunoconjugates/adverse effects* ; Neoplasms/immunology* ; Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use*

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a class of targeted biological agents that link cytotoxic drugs to monoclonal antibodies through linkers. The monoclonal antibody targets tumor cells and transports small-molecule cytotoxic drugs for specific delivery and minimal off-target side effects. September 30, 2022, 14 anti-tumor ADC drugs have been approved for marketing in the world, and four ADCs have been approved in China. With the improvement of the clinical accessibility of ADC drugs, clinicians urgently need to understand the molecular characteristics and mechanisms of ADCs, and clarify the indications for rational use of drugs. Patients' survival mainly depends on the appropriate dose and course of treatment and also on proper management of adverse reactions. In view of this, on the basis of the "Expert Consensus on the Clinical Application of Antibody-drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Malignant Tumors (2020 edition)" , Professional Committee on Clinical Research of Oncology Drugs, Chinese Anti-Cancer Association fully combines the existing clinical research evidence and the feasibility of current ADC drugs in China to update the consensus content. This consensus aims to provide a systematic overview of ADC drugs, so as to provide practical and effective suggestions and references for clinicians to apply and manage ADC drugs more accurately.
Humans ; Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use* ; Consensus ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects* ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use*

As a newly emerged class of anticancer bioagents in the most precise and selectively targeted way, antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) combines the cancer-targeting abilities of monoclonal antibodies with the cytotoxicity potency of payload, delivering highly cytotoxic drug into tumors via 'targeted chemotherapy'. ADC has revolutionized the treatment landscape of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive and triple negative subtypes in breast cancer. Three ADCs have been approved by U. S. Food and Drug Administration with breast cancer indications, including trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; also approved in China), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) and sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132; also approved in China). Antibodies, cytotoxic drug, linker, and conjugation process are implicated in ADC profile, resulting in unique adverse drug reactions and toxicity heterogeneity within ADC class. For example, more attention should be paid to the management of thrombocytopenia, hepatotoxicity, and reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine; clinical physicians should pay attention to the risk of neutropenia, interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis, and reductions in LVEF when treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan; sacituzumab govitecan most frequently caused neutropenia, anemia and diarrhea requiring close monitor. ADC has generally favorable safety profiles, and dose modifications and/or symptomatic supporting treatment are effective in terms of toxicity management. This consensus aims at providing guidance for clinical oncologists of early detection, regular assessment, timely management and follow-up monitor of ADC-associated adverse reactions/events.
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine/therapeutic use* ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use* ; Breast Neoplasms/therapy* ; Camptothecin/adverse effects* ; Consensus ; Cytotoxins/therapeutic use* ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use* ; Neutropenia/etiology* ; Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism* ; Trastuzumab/therapeutic use* ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/therapy* ; Ventricular Function, Left

Antibodies, Monoclonal ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects* ; Bendamustine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Immunoconjugates/adverse effects* ; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy* ; Rituximab/adverse effects*

English articles on abatacept, golimumab, and tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis published between 2002 and 2009 were reviewed systematically. All randomized clinical trials, open-label extensions, meta-analyses, and reviews were examined. There were thirteen articles on abatacept, four on golimumab, and seven on tocilizumab. All three drugs were effective in methotrexate-naive, methotrexate-incomplete responders, and tumor-necrosis-factor-failure rheumatoid arthritis patients. Of the three, only abatacept has been tested in a head-to-head trial with infliximab, in which it was found to be equivalent to infliximab. Golimumab resulted in a more modest improvement than the others in methotrexate-naive patients, although no direct comparisons among the three drugs were possible or appropriate. Descriptive analysis of adverse events showed that patients receiving abatacept, golimumab, and tocilizumab were subject to more adverse events than controls overall, as expected. In the abatacept studies, a few cases of tuberculosis, more cardiovascular events and gastrointestinal bleedings and more basal cell carcinoma were seen. Golimumab was associated with more skin rashes and pneumonia, while tocilizumab was associated with increased lipids, more liver-function abnormalities, and neutropenia. These new medications are useful additions to the rheumatologic armamentarium and represent greater convenience (golimumab) or different mechanisms of action (abatacept and tocilizumab) than tumor-necrosis-factor inhibitors for treating rheumatoid arthritis. As expected, some adverse events occur when using these drugs and patients need to be watched carefully.
Antibodies, Monoclonal/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Antirheumatic Agents/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid/*drug therapy ; Biological Therapy ; Humans ; Immunoconjugates/*administration & dosage/adverse effects

Rheumatoid arthritis is a common and potentially devastating condition which did not have good treatment options until recently. Pharmacological treatment should not just comprise antiinflammatory agents and corticosteroids. The current therapeutic approach is to start a disease modifying agent early in the illness to prevent eventual joint damage. Older disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) include methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine. Newer ones such as leflunomide and cyclosporine are also used. A recent advance in the management of rheumatoid arthritis is the use of biological agents which block certain key molecules involved in the pathogenesis of the illness. They include tumour necrosis factor (TNF)- blocking agents such as infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab, the anti-CD 20 agent rituximab and CTLA-4 Ig abatacept. Other agents which are in development include anti-IL6 tocilizumab, anti-CD22 and anti-lymphostat B. In this review, the efficacy and side effects of these agents, their impact on current clinical practice and future trends are discussed.
Abatacept ; Antibodies, Monoclonal ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; Antirheumatic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; immunology ; therapy ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Immunoconjugates ; therapeutic use ; Immunologic Factors ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Methotrexate ; therapeutic use ; Remission Induction ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha ; antagonists & inhibitors