1.A Case of Long-term Follow-up After Vitrectomy of Epiretinal Membrane with Coats Disease: Case Report
Journal of Retina 2026;11(1):83-89
Purpose:
To report a stable long-term course after vitrectomy of epiretinal membrane associated with Coats disease.Case summary: A 60-year-old female patient visited our clinic for visual discomfort. She was diagnosed with an epiretinal membrane and macular edema associated with Coats disease. Vitrectomy, epiretinal membrane peeling, inner limiting membrane peeling, phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation and laser photocoagulation were performed. Two months after vitrectomy, uncorrected visual acuity (VA) improved to 0.5, and four months later, VA improved to 0.8. There continued to be gradual improvement, and at 13 months, few exudates were observed in the macula, and VA was measured as 1.0. At 21 months postoperative, new telangiectatic lesions and macular edema were found, so laser photocoagulation and intravitreal bevacizumab injection were performed again. One month later, due to decreased VA to 0.4 and increased subretinal fluid, fluorescein angiography was done, followed by laser photocoagulation and intravitreal bevacizumab injection. At 2 years postoperatively, subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid were absorbed, macular edema decreased, and VA was restored to 1.0.
Conclusions
In an epiretinal membrane associated with Coats disease, vitrectomy can be an effective treatment method. However, continuous follow-up and appropriate treatment are required even after surgery
2.Characteristics of Unexposed Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: An Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study
Hyunyeon KIM ; Donghun LEE ; Sook Hyun YOON ; Geun Woo LEE
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2023;64(3):194-203
Purpose:
To compare optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) findings between severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and unexposed proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and identify predictive factors.
Methods:
Patients newly diagnosed with severe NPDR or unexposed PDR between January 2018 and December 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Unexposed PDR was diagnosed using fluorescein fundus angiography, because new vessels could not be observed in the poster pole or clearly distinguished in the retinal periphery on wide fundus photography. Clinical features at the time of diagnosis, and OCTA measurements (mean vascular density, superficial capillary plexus (SCP) foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, and mean retinal thickness), were compared between the two groups. Factors that could predict unexposed PDR were investigated using multivariate analysis with a generalized estimating equation.
Results:
A total of 61 severe NPDR and 23 unexposed PDR eyes were included. The unexposed PDR had significantly larger SCP-FAZ areas (p = 0.031) and lower total and parafoveal mean inner retinal thicknesses (p = 0.014 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, there were no differences in mean vascular density between the groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that SCP-FAZ area and parafoveal mean inner retinal thickness were significant predictors of unexposed PDR (p = 0.027 and p = 0.001, respectively).
Conclusions
In severe NPDR patients, unexposed PDR may be considered a differential diagnosis when the SCP-FAZ area is large or the parafoveal mean inner retinal thickness is small.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail