Background: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by erythema, papules, ocular symptoms, and heightened sensitivity. Patients with neurogenic symptoms such as burning or stinging remain particularly difficult to manage. Current guidelines often underrepresent energy-based devices (EBDs), pigmentary sequelae, psychosocial burden, and ocular comorbidities. Objective: To examine Korean dermatologists’ expert perspectives on rosacea management, focusing on skin sensitivity, neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary changes, psychosocial impact, ocular involvement, and EBD use. Methods: A web-based, 29-item survey was administered to 25 board-certified Korean dermatologists (May–June 2025). Quantitative and qualitative responses were analyzed. Results: Erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular phenotypes with sensitivity skin predominated. EBDs (pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light) were frequently used but limited by cost and sensitivity issues. Neurogenic symptoms were recognized but rarely treated with neuromodulators. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was infrequent, yet monitoring was inconsistent.Psychosocial and ocular aspects were acknowledged but seldomly systematically addressed.Respondents expressed interest in emerging adjunctive treatments such as cold plasma, skin boosters, and holistic care approaches. Conclusion Korean dermatologists adopt individualized strategies for rosacea, yet practice gaps remain regarding neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary complications, and psychosocial and ocular comorbidities. Findings support the need for updated multidisciplinary, phenotype-driven guidelines aligned with real-world practice.

This study was performed to evaluate the factors influencing the Quality of Life(QOL) in hemodialysis patients. Authors surveyed and analyzed the questionnaires about social characteristics, symptom, social support, satisfaction with life and quality of life. With these questionnaires, authors compared the hemodialysis patients(N=240, >6 month with hemodialysis) with the control group(N=240). Additionally authors eva- luated the anemia state, nutritional state and dialysis effect, and then analyzed the correlation between these laboratory findings and quality of life in hemodialysis patients. The results were as follows ; 1) The mean age of control group was 33.4 +/- 8.2 yrs, and the patients group was 48.812yrs. 2) Of 294 patients, 73 had the religion(75.2%), 173 had studied above high school(58.8%), 211 were married(71.8%), and 94 were homemaker(3296). Economically, 130 of 294 patients(44.2M) were the middle classes. The patients without occupation were 121 of 294 patients(41.2M), while those with occupation were 77(26.1%) and remainder were housemaker. The patients with medical insurance were 59.9%, those with 1st Medicaid were 22.4%, and those with 2nd Medicaid were 17%. 3) The causes of ESRD were CGN(29.5%), DM (22.3%), etc. Total duration of hemodialysis was 51.4 43.8 months in average, and weekly hemodialysis time was 11.541.98 hours in average. Average BMI was 20.6 +/- 2.79, and in 236 of 294 patients(80.1%), EPO was injected. Of all the complication, 96(32.9%) was cardiovascular problem. Iron storage state was relatively good in all the patients, and the mean level of PTH-i was 174.3 +/- 307.9pg/dl, hemoglobin 8.5 +/- 1.3g/dl, cholesterol 161.536.6mg/dl, total protein 6.60.5g/dl, albumin 3.960.4g/dl. The URR was 65.36.9%, and KtV was 1.3 +/- 0.3. The comparison about laboratory finding between male and female was as followed; Hb. and albumin level was signifi- cantly higher in male compared with female patients, and cholesterol, URR and Kt/V was significantly higher in female than in male. 4) The result of statistic analysis about several variables and Questionnaires. (1) The subjective and objective instrument about QOL showed positive correlation, and the QOL was correlated positively to symptom, physical health state and social support. (2) Of social characteristics, the direct influencing factors for QOL were occupation, economic state, marriage state, and educational state, whereas in- direct factors were a fee for medical treatment and social support. In clinical and laboratory characteristics, the significant factors were age, DM, symptoms, albumin, pre-dialytic creatinine, sodium and calcium. The effect of dialysis did not correlate with QOL. In conclusion, to increase QOL in dialysis pa- tients, all of the community, family, and medical team should make an effort. Firsty, the concern and the support of the community about the dialysis patients should be promoted in social welfare and the opportunity of employment. Secondly, the patients should promote the self-reliance and self- efficacy to take a share of their role in the community and a family by their own efforts. Lastly, the medical team should make an effort to decrease the symptom, to correct the anemia and malnutrition, to treat the complication, and to promote the physical activity. Through these efforts, the health of patients will be elevated. Elevation of the patient's health will increase the possibility of employment and self-reliance, and subsequently will increase the economics. If so, the burden of a fee for the medical treatment will be reduced. Additionally, if social and familial support increase, the QOL of the dialysis patients will be better.
Anemia ; Calcium ; Cholesterol ; Creatinine ; Dialysis ; Employment ; Fees and Charges ; Female ; Humans ; Insurance ; Iron ; Kidney Failure, Chronic ; Male ; Malnutrition ; Marriage ; Medicaid ; Motor Activity ; Occupations ; Quality of Life* ; Renal Dialysis* ; Social Welfare ; Sociology ; Sodium ; Surveys and Questionnaires