Humans ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 ; Hypoglycemia/chemically induced* ; Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects* ; China ; Blood Glucose ; Insulin

Humans ; Glycated Hemoglobin ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 ; Blood Glucose ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

INTRODUCTION

Demyelinating central nervous system (CNS) disorders such as transverse myelitis (TM) and multiple sclerosis (MS) have been reported with mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. Some cases were relapses of a pre-existing condition but de novo and initial presentation of MS after BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine has very rarely been documented.

We report a 72-year-old female, right-handed, Filipina, with a one-month history of bilateral lower extremity weakness which occurred 7 days after she received her first booster dose of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. This was later accompanied by fecal and urinary incontinence. On examination, she had motor deficit below L1 myotome manifesting with loss of hip flexion, knee extension, dorsiflexion, and plantar flexion. There was also sensory deficit below T10 level with relative 80% sensation of vibratio, proprioception, light touch and complete loss of pain and temperature sensation. The initial impression was Transverse Myelitis which may be related to a post-vaccination state. Spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed long segment enhancing T2W hyperintense lesion at T2 to T7. Cranial MRI revealed ovoid areas of heterogeneous, predominantly T2/FLAIR hyperintense signals exhibiting restricted diffusion in the periventricular white matter of the fronto-parietal lobes. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis was negative for infectious causes such as tuberculosis but with high levels of CSF immunoglobulin G. She was then diagnosed to have Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and was treated with high dose oral prednisone. However, there was no improvement in neurological deficits on follow-up.

This case adds to the reported rare cases of initial presentation of MS occurring after vaccination for COVID-19 and the first reported case in the Philippines. Early recognition and prompt treatment is important to improve outcomes.

Humans ; Adult ; Consensus ; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin ; Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma ; T-Lymphocytes ; China

Humans ; Child, Preschool ; Insulin/therapeutic use* ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Blood Glucose

Humans ; Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia/genetics* ; East Asian People ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Lymphoma

Humans ; Herpesvirus 3, Human ; Myelitis, Transverse/complications* ; Guillain-Barre Syndrome/complications* ; Herpes Zoster/complications* ; Varicella Zoster Virus Infection/complications*

Adult ; Humans ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 ; Nutritional Status ; Blood Glucose ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Insulin

BACKGROUND: There is still uncertainty regarding whether diabetes mellitus (DM) can adversely affect patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for carotid stenosis. The aim of the study was to assess the adverse impact of DM on patients with carotid stenosis treated by CEA. METHODS: Eligible studies published between 1 January 2000 and 30 March 2023 were selected from the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials databases. The short-term and long-term outcomes of major adverse events (MAEs), death, stroke, the composite outcomes of death/stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) were collected to calculate the pooled effect sizes (ESs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and prevalence of adverse outcomes. Subgroup analysis by asymptomatic/symptomatic carotid stenosis and insulin/noninsulin-dependent DM was performed. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies (n = 122,003) were included. Regarding the short-term outcomes, DM was associated with increased risks of MAEs (ES = 1.52, 95% CI: [1.15-2.01], prevalence = 5.1%), death/stroke (ES = 1.61, 95% CI: [1.13-2.28], prevalence = 2.3%), stroke (ES = 1.55, 95% CI: [1.16-1.55], prevalence = 3.5%), death (ES = 1.70, 95% CI: [1.25-2.31], prevalence =1.2%), and MI (ES = 1.52, 95% CI: [1.15-2.01], prevalence = 1.4%). DM was associated with increased risks of long-term MAEs (ES = 1.24, 95% CI: [1.04-1.49], prevalence = 12.2%). In the subgroup analysis, DM was associated with an increased risk of short-term MAEs, death/stroke, stroke, and MI in asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA and with only short-term MAEs in the symptomatic patients. Both insulin- and noninsulin-dependent DM patients had an increased risk of short-term and long-term MAEs, and insulin-dependent DM was also associated with the short-term risk of death/stroke, death, and MI. CONCLUSIONS In patients with carotid stenosis treated by CEA, DM is associated with short-term and long-term MAEs. DM may have a greater impact on adverse outcomes in asymptomatic patients after CEA. Insulin-dependent DM may have a more significant impact on post-CEA adverse outcomes than noninsulin-dependent DM. Whether DM management could reduce the risk of adverse outcomes after CEA requires further investigation.
Humans ; Endarterectomy, Carotid/adverse effects* ; Carotid Stenosis/surgery* ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Time Factors ; Stents/adverse effects* ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications* ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 ; Stroke/complications* ; Insulin/therapeutic use* ; Myocardial Infarction/complications* ; Risk Assessment

Humans ; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen ; T-Lymphocytes ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy* ; Prognosis ; Immunotherapy, Adoptive ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell ; Recurrence