Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) were more susceptible to poor outcomes owing to respiratory muscle weakness and immunotherapy. Several studies conducted in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic reported higher mortality in patients with MG compared to the general population. This study aimed to investigate the clinical course and prognosis of COVID-19 in patients with MG and to compare these parameters between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in South Korea. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study, which was conducted at 14 tertiary hospitals in South Korea, reviewed the medical records and identified MG patients who contracted COVID-19 between February 2022 and April 2022. The demographic and clinical characteristics associated with MG and vaccination status were collected. The clinical outcomes of COVID-19 infection and MG were investigated and compared between the vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Results: Ninety-two patients with MG contracted COVID-19 during the study. Nine (9.8%) patients required hospitalization, 4 (4.3%) of whom were admitted to the intensive care unit. Seventy-five of 92 patients were vaccinated before contracting COVID-19 infection, and 17 were not. During the COVID-19 infection, 6 of 17 (35.3%) unvaccinated patients were hospitalized, whereas 3 of 75 (4.0%) vaccinated patients were hospitalized (P < 0.001). The frequencies of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation were significantly lower in the vaccinated patients than in the unvaccinated patients (P = 0.019 and P = 0.032, respectively). The rate of MG deterioration was significantly lower in the vaccinated patients than in the unvaccinated patients (P = 0.041). Logistic regression after weighting revealed that the risk of hospitalization and MG deterioration after COVID-19 infection was significantly lower in the vaccinated patients than in the unvaccinated patients. Conclusion This study suggests that the clinical course and prognosis of patients with MG who contracted COVID-19 during the dominance of the omicron variant of COVID-19 may be milder than those at the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic when vaccination was unavailable. Vaccination may reduce the morbidity of COVID-19 in patients with MG and effectively prevent MG deterioration induced by COVID-19 infection.

Background: This study aimed to differentiate video nystagmography (VNG) characteristics, including the video head impulse test (vHIT), in patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement behavior disorder (RBD) from healthy controls, which is considered a precursor to degenerative diseases. Methods: One hundred eighty-five patients underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) and VNG. Based on overnight PSG, 27 patients with RBD or REM sleep without atonia (RWA) and AHI<15 were categorized into the RBD group, 34 patients with RBD/RWA and AHI≥15 were grouped into the combined group. Sixty patients with AHI≥15 and no RBD/RWA were included in the obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) group, and 64 negative participants were assigned to the control group. In VNG, we measured the gain of vHIT in each canal, with the latency, amplitude, and velocity of horizontal saccades and smooth pursuit. We compared the results between groups using ANOVA, after normalization and adjustment for age and sex. Results: The gain of vHIT in the left horizontal canal was decreased in the RBD group, but it was more pronounced in the OSA group. Elevated gain of the left posterior canal was seen in the RBD group, but technical errors were attributable. The RBD group displayed prolonged latency of saccade on the left side and slowed saccade on the right side, but these were statistically insignificant. Conclusions The VNG study revealed differences between the sleep disorders, potentially reflecting brainstem function in each disorder. However, these differences lacked statistical significance. We anticipate that significant results could be obtained with more controlled conditions.

Purpose: This quasi-experimental single group study aimed to confirm the effects of discharge education using a systematic discharge education program on anxiety and parenting confidence in mothers of premature babies. Methods: This study conducted discharge education for 3 to 5 days prior to the discharge of 29 mothers of premature babies born in the neonatal intensive care unit. Data were collected between April 1, 2021, to June 30, 2021, and were examined. The hypotheses were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Discharge education using a systematic discharge education program was effective in increasing the parenting confidence of mothers with premature babies (z=-3.839, p<0.001). However, it was not effective in reducing anxiety (z=-1.712, p=0.087). Conclusion The effects of the systematic discharge education program development and discharge education systematized discharge nursing education, reduced mothers’ anxiety in raising premature babies at home after discharge, and contributed to improving parenting confidence.

This study aims to examine the clinical differences between objective short sleep insomniacs (OSSI) and subjective short sleep insomniacs (SSSI). Methods: We enrolled 79 patients (aged 27–74 years) with chronic insomnia disorder (CID) who underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) and completed sleep-related questionnaires as well as habitual sleep time. All of them completed actigraphy (ACT) recording for one week prior to the PSG study. Objective sleep duration for one-week average sleep was calculated by ACT, and subjective sleep duration was counted through self-reported habitual sleep time. We divided the subjects into three groups; OSSI (<6 hight), SSSI (objective sleep ≥6 hight and subjective sleep <6 h/ night), and normal sleep duration insomniacs (NSDI, subjective sleep ≥6 hight). Results: The three groups namely OSSI, SSSI, and NSDI had 25 (31.6%), 36 (45.6%), and 18 (22.8%) subjects, respectively. The SSSI were significantly older and had higher daytime sleepiness than the OSSI. According to the PSG results, the OSSI showed shorter sleep latency (11.86 min vs. 39.69 min) and N2 sleep % (59.43% vs. 67.96%), and longer rapid eye movement sleep % (20.79% vs. 15.47%) than that in the NSDI. There was no difference in treatment response between groups. Conclusions: 45.6% of CID patients underestimated their sleep relative to objective sleep. However, there were no differences in total sleep time on PSG between groups. The OSSI showed younger age and more daytime sleepiness, and the SSSI showed poorer sleep quality than the NSDI. These findings suggest that long-term ACT recording in a casual environment would be useful to monitor objective sleep in patients with CID, particularly, in subjectively short sleep insomniacs.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate dizziness in patients with sleep disorders, objectively identify vestibular function through the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) using the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT), and evaluate the association between these findings. Methods: Among the patients who visited the sleep clinic from June to October 2021, 69 who underwent both polysomnography (PSG) and vHIT were included. Participants completed questionnaires including the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Beck Anxiety Inventory, Korean-Beck Depression Inventory-II, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The subjects were classified into four groups: insomnia (n=4), rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) (n=13), obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) (n=34), and RBD and OSAS (n=18). Moderate to severe OSAS (n=49) was compared with no OSAS and mild OSAS (n=20). Results: In comparison of the four groups according to sleep disorders, the OSAS patients showed the highest DHI scores and the lowest VOR gain, but statistical significance was not found. Although all VOR gains were within the normal range, the VOR gain of the left posterior semicircular canal was significantly lower in the moderate to severe OSA group than in the no OSA and mild OSA groups (1.02±0.18 vs. 0.94±0.10, p=0.019). DHI total scores showed no correlation with VOR gain but showed a positive correlation with ISI (r=0.422, p=0.001) and PSQI (r=0.287, p=0.022). Among PSG parameters, lowest oxygen saturation (SaO2) and percentage of time with SaO2 less than 90% were correlated with the emotional score of DHI (r=-0.245, p=0.043 and r=0.311, p=0.010, respectively). Conclusions Although our study could not objectively confirm vestibular dysfunction in patients with sleep disorders, we found that subjective sleep complaints were associated with dizziness and hypoxic conditions during sleep were associated with emotional aspects of dizziness. This suggests that the treatment of concomitant sleep disorders may improve dizziness.

Objectives: Light at night (LAN) can suppress melatonin secretion and thus disturb normal sleep. The aim of this study was to investigate how the illumination of a smartphone at bedtime affects the circadian rhythm and sleep in patients with insomnia. Methods: We recruited two middle-aged patients (one day worker and one shift worker) with insomnia. They used a smartphone more than 12 hours a day, particularly at bedtime. This was a crossover design study, and each patient spent a night at the light control unit twice at a one-week interval, with or without smartphone use. Patients were instructed to look at a smartphone (5–10 lux) under 150 lux of ceiling illumination from 18:00 until lights-off. During the night, without a smartphone, they read a book or newspaper. Saliva was collected every 30 minutes and analyzed for melatonin. Sleep was monitored by polysomnography. Results: The day worker showed a delayed dim light melatonin onset time (DLMO) (21:30 vs. 22:00) and a 38.7% decrease in melatonin levels with smartphone use. For the shift worker, both melatonin and cortisol showed abnormal patterns, and thus DLMO was not determined in either condition. In the day worker, shorter rapid eye movement (REM) latency and increased REM were observed with smartphone use. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the use of smartphones at bedtime acutely suppresses melatonin secretion and delays the sleep-wake cycle. However, the effect of LAN on melatonin secretion was not apparent in the shift worker with already misaligned circadian rhythm.

Objective: Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) emit less blue light than traditional light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and we previously found that early-night OLED light exposure (LE) delays the melatonin phase by less than LED at a color temperature of 4,000 K. As a follow-up study, we investigated the effects of OLED and LED at a different color temperature (3,000 K) on melatonin profile, sleep, and vigilance. Methods: 24 healthy subjects (27.5±5.1 years) were exposed to three light conditions [OLED, LED, and dim light (DL)] from 17:30 to 24:00, in a random order and with a 1-week interval. Saliva samples for melatonin were taken every hour from 18:00 to 24:00. Polysomnography (PSG) and a psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) were performed. Results: Melatonin onset time was significantly delayed under OLED and LED compared with DL, with no significant difference between OLED and LED. The mean melatonin level at 24:00 under LED was lower than that under DL, but there was no significant difference between OLED LE and DL. The percentage of slow wave sleep (N3) in LED was significantly lower than in OLED. Conclusion Exposure to light in the evening can suppress melatonin secretion late at night and disturb deep sleep, and those effects are slightly worse under LED than OLED.

Objective: Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) emit less blue light than traditional light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and we previously found that early-night OLED light exposure (LE) delays the melatonin phase by less than LED at a color temperature of 4,000 K. As a follow-up study, we investigated the effects of OLED and LED at a different color temperature (3,000 K) on melatonin profile, sleep, and vigilance. Methods: 24 healthy subjects (27.5±5.1 years) were exposed to three light conditions [OLED, LED, and dim light (DL)] from 17:30 to 24:00, in a random order and with a 1-week interval. Saliva samples for melatonin were taken every hour from 18:00 to 24:00. Polysomnography (PSG) and a psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) were performed. Results: Melatonin onset time was significantly delayed under OLED and LED compared with DL, with no significant difference between OLED and LED. The mean melatonin level at 24:00 under LED was lower than that under DL, but there was no significant difference between OLED LE and DL. The percentage of slow wave sleep (N3) in LED was significantly lower than in OLED. Conclusion Exposure to light in the evening can suppress melatonin secretion late at night and disturb deep sleep, and those effects are slightly worse under LED than OLED.

Objectives: Light at night (LAN) can suppress melatonin secretion and thus disturb normal sleep. The aim of this study was to investigate how the illumination of a smartphone at bedtime affects the circadian rhythm and sleep in patients with insomnia. Methods: We recruited two middle-aged patients (one day worker and one shift worker) with insomnia. They used a smartphone more than 12 hours a day, particularly at bedtime. This was a crossover design study, and each patient spent a night at the light control unit twice at a one-week interval, with or without smartphone use. Patients were instructed to look at a smartphone (5–10 lux) under 150 lux of ceiling illumination from 18:00 until lights-off. During the night, without a smartphone, they read a book or newspaper. Saliva was collected every 30 minutes and analyzed for melatonin. Sleep was monitored by polysomnography. Results: The day worker showed a delayed dim light melatonin onset time (DLMO) (21:30 vs. 22:00) and a 38.7% decrease in melatonin levels with smartphone use. For the shift worker, both melatonin and cortisol showed abnormal patterns, and thus DLMO was not determined in either condition. In the day worker, shorter rapid eye movement (REM) latency and increased REM were observed with smartphone use. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the use of smartphones at bedtime acutely suppresses melatonin secretion and delays the sleep-wake cycle. However, the effect of LAN on melatonin secretion was not apparent in the shift worker with already misaligned circadian rhythm.