1.Distinct Contributions of Alpha and Beta Oscillations to Context-Dependent Visual Size Perception.
Neuroscience Bulletin 2024;40(12):1875-1885
Previous studies have proposed two cognitive mechanisms responsible for the Ebbinghaus illusion effect, i.e., contour interaction and size contrast. However, the neural underpinnings of these two mechanisms are largely unexplored. The present study introduced binocular depth to the Ebbinghaus illusion configuration and made the central target appear either in front of or behind the surrounding inducers in order to disturb size contrast instead of contour interaction. The results showed that the illusion effect, though persisted, was significantly reduced under the binocular depth conditions. Notably, the target with a larger perceived size reduced early alpha-band power (8-13 Hz, 0-100 ms after stimulus onset) at centroparietal sites irrespective of the relative depth of the target and the inducers, with the parietal alpha power negatively correlated with the illusion effect. Moreover, the target with a larger perceived size increased the occipito-parietal beta-band power (14-25 Hz, 200-300 ms after stimulus onset) under the no-depth condition, and the beta power was positively correlated with the illusion effect when the depth conditions were subtracted from the no-depth condition. The findings provided neurophysiological evidence in favor of the two cognitive mechanisms of the Ebbinghaus illusion by revealing that early alpha power is associated with low-level contour interaction and late beta power is linked to high-level size contrast, supporting the claim that neural oscillations at distinct frequency bands dynamically support different aspects of visual processing.
Humans
;
Alpha Rhythm/physiology*
;
Female
;
Male
;
Size Perception/physiology*
;
Young Adult
;
Adult
;
Beta Rhythm/physiology*
;
Photic Stimulation/methods*
;
Illusions/physiology*
;
Optical Illusions/physiology*
;
Depth Perception/physiology*
2.Effect of practice versus information on the visual illusion.
Abbas A KHORASANI ; Javad S FADARDI ; Marziyeh S FADARDI ; W Miles COX ; Jafar T SHARIF
Neuroscience Bulletin 2007;23(1):30-34
OBJECTIVEThe Muller-Lyer illusion is a visual illusion in which a horizontal shaft with an inward-pointing chevron (fins-out) affixed to each end is perceived longer than a shaft with outward-pointing chevrons (fins-in). The goal of this study was to compare the effects of experience and knowledge about the Muller-Lyer illusion on participants' perceptual precision.
METHODSParticipants were undergraduate students (n = 108) who were not familiar with the Muller-Lyer illusion prior to the experiment. The task of participants was to adjust one movable line to make it equal to the other in Muller-Lyer figure. They received ascending and descending Muller-Lyer trials in three blocks with 20 trials each. The Experimental Group received information about the Muller-Lyer illusion prior to the third block.
RESULTSFor the Experimental Group, the amount of departure in Block 3 was reduced significantly compared with previous blocks.
CONCLUSIONKnowledge about the mechanisms underlying visual illusions may play an important role in helping individuals overcome them.
Adult ; Brain ; physiology ; Cognition ; physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Illusions ; physiology ; Learning ; physiology ; Male ; Models, Neurological ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Orientation ; physiology ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Sex Characteristics ; Visual Perception ; physiology

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail